GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (32)
  • 2020-2024  (32)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (32)
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (32)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 368-368
    Abstract: 368 Background: Mucosal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (T1a EC) is treated with endoscopic (ER) or surgical resection (SR). The data regarding prognosis of T1a EC and the associated factors are still lacking. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of T1a EC in ER and SR groups, and to investigate the factors affecting long-term survival. Methods: We retrieved data for 263 patients with T1a EC who underwent ER (n = 200) or SR (n = 63). Relevant clinical and tumor-specific parameters were reviewed. Underlying comorbidity was scored using Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI). Significant factors affecting survival were determined by Cox regression analysis. Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.5±8.0 years. During a mean follow-up of 54.4±20.4 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) of all T1a EC patients was 85.7% (86.8% in ER and 82.4% in SR group; p = 0.631). In multivariate analysis, CCI was a significant factor affecting survival (p 〈 0.001). The 5-year OS was 60.2% in patients with CCI 〉 2 and 88.2% in patients with CCI ≤2 (p 〈 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of primary EC recurrence was 1.9% and metachronous EC recurrence was 15.1% in ER group (0% in SR group). Incidence of subsequent second primary cancers was 9% in ER and 9.5% in SR. The 5-year cumulative incidences of all cases of cancer recurrence in ER and SR groups were 27.5% and 10.8%, respectively (p = 0.037). The procedure-related adverse events occurred in 10.0% in ER and 41.3% in SR (p 〈 0.001). Among the 24 (12.0%) and 10 (15.9%) deaths in ER and SR group, respectively, primary EC-specific death was not reported. The major causes of death were second primary cancers in ER group (75%), and post-operative complications or organ failure in SR group (70%). Conclusions: Long-term survival was excellent in patients undergoing ER or SR for T1a EC. The prognosis of T1a EC was significantly associated with underlying comorbidity. Attention should be paid to metachronous cancer recurrence in ER group and operation-related adverse events in SR group.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e16542-e16542
    Abstract: e16542 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown survival benefits in unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer (GC), esophageal cancer (EC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on scientific rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy, including enhanced immune recognition, we initiated a phase II study of IMC-001, a novel PD-L1 targeting fully human monoclonal Ab in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable GC, EC, and HCC. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, phase II study of neoadjuvant IMC-001 (20 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks for 2 cycles) across three cohorts of resectable gastrointestinal cancers (GC, EC, HCC). The primary endpoint is major pathologic response rate ( 〈 10% of viable tumor cells) and secondary endpoints include safety, feasibility, R0 resection rate, clinical tumor response rate/disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include immune monitoring and biomarker analysis in tumor tissues, blood, and stool. Results: From Sep. 2019 to Feb. 2020, 14 eligible patients (pts) (6 HCC; 5 GC; 3 EC) were enrolled; male (79%), median age = 63 yrs (range, 40-72), clinical stage (AJCC 8 th ) I (57%)/II (21%)/III (21%). 12 pts completed 2 cycles of neoadjuvant IMC-001 and one pt stopped after one cycle due to G3 autoimmune hepatitis, which was only G3 adverse event (AE) and resolved with steroid. Other AE included G2 hyperthyroidism (n = 1), G1 pruritus (n = 2), G1 rash (n = 1), G1 myalgia (n = 1), G1 arthralgia (n = 1), G1 diarrhea (n = 1), G1 cough (n = 1), G1 palate discomfort (n = 1), and G1 chest discomfort (n = 1). So far, 10 clinical response-evaluable pts showed a 100% DCR and underwent surgery, which was all R0 resection. Post-treatment surgery specimens showed various degrees of lymphocyte infiltration in intratumoral or peritumoral areas ranging from 10% to 90%, which was increased compared to pre-treatment biopsies. In HCC pts, adjacent hepatic parenchyma showed mild to moderate, diffuse portal inflammation regardless of Hepatitis B virus status and minimal and moderate fatty change. IHC for PD-L1 using 22C3, SP263 and SP142 clones showed similar results among three Abs with relatively low expression regardless of tumor types (range, 0-20%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant IMC-001 seems to be well tolerated and have preliminary immune modulating activity in resectable GC, EC, and HCC pts. The study is ongoing and the updated clinical and immunologic results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04196465 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 822-822
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 822-822
