GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your search history is empty.

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2020-2024  (4)
  • Medicine  (4)
  • XA 30325  (4)
Material
Publisher
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (4)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (4)
RVK
  • 1
    In: Arthritis & Rheumatology, Wiley, Vol. 72, No. 12 ( 2020-12), p. 1998-2004
    Abstract: Coagulopathy is one of the characteristics observed in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) contribute to coagulopathy, though their role in COVID‐19 remains unclear. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and characteristics of aPLs in patients with COVID‐19. Methods Sera collected from 66 COVID‐19 patients who were critically ill and 13 COVID‐19 patients who were not critically ill were tested by chemiluminescence immunoassay for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs), anti–β 2 ‐glycoprotein I (anti‐β 2 GPI) (IgG, IgM, and IgA), and IgG anti‐β 2 GPI–domain 1 (anti‐β 2 GPI–D1) and IgM and IgG anti–phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti‐PS/PT) antibodies were detected in the serum by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results Of the 66 COVID‐19 patients in critical condition, aPLs were detected in 31 (47% ). Antiphospholipid antibodies were not present among COVID‐19 patients who were not in critical condition. The IgA anti‐β 2 GPI antibody was the most commonly observed aPL in patients with COVID‐19 and was present in 28.8% (19 of 66) of the critically ill patients, followed by IgA aCLs (17 of 66, or 25.8%) and IgG anti‐β 2 GPI (12 of 66, or 18.2%). For multiple aPLs, IgA anti‐β 2 GPI + IgA aCLs was the most common antibody profile observed (15 of 66, or 22.7%), followed by IgA anti‐β 2 GPI + IgA aCL + IgG anti‐β 2 GPI (10 of 66, or 15.2%). Antiphospholipid antibodies emerge ~35–39 days after disease onset. A dynamic analysis of aPLs revealed 4 patterns based on the persistence or transient appearance of the aPLs. Patients with multiple aPLs had a significantly higher incidence of cerebral infarction compared to patients who were negative for aPLs ( P = 0.023). Conclusion Antiphospholipid antibodies were common in critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Repeated testing demonstrating medium to high titers of aPLs and the number of aPL types a patient is positive for may help in identifying patients who are at risk of developing cerebral infarction. Antiphospholipid antibodies may be transient and disappear within a few weeks, but in genetically predisposed patients, COVID‐19 may trigger the development of an autoimmune condition similar to the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), referred to as “COVID‐19–induced APS‐like syndrome.” Long‐term follow‐up of COVID‐19 patients who are positive for aPLs would be of great importance in understanding the pathogenesis of this novel coronavirus.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2326-5191 , 2326-5205
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2754614-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Arthritis Care & Research, Wiley, Vol. 76, No. 5 ( 2024-05), p. 703-711
    Abstract: There is an unmet need for simpler urate‐lowering therapy (ULT) regimens that achieve the serum urate target and improve the overall quality of gout care. We report a comparative effectiveness trial of febuxostat monotherapy versus benzbromarone add‐on to low‐dose febuxostat in gout specifically with combined renal urate underexcretion and overload. Methods A prospective randomized trial was conducted on patients with combined‐type hyperuricemia and estimated glomerular filtration rate 〉 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 1:1 randomly assigned to febuxostat and benzbromarone combination therapy (initially febuxostat at 20 mg/day, with benzbromarone at 25 mg/day added onto 20 mg/day of febuxostat if not at target) or febuxostat monotherapy (initially 20 mg/day, escalating to 40 mg/day if not at target). The primary end point at 12 weeks was the proportion achieving a serum urate (SU) level 〈 360 μmol/L. Other outcomes included altered liver and kidney function, new‐onset urolithiasis, and gout flares. Results There were 250 participants randomized; 219 completed 12‐week treatment. More patients in the febuxostat and benzbromarone combination group achieved the SU target compared to patients in the febuxostat monotherapy group (75.5% vs 47.7%; odds ratio 3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.90–5.98]). Safety profiles were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Simply adding on low‐dose benzbromarone (25 mg/day) to low‐dose (20 mg/day) febuxostat showed superior urate lowering compared to febuxostat monotherapy in gout with a combined‐type hyperuricemia. For selected patients, expedited achievement of the SU target in more than 75% of patients using one titration step and low xanthine oxidase inhibitor and uricosuric doses is a potential alternative to standard ULT regimens.