GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (4)
  • 2020-2024  (4)
Material
Publisher
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (4)
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (4)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 5_Supplement ( 2023-03-01), p. P1-12-08-P1-12-08
    Abstract: Background Previously, we reported the clinical outcomes of the combination of anti-PD-1 Ab, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, and endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER positive/HER2 negative advanced breast cancer in SABCS2020; biomarker analysis has been performed to provide insight into the hepatotoxicy frequently observed in the study. Methods Subjects received 240 mg nivolumab IV on days 1 and 15, 150 mg abemaciclib PO twice daily, and either 500 mg fulvestrant (FUL) on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter (FUL cohort) or 2.5 mg letrozole (LET) once daily (LET cohort). The primary endpoint was objective response rate and secondary endpoints included toxicity evaluated in the CTCAE along with an exploratory endpoint as related to the biomarker analysis. Archival tumor tissues were collected before study entry and blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and on cycle3 day1. Tumor tissues were subjected to IHC analysis and RNA sequencing followed by subtyping using NGS. High throughput cytokine analysis using ELISA-based assay were performed with serum samples and cell sorting analysis of PBMC was performed with FACS. Results From June 2019 to December 2019, 17 subjects were enrolled (FUL cohort [n = 12], LET cohort [n = 5] ). The study was prematurely closed due to safety concerns such as hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease. AEs ≥ Grade 3 were observed in 91.7% and 100% of patients in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. The most frequent AEs ≥ Grade 3 were elevated liver function tests (LFT; FUL cohort: 50.0%, LET cohort: 60.0%). Serum cytokine analysis from the subjects with severe hepatotoxicity indicated cytokine storm with elevations of sCD30/TNFRSF8, IL-11, -34, Pentraxin-3, sTNF-R1, -R2, TSLP, which was supported by the findings of reduction of effector regulatory T cells in PBMC. IHC study in liver biopsy from three subjects with the toxicity revealed infiltration of CD8+ T cells and FOXP3+ T reg into the liver, suggesting the immune related liver injury upon the treatment with nivolumab and abemaciclib. HLA typing was performed in the 17 patients but no association between HLA type and ILD or hepatotoxicity were observed. Conclusions The frequent and severe immune related hepatotoxicity induced by the combination of anti-DD-1 and CDK 4/6 inhibitors might have been an immune-boosting therapy as suggested in the preclinical studies. This study was supported by the Ono Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. The registration number of the study is UMIN000036970. Citation Format: Junji Tsurutani, Jun Masuda, Norikazu Masuda, Yuko Tanabe, Tsutomu Iwasa, Masato Takahashi, Manabu Futamura, Koji Matsumoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hiroji Iwata, Mari Hosonaga, Toru Mukohara, Kiyoshi Yoshimura, Chiyo K. Imamura, Sakiko Miura, Toshiko Yamochi, Kenichi Yoshimura, Toshimi Takano, Hidetaka Kawabata. Biomarker analysis of hepatotoxicity in a Phase II study of nivolumab, abemaciclib and endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: WJOG11418BTR NEWFLAME_TR [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 9 ( 2022-05-03), p. 1712-1723
    Abstract: Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is a risk factor for gastric cancer following infection with Helicobacter pylori. To explore the susceptibility of pure gastric IM to cancer development, we investigated genetic alterations in single IM gastric glands. We isolated 50 single IM or non-IM glands from the inflamed gastric mucosa of 11 patients with intramucosal gastric carcinoma (IGC) and 4 patients without IGC; 19 single glands in the noninflamed gastric mucosa of 11 individuals from our cohort and previous dataset were also included as controls. Whole-exome sequencing of single glands revealed significantly higher accumulation of somatic mutations in various genes within IM glands compared with non-IM glands. Clonal ordering analysis showed that IM glands expanded to form clusters with shared mutations. In addition, targeted-capture deep sequencing and copy number (CN) analyses were performed in 96 clustered IM or non-IM gastric glands from 26 patients with IGC. CN analyses were also performed on 41 IGC samples and The Cancer Genome Atlas-Stomach Adenocarcinoma datasets. These analyses revealed that polyclonally expanded IM commonly acquired CN aberrations (CNA), including amplification of chromosomes 8, 20, and 2. A large portion of clustered IM glands typically consisted of common CNAs rather than other cancer-related mutations. Moreover, the CNA patterns of clustered IM glands were similar to those of IGC, indicative of precancerous conditions. Taken together, these findings suggest that, in the gastric mucosa inflamed with H. pylori infection, IM glands expand via acquisition of CNAs comparable with those of IGC, contributing to field cancerization. Significance: This study contributes to our understanding of gastric intestinal metaplasia as a risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma via their multifocal expansion and acquisition of CNAs and somatic mutations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. P5-01-15-P5-01-15
    Abstract: Background: Hormone receptor positive breast cancers accounts for approximately 70% of metastatic breast cancers (MBCs), and it is often treated with an anti-hormonal agent as long as possible unless with visceral and aggressive metastasis.CDK4/6 inhibitorsare effective as first- or second-line treatments for metastatic hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer (HR+ HER2-). When disease progression due to resistance to CDK4/6 treatment occurs, treatment modification is required. Currently, monitoring of treatment response relies solely on imaging.Therefore, through thisstudy, we aim to evaluate ctDNA as a potential biomarker to monitor response to CDK4/6 treatment. Materials & Methods: Patients were recruited from the Cancer Institute Hospital of Japan Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR).Hormone positive HER2 negative (HR+ HER2-) MBC patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors were collected at different timepoints up till 24 months or if patient develops disease progression. These samples were