GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (11)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 8 ( 2012-08-01), p. 1362-1370
    Abstract: Background: We previously reported significant associations between genetic variants in insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) and breast cancer risk in women carrying BRCA1 mutations. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether the IRS1 variants modified ovarian cancer risk and were associated with breast cancer risk in a larger cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Methods:IRS1 rs1801123, rs1330645, and rs1801278 were genotyped in samples from 36 centers in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Data were analyzed by a retrospective cohort approach modeling the associations with breast and ovarian cancer risks simultaneously. Analyses were stratified by BRCA1 and BRCA2 status and mutation class in BRCA1 carriers. Results: Rs1801278 (Gly972Arg) was associated with ovarian cancer risk for both BRCA1 (HR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06–1.92; P = 0.019) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.39–3.52, P = 0.0008). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the breast cancer risk was higher in carriers with class II mutations than class I mutations (class II HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.28–2.70; class I HR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.69–1.09; Pdifference, 0.0006). Rs13306465 was associated with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 class II mutation carriers (HR, 2.42; P = 0.03). Conclusion: The IRS1 Gly972Arg single-nucleotide polymorphism, which affects insulin-like growth factor and insulin signaling, modifies ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 class II mutation carriers. Impact: These findings may prove useful for risk prediction for breast and ovarian cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(8); 1362–70. ©2012 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2022
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 31, No. 1_Supplement ( 2022-01-01), p. PO-164-PO-164
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 31, No. 1_Supplement ( 2022-01-01), p. PO-164-PO-164
    Abstract: Introduction: Pathogenic variants (PVs) in high- and intermediate-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes have large effects on disease risk. While individual PVs are rare, in aggregate, they markedly contribute to breast cancer risk in women of European ancestry in the general population. We examined the association with risk of developing breast cancer in Latinas. Methods: We conducted a pooled case-control analysis of breast cancer in Latinas from the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Mexico (4,172 cases and 3,692 controls). Case ascertainment included 2,095 participants from high-risk breast cancer studies (age below 50 years at breast cancer diagnosis, family history, or bilateral breast cancer) and 5,769 from general population studies. We determined presence of a rare PV in nine known breast cancer risk genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, and TP53). We examined associations between PVs in each gene and breast cancer using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for age and ancestry. Secondary analyses were stratified by age, family history, or Indigenous American (IA) ancestry. Results: PVs in known risk genes were detected in 7.0% of cases and 1.7% of controls in participants from general population studies. Odds ratios (OR) for breast cancer in those with PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, and TP53 were 15.7 (95% CI: 5.7-64.8), 7.0 (95% CI: 3.7-14.4), 1.9 (95% CI: 1.0-4.0), 6.1 (95% CI: 3.1-13.9), and 3.7 (95% CI: 1.1-16.2) respectively. PVs in ATM (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 0.7-2.1), BARD1 (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.3-10.4), PTEN (PVs in 4 cases and 0 controls), and RAD51C (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.2-11.5) were not significantly associated with breast cancer. Among cases, those with age & lt;50 at diagnosis or with family history of breast cancer had increased odds of having a PV, with ORs of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.0-1.9) and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.4-4.0), respectively. IA above the median was associated with increased odds of having a PV among cases (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.5) but not among controls. Discussion: Among Latina participants, having a PV in any of the nine genes was associated with increased risk of breast cancer. As expected, cases who were younger or had a family history of breast cancer were more likely to have a PV. In addition, cases but not controls with high IA were more likely to have a PV. The higher prevalence of PVs among high IA cases but not controls may be due to the younger age of these women and/or lower prevalence of other environmental risk factors. Our PV prevalence estimates among Latinas were similar to those previously found among European ancestry participants. Our results suggest that there may be clinical utility in testing for rare PVs in breast cancer risk genes among those in the general population. Citation Format: Jovia L Nierenberg, Aaron Adamson, Yuan C. Ding, Yiwey Shieh, Donglei Hu, Scott Huntsman, Esther M. John, Gabriela Torres-Mejia, Christopher A. Haiman, Lawrence H. Kushi, Charite N. Ricker, Linda Steele, Robin Lee, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Laura Fejerman, Elad Ziv, Susan L. Neuhausen. Pathogenic variants in breast cancer risk genes in Latinas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-164.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 24, No. 1 ( 2015-01-01), p. 308-316