    Abstract: 822 Background: Endoscopic resection (ER) can be applied for small SETs of stomach. GISTs can be diagnosed pathologically after resection. Initially we used ESD. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) was introduced for overcoming limitations of ESD. However, STER was very difficult to apply for gastric lesions. We developed new ER method, clip-assisted surgical endoscopy (CASE, Jung's method). In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of ER for GISTs and compared 3 ER methods. Methods: Medical records of 53 patients who diagnosed GISTs after ER for SETs from 2005 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Average age was 60.0 ± 10.6 years. ESD, STER and CASE were performed for 23, 5, and 25 patients, respectively. Clinical characteristics, procedure times, and outcomes of each endoscopic technique were analyzed. Results: Average pathological size of GIST was 2.1 cm. 94.3% proved to be very low risk of malignant potential. Location of SETs were different; ESD applied mainly for body lesions, STER tried for fundus lesions, CASE also mainly for fundus and high body lesions. Overall R0 and R1 resection rate was 62.3%, and 35.8%. There are 34 patients who had complications after the procedure (21 micro-perforation, 12 macro-perforation, 1 bleeding), but perforation would be a part of ER procedure for SETs. In ESD, some macro-perforations was a reason for surgical conversion. Four patients (2 ESD, 1 STER, 1 CASE) underwent surgical conversion during ER. STER had the longest procedure time (50.3, 95.2 and 40.7 min, P = 0.018). After development of CASE procedure, we can reduce procedure time and on-site surgical conversion. R0 resection rate was highest in CASE. No R1 resected patients were recurrent so far. Conclusions: ER seems to be safe and effective therapeutic options for removing small gastric GISTs. Using CASE (Jung's method), ER would be more comfortable especially in the fundus lesions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 29 ( 2022-10-10), p. 3394-3405
    Abstract: Epidemiologic studies suggest that chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a risk factor for various primary extrahepatic malignancies. Our aim was to evaluate the associations of CHB and nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment with the risk of the development of extrahepatic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted an 18-month landmark analysis using nationwide claims data from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. Patients newly diagnosed with CHB in 2012-2014 (n = 90,944) and matched-controls (n = 685,436) were included. Patients with CHB were further classified as the NA-treated (CHB+/NA+, n = 6,539) or the NA-untreated (CHB+/NA–, n = 84,405) group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was applied to balance the treatment groups. Time-varying Cox analysis was performed to evaluate time-varying effect of NA treatment. The primary outcome was the development of any primary extrahepatic malignancy. Development of intrahepatic malignancy and death were considered as competing events. RESULTS During the study period (median = 47.4 months), 30,413 patients (3.9%) developed any extrahepatic malignancy. The CHB+/NA– group had a higher overall risk of extrahepatic malignancy than the CHB+/NA+ group (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.45; P 〈 .001) or controls (aSHR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.26; P 〈 .001). There was no difference in the risk of extrahepatic malignancy between the CHB+/NA+ group and the controls (CHB+/NA+ v control: aSHR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.08; P = .48). In time-varying Cox analysis, the CHB+/NA– patients were associated with a higher risk of extrahepatic malignancy than the CHB+/NA+ patients (aSHR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.52; P 〈 .001). CONCLUSION Patients with CHB have an elevated risk of developing primary extrahepatic malignancy. Long-term NA treatment was associated with a lower risk of extrahepatic malignancy development among patients with CHB.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 5511-5511
    Abstract: 5511 Background: Pembrolizumab was approved for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, based on 14.3% of objective response rate (ORR) in patients with PD-L1 expression (CPS≥1). GX-188E vaccination has been shown to induce human papillomavirus (HPV) E6- and E7-specific T-cell responses. We aimed to investigate whether a combination of GX-188E (Tirvalimogene teraplasmid) therapeutic DNA vaccine plus pembrolizumab showed antitumor activity against recurrent or advanced cervical cancer. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients with recurrent or advanced cervical cancer, who were aged over 18 years with ECOG PS of 0 or 1, HPV-16 or HPV-18 and histologically confirmed positive cervical cancer, and who had progressed after standard-of-care therapy were recruited from nine hospitals in South Korea. Patients received intramuscular 2 mg GX-188E at weeks 1, 2, 4, 7, 13, 19, and optional dose at week 46, and intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 2 years or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the Best Overall Response Rate assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Results: To date, a total of 52 patients have been enrolled and received at least one study treatment, and this interim analysis was performed after obtaining at least one post-baseline tumor assessment data from 48 patients. Median age was 52 (range, 27-79) years and 46.2% had ECOG PS 1. At the data cutoff date on January 11, 2021, median follow-up duration was 6.2 months (range; 1.7- 24.2 months). According to investigator evaluation, 15 (31.3%) of 48 patients achieved best overall response; 5 (10.4 %) patients had a complete response (CR) and 10 (20.8 %) had a partial response (PR). Especially, this combination treatment showed higher response rate, 48.0 %, in patients with PD-L1 positive, HPV-16 and squamous cell carcinoma. Median PFS was 4.1 months (range; 1.3-24.2) and median OS was 16.7 months (range; 1.7-24.2). In this clinical trial with cervical cancer patients, GX-188E in combination with pembrolizumab has shown an improved median PFS and OS than the monotherapy of pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-158). 