GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2000-2004  (3)
  • 2001  (3)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 2000-2004  (3)
Year
  • 2001  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2001
    In:  Guides Newsletter Vol. 6, No. 3 ( 2001-05-1), p. 10-11
    In: Guides Newsletter, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 6, No. 3 ( 2001-05-1), p. 10-11
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2642-0880
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2001
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2001
    In:  Guides Newsletter Vol. 6, No. 1 ( 2001-01-1), p. 1-3
    In: Guides Newsletter, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 6, No. 1 ( 2001-01-1), p. 1-3
    Abstract: The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, was published in November 2000 and contains major changes from its predecessor. In the Fourth Edition, all musculoskeletal evaluation and rating was described in a single chapter. In the Fifth Edition, this information has been divided into three separate chapters: Upper Extremity (13), Lower Extremity (14), and Spine (15). This article discusses changes in the spine chapter. The Models for rating spinal impairment now are called Methods. The AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, has reverted to standard terminology for spinal regions in the Diagnosis-related estimates (DRE) Method, and both it and the Range of Motion (ROM) Method now reference cervical, thoracic, and lumbar. Also, the language requiring the use of the DRE, rather than the ROM Method has been strengthened. The biggest change in the DRE Method is that evaluation should include the treatment results. Unfortunately, the Fourth Edition's philosophy regarding when and how to rate impairment using the DRE Model led to a number of problems, including the same rating of all patients with radiculopathy despite some true differences in outcomes. The term differentiator was abandoned and replaced with clinical findings. Significant changes were made in evaluation of patients with spinal cord injuries, and evaluators should become familiar with these and other changes in the Fifth Edition.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2642-0880
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2001
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2001
    In:  Guides Newsletter Vol. 6, No. 6 ( 2001-11-1), p. 1-4, 14
    In: Guides Newsletter, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 6, No. 6 ( 2001-11-1), p. 1-4, 14
    Abstract: A careful and thorough physical examination is a critical component of the spinal impairment evaluation. Two methods have been used for this evaluation, the Diagnosis-related estimates (DRE) method and the Range of Motion (ROM) method, but the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, states that “the DRE method is the principal methodology used to evaluate an individual who has had a distinct injury.” The DRE rating is based on objective findings at the time of evaluation and includes the following clinical findings: muscle spasm; muscle guarding; asymmetric spinal motion (previously called dysmetria); nonverifiable radicular pain; reflexes, neurological changes such as weakness or loss of sensation, atrophy, radiculopathy, and electrodiagnostic changes; alteration of motion segment integrity; cauda equina–like syndrome; and urodynamic tests. This article examines the definitions of the findings and discusses their use in the DRE method. For example, the AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, defines muscle spasm as a sudden, involuntary contraction of a muscle or group of muscles, and muscle spasm must be present at the time of a DRE-based evaluation; in the Fourth Edition, examiners used only a history of spasm. The AMA Guides, Fifth Edition also has different parameters, compared with the Fourth Edition, for determining atrophy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2642-0880
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2001
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...