GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (4)
  • 1
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 4 ( 2015-02-15), p. 730-738
    Abstract: Purpose: MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways play important roles in many tumors. In this study, safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of buparlisib (pan class PI3K inhibitor) and trametinib (MEK inhibitor) were evaluated. Experimental Design: This open-label, dose-finding, phase Ib study comprised dose escalation, followed by expansion part in patients with RAS- or BRAF-mutant non–small cell lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer. Results: Of note, 113 patients were enrolled, 66 and 47 in dose-escalation and -expansion parts, respectively. MTD was established as buparlisib 70 mg + trametinib 1.5 mg daily [5/15, 33% patients with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)] and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) buparlisib 60 mg + trametinib 1.5 mg daily (1/10, 10% patients with DLTs). DLTs included stomatitis (8/103, 8%), diarrhea, dysphagia, and creatine kinase (CK) increase (2/103, 2% each). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 73 patients (65%); mainly CK increase, stomatitis, AST/ALT (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) increase, and rash. For all (21) patients with ovarian cancer, overall response rate was 29% [1 complete response, 5 partial responses (PR)] , disease control rate 76%, and median progression-free survival was 7 months. Minimal activity was observed in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (1/17 PR) and pancreatic cancer (best overall response was SD). Relative to historical data, buparlisib exposure increased and trametinib exposure slightly increased with the combination. Conclusions: At RP2D, buparlisib 60 mg + trametinib 1.5 mg daily shows promising antitumor activity for patients with KRAS-mutant ovarian cancer. Long-term tolerability of the combination at RP2D is challenging, due to frequent dose interruptions and reductions for toxicity. Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 730–8. ©2014 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. PD10-06-PD10-06
    Abstract: Background: Young breast cancer patients (pts) carrying a germline BRCA mutation (mBRCA) have similar outcomes as non-carriers. However, there is currently lack of evidence regarding the impact of mBRCA type and hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of mBRCA breast cancer. We aim to address these questions in the largest dataset to date of young mBRCA breast cancer pts. Methods: This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Women harboring deleterious germline mBRCA1 or mBRCA2 that received a diagnosis of stage I-III invasive early breast cancer at age ≤40 years between January 2000 and December 2012 were included. Baseline pts, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pattern and risk over time of disease-free survival (DFS) events, and survival outcomes (DFS, distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI] and overall survival [OS] ) were compared between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts overall and by hormone receptor status. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard rates (HRs). Results: 1,236 young mBRCA breast cancer pts were included. Among 808 and 428 pts with mBRCA1 or mBRCA2, respectively, 191 (23.6%) and 356 (83.2%) had hormone receptor-positive tumors while 617 (76.4%) and 72 (16.8%) hormone receptor-negative disease (p & lt;0.001). Compared to mBRCA2 breast cancer pts, those with mBRCA1 were younger, more likely to have reported Jewish ancestry, had more grade 3 tumors, less nodal involvement, lobular histology and HER2 positivity, and received more frequently chemotherapy (all p & lt;0.001). More mBRCA1 pts with hormone receptor-positive tumors did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (14.7% vs. 4.2%, p & lt;0.001). No difference between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts was observed in risk-reducing mastectomy (43.9% vs. 46.0%; p=0.371) or salpingo-oophorectomy (48.3% vs. 48.8%; p=1.0). Median follow-up was 7.9 years (range 5.6-10.6 years). Second primary breast cancers (17.0% vs. 12.2%, p=0.025) and non-breast primary malignancies (4.3% vs. 1.9%, p=0.033) were more frequent among mBRCA1 pts compared to mBRCA2 pts, while distant recurrences were less frequent (10.4% vs. 15.4%, p=0.013). 8-year DFS was 62.8% and 65.9% for mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.96). The worse DFS in mBRCA1 was observed regardless of hormone receptor status (pinteraction=0.848): hormone receptor-positive (adjusted HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.58-1.03) and hormone receptor-negative (adjusted HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.13). No differences in DRFI and OS were observed between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts. Compared to pts with hormone receptor-negative disease, those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer had higher chances of developing distant (± loco-regional) recurrences (16.1% vs. 9.0%; p & lt;0.001) and less frequent second primary malignancies (BC: 12.1% vs. 17.9%, p=0.005; non-BC: 2.8% vs. 4.0%, p=0.216). No differences in DFS and OS were observed between pts with hormone receptor-positive or negative breast cancer. However, there was a trend towards worse DRFI in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer as compared to those with hormone receptor-negative disease (8-year DRFI: 83.4% vs. 90.1%; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.94-2.05). Conclusions: In this large unique dataset, young mBRCA1 breast cancer pts had worse DFS than those with mBRCA2 mostly due to higher rates of second primary malignancies. Hormone receptor positivity had no positive prognostic value in young mBRCA breast cancer pts with a trend towards worse DRFI in those with hormone receptor-negative disease. These results provide important information for counseling young mBRCA breast cancer pts regarding treatment, prevention and follow-up care strategies. Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Olivier Caron, Philip D. Poorvu, Estela Carrasco, Albert Grinshpun, Kevin Punie, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Alberta Ferrari, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Angela Toss, Claire Senechal, Fabio Puglisi, Katarzyna Pogoda, Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Laura De Marchis, Riccardo Ponzone, Luca Livraghi, Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Florian Clatot, Francois P. Duhoux, Rossella Graffeo, Luis Teixeira, Octavi Córdoba, Amir Sonnenblick, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Ann H. Partridge, Antonio Di Meglio, Claire Saule, Fedro A. Peccatori, Marco Bruzzone, Lucia Del Mastro, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Hatem A. Azim, Jr. Clinical behavior and outcomes of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in young patients according to type of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status: Results from an international cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-06.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 19, No. 10_Supplement ( 2010-10-01), p. A31-A31