    Abstract: Background:BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. Methods: Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. Results: The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. Conclusion: There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 308–16. ©2014 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 3 ( 2020-02-01), p. 624-638
    Abstract: Pathogenic sequence variants (PSV) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk and severity of prostate cancer. We evaluated whether PSVs in BRCA1/2 were associated with risk of overall prostate cancer or high grade (Gleason 8+) prostate cancer using an international sample of 65 BRCA1 and 171 BRCA2 male PSV carriers with prostate cancer, and 3,388 BRCA1 and 2,880 BRCA2 male PSV carriers without prostate cancer. PSVs in the 3′ region of BRCA2 (c.7914+) were significantly associated with elevated risk of prostate cancer compared with reference bin c.1001-c.7913 [HR = 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25–2.52; P = 0.001], as well as elevated risk of Gleason 8+ prostate cancer (HR = 3.11; 95% CI, 1.63–5.95; P = 0.001). c.756-c.1000 was also associated with elevated prostate cancer risk (HR = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.71–4.68; P = 0.00004) and elevated risk of Gleason 8+ prostate cancer (HR = 4.95; 95% CI, 2.12–11.54; P = 0.0002). No genotype–phenotype associations were detected for PSVs in BRCA1. These results demonstrate that specific BRCA2 PSVs may be associated with elevated risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer. Significance: Aggressive prostate cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers may vary according to the specific BRCA2 mutation inherited by the at-risk individual.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 4 ( 2012-04-01), p. 645-657
    Abstract: Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified variants at 19p13.1 and ZNF365 (10q21.2) as risk factors for breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. We explored associations with ovarian cancer and with breast cancer by tumor histopathology for these variants in mutation carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Methods: Genotyping data for 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers from 40 studies were combined. Results: We confirmed associations between rs8170 at 19p13.1 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers [HR, 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07–1.27; P = 7.42 × 10−4] and between rs16917302 at ZNF365 (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73–0.97; P = 0.017) but not rs311499 at 20q13.3 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94–1.31; P = 0.22) and breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Analyses based on tumor histopathology showed that 19p13 variants were predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, whereas rs16917302 at ZNF365 was mainly associated with ER-positive breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. We also found for the firs t time that rs67397200 at 19p13.1 was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer for BRCA1 (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05–1.29; P = 3.8 × 10−4) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10–1.52; P = 1.8 × 10−3). Conclusions: 19p13.1 and ZNF365 are susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer and ER subtypes of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: These findings can lead to an improved understanding of tumor development and may prove useful for breast and ovarian cancer risk prediction for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(4); 645–57. ©2012 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 70, No. 23 ( 2010-12-01), p. 9742-9754
