GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
  • 2015-2019  (5)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (5)
Language
Years
  • 2015-2019  (5)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 10106-10106
    Abstract: 10106 Background: A decision aid (DA) increases knowledge, decreases decisional conflicts and regrets and improves post-decision satisfaction, emotional distress. However, few DA trials have revealed whether decisional role preferences have an impact on patient-reported outcomes by decision making. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of caregiver’s decisional role preference on decisional conflicts and psychiatric distresses in decision making. Methods: 406 of 444 caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients enrolled onto a previous trial determining the efficacy of the decision aid about disclosure of terminal disease status were included in this analysis. The analysis outcomes were change score of decisional conflicts using the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) and depression and anxiety using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1 and 3 months from baseline. Participants were divided into 4 groups: active caregiver who received DA (active-DA), active caregiver in control group (active-control), passive caregiver who received DA (passive-DA), and passive caregiver in control group (passive-control). Linear mixed model was conducted to find out the impact of caregiver’s decisional role preference on the DCS and the HADS. Results: Among 406 caregivers, 137 (33.7%) showed active role preference, and 269 (66.3%) showed passive role preference. In post-hoc analysis of adjusted differences of change scores between passive-DA and active-DA groups, non-significant differences were observed in DCS. However, at 3 months, change scores of HADS depression subscale increased as 4.43 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-8.07; P 〈 0.007; effect size (ES) 0.71) and those of HADS anxiety subscales increased as 4.14 (95% CI, 0.37-7.91; P= 0.021; ES 0.61) in passive-DA group than in active-DA group, showing moderate to large difference. Conclusions: These findings suggest that information about decision making might be provided with tailored format for how much individual wish to involve in decision making.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 3104-3104
    Abstract: 3104 Background: It has been demonstrated in vivo that HGF-MET signaling axis is a key molecular determinant in tumor invasion and there is a significant association in HGF expression and mesenchymal phenotype in addition to immune cell recruitment. We have developed a HGF neutralizing humanized monoclonal antibody antibody, YYB-101. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerate dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of YYB101, in patients with refractory solid tumors. Methods: YYB101 was administered intravenously at once every 2 weeks doses of 0.3, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 mg/kg, according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. Enrolled patients were planned to receive YYB101 until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The escalation and expansion cohorts (20mg/kg) were completed. Pre-planned biomarker analysis was performed in parallel. Results: 39 heavily pre-treated refractory cancer patients were enrolled and received YYB101. No DLT was observed. YYB101 demonstrated dose proportional PK up to the dose of 30 mg/kg. No patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Based on PK analysis and toxicity data, the recommended dose was determined as 20 mg/kg. Of 39 evaluation patients, there was 1 confirmed partial response for 〉 +14months (2.5%, N = 1; 1 (of 2) sebaceous carcinoma) and 17 stable disease as best response (43.5%, N = 17; 7 (of 13) CRC, 3 (of 4) melanoma, 1 (of 2) sebaceous carcinoma, 1 (of 3) gastric, 1 (of 1) basal cell carcinoma, 2 (of 10) ovarian cancer, 1 (of 1) HCC, 1 (of 1) lung cancer). Of note, 1 sebaceous carcinoma patient who have failed to ≥2+ lines of chemotherapy, have been responding to YYB for 14 months. The MET and HGF expressions by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were evaluated in 19 and 17 tumor specimens, respectively. Neither protein expressions were significant predictors for treatment response to anti-HGF antibody. However, we have observed significant reduction in HGF in responders to YYB. Two long-term responders had mesenchymal signature in RNA sequencing. Conclusions: YYB101 has a favorable safety profile in patients with refractory solid tumors and a dose-proportional PK. Efficacy data are encouraging and phase II combination therapy with YYB101 is planned to be open in metastatic CRC patients as salvage treatment. The predictive power of mesenchymal signature in YYB responders will be defined prospectively. Clinical trial information: 02499224.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e14501-e14501
