GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1995-1999  (3)
Document type
Years
Year
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    [S.l.] : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    Review of Scientific Instruments 66 (1995), S. 1028-1034 
    ISSN: 1089-7623
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Electrical Engineering, Measurement and Control Technology
    Notes: The magnitude and spatial variation of the impressed electric-field patterns inside a compact electron cyclotron resonance ion/plasma source are experimentally measured for argon and nitrogen feed gases. This ECR plasma source consists of several components: a resonant coaxial coupling section, an evanescent circular waveguide section, coupling loop, and the ECR discharge load itself. The electric fields inside the coaxial and circular waveguide sections are measured as the operating pressure and input power and are varied from 0.2 to 2.0 mTorr and 100 to 170 W, respectively. The measured fields verify that a standing wave with a maximum of 20–40 kV/m exists inside the coaxial section of length l. For matched conditions the length of this section varies only slightly between 0.6 and 0.7λ as pressure, power, and gas type vary. However, the evanescent impedance-matching circular waveguide section of length d changes from 2.5 for argon to 3.2 cm for nitrogen, indicating that the gas type influences the plasma impedance. Field pattern measurements in the ECR section of the source demonstrate the presence of nonevanescent fields in the discharge region. Measured plasma loaded and unloaded quality factors varied from 220 to 1800, respectively, indicating that 87% of the net input power is coupled into the discharge load. Additional calculations of conductive wall losses show that about 6% of the input power is lost in the cavity walls, and the remaining 7% is lost in the coupling loop. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: CYP2D6 ; Quinidine ; Codeine ; morphine ; plasma ; cerebrospinal fluid
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: The analgesic effect of codeine depends on its O-demethylation to morphine via sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6) in the liver and presumably also via this enzyme in the CNS. We studied the ability of quinidine, which is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, to penetrate the blood brain barrier and its pssible impact on codeine O-demethylation in CNS. Methods: The study comprised 16 extensive and one poor metaboliser of sparteine, who underwent spinal anaesthesia for urinary tract surgery or examination. Eight patients were given an oral dose of 125 mg codeine and 9 patients (including the poor metaboliser) were given 200 mg quinidine 2 h before the same dose of codeine. Plasma and spinal fluid samples were collected 2 h after codeine intake. Results: Free concentrations of quinidine were 11-times lower in cerebrospinal fluid than in plasma, and ranged from 9–15 nmol·l−1. Morphine concentrations were significantly lower in patients pre-treated with quinidine, both in plasma (median 1.45 nmol·l−1, range 0.74–1.95 nmol·l−1 vs 9.86 nmol·l−1, range 4.59–28.4 nmol·l−1) and in cerebrospinal fluid (0.23, 0.16–0.61 nmol·l−1 vs 3.63, 0.6–8.09 nmol·l−1). The morphine/codeine concentration ratio in plasma (3.07×10−3, 1.68–3.68×10−3 vs 19.87×10−3, 9.87–66.22×10−3) and in cerebrospinal fluid (0.83×10−3, 0.58–1.45×10−3 vs 7.19×10−3, 2.03–17.7×10−3) was also lower. The morphine/-codeine concentration ratios were significantly lower in cerebrospinal fluid both without and with quinidine, but the difference between the plasma and spinal fluid ratios was significantly smaller with quinidine than without (p=0.0002). Conclusion: Quinidine penetrates the blood brain barrier poorly, but quinidine pre-treatment leads to pronounced lowering of the cerebrospinal fluid concentration of morphine after codeine intake. However, the O-demethylation of codeine in CNS may not be totally blocked by quinidine.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Key words CYP2D6 ; Quinidine ; Codeine ; morphine ; plasma ; cerebrospinal fluid
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract. Objective: The analgesic effect of codeine depends on its O-demethylation to morphine via sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6) in the liver and presumably also via this enzyme in the CNS. We studied the ability of quinidine, which is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, to penetrate the blood brain barrier and its possible impact on codeine O-demethylation in CNS. Methods: The study comprised 16 extensive and one poor metaboliser of sparteine, who underwent spinal anaesthesia for urinary tract surgery or examination. Eight patients were given an oral dose of 125 mg codeine and 9 patients (including the poor metaboliser) were given 200 mg quinidine 2 h before the same dose of codeine. Plasma and spinal fluid samples were collected 2 h after codeine intake. Results: Free concentrations of quinidine were 11-times lower in cerebrospinal fluid than in plasma, and ranged from 9–15 nmol ⋅l−1. Morphine concentrations were significantly lower in patients pre-treated with quinidine, both in plasma (median 1.45 nmol ⋅l−1, range 0.74–1.95 nmol ⋅l−1 vs 9.86 nmol ⋅l−1, range 4.59–28.4 nmol ⋅l−1) and in cerebrospinal fluid (0.23, 0.16–0.61 nmol ⋅l−1 vs 3.63, 0.6–8.09 nmol ⋅l−1). The morphine/codeine concentration ratio in plasma (3.07 × 10−3, 1.68–3.68 × 10−3 vs 19.87 × 10−3, 9.87–66.22 × 10−3) and in cerebrospinal fluid (0.83 × 10−3, 0.58–1.45 × 10−3 vs 7.19 × 10−3, 2.03–17.7 × 10−3) was also lower. The morphine/-codeine concentration ratios were significantly lower in cerebrospinal fluid both without and with quinidine, but the difference between the plasma and spinal fluid ratios was significantly smaller with quinidine than without (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Quinidine penetrates the blood brain barrier poorly, but quinidine pre-treatment leads to pronounced lowering of the cerebrospinal fluid concentration of morphine after codeine intake. However, the O-demethylation of codeine in CNS may not be totally blocked by quinidine.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...