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2151-464X , 2151-4658
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2016713-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Arthritis & Rheumatology, Wiley, Vol. 74, No. 12 ( 2022-12), p. 2015-2023
    Abstract: The predominant mechanism driving hyperuricemia in gout is renal uric acid underexcretion; however, the standard urate‐lowering therapy (ULT) recommendation is first‐line xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI), irrespective of the cause of hyperuricemia. This comparative effectiveness clinical trial was undertaken to compare first‐line nontitrated low‐dose benzbromarone (LDBen) uricosuric therapy to XOI ULT with low‐dose febuxostat (LDFeb) in gout patients with renal uric acid underexcretion. Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, single‐center, open‐label trial in men with gout and renal uric acid underexcretion (defined as fractional excretion of urate 〈 5.5% and uric acid excretion ≤600 mg/day/1.73 m 2 ). A total of 196 participants were randomly assigned to receive LDBen 25 mg daily or LDFeb 20 mg daily for 12 weeks. All participants received daily urine alkalization with oral sodium bicarbonate. The primary end point was the rate of achieving the serum urate target of 〈 6 mg/dl. Results More participants in the LDBen group achieved the serum urate target than those in the LDFeb group (61% compared to 32%, P   〈  0.001). Rates of adverse events, including gout flares and urolithiasis, did not differ between groups, with the exception of greater transaminase elevation in the LDFeb group (4% for LDBen compared to 15% for LDFeb, P  = 0.008). Conclusion Compared to LDFeb, LDBen has superior urate‐lowering efficacy and similar safety in treating relatively young and healthy patients with renal uric acid underexcretion–type gout.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2326-5191 , 2326-5205
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2754614-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Arthritis Care & Research, Wiley
    Abstract: To assess post‐COVID‐19 vaccination gout flare risk with differing baseline flare burden. Methods We prospectively studied gout patients with infrequent or frequent flares, defined as ≤1 flare/year, or ≥2 flares/year, respectively. COVID‐19 vaccine‐naïve patients managed with urate‐lowering therapy between February‐June 2021were included, and voluntarily decided on vaccination. Participants were followed for 12 weeks after enrollment or first vaccine dose. Gout flares and risk factors were compared between groups. Results Of 530 participants, 308 (58.1%) had infrequent flares, and 222 (41.9%) had frequent flares at baseline, with 248 (142 infrequent, 106 frequent) receiving two‐dose COVID‐19 vaccination. Vaccination increased cumulative flare incidence at 12 weeks in the infrequent but not the frequent flare group (26.1% vs. 10.8%, P =0.001, compared to 60.4% vs. 65.5%, P =0.428). Flare incidence in the final 4 weeks of observation decreased significantly only in the vaccinated infrequent flare group (4.3% vs. 12.0%, P =0.017). Multivariable analyses showed that vaccination (OR=2.82, 95%CI 1.50‐5.30, P =0.001), flare in the preceding year (OR=1.95, 95%CI 1.03‐3.71, P =0.04) and BMI (OR=1.09, 95%CI 1.01‐1.19, P =0.03) were independently associated with increased flare risk in the infrequent flare group. Baseline serum urate (mg/dL) was an independent risk factor in the frequent flare group (OR=1.23, 95%CI 1.05‐1.45, P =0.012). Conclusion COVID‐19 vaccination was associated with increased early gout flares only in patients with previously infrequent flares. image
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2151-464X , 2151-4658
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2016713-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...