In:
AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, American Accounting Association, Vol. 31, No. 1 ( 2012-02-01), p. 97-114
Kurzfassung:
Using structured interviews and surveys of practicing audit partners, this study examines their perceptions with regard to mandatory partner rotation and cooling-off periods, and how recently enacted, more stringent rules, may negatively impact auditors' quality of life to the detriment of audit quality. Results suggest rotation, in general, increases partners' workloads and the likelihood of relocation. Additionally, results suggest that in response to accelerated rotation (and an extended cooling-off period), partners would rather learn a new industry than relocate. Importantly, partners perceive audit quality suffers from retraining, but not from relocating. Thus these results suggest an indirect, negative impact, and unintended consequence, of accelerated rotation/extended cooling-off periods on audit quality. Data Availability: The survey instrument is available upon request. Individual audit partner responses are confidential.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0278-0380
,
1558-7991
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
American Accounting Association
Publikationsdatum:
2012
ZDB Id:
2068208-6
SSG:
3,2
Permalink
