In:
Slavic Review, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 72, No. 1 ( 2013), p. 1-23
Abstract:
The question of the perpetrator is largely uncharted territory in the history of the Soviet Union. The term is rarely used in the historiography of the Stalinist Soviet Union. In part, this omission is based upon a reluctance to go beyond Iosif Stalin in assigning agency or responsibility for the immense crimes of his reign. In part, the omission derives from decades-long restrictions on archival access. Lynne Viola begins with an exploration of the postwar trajectories of the historiographies of the mid-twentieth century's classically paired “totalitarian” regimes in order to understand the relative absence of “perpetrator studies” for the Stalinist 1930s. She then examines the question of the Soviet perpetrator, less to demarcate who the perpetrator was than to offer a conceptualization of the range of factors that enabled, conditioned, and shaped their violent acts. Intended to raise questions for further study, Viola's article is complemented by comments from Wendy Goldman and Peter Fritzsche.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0037-6779
,
2325-7784
DOI:
10.5612/slavicreview.72.1.0001
Language:
English
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Publication Date:
2013
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2029130-9
detail.hit.zdb_id:
203404-9
SSG:
7,39
SSG:
7,41
SSG:
3,6
Permalink