17 (32.7%) of 52 patients had treatment-related adverse events of any grade and two (3.8%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events; increased aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: GX-188E vaccine combined with pembrolizumab in recurrent/advanced cervical cancer was safe and tolerable, and showed an enhanced clinical response rate compared with pembrolizumab alone in particular in patients with PD-L1 positive, HPV-16 and squamous cell carcinoma. The combination therapy could represent a new potential treatment option for this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT03444376.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS5610-TPS5610
    Abstract: TPS5610 Background: Given the expanding clinical use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), there is a significant need for optimal strategies with which to treat patients whose cancer progresses while using a PARPi. However, the treatment consensus after PARPi has not been established. The aim of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) 3056/NIRVANA-R trial is to investigate the efficacy of niraparib in combination with bevacizumab as a maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients who were previously treated with a PARPi. Methods: The KGOG 3056/NIRVANA-R is a multi-centre, investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer recruited from seven KGOG sites. This study included patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy and had been treated with a PARPi. Mucinous histology type was excluded. Patients who had responded to the last platinum regimen (either complete or partial response) were eligible to participate in this study. Forty-four patients will be recruited. All enrolled patients are treated with niraparib and bevacizumab for maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent. The primary endpoint of the study is 6-month progression-free survival rate and 4 of planned 44 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04734665.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 26 ( 2021-09-10), p. 2903-2913
    Abstract: Adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy is standard for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) in Asia. Based on positive findings for perioperative chemotherapy in European phase III studies, the phase III PRODIGY study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01515748 ) investigated whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 could improve outcomes versus standard treatment in Korean patients with resectable LAGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients 20-75 years of age, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and with histologically confirmed primary gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (clinical TNM staging: T2-3N+ or T4Nany) were randomly assigned to D2 surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (40-60 mg orally twice a day, days 1-28 every 6 weeks for eight cycles; SC group) or neoadjuvant DOS (docetaxel 50 mg/m 2 , oxaliplatin 100 mg/m 2 intravenously day 1, S-1 40 mg/m 2 orally twice a day, days 1-14 every 3 weeks for three cycles) before D2 surgery, followed by adjuvant S-1 (CSC group). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) with CSC versus SC. Two sensitivity analyses were performed: intent-to-treat and landmark PFS analysis. RESULTS Between January 18, 2012, and January 2, 2017, 266 patients were randomly assigned to CSC and 264 to SC at 18 Korean study sites; 238 and 246 patients, respectively, were treated (full analysis set). Follow-up was ongoing in 176 patients at data cutoff (January 21, 2019; median follow-up 38.6 months [interquartile range, 23.5-62.1]). CSC improved PFS versus SC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; stratified log-rank P = .023). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. Treatments were well tolerated. Two grade 5 adverse events (febrile neutropenia and dyspnea) occurred during neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION PRODIGY showed that neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy, as part of perioperative chemotherapy, is effective and tolerable in Korean patients with LAGC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 3605-3605
    Abstract: 3605 Background: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adding temozolomide (TMZ) to preoperative capecitabine (CAP)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and validate O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status as a predictive marker for TMZ combined regimens. Methods: : LARC patients with clinical stage II (cT3-4N0) or III (cT any N+) disease were enrolled. They were stratified into MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT) and MGMT methylated (mMGMT) groups by methylation-specific PCR before randomization, and then were randomly assigned (1:1) to one of four treatment arms: uMGMT/CAP (arm A), uMGMT/TMZ+CAP (arm B), mMGMT/CAP (arm C), and mMGMT/TMZ+CAP (arm D). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: Between November 2017 and July 2020, 64 patients were randomized. Slow accrual caused early study termination. After excluding 4 ineligible patients, 60 were included in the full analysis set. The pCR rate was 15.0% (9/60), 0%, 14.3%, 18.8%, and 26.7% for arms A, B, C, and D, respectively ( p= 0.0498 between arms A and D). The pCR rate was 9.7% in the CAP group (arms A+C), 20.7% in the TMZ+CAP group (arms B+D), 6.9% in the uMGMT group (arms A+B), and 22.6% in the mMGMT group (arms C+D). Grade 1–2 nausea or vomiting was significantly more frequent in the TMZ+CAP treatment groups (arms B+D) than in the CAP treatment groups (arms A+C, p 〈 0.001) with no difference in grade 3 adverse events (AEs). There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs. Conclusions: The addition of TMZ to CAP-based CRT tended to improve pCR rates, particularly in those with mMGMT LARC. MGMT status may warrant further investigation as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03156036.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. 309-309
