GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Global Change Biology, Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 11 ( 2022-06), p. 3515-3536
    Abstract: Offshore platforms, subsea pipelines, wells and related fixed structures supporting the oil and gas (O & G) industry are prevalent in oceans across the globe, with many approaching the end of their operational life and requiring decommissioning. Although structures can possess high ecological diversity and productivity, information on how they interact with broader ecological processes remains unclear. Here, we review the current state of knowledge on the role of O & G infrastructure in maintaining, altering or enhancing ecological connectivity with natural marine habitats. There is a paucity of studies on the subject with only 33 papers specifically targeting connectivity and O & G structures, although other studies provide important related information. Evidence for O & G structures facilitating vertical and horizontal seascape connectivity exists for larvae and mobile adult invertebrates, fish and megafauna; including threatened and commercially important species. The degree to which these structures represent a beneficial or detrimental net impact remains unclear, is complex and ultimately needs more research to determine the extent to which natural connectivity networks are conserved, enhanced or disrupted. We discuss the potential impacts of different decommissioning approaches on seascape connectivity and identify, through expert elicitation, critical knowledge gaps that, if addressed, may further inform decision making for the life cycle of O & G infrastructure, with relevance for other industries (e.g. renewables). The most highly ranked critical knowledge gap was a need to understand how O & G structures modify and influence the movement patterns of mobile species and dispersal stages of sessile marine species. Understanding how different decommissioning options affect species survival and movement was also highly ranked, as was understanding the extent to which O & G structures contribute to extending species distributions by providing rest stops, foraging habitat, and stepping stones. These questions could be addressed with further dedicated studies of animal movement in relation to structures using telemetry, molecular techniques and movement models. Our review and these priority questions provide a roadmap for advancing research needed to support evidence‐based decision making for decommissioning O & G infrastructure.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1354-1013 , 1365-2486
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020313-5
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Ecological Monographs, Wiley, Vol. 92, No. 1 ( 2022-02)
    Abstract: Cumulative impacts assessments on marine ecosystems have been hindered by the difficulty of collecting environmental data and identifying drivers of community dynamics beyond local scales. On coral reefs, an additional challenge is to disentangle the relative influence of multiple drivers that operate at different stages of coral ontogeny. We integrated coral life history, population dynamics, and spatially explicit environmental drivers to assess the relative and cumulative impacts of multiple stressors across 2,300 km of the world’s largest coral reef ecosystem, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Using literature data, we characterized relationships between coral life history processes (reproduction, larval dispersal, recruitment, growth, and mortality) and environmental variables. We then simulated coral demographics and stressor impacts at the organism (coral colony) level on 〉 3,800 individual reefs linked by larval connectivity and exposed to temporally and spatially realistic regimes of acute (crown‐of‐thorns starfish outbreaks, cyclones, and mass coral bleaching) and chronic (water‐quality) stressors. Model simulations produced a credible reconstruction of recent (2008–2020) coral trajectories consistent with monitoring observations, while estimating the impacts of each stressor at reef and regional scales. Overall, simulated coral populations declined by one‐third across the GBR, from an average of ~29% to ~19% hard coral cover. By 2020, 〈 20% of the GBR had coral cover higher than 30%, a status of reef health corroborated by scarce and sparsely distributed monitoring data. Reef‐wide annual rates of coral mortality were driven by bleaching (48%) ahead of cyclones (41%) and starfish predation (11%). Beyond the reconstructed status and trends, the model enabled the emergence of complex interactions that compound the effects of multiple stressors while promoting a mechanistic understanding of coral cover dynamics. Drivers of coral cover growth were identified; notably, water quality (suspended sediments) was estimated to delay recovery for at least 25% of inshore reefs. Standardized rates of coral loss and recovery allowed the integration of all cumulative impacts to determine the equilibrium cover for each reef. This metric, combined with maps of impacts, recovery potential, water‐quality thresholds, and reef state metrics, facilitates strategic spatial planning and resilience‐based management across the GBR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0012-9615 , 1557-7015
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010129-6
    SSG: 12
    SSG: 14
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Ecosphere, Wiley, Vol. 14, No. 6 ( 2023-06)
    Abstract: Crown‐of‐thorns starfish (CoTS) naturally occur on coral reefs throughout the Indo‐Pacific region. On Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR), outbreaks of CoTS populations are responsible for ecologically significant losses of corals, and while they have been documented for decades, they now undermine coral recovery from multiple stressors, especially anthropogenic warming. Culling interventions are currently the best approach to control CoTS outbreaks on the GBR, but assessing control effectiveness under multiple stressors is complicated. Using an ensemble of two reef community models simulating the temporal and spatial dynamics of CoTS and corals under future climate scenarios, we evaluate the present‐day and future effectiveness of the current implementation of the GBR CoTS Control Program. Specifically, we determine the culling effort needed (i.e., number of vessels) to achieve the maximum ecological benefits as predicted by the models under possible warming futures. Benefits were measured by comparing projections of coral cover and CoTS densities under scenarios of increasing control effort and baseline scenarios where no control was simulated. Projections of present‐day control efforts (five vessels) show that the number of individual reefs subject to CoTS outbreaks is reduced by 50%–65% annually, yielding a benefit of 5%–7% of healthy GBR coral area per decade, equivalent to gaining 104–150 km 2 of live corals by 2035. A threefold increase in current control efforts is sufficient to reach more than 80% of the maximum coral benefits predicted by each model, but the future amount of effort required to control CoTS effectively depends on the intensity of warming and the early detection of CoTS outbreaks. While culling CoTS across the entire GBR is unfeasible, we provide a framework for maximizing ecosystem‐wide benefits of CoTS control and guide management decisions on the required culling effort needed to reduce CoTS outbreaks to levels that may ensure coral persistence in the face of future climate change impacts.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2150-8925 , 2150-8925
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2572257-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...