GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (3)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. CT055-CT055
    Abstract: Introduction: Peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) is a condition with poor prognosis, even in patients undergoing potentially curative treatment with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). The ImmunoPeCa trial explores the tolerability of combining intraperitoneally administered MOC31PE immunotoxin with CRS-HIPEC. MOC31PE, consisting of the monoclonal antibody MOC31, which recognizes the tumor associated cell surface antigen EpCAM, and Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE), has shown excellent anti-cancer efficacy in preclinical studies. The immunotoxin was well tolerated upon intravenous administration in a previous clinical phase I trial, where the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reversible liver toxicity. In this trial, MOC31PE was administered intraperitoneally in humans for the first time, with the rationale that killing residual cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity after CRS-HIPEC will improve outcome. Patients and methods: The ImmunoPeCa phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02219893) startet enrollment in 2014 and adult patients with EpCAM positive PM-CRC accepted for CRS-HIPEC were included. MOC31PE was administered on the first postoperative day through abdominal drainage catheters that were clamped for 6h before they were reopened to remove intraabdominal fluid. Standard dose escalation was applied, with four dose levels (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 μg/kg). Main endpoints were safety and toxicity (CTCAE version 4.0), and pharmacokinetic analyses of serum and peritoneal fluid were performed. Results: Twelve patients have received MOC31PE without major toxicity, and a maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Interestingly, MOC31PE was not detected in patient serum, suggesting that there was no systemic absorption of the drug. In peritoneal fluid samples at 6h and 24h MOC31PE was present in cytotoxic concentrations based on in vivo and in vitro studies, at least for the two highest dose levels, and the drug was impressively still fully active when analyzed in cell based assays. Conclusions: No DLT was observed upon peritoneal administration of MOC31PE, which is consistent with no systemic absorption. Remarkably, MOC31PE was fully active in peritoneal fluid samples 24h after treatment, with the intraperitoneal drug concentration in the cytotoxic range based on in vitro and in vivo studies. Taken together, treatment with MOC31PE represents a unique possibility for intraperitoneal treatment intensification without systemic toxicity. The highest dose level (10 μg/kg) has been chosen for further testing in a planned phase II expansion of the trial. Citation Format: Kjersti Flatmark, Yvonne Andersson, Ben Davidson, Svein Dueland, Øystein Fodstad, Ida S. Frøysnes, Karl Erik Giercksky, Lars Julsrud, Stein G. Larsen, Kari H. Olsen, Janne M T Øien. Novel intraperitoneal treatment for peritoneal metastases: results from the Immunotoxin in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (ImmunoPeCa) phase I clinical trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT055.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 70, No. 24_Supplement ( 2010-12-15), p. P6-14-05-P6-14-05
    Abstract: Background: In women with HER2-positive breast cancer progressing during trastuzumab treatment, continuation of trastuzumab plus capecitabine (XH) showed a significantly improved overall response rate and time to progression compared with capecitabine (X) alone (von Minckwitz et al, J Clin Oncol 27:1999-2006, 2009). Here we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who progressed during treatment with trastuzumab with or without adjuvant and/or 1st-line metastatic chemotherapy were prospectively randomized to X (2500 mg/m2 on days 1-14, q3w) or XH (6 mg/kg, q3w). OS was a pre-specified secondary endpoint of the study. Results: Median follow up at June 2010 was 20.7 months. 59 of 74 and 60 of 77 pts died in the X alone and XH arm, respectively. Median OS was 20.6 and 24.9 months with X alone and XH, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (HR=0.94 [0.65-1.35]; p=0.73). Cox proportional hazard model showed performance status, hormone receptor status and metastatic site as independent prognosticators for survival. No difference between treatment arms was observed for pts with a clinical response or clinical benefit, respectively. Pts who continued/restarted anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab or lapatinib) after 2nd progression (N=88) had an OS of 18.8 compared with 13.3 months for those who did not receive 3rd line treatment with anti-HER2 agents (N=52) (HR 0.63; p=0.02). Pts who continued treatment after progression as initially randomized (anti-HER2 treatment after XH (N=31) or no anti-HER2 treatment after X alone (N=53)) had an OS of 26.7 months and 20.4 months (HR 0.71; p=0.2). Conclusions: Final OS analysis of the GBG-26 study could not demonstrate a survival benefit for treatment beyond progression with trastuzumab. However in a post-hoc analysis, pts receiving anti-HER2 treatment as 3rd line therapy showed a better OS than those not receiving this targeted treatment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-14-05.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 13_Supplement ( 2018-07-01), p. CT094-CT094
    Abstract: Background. Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with poor outcome, but in patients with resectable disease long-term survival through cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be achieved. The dual rationale for applying intraperitoneal therapy in PM-CRC is dose intensification because of the peritoneal-plasma barrier and the conception of PM as a localized disease within the peritoneal cavity. Outcome following CRS-HIPEC is however highly variable and most patients will experience disease recurrence, illustrating the need for improved treatment. MOC31PE immunotoxin, composed of the monoclonal antibody MOC31 and pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE), was developed by researchers at the Norwegian Radium Hospital to rapidly kill cells expressing the tumor-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), which is highly expressed in CRC. In the ImmunoPeCa trial we investigated the use of intraperitoneal MOC31PE as a novel therapeutic principle to target PM-CRC. Methods. The ImmunoPeCa trial was a dose-escalating phase I trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetic profile, and neutralizing antibody response (secondary endpoints) upon a single dose of intraperitoneal MOC31PE in patients with PM-CRC undergoing CRS-HIPEC. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were also examined (secondary endpoints). Fifteen patients received the study drug at four dose levels (2.5 (n=3), 5.0 (n=3), 7.5 (n=3) and 10 (n=6) µg kg). Additional 6 patients, constituting an expansion cohort, were treated on dose level 4 (10 µg/kg). Results. There was no major toxicity, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The systemic drug exposure was low, and MOC31PE in peritoneal fluid samples retained cytotoxic capacity, suggesting that the drug is very stable under physiological conditions. With a median follow-up of 29 months (95% CI 22-35 months), the median OS was not reached and the estimated 3-year OS was 85%. Estimated median DFS was 20 months (95% CI 8-33 months) and the estimated 3-year DFS was 36%, with a median follow-up of 25 months (95% CI 19-31 months). Although very encouraging, the results may reflect the selection of the cohort, and investigation in a larger cohort would be necessary to study efficacy. Conclusions. Intraperitoneal, perioperative administration of MOC31PE was safe and well tolerated. The promising long-term outcome combined with the low systemic uptake and retained cytotoxic activity in peritoneal fluid samples support further clinical testing. Citation Format: Ida S. Froysnes, Yvonne Andersson, Stein Larsen, Ben Davidson, Janne-Merete T. Oien, Kari H. Olsen, Karl-Erik Giercksky, Lars Julsrud, Oystein Fodstad, Svein Dueland, Kjersti Flatmark. Novel treatment with intraperitoneal MOC31PE immunotoxin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis: Long-term outcome from the ImmunoPeCa phase I/II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT094.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...