    Abstract: 309 Background: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) still remains a major obstacle in the treatment of stage IV gastric cancer. This study was designed as a dose-escalation study of intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel combined with intravenous (IV) fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) to determine the recommended phase II dose in gastric cancer patients. Methods: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma with PM were enrolled. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was evaluated, and IP + IV chemoport insertion was done. The initial dose of IP paclitaxel was 40mg/m 2 , then stepped up to 60 then 80mg/m 2 . Target dose was 100mg/m 2 . IV FOLFOX was administered on the same day (oxaliplatin 100mg/m 2 , leucovorin 100mg/m 2 , fluorouracil 2400mg/m 2 ). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as leukopenia ≥ grade 4, thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3, febrile neutropenia ≥ grade 3, and other nonhematologic toxicity ≥ grade 3. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled, and two patients were dropped due to patient consent withdrawal. There was no DLT at 40 and 60mg/m 2 doses. Two patients had grade 3 febrile neutropenia at dose 80mg/m 2 , and thus the final recommended phase II dose was 60mg/m 2 . Other patients underwent IP paclitaxel and FOLFOX without serious adverse events. Seven patients underwent second-look diagnostic laparoscopy, and the average change in PCI score was -5.6 ± 9.3. Four patients received gastrectomy, and the ascites conversion rate was 4/5 (80%). Median survival time was 16.6 months (95% CI, 7.2 – N/A). Conclusions: The biweekly regimen of IP paclitaxel and FOLFOX is safe and the recommended dose for a phase II trial is 60mg/m 2 . Clinical trial information: NCT03618758.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 7522-7522
    Abstract: 7522 Background: All the FDA-approved CD19 CAR-T products are based on FMC63 scFv, which binds to the membrane-distal region of CD19. We developed a novel anti-CD19 antibody clone (1218) that binds to a membrane-proximal epitope of CD19, thereby not competing with FMC63. AT101 is an autologous CAR T cell transduced with a lentiviral vector, including the CD19-CAR with a humanized scFv of 1218, 4-1BB costimulatory, and CD3zeta domain. Methods: In this phase 1 trial, patients (n = 3 per dose level; up to n = 18 in total) are treated with AT101 in 3 dose-escalation cohorts based on a standard 3 + 3 design. Each patient received a single intravenous dose of AT101 at dose level (DL) 1 (0.2 x 10 6 cells/kg), DL2 (1.0 x 10 6 cells/kg), or DL3 (5.0 x 10 6 cells/kg). The primary objective is to determine the safety, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AT101. The secondary objective is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of AT101 and the preliminary efficacy, such as overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Key eligibility criteria include patients aged ≥19 with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled from March 2022 to December 2022, and nine were treated. The median age of treated patients was 61.6 years (ranged from 39 to 84) after a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range 2-10). Their subtypes of NHL were as follows: diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n = 4), follicular lymphoma (n = 3), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 1), or marginal zone lymphoma (n = 1). The dosing of AT101 at DL1 and DL2 was completed. The dosing at DL3 is ongoing. Across cohorts 1 and 2, no grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported. Among the first three patients at DL1, one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 4 neurotoxicity was observed but resolved in a week without sequelae. No other DLTs were observed in the additional three patients at the DL1 and three at the DL2 cohort. Another one at DL2 experienced grade 1 CRS with grade 1 neurotoxicity. Five patients experienced Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities. An ORR is 66.7% (4/6) in cohort 1 and 100% (3/3) in cohort 2, including six complete responses (CR, 50.0% [3/6] in cohort 1 and 100% [3/3] in cohort 2). As of February 13, 2023, all six CRs are ongoing, including two patents exceeding six months after the treatments. Updated results will be presented at the meeting, including the cohort of DL3. Conclusions: In this phase I study, AT101 was well tolerated at the first two dose levels and showed promising efficacy in relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL patients. The majority of adverse effects were transient and manageable. The administrations of DL3 are currently ongoing, and updated results will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT05338931 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...