    Abstract: The purpose of the PNRP patient navigation is to provide individualized assistance to persons with abnormal cancer screening tests or cancer diagnosis by trained, culturally sensitive navigators familiar with the patient's community. The Moffitt Cancer Center is one of nine NCI-funded sites nationally to study the impact that patient navigation has on four main outcomes: 1) time from screening to definitive diagnosis; 2) time from definitive diagnosis to treatment; 3) patient satisfaction; and 4) cost effectiveness. Moffitt's patient navigators navigated over 640 patients referred from seven community clinics in four counties. The majority of the patients were female (93%), Hispanics (54%), with annual household income under $20,000 (80%), mostly unemployed (47.5%), and with an average of 8.8 years of education. Lay patient navigators familiar with the patients’ culture and language were trained to navigate patients with breast or colorectal cancer screening abnormalities. The navigators were asked to record in a log the barriers that they identified, along with the actions they took to assist the patients address such barriers. Navigators addressed 20 different types of barriers in an average of 10 encounters per patient. This presentation will 1) describe the processes of patient navigation utilized by Moffitt PNRP, including training requirements, and caseloads for patient navigators, and 2) discuss the most relevant barriers that navigators found among medically underserved patients to access cancer health services, and actions taken to address such barriers. Moffitt patient navigators engage in a number of actions to help address unique barriers faced by this population when trying to access cancer care services. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(10 Suppl):A31.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 14, No. 12_Supplement_2 ( 2015-12-01), p. C38-C38
    Abstract: Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene are known driver mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other cancer types. AML is hallmarked by a differentiation block and patient outcomes remain poor, especially for patients above 60 years of age who typically do not tolerate high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, leading to cure rates below 20%. Hence the development of novel targeted therapies for treatment of AML subtypes are required. Of note, inhibitors of mutants of the closely related IDH2 gene as well as IDH1 have recently been described and show promising pre-clinical and early phase clinical activity. However, the specific molecular and functional effects of IDH1 inhibitors in AML, including in primary patients' cells, have not been reported yet. Here, we report the development of novel allosteric inhibitors of mutant IDH1 for differentiation therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. A high-throughput biochemical screen targeting an IDH1 heterodimer composed of R132H and WT IDH1 led to the identification of a tetrahydropyrazolopyridine series of inhibitors. Structural and biochemical analyses revealed that these novel compounds bind to an allosteric site that does not contact any of the mutant residues in the enzymes active site and inhibit enzymatic turnover. The enzyme complex locked in the catalytically inactive conformation inhibits the production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). In biochemical studies, we observed potent inhibition of several different clinically relevant R132 mutants in the presence or absence of the cofactor NADPH, accompanied by significant decrease in H3K9me2 levels. Treatment of primary IDH1 mutant AML patients' cells ex vivo uniformly led to a decrease in intracellular 2-HG, abrogation of the myeloid differentiation block, increased cell death and induction of differentiation both at the level of leukemic blasts and immature stem-like cells. Allosteric inhibition of IDH1 also led to a decrease in leukemic blasts in an in vivo xenotransplantation model. At the molecular level, enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing showed that treatment with allosteric IDH1 inhibitors led to a significant reversal of the DNA cytosine hypermethylation pattern induced by mutant IDH1, accompanied by gene expression changes of key sets of genes and pathways, including “Cell Cycle”, “G1/S transition”, “Cellular growth and proliferation”, and “Cell death and survival”. Taken together, our findings provide novel insight into the effects of inhibition of mutant IDH1 in primary AML patients' cells and open avenues for future investigations with these and other novel allosteric inhibitors for targeting IDH1 mutants in leukemia and possibly in other cancers. Citation Format: Ujunwa C. Okoye-Okafor, Boris Bartholdy, Jessy Cartier, Enoch Gao, Beth Pietrak, Alan R. Rendina, Cynthia Rominger, Chad Quinn, Angela Smallwood, Ken Wiggall, Alexander Reif, Stan Schmidt, Hongwei Qi, Huizhen Zhao, Gerard Joberty, Maria Faelth-Savitski, Marcus Bantscheff, Gerard Drewes, Chaya Duraiswami, Pat Brady, Swathi-Rao Narayanagari, Ileana Antony-Debre, Kelly Mitchell, Heng Rui Wang, Yun-Ruei Kao, Maximilian Christopeit, Luis Carvajal, Laura Barreyro, Elisabeth Paietta, Britta Will, Nestor Concha, Nicholas D. Adams, Benjamin Schwartz, Michael T. McCabe, Jaroslav Maciejewski, Amit Verma, Ulrich Steidl. Novel allosteric IDH1 mutant Inhibitors for differentiation therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr C38.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-7163 , 1538-8514
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...