In:
Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 79, No. 4_Supplement ( 2019-02-15), p. PD9-02-PD9-02
Abstract:
Background: While great strides have been made in the treatment of ER+ MBC, therapeutic resistance is nearly universal. The genomic evolution of ER+ breast cancer in the metastatic setting under the selective pressure of multiple lines of therapies is not well understood. To address this, we analyzed the clonal dynamics of serial metastatic samples (mets) to evaluate how tumors evolve and to identify acquired resistance mechanisms. Methods: We performed WES on 462 clinically annotated samples from 208 patients (pts) with ER+ MBC, including 67 primary tumor biopsies, 229 metastatic biopsies and 160 blood samples (cfDNA). Pts with multiple mets included cases with temporally concordant metastatic tumor and blood samples (48 pts) and cases with serial mets obtained over the course of treatment in the metastatic setting (69 pts). Treatments given between the serial mets included CDK4/6 inhibitors (23 pts), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (19 pts), among others. Results: In the temporally-concordant mets, we found that cfDNA mutations (muts) largely overlap with muts found in tumor biopsies, capturing & gt;85% of clonal tumor muts. However, we observed a higher level of heterogeneity in cfDNA compared to biopsies (p.value & lt; 1.05e-19, Welch test) and a subset of high-confidence muts that were only detected in cfDNA, including in clinically important genes such as ESR1, PIK3CA, KRAS, and ERBB2. Analysis of serial mets was used to elucidate the evolutionary dynamics within the metastatic setting under the selective pressure of treatment. The median duration between mets was 112 days and the median number of inter-biopsy unique treatments was two. Most tumors continued to evolve within the metastatic setting, with 50 out of 69 pts (72%) acquiring a meaningful sub-clone (50% increase in relative cancer cell fraction) and 31 out of 69 (45%) acquiring muts in known cancer genes, including a subset acquiring a plausible resistance alteration such as alterations that dysregulate ER (5 out of 69 pts, 7%; ESR1 mut, FOXA1 amplification (amp), NCOR1 bi-allelic deletion (del)), ERBB (4%; ERBB2 amp, ERBB3 mut), RAS (4%; KRAS mut, NRAS amp, NF1 del), FGF/FGFR (12%; FGFR2 mut, FGFR1/2 amp, FGF3 amp), and cell cycle (13%; RB1 del, CDK4 amp, AURKA amp, CDKN2A del). Finally, in pts who had multiple mets, we observed several cases of evolutionary convergence toward equivalent resistance mechanisms including convergent RB1 loss as a mechanism of resistance to a CDK4/6 inhibitor and convergent BRCA2 reversion following resistance to a PARP inhibitor. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ER+ MBC continues to evolve under the selective pressure of treatments in the metastatic setting. These findings elucidate the challenge of studying high complexity and heavily treated tumors, while also highlighting some commonalities in the evolutionary trajectories selected by these treatments. The multiplicity of clinically relevant genomic alterations acquired in these advanced stages highlights the need for serial biopsies and the potential to inform post-progression therapeutic choices through targeting the acquired dependencies in post-progression tumors. Citation Format: Cohen O, Buendia-Buendia J, Wander S, Nayar U, Mao P, Waks A, Kim D, Freeman S, Adalsteinsson V, Helvie K, Livitz D, Rosebrock D, Leshchiner I, Dellostritto L, Garrido-Castro A, Jain E, Periyasamy S, Mackichan C, Lloyd M, Marini L, Krop I, Garraway L, Getz G, Winer E, Lin N, Wagle N. Evolutionary analysis of 462 serial metastatic biopsies from 208 patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) using whole exome sequencing (WES) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-02.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0008-5472
,
1538-7445
DOI:
10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-PD9-02
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2036785-5
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1432-1
detail.hit.zdb_id:
410466-3
Permalink
