In:
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, Wiley, Vol. 48, No. 3 ( 2002-08-15), p. 439-446
Abstract:
Profile search methods based on protein domain alignments have proven to be useful tools in comparative sequence analysis. Domain alignments used by currently available search methods have been computed by sequence comparison. With the growth of the protein structure database, however, alignments of many domain pairs have also been computed by structure comparison. Here, we examine the extent to which information from these two sources agrees. We measure agreement with respect to identification of homologous regions in each protein, that is, with respect to the location of domain boundaries. We also measure agreement with respect to identification of homologous residue sites by comparing alignments and assessing the accuracy of the molecular models they predict. We find that domain alignments in publicly available collections based on sequence and structure comparison are largely consistent. However, the homologous regions identified by sequence comparison are often shorter than those identified by 3D structure comparison. In addition, when overall sequence similarity is low alignments from sequence comparison produce less accurate molecular models, suggesting that they less accurately identify homologous sites. These observations suggest that structure comparison results might be used to improve the overall accuracy of domain alignment collections and the performance of profile search methods based on them. Proteins 2002;48:439–446. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0887-3585
,
1097-0134
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2002
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1475032-6
SSG:
12
Permalink