    Abstract: The known breast cancer susceptibility polymorphisms in FGFR2, TNRC9/TOX3, MAP3K1, LSP1, and 2q35 confer increased risks of breast cancer for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. We evaluated the associations of 3 additional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs4973768 in SLC4A7/NEK10, rs6504950 in STXBP4/COX11, and rs10941679 at 5p12, and reanalyzed the previous associations using additional carriers in a sample of 12,525 BRCA1 and 7,409 BRCA2 carriers. Additionally, we investigated potential interactions between SNPs and assessed the implications for risk prediction. The minor alleles of rs4973768 and rs10941679 were associated with increased breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers (per-allele HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.18, P = 0.006 and HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19, P = 0.03, respectively). Neither SNP was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 carriers, and rs6504950 was not associated with breast cancer for either BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers. Of the 9 polymorphisms investigated, 7 were associated with breast cancer for BRCA2 carriers (FGFR2, TOX3, MAP3K1, LSP1, 2q35, SLC4A7, 5p12, P = 7 × 10−11 − 0.03), but only TOX3 and 2q35 were associated with the risk for BRCA1 carriers (P = 0.0049, 0.03, respectively). All risk-associated polymorphisms appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk for mutation carriers. Based on the joint genotype distribution of the 7 risk-associated SNPs in BRCA2 mutation carriers, the 5% of BRCA2 carriers at highest risk (i.e., between 95th and 100th percentiles) were predicted to have a probability between 80% and 96% of developing breast cancer by age 80, compared with 42% to 50% for the 5% of carriers at lowest risk. Our findings indicated that these risk differences might be sufficient to influence the clinical management of mutation carriers. Cancer Res; 70(23); 9742–54. ©2010 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 72, No. 8_Supplement ( 2012-04-15), p. 2632-2632
    Abstract: Objectives: Both iron overload and iron deficiency cause oxidative stress and DNA damage, which increase carcinogenesis risk, especially in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In animal models, iron overload causes forestomach tumors, and in epidemiologic studies, high heme iron intake is associated with some upper GI cancers. Hemochromatosis, which results in excessive iron absorption in the GI tract, is also associated with GI cancer. The mechanism of increased cancer risk may involve the impairment of iron-dependent metabolic functions related to genome protection and maintenance. Genetic variants of genes with iron-dependent metabolic functions may confer differential GI cancer risk. Therefore, we comprehensively examined the genetic variants of these genes and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) in a high-risk population in China. Methods: We genotyped 249 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 23 genes with known iron-dependent metabolic function in 1027 ESCC cases and 752 GCA cases plus 1452 controls from two epidemiologic studies in a high-risk region in China. For all genes as a single pathway and each gene individually, we calculated summary p-values using the adaptive rank truncated product (ARTP) method. For SNPs, logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: In pathway-based tests, the iron pathway was not associated with either ESCC (p=0.320) or GCA (p=0.550). However, in gene-based tests, HMOX2 (heme oxygenase 2, p=0.018) and BMP2 (bone morphogenetic protein 2, p=0.032) were associated with ESCC risk, and IREB2 (iron-responsive element binding protein 2, p=0.033) was associated with GCA risk. In SNP-based tests, RS235756 (OR=0.78, CI=0.66-0.91) and RS910141 (OR=0.76, CI=0.63-0.93) tagged to BMP2 (linkage disequilibrium of pairwise r2=0.55) were associated with ESCC risk. RS6500609 (OR=1.30, CI=1.08-1.57) tagged to HMOX2 was also associated with ESCC risk. RS12910090 (OR=0.83, CI=0.72-0.94) and RS2568500 (OR=0.83, CI=0.73-0.95) tagged to IREB2 (r2=0.90) were associated with GCA risk. RS11630228 (OR=1.21, CI=1.06-1.38) also tagged to IREB2 (r2 & lt;0.38 with two previous SNPs) was associated with GCA risk. Conclusions: The potential link between iron status and differential UGI cancer risk may involve the impairment of iron-dependent metabolic functions, which leads to oxidative stress and DNA damage. The association of SNPs in HMOX2 and BMP2 with ESCC risk and IREB2 with GCA risk suggests that genetic variants of genes with iron-dependent metabolic functions may differentially confer risk of upper GI cancer. Further research is warranted to replicate these findings and elucidate the functional effects of the SNPs in the context of upper GI carcinogenesis to better understand the role of iron overload or iron deficiency in cancer development. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2632. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2632
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 32, No. 6 ( 2023-06-01), p. 809-817
