GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (2)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P3-01-12-P3-01-12
    Abstract: Background - Physical distancing for COVID-19 led to decreased in-person patient follow up assessments and delayed imaging appointments. Herein we describe for the first time the impact of delays in diagnostic investigations of patients with an history of early-stage breast cancer (BC) in the largest public cancer center of Lombardy, the Italian region most affected by the pandemic. Methods - This single-institution retrospective study included three observational periods. The first pandemic peak period (March-April 2020) corresponding to the interruption of follow up imaging; the post-peak period (May-December 2020); the pre-pandemic period represented by the five previous years (January 2015- December 2019) as control. The flow of diagnostic activities was compared among the different years. Moreover, the number and characteristics of recurrent BC cases (rBC) diagnosed in the post-peak period were compared to the figures observed in pre-pandemic years, when imaging was regularly carried out, using descriptive statistics. A further comparison was performed between the characteristics of scheduled and delayed rBC diagnosed after the first peak. Results - During the first pandemic peak, diagnostic investigations declined by 81.2% (from 1032 in January-February to 194 in March-April), a drop which was not identified in the same period of the pre-pandemic years, before rebounding to 1065 in May-June, 832 July-August (reflecting the summer physiological drop), 1334 September-October, and 879 November-December. The average number of rBC cases of 16 (range 12-25) in March-April of the pre-pandemic period declined to a value as low as 4 during the first pandemic peak. Thereafter, the number of rBC cases began a steady increase, until reaching a total of 27 in September-October 2020, almost doubling the mean of 14.8 (range 11-21) achieved in the corresponding months of 2015-2019. As a result, the absolute number of rBC cases was 76 in 2020 and on average 78.4 (range 70 - 95) in pre-pandemic years, and the rBC proportion of 1.42% (76/5336; 95% exact confidence interval, CI: 1.12-1.78%) in 2020 was slightly higher than the average proportion of 1.26% of the five previous years, though the latter being well included in the CI of the 2020 proportion. No difference in primary tumor presentation and age at initial diagnosis was found among recurrent patients before and after the pandemic. Of the rBC cases reported during 2020, 10 were from 513 patients with postponed follow up who were finally diagnosed between September-December. As compared to patients on schedule, delayed rBC cases did not present with ductal carcinoma in situ, and reported a median tumor size of 18 mm (range 4.3-90 mm), which was 20% higher than the median of 15 mm (3.1-34) observed for scheduled patients. Distribution of luminal-like, triple negative and HER2-overexpressing BC subtypes among evaluable rBC cases was 75%, 12.5%, 12.5% in scheduled and 66%, 11% and 22% in delayed cases, respectively. Conclusions - Our data showed a slight decrease in the absolute number of rBC during 2020 despite a rebound of examinations, and an increased size of invasive recurrence following the 2-month stop of the first pandemic peak. The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on recurrent cancer diagnosis will be known when national population-based data become available in the coming years. Citation Format: Serena Di Cosimo, Catherine Depretto, Rosalba Miceli, Paolo Baili, Silva Ljevar, Milena Sant, Claudio Ferranti, Secondo Folli, Massimiliano Gennaro, Filippo G de Braud, Claudio Vernieri, Maria Carmen De Santis, Laura Lozza, Andrea Vingiani, Giancarlo Pruneri, Giovanni Apolone, Alfonso Marchianò, Gianfranco P Scaperrotta. The impact of COVID-19 on diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer [abstract] . In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-12.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 25, No. 15 ( 2019-08-01), p. 4775-4790
    Abstract: For the development of new anticancer therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, including alpha particle emitters, it is important to determine the contribution of targeted effects in irradiated cells, and also of nontargeted effects in nonirradiated neighboring cells, because they may affect the therapeutic efficacy and contribute to side effects. Experimental Design: Here, we investigated the contribution of nontargeted cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in vitro and in vivo (in xenografted mice) during alpha (212Pb/212Bi, 213Bi) and Auger (125I) radioimmunotherapy (RIT). Results: Between 67% and 94% (alpha RIT) and 8% and 15% (Auger RIT) of cancer cells were killed by targeted effects, whereas 7% to 36% (alpha RIT) and 27% to 29% (Auger RIT) of cells were killed by nontargeted effects. We then demonstrated that the nontargeted cell response to alpha and Auger RIT was partly driven by lipid raft–mediated activation of p38 kinase and JNK. Reactive oxygen species also played a significant role in these nontargeted effects, as demonstrated by NF-κB activation and the inhibitory effects of antioxidant enzymes and radical scavengers. Compared with RIT alone, the use of RIT with ASMase inhibitor (imipramine) or with a lipid raft disruptor (e.g., methyl-beta-cyclodextrin or filipin) led to an increase in clonogenic cell survival in vitro and to larger tumors and less tissue DNA damage in vivo. These results were supported by an inhibitory effect of pravastatin on Auger RIT. Conclusions: Cell membrane–mediated nontargeted effects play a significant role during Auger and alpha RIT, and drugs that modulate cholesterol level, such as statins, could interfere with RIT efficacy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...