GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2018
    In:  Anesthesia & Analgesia Vol. 127, No. 4 ( 2018-10), p. 832-839
    In: Anesthesia & Analgesia, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 127, No. 4 ( 2018-10), p. 832-839
    Abstract: Multiple studies completed in the ambulatory nonsurgical setting show a significant association between short- and long-term blood pressure variability and poor outcomes. However, perioperative blood pressure variability outcomes have not been well studied, especially in the cardiac surgical setting. In this study, we sought to assess whether systolic and mean arterial blood pressure variability were associated with 30-day mortality and in-hospital renal failure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Furthermore, blood pressure variability has not been evaluated specifically during each phase of surgery, namely in the pre-, intra- and postbypass phases; thus, we aimed also to assess whether outcomes were associated with phase-specific systolic and mean arterial blood pressure variability. METHODS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgery from January 2008 to June 2014 were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcome data were obtained from the institution’s Society of Thoracic Surgery database and Anesthesia Information Management System. Systolic and mean arterial blood pressure variability were assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV). The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital renal failure in relation to the entire duration of a case, while the secondary outcomes assessed phase-specific surgical periods. In an effort to control the family-wise error rate, P values 〈 .0125 were considered significant for the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 3687 patients analyzed, 2.7% of patients died within 30 days of surgery and 2.8% experienced in-hospital renal failure. After adjusting for significant covariates, we found a statistically significant association between increasing CV for systolic blood pressure (CV SBP ) and 30-day mortality and in-hospital renal failure. For every 0.10 increase in CV SBP , there was a 150% increase in the odds of death (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–3.92; P 〈 .0001) and there was a 104% increase in odds of experiencing renal failure (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.33–3.14; P = .001). The association with mortality was driven primarily by the prebypass period, because the association between CV SBP and mortality during the prebypass phase was significant ( P = .01), and not during the postbypass phase ( P = .08). There was no significant association between CV for mean arterial blood pressure and either death or renal failure during any period of surgery, including the bypass phase. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing systolic blood pressure variability was associated with 30-day mortality and development of renal failure, with surgery phase-specific relationships observed. Further research is required to determine how to prospectively detect blood pressure variability and elucidate opportunities for intervention.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-2999
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018275-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2016
    In:  Anesthesiology Vol. 124, No. 3 ( 2016-03-01), p. 526-527
    In: Anesthesiology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 124, No. 3 ( 2016-03-01), p. 526-527
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-3022
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2016092-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: JAMA, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 321, No. 7 ( 2019-02-19), p. 686-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0098-7484
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2958-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018410-4
    SSG: 5,21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2016
    In:  Anesthesiology Vol. 125, No. 3 ( 2016-09-01), p. 449-450
    In: Anesthesiology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 125, No. 3 ( 2016-09-01), p. 449-450
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-3022
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2016092-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: JAMA, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 319, No. 5 ( 2018-02-06), p. 452-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0098-7484
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2958-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018410-4
    SSG: 5,21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2019
    In:  JAMA Vol. 322, No. 3 ( 2019-07-16), p. 272-
    In: JAMA, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 322, No. 3 ( 2019-07-16), p. 272-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0098-7484
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2958-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018410-4
    SSG: 5,21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Anesthesia & Analgesia, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 124, No. 1 ( 2017-01), p. 16-22
    Abstract: Preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and postoperative glycemic variability predict major adverse events (MAEs) after coronary artery bypass grafting in a protocolized glycemic control setting. However, the influence of preoperative HbA1c and postoperative glycemic variability in isolated cardiac valvular surgery is unknown. In this study, we sought to establish (a) whether preoperative HbA1c could identify patients at increased risk of MAEs and (b) whether postoperative glycemic variability was associated with MAEs after isolated cardiac valvular surgery. METHODS: Patients 〉 18 years of age undergoing isolated valve surgery from January 2008 to December 2013 were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, observational cohort study with IRB approval. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative MAEs were extracted from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database. The primary outcome, MAEs, was a composite of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, reoperations, sternal infection, cardiac tamponade, pneumonia, stroke, or renal failure. Glycemic variability in the postoperative period was assessed by the coefficient of variation. Patents were stratified by HbA1c levels ( 〈 6.5% or ≥6.5%) and assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the enrolled 763 patients, 109 (14.3%) had a preoperative HbA1c level ≥6.5%. Patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% were older (70 [63–79] vs 66 [56–75] , P 〈 .001) and had a higher incidence of dyslipidemia (83.5% vs 57.0%, P 〈 .001) and congestive heart failure (39.5% vs 27.8%, P = .01). The calculated STS risk score for morbidity and mortality was also statistically higher in this group (0.18 [0.13–0.27] vs 0.13 [0.09–0.21] , P 〈 .001). The occurrence of MAEs was similar between the 2 groups (13.8% in HbA1c ≥6.5% vs 11.0% in HbA1c 〈 6.5%, P = .40). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that neither preoperative HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] : 0.78–2.82; P = .23) nor postoperative glycemic variability (CV per quartile; OR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85–1.30; P = .67) was found to be associated with MAEs. An HbA1c ≥ 6.5% was associated with the increased glycemic variability in the postoperative period (0.173 [0.129–0.217] vs 0.141 [0.106–0.178] , P 〈 .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show an association between preoperative HbA1c and postoperative glycemic variability with MAEs after isolated cardiac valvular surgery. Specifically, lack of association between postoperative glycemic variability and MAEs is noteworthy and is in contrast to our previous finding in CABG patients. Future studies should focus a targeted glycemic variability reduction in CABG patients and evaluate the reduction in MAEs, without risk of employing a one-size fits all approach when approaching other cardiac procedures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-2999
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018275-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2016
    In:  Anesthesia & Analgesia Vol. 123, No. 3 ( 2016-09), p. 547-550
    In: Anesthesia & Analgesia, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 123, No. 3 ( 2016-09), p. 547-550
    Abstract: In this prospective observational study, conducted at an academic medical center, we evaluated the feasibility of performing a basic transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) technology to determine what cardiac structures could be assessed. This may be potentially beneficial during hemodynamic emergencies in the endoscopy suite resulting from hypovolemia, depressed ventricular function, aortic dissection, pericardial effusions, or aortic stenosis. Of the 20 patients enrolled, 18 underwent EUS with a linear echoendoscope for standard clinical indications followed by a cardiac assessment performed under the guidance of a TEE-certified cardiac anesthesiologist. Eight of the 20 standard views of cardiovascular structures per the 1999 American Society of Echocardiography/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists guidelines for TEE could be obtained using the linear echoendoscope. The following cardiac valvular structures were visualized: aortic valve (100%), mitral valve (100%), tricuspid valve (33%), and pulmonic valve (11%). Left ventricular and right ventricular systolic function could be assessed in 89% and 67% of patients, respectively. Other structures such as the ascending and descending aorta, pericardium, left atrial appendage, and interatrial septum were identified in 100% of patients. Doppler-dependent functions could not be assessed. Given that the EUS images were not directly compared with TEE in these patients, we cannot comment definitively on the quality of these assessments and further studies would need to be performed to make a formal comparison. Based on this study, EUS technology can consistently assess the mitral valve, aortic valve, aorta, pericardium, and left ventricular function. Given its limitations, EUS technology, although not a substitute for formal echocardiography, could be a helpful early diagnostic tool in an emergency setting.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-2999
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018275-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...