GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • MDPI AG  (4)
  • 2015-2019  (4)
Material
Publisher
  • MDPI AG  (4)
Language
Years
  • 2015-2019  (4)
Year
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MDPI AG ; 2016
    In:  ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information Vol. 5, No. 10 ( 2016-10-10), p. 185-
    In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, MDPI AG, Vol. 5, No. 10 ( 2016-10-10), p. 185-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2220-9964
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2655790-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MDPI AG ; 2015
    In:  ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information Vol. 4, No. 2 ( 2015-03-27), p. 418-446
    In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, MDPI AG, Vol. 4, No. 2 ( 2015-03-27), p. 418-446
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2220-9964
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2655790-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MDPI AG ; 2018
    In:  ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information Vol. 7, No. 8 ( 2018-07-31), p. 307-
    In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, MDPI AG, Vol. 7, No. 8 ( 2018-07-31), p. 307-
    Abstract: The building permission process is to a large extent an analogue process where much information is handled in paper format or as pdf files. With the ongoing digitalisation in society, there is a potential to automate this process by integrating Building Information Models (BIM) of planned buildings and geospatial data to check if a building conforms to the building permission regulations. In this study, an inventory of which regulations in the (Swedish) detailed development plans that can be automatically checked or supported by 3D visualisation was conducted. Then, two of these regulations, the building height and the building footprint area, were studied in detail to find to which extent they can be automatically checked by integration of BIM and geospatial data. In addition, a feasibility study of one visual criterion was conducted. One concern when automating the building permission process is the variability of content within the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) data model. Variations in modelling methods and model content leads to differences in IFC models’ content and structure; these differences complicate automated processes. To facilitate automated processes, requirements on the production of IFC models for building permission applications could be defined in the form of model view definitions or delivery specifications.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2220-9964
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2655790-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MDPI AG ; 2019
    In:  ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information Vol. 8, No. 7 ( 2019-07-19), p. 310-
    In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, MDPI AG, Vol. 8, No. 7 ( 2019-07-19), p. 310-
    Abstract: Geospatial information is indispensable for various real-world applications and is thus a prominent part of today’s data science landscape. Geospatial data is primarily maintained and disseminated through spatial data infrastructures (SDIs). However, current SDIs are facing challenges in terms of data integration and semantic heterogeneity because of their partially siloed data organization. In this context, linked data provides a promising means to unravel these challenges, and it is seen as one of the key factors moving SDIs toward the next generation. In this study, we investigate the technical environment of the support for geospatial linked data by assessing and benchmarking some popular and well-known spatially enabled RDF stores (RDF4J, GeoSPARQL-Jena, Virtuoso, Stardog, and GraphDB), with a focus on GeoSPARQL compliance and query performance. The tests were performed in two different scenarios. In the first scenario, geospatial data forms a part of a large-scale data infrastructure and is integrated with other types of data. In this scenario, we used ICOS Carbon Portal’s metadata—a real-world Earth Science linked data infrastructure. In the second scenario, we benchmarked the RDF stores in a dedicated SDI environment that contains purely geospatial data, and we used geospatial datasets with both crowd-sourced and authoritative data (the same test data used in a previous benchmark study, the Geographica benchmark). The assessment and benchmarking results demonstrate that the GeoSPARQL compliance of the RDF stores has encouragingly advanced in the last several years. The query performances are generally acceptable, and spatial indexing is imperative when handling a large number of geospatial objects. Nevertheless, query correctness remains a challenge for cross-database interoperability. In conclusion, the results indicate that the spatial capacity of the RDF stores has become increasingly mature, which could benefit the development of future SDIs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2220-9964
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2655790-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...