sequenced using a targeted pan-cancer panel that utilizes ultradeep NGS with molecular barcodes.This panel is able to detect all classes of mutations such as single nucleotide variants (SNV), copy number variants (CNV) and fusions. Results:A total of 78 samples from 20patients was sequenced. CDK4/6 was administered as early line treatments. The average total coverage was 56,933X and average molecular coverage was 4,442X.The majority of mutations detected prior to CDK4/6 treatment were TP53, PIK3CAand ESR1. The ctDNA profile is consistent with the clinical status in most patients. ctDNA showed greater dynamics of tumor response to CDK4/6 inhibitor compared to tumor markers CEA and CA15-3.ctDNA was also more sensitive at detecting onset of progression disease compared to imaging. We observed an increase in ctDNA mutation frequency 2-3 months earlier than imaging in 2 patients. From the 20 patients, 7 patients developed progression disease(PD) during our evaluation and required a different treatment. 5 of the 7 patients (71.4%) have ESR1 mutations prior to start of treatment and these patients developed PD within 6 months of treatment. In contrast, no ESR1 mutations were detected in patients who did not develop disease progression. Discussion: In this study, we observed that ctDNA was more sensitive at detecting onset of progression disease compared to imaging. This is essential as early detection of poor response enables timely change of treatment for patients. Patients carrying ESR1mutations respond poorly to CDK4/6 treatment. This might be due to resistance of ESR1mutants to fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor component of the CDK4/6 treatment regimen. Conclusion: Monitoring of ctDNA is useful to assess treatment response of CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Tomoko Shibayama, Yoon Ming Chin, Makiko Ono, Takayuki Kobayashi, Hiu Ting Chan, Fumitaka Hara, Mari Hosonaga, Kokoro Kobayashi, Rina Inagaki, Yoshinori Ito, Takayuki Ueno, Shunji Takahashi, Shinji Oono, Yusuke Nakamura, Siew Kee Low. Monitoring of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment response through blood liquid biopsy in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-15.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. PS12-10-PS12-10
    Abstract: Background: Currently, the standard immunotherapy treatment for anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive triple-negative breast cancer is a combination of PD-L1 antibody and nab-paclitaxel. PD-1/PD-L1 antibody was investigated as a treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer; however, the efficacy of single agents is poor. In pre-clinical studies, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and endocrine therapy (ET) have synergistic effects. We initiated this investigator-initiated trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab, abemaciclib, and ET (fulvestrant [FUL] or letrozole [LET] ) as a first- or second-line treatment for patients (pts) with HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This multicenter, multi-cohort, nonrandomized, open-label phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, abemaciclib, and ET (FUL or LET) in pts with HR+, HER2- MBC. Key eligibility criteria for the FUL cohort were: HR+, HER2- MBC with ECOG PS ≤ 1; measurable disease; no more than one ET; no prior chemotherapy for MBC; and had exhibited disease progression while receiving ET, adjuvant ET, or ≤ 12 months after adjuvant ET. Key eligibility criteria for the LET cohort were: postmenopausal HR+, HER2- MBC with ECOG PS ≤ 1; measurable disease; and no prior systemic therapy. ET as an adjuvant was permitted if the patient had a disease-free interval & gt; 12 months after the completion of ET. Patients received 240 mg nivolumab on days 1 and 15, 150 mg abemaciclib twice daily, and either 500 mg FUL on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter (FUL cohort) or 2.5 mg LET once daily (LET cohort) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included toxicity, disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD), progression-free survival (PFS), and the overall survival (OS). The threshold and expected ORR of the FUL cohort were 45% and 60%, respectively; and 32 pts would ensure a statistical power of 80% (α = 0.20). The threshold and expected ORR of the LET cohort were 55% and 75%, respectively; and 16 pts would ensure a statistical power of 80% (α = 0.20). Results: Between June and December 2019, 17 pts were enrolled (FUL cohort: n = 12, LET cohort: n = 5). One patient in the FUL cohort was excluded due to prior treatment history. Enrollment was closed and combination treatment was discontinued mid-study due to safety concerns. All pts had ≥ 1 adverse event (AE). AEs ≥ Grade 3 were observed in 91.7% and 100% of pts in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. Immune-related AEs ≥ Grade 3 were observed in 66.7% and 60.0% of pts in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. The most frequent AEs ≥ Grade 3 were elevated liver function tests (LFT; FUL cohort: 50.0%, LET cohort: 60.0%). Immune-related (elevated LFT) AEs ≥ Grade 3 were observed in 50.0% and 40.0% of pts in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. Severe AEs (SAEs) were observed in 50.0% and 60.0% of pts in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. One treatment-related patient death occurred in the LET cohort due to interstitial lung disease (ILD). ORR was 54.5% (6/11) and 20% (1/5) in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. DCR was 90.9% (10/11) in the FUL cohort and 80.0% (4/5) in the LET cohort. Due to the discontinuation, PFS and OS were undetermined. Conclusions: Although nivolumab + abemaciclib + FUL appeared to have activity, our findings do not support further investigation of this combination therapy due to toxicity. Toxicity profiles vary with CDK4/6 inhibitors; therefore, a different inhibitor may improve tolerability. Results of the ongoing nivolumab, palbociclib, and ET trial are awaited (CheckMate 7A8, NCT04075604). Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-194782. Citation Format: Jun Masuda, Junji Tsurutani, Norikazu Masuda, Yuko Tanabe, Tsutomu Iwasa, Masato Takahashi, Manabu Futamura, Koji Matsumoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hiroji Iwata, Mari Hosonaga, Toru Mukohara, Kenichi Yoshimura, Toshimi Takano. Phase II study of nivolumab in combination with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer: WJOG11418B NEWFLAME trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-10.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...