    Abstract: Human gut microbiome has complex relationships with the host, contributing to metabolism, immunity, and carcinogenesis. Methods: Summary-level data for gut microbiota and metabolites were obtained from MiBioGen, FINRISK and human metabolome consortia. Summary-level data for colorectal cancer were derived from a genome-wide association study meta-analysis. In forward Mendelian randomization (MR), we employed genetic instrumental variables (IV) for 24 gut microbiota taxa and six bacterial metabolites to examine their causal relationship with colorectal cancer. We also used a lenient threshold for nine apriori gut microbiota taxa as secondary analyses. In reverse MR, we explored association between genetic liability to colorectal neoplasia and abundance of microbiota studied above using 95, 19, and 7 IVs for colorectal cancer, adenoma, and polyps, respectively. Results: Forward MR did not find evidence indicating causal relationship between any of the gut microbiota taxa or six bacterial metabolites tested and colorectal cancer risk. However, reverse MR supported genetic liability to colorectal adenomas was causally related with increased abundance of two taxa: Gammaproteobacteria (β = 0.027, which represents a 0.027 increase in log-transformed relative abundance values of Gammaproteobacteria for per one-unit increase in log OR of adenoma risk; P = 7.06×10−8), Enterobacteriaceae (β = 0.023, P = 1.29×10−5). Conclusions: We find genetic liability to colorectal neoplasia may be associated with abundance of certain microbiota taxa. It is more likely that subset of colorectal cancer genetic liability variants changes gut biology by influencing both gut microbiota and colorectal cancer risk. Impact: This study highlights the need of future complementary studies to explore causal mechanisms linking both host genetic variation with gut microbiome and colorectal cancer susceptibility.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 7 ( 2016-04-01), p. 1714-1723
    Abstract: Gastric cancer and esophageal cancer are the second and sixth leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Multiple genomic alterations underlying gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have been identified, but the full spectrum of genomic structural variations and mutations have yet to be uncovered. Here, we report the results of whole-genome sequencing of 30 samples comprising tumor and blood from 15 patients, four of whom presented with ESCC, seven with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), and four with gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma. Analyses revealed that an A & gt;C mutation was common in GCA, and in addition to the preferential nucleotide sequence of A located 5 prime to the mutation as noted in previous studies, we found enrichment of T in the 5 prime base. The A & gt;C mutations in GCA suggested that oxidation of guanine may be a potential mechanism underlying cancer mutagenesis. Furthermore, we identified genes with mutations in gastric cancer and ESCC, including well-known cancer genes, TP53, JAK3, BRCA2, FGF2, FBXW7, MSH3, PTCH, NF1, ERBB2, and CHEK2, and potentially novel cancer-associated genes, KISS1R, AMH, MNX1, WNK2, and PRKRIR. Finally, we identified recurrent chromosome alterations in at least 30% of tumors in genes, including MACROD2, FHIT, and PARK2 that were often intragenic deletions. These structural alterations were validated using the The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Our studies provide new insights into understanding the genomic landscape, genome instability, and mutation profile underlying gastric cancer and ESCC development. Cancer Res; 76(7); 1714–23. ©2016 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 74, No. 19_Supplement ( 2014-10-01), p. 2206-2206
    Abstract: PURPOSE: Several observational studies and multinutrient interventional trials suggest that selenium compounds have potential chemopreventive effects on esophageal and gastric carcinogenesis, presumably via their influence on selenoproteins. We aimed to investigate associations between genetic variants in selenoprotein genes and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), gastric carcinoma (GC) and GC subsets: cardia (GCA) and non-cardia (GNCA) using data from a genome-wide association study in a Han Chinese population in which ESCC and GC are predominant cancers. METHODS: 1944 ESCC cases, 1758 GC cases (1126 GCA and 632 GNCA) and 2111 controls from the Shanxi Upper GI Cancer Genetics project and the Linxian Nutritional Intervential Trials were genotyped for 243 SNPs in 24 selenoprotein genes. Logistic regression models were applied to evaluate SNP-level associations. Pathway- and gene-level associations were determined using the resampling-based adaptive rank-truncated product approach. RESULTS: Selenoproteins as a whole pathway were not significantly associated with ESCC (p=0.398) or GC (p=0.608), but five significant (p & lt;0.05) gene-level associations were identified, including GPX2 (p=0.008) and GPX5 (p=0.006) with ESCC, DIO2 (p=0.026) with GC, and SEPP1 (p=0.007) and SEPW1 (p=0.004) with GCA. CONCLUSION: Our results show evidence for an association between specific selenoprotein genes and the risk of ESCC and GC, warranting further studies to validate these associations and investigate underlying mechanisms. Citation Format: Sharon Li, Paula L. Hyland, Neal D. Freedman, Nan Hu, Hua Su, Lemin Wang, Chaoyu Wang, Ti Ding, Yuan Wang, Jin-Hu Fan, You-Lin Qiao, Xiaoqin Xiong, Kai Yu, Alisa M. Goldstein, Sanford M. Dawsey, Philip R. Taylor, Christian C. Abnet, Shih-Wen Lin. Genetic variants in selenoprotein genes and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cancer in a Chinese population. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2206. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2206
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...