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 7_suppl ( 2015-03-01), p. 427-427
    Abstract: 427 Background: Standard sunitinib schedule, 4-week on followed by 2-week off (schedule 4/2), is associated with troublesome toxicities, and maintenance of sunitinib dose intensity has been challenging, especially in patients with Asian ethnicity. To determine the efficacy and safety of an alternative dosing schedule, 2-week on and 1-week off (schedule 2/1), we conducted a randomized phase II study. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients ≥18 years with clear cell type, mRCC were randomly assigned 1:1 to schedule 4/2 or schedule 2/1 after stratification for MSKCC risk group. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS) at 6 months. Results: From November 2007 to February 2014, 76 patients were enrolled (38 to schedule 4/2 and 38 to schedule 2/1). Two patients in schedule 4/2 were later found to be ineligible due to brain metastases and excluded from the analysis. FFS at 6 months was 44% in schedule 4/2 and 63% in schedule 2/1. Patients with schedule 2/1 were treated for a median of 7.7 months (95% CI, 3.0-12.3) of initial assigned schedule, while patients with schedule 4/2 were treated for a median of 5.7 months (95% CI, 5.0-6.5) (HR=0.54, 95% CI, 0.32-0.91, p=0.021). Seven patients in the schedule 4/2 crossed over to the schedule 2/1. Neutropenia (all grade 61% vs. 37%; grade 3-4 28% vs. 11%, p=0.0368) and fatigue (all grade 83% vs. 58%, p=0.0167) were more frequently observed with schedule 4/2. There is a strong tendency of lower incidence of mucositis (all grade, 86% vs.71%, p=0.116), and hand-foot syndrome (grade 3-4, 33% vs. 18%, p=0.143) and rash (all grade, 56% vs. 34%, p=0.0648) with schedule 2/1. Eighteen patients (ORR, 47%) in the schedule 2/1 achieved a partial response (PR) while one patient had a complete response and 11 patients had a PR (ORR, 36%, 95% CI) in the schedule 4/2. With a median follow-up duration of 47 months, the median time-to-progression was 15.1 months in the schedule 2/1 and 10.1 months in the schedule 4/2 (HR=0.69, 95% CI, 0.39-1.20). Conclusions: Sunitinib given with the schedule 2/1 is associated with less toxicity and longer FFS than the schedule 4/2 without compromising the efficacy in terms of ORR and PFS (NCT00570882). Clinical trial information: NCT00570882.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 4051-4051
    Abstract: 4051 Background: Afatinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB kinase inhibitor showed anti-tumor activity against esophageal cancer in phase I trial. In this multicenter, open-label, single arm phase II study, we aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of afatinib in R/M ESCC. Methods: Patients (pts) who had ECOG PS 0-2 and had progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy for R/M ESCC were enrolled. Pts were treated with afatinib 40mg/day until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient’s refusal. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. The estimated sample size was 49, using a two-stage minimax design to evaluate incremental response rate from 5 to 15%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile. Additionally, we try to identify biomarker to predict efficacy of afatinib with target capture sequencing and gene expression profile as exploratory endpoints. Results: In a total of 49 enrolled pts (median age 60; range 44 -84), ORR and DCR were 14.3 % and 73.3%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 6.6 months, median PFS and OS was 3.4 months (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 6.6 months (95% CI 5.2-8.0). Median treatment duration and duration of response were 2.8 months (range, 0.4-15.3) and 7.1 months (range, 2.5-13.9), respectively. Dose reduction and interruption occurred in 19 (38.8%) and 15 (30.6 %) pts. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 33 pts (67.3%) with most common TRAEs being diarrhea (n=22, 44.9%) and acneiform rash (n=12, 24.5%). G3-4 TRAEs were rare, occurring in 7 pts (14.3 %). Conclusions: Afatinib demonstrated modest efficacy with manageable toxicity in platinum-resistant R/M ESCC patients. Given the modest response rate, identification of predictive biomarkers is essential for further clinical investigation of afatinib in R/M ESCC. Those biomarkers are being analyzed and will be presented in the conference (NCT02353936). Clinical trial information: NCT02353936. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...