GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2000-2004  (1)
Material
Publisher
Language
Years
  • 2000-2004  (1)
Year
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2003
    In:  Clinical Rehabilitation Vol. 17, No. 4 ( 2003-06), p. 402-409
    In: Clinical Rehabilitation, SAGE Publications, Vol. 17, No. 4 ( 2003-06), p. 402-409
    Abstract: Objective: To research test–retest reliability and discriminant validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), a client-centred outcome measure, in stroke patients. Design: The COPM was administered twice with a mean interval of eight days (SD 2.5, range 5–16). On both occasions the patient identified a maximum of five problems in daily activities. The problems of both interviews were compared. The problems identified during the first COPM were rated by the patient on a performance and satisfaction rating scale on both occasions. The individually identified items with use of the client-centred COPM were compared with the fixed items of standardized measures (Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index, Stroke Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30, Euroqol 5D and Rankin Scale). Setting: Patients were interviewed at their place of residence. Subjects: Twenty-six stroke patients participated, 11 men and 15 women, aged from 26 to 83 years (mean 68, SD 15). Twenty-four patients were six months, two patients were two months post stroke. Results: Of the 115 problems identified during the first COPM, 64 (56%) were also identified the second time. Correlation coefficients for the scores were 0.89 ( p 〈 0.001) for performance and 0.88 ( p 〈 0.001) for satisfaction. Of the individual problems identified with the COPM, 25% or less were present in the standardized measures. Correlations between the scores on the COPM and the standardized measures were low and nonsignificant, while all standardized measures correlated significantly with each other. Conclusions: Test–retest reliability of the COPM was moderate for the item pool but was good for the performance and satisfaction scores. Discriminant validity was confirmed. Many patient-unique problems identified with the COPM were not evaluated by standardized measures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0269-2155 , 1477-0873
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2003
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2028323-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...