Description: Fouling is a stressor that might determine the fate of seaweeds, but reports of algal adaptation to epibiosis are scarce. Previous comparisons have shown resistance to epibionts can be higher in non-native than in resident seaweed species, but we do not know whether it is an intrinsic trait of the non-natives or it has been acquired during the invasion process. We here compared native and non-native populations of the same algal species to elucidate this question. Resistance against two groups of epiphytes was assessed in living thalli and in artificial substrata coated with surface extracts, both gained from four Asian (native) and four European (non-native) populations of the red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla. Two diatom species and two filamentous macroalgae were used as micro- and macro-epiphytes, and one of each type was collected in Asia, while the other came from Europe. Laboratory assays were done in both distributional ranges of G. vermiculophylla and in different seasons. We used a fully crossed design with the factors (i) ‘Origin of Gracilaria’, (ii) ‘Origin of epiphytes’, (iii) ‘Season’ and (iv) ‘Solvent used for extraction’. Both groups of epiphytes, regardless of their origin, attached less to living thalli and to surface extracts from non-native G. vermiculophylla. Fewer diatoms attached to hexane-based extracts, while fewer Ceramium filaments settled on extracts gained with dichloromethane. Our results show for the first time that non-native individuals of a seaweed are better defended against epiphytes than native conspecifics. Furthermore, we found evidence that at least a part of the defence is based on extractable secondary metabolites. We suggest that an enhanced defence against epiphytes after introduction is one reason for G. vermiculophylla’s invasion success. Our observation may also apply to other basibiont–epibiont interactions and could be a key feature of seaweed bioinvasions.

Description: RNA polymerase II (pol II) is required for the transcription of all protein-coding genes and as such represents a major enzyme whose activity is tightly regulated. Transcriptional initiation therefore requires numerous general transcriptional factors and cofactors that associate with pol II at the core promoter to form a pre-initiation complex. Transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) is a general cofactor that binds TFIID and stabilizes the TFIID–DNA complex during transcription initiation. Previous studies showed that TFIIA can make contact with the DNA sequence upstream or downstream of the TATA box, and that the region bound by TFIIA could overlap with the elements recognized by another factor, TFIIB, at adenovirus major late core promoter. Whether core promoters contain a DNA motif recognized by TFIIA remains unknown. Here we have identified a core promoter element upstream of the TATA box that is recognized by TFIIA. A search of the human promoter database revealed that many natural promoters contain a TFIIA recognition element (IIARE). We show that the IIARE enhances TFIIA-promoter binding and enhances the activity of TATA-containing promoters, but represses or activates promoters that lack a TATA box. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that the IIARE activates transcription by increasing the recruitment of pol II, TFIIA, TAF4, and P300 at TATA-dependent promoters. These findings extend our understanding of the role of TFIIA in transcription, and provide new insights into the regulatory mechanism of core promoter elements in gene transcription by pol II.

Description: The 1555A→G mutation in mitochondrial 12S rRNA has been associated with aminoglycoside-induced and non-syndromic deafness in many individuals worldwide. Mitochondrial genetic modifiers are proposed to influence the phenotypic expression of m.1555A→G mutation. Here, we report that a deafness-susceptibility allele (m.4317A→G) in the tRNAIle gene modulates the phenotype expression of m.1555A→G mutation. Strikingly, a large Han Chinese pedigree carrying both m.4317A→G and m.1555A→G mutations exhibited much higher penetrance of deafness than those carrying only the m.1555A→G mutation. The m.4317A→G mutation affected a highly conserved adenine at position 59 in the T-loop of tRNAIle. We therefore hypothesized that the m.4317A→G mutation alters both structure and function of tRNAIle. Using lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from members of Chinese families (three carrying both m.1555A→G and m.4317A→G mutations, three harboring only m.1555A→G mutation, and three controls lacking these mutations), we found that the cell lines bearing both m.4317A→G and m.1555A→G mutations exhibited more severe mitochondrial dysfunctions than those carrying only the m.1555A→G mutation. We also found that the m.4317A→G mutation perturbed the conformation, stability, and aminoacylation efficiency of tRNAIle. These m.4317A→G mutation-induced alterations in tRNAIle structure and function aggravated the defective mitochondrial translation and respiratory phenotypes associated with the m.1555A→G mutation. Furthermore, mutant cell lines bearing both m.4317A→G and m.1555A→G mutations exhibited greater reductions in the mitochondrial ATP levels and membrane potentials and increasing production of reactive oxygen species than those carrying only the m.1555A→G mutation. Our findings provide new insights into the pathophysiology of maternally inherited deafness arising from the synergy between mitochondrial 12S rRNA and tRNA mutations.

Description: Cytoskeletal filamin A (FLNA) is an important protein involved in multiple cellular processes. Previous studies have shown that FLNA can promote or inhibit cancer growth and development; however, the mechanisms underlying these events are not fully understood. Here we show that, in both 293T and SaOS2 cells, knockdown of FLNA significantly enhanced transcription of RNA polymerase (pol) III-transcribed genes except for a subset of tRNA genes. In contrast, re-expression of FLNA in an FLNA-deficient melanoma cell line (A7) repressed transcription of all pol III-transcribed genes, suggesting that FLNA inhibits pol III transcription in a cell type-specific manner. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that the repression of pol III gene transcription by FLNA correlates with the decreased occupancy of the RNA pol III transcription machinery at promoters. Immunofluorescence microscopy and coimmunoprecipitation assays revealed that FLNA can associate with the RNA pol III transcription machinery through its actin-binding domain within nuclei. Mechanistic analysis revealed that FLNA suppresses pol III gene transcription by confining the recruitment of the RNA pol III transcription machinery at the promoters of the genes that are sensitive to the alteration of FLNA expression. These findings not only extend the understanding of FLNA function in cells but also provide novel insights into the mechanism by which FLNA represses cell proliferation.