GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Zou, Dehui  (2)
  • 2015-2019  (2)
  • Medicine  (2)
Material
Language
Years
  • 2015-2019  (2)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (2)
RVK
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 4343-4343
    Abstract: In the era of bortezomib, traditional prognostic markers in multiple myeloma (MM) may be suspect. The outcome of patients with t(4;14) is largely improved by bortezomib based treatment. Whether the outcome of patients with t(4;14) is still homogeneously inferior remains unknown. In this long follow-up non-randomized clinical trial, we observed no significant difference in the PFS and OS of t(4;14) positive or negative patients in the bortezomib arm. Interestingly, t(4;14) was highly correlated with the presence of 1q21 gain. In t(4;14)-positive patients, the median OS of patients with and without 1q21 gain was 38.8 and 57.2 months (P=0.034), respectively. In t(4;14)-negative patients, the median OS of the two subgroups was 43.0 and 89.4 months (P 〈 0.001), respectively. In contrast, no statistical difference in PFS or OS was observed in 1q21 gain patients with versus without t(4;14) aberration. We then discovered that 1q21 gain facilitated the acquisition of new chromosome abnormalities and contributed to the genomic instability, evidenced by the strong correlation between 1q21 gain and complex karyotypes or the acquisition of more than two cytogenetic aberrations. Moreover, 1q21 gain and/or del(17p) were powerful enough to discriminate the high-risk patients. The combination of 1q21 gain with International Staging System (ISS) was useful to divide MM patients with respect to their survival. Finally, although bortezomib might benefit patients with 1q21 gain, it could not completely overcome its adverse effects, suggesting the necessity of more effective therapies for these patients. Figure Disclosures Zhan: BIPHARM LLC: Consultancy, Other: % Allocation of Profit. Anderson:Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5491-5491
    Abstract: Background Chemotherapy resistance remains a significant hurdle in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, it is difficult to discriminate the potential refractory patients from the very early stage. Flow cytometry is a convenient tool to detect the residual myeloma cell tiding, indicating therapeutic response sensitively. Methods From June, 2014 to December, 2016, 172 sequential patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were enrolled in the BDH2008/02 clinical trial. Patient informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. 144 patients with at least two flow cytometry detections were analyzed. Bone marrow samples were detected by an eight-color EuroFlow panel. CD20 negative and CD81 positive is defined as normal phenotype. Results We conducted a median of 3-time (2-8) flow cytometry detection on each patient. When newly diagnosed and achieved best response, CD20, CD81 expression rates were 29.9%, 9.7% and 14.9%, 64.4% (P=0.0091, P 〈 0.0001), respectively. According to the status variation of CD20 and CD81, all patients were divided into three groups: both markers were always normal (Group A), either CD20 or CD81 was abnormal at diagnosed and turned normal during therapy (Group B) and markers stayed abnormal (Group C). Patients with undetectable residual tumor cells were also classified as Group A. The overall response rate of the patients in Group C was inferior to Group B ( 〉 PR rate: 54.3% vs. 71.4%, P=0.021). And the OS of Group C was significantly worse than Group A and B (47.9 months vs. not reached vs. not reached, P=0.036). Conclusion CD20/CD81 switching to normal phenotype during therapy indicates therapeutic response and an improved outcome than that staying abnormal. The expression tiding of CD20 and CD81 may be a reasonable combination to dynamically stratify MM patients, directing the choice of maintenance therapy. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...