GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 121, No. 20 ( 2013-05-16), p. 4056-4062
    Abstract: Risk stratification treatment of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia may decrease relapse and improve long-term survival. Allo-HSCT benefited high-risk patients, but impaired the survival of low-risk patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 7691-7692
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 13-13
    Abstract: Introduction Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired, organ-specific, autoimmune disease and one of the most common bleeding disorders seriously endangering human health. Glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin are first-line treatments recommended by guidelines for patients with ITP. However, approximately 50%-85% of patients relapse during the first year of treatment. In addition, long-term use of glucocorticoids increases the risk for dose- and time-dependent glucocorticoid-related complications and serious side effects. Therefore, in-depth studies investigating new solutions for the first-line treatment of ITP are urgently needed. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor, which forms a complex by binding to FK506-binding protein. It is currently widely used in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease for organ transplantation as well as for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In addition to recent retrospective studies and case reports demonstrating its effectiveness in ITP, tacrolimus has been shown to improve anti-platelet antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia in mice, suggesting it may be a potential treatment for ITP. The aim of this study was to compare two first-line treatment options for ITP-a standard glucocorticoid-only regimen versus tacrolimus in combination with a standard glucocorticoid regimen-to determine which could help patients achieve stable platelet counts faster and experience a longer duration of remission. Methods This open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial, enrolled adult ITP patients from seven different tertiary medical centers in China. Elderly patients had confirmed, newly diagnosed, treatment-naive ITP, platelet counts & lt;30×10 9/L, or & lt; 50×10 9/L and significant bleeding symptoms (World Health Organization bleeding scale ≥ 2). Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 with an interactive web-based response system to receive either oral tacrolimus (initial 0.03 mg/kg/day and maintain blood concentration at 3-5 ng/mL for 12 weeks) plus high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) or HD-DXM monotherapy for 12 weeks. DXM (40 mg) was administered orally daily for 4 consecutive days to both study arms. The 4-day course of DXM was repeated on days 11-14 in patients who lacked response by day 10. The primary endpoint was 6-month sustained response (SR), defined as platelet count maintained & gt;50×10 9/L without any additional ITP-modifying therapy at the 6-month follow-up. Key secondary endpoints included initial response by day 14 (OR, platelet count ≥30×10 9/L and at least 2-fold increase in baseline platelet count and absence of bleeding; and CR, platelet count ≥ 100×10 9/L), duration of response, bleeding scores, and adverse events (AEs). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04747080). Results Total 140 patients newly diagnosed with ITP were randomly assigned to either the tacrolimus plus HD-DXM (n=72) or HD-DXM monotherapy (n=68) groups. At the 6-month follow-up, the proportion of patients exhibiting SR was significantly higher in the tacrolimus plus HD-DXM group than in the HD-DXM monotherapy group (65.3% vs 42.6%, p= 0.007). Of the 140 patients with ITP (males accounted for 48.6%), the mean age was 32.8 years, the mean platelet count was 16.7×10 9/L. The combination group exhibited a higher 14-day early remission rate than the monotherapy group (76.4% vs 55.9%, P=0.001). Significantly fewer treatment failures occurred in patients randomly assigned to the combination group(19.4% vs 38.2%, P=0.0014). During the follow-up period, fewer patients in the combination group experienced relapse than in the monotherapy group; the median time to relapse was 77 days (Tacrolimus+HD-DXM) vs 36 days (HD-DXM). The combination group exhibited a lower proportion of bleeding events and a lower bleeding score. The incidence of serious AEs, rescue therapy, and treatment side effects were similar between the two groups, and treatment was well tolerated by all patients, with no grade 4 AEs or treatment-related deaths reported. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related AEs between the two groups. Conclusions Low-dose tacrolimus plus HD-DXM was an effective and safe treatment for ITP as first-line therapy and elicited a sustained prolonged response in adults. This therapy may be a new treatment option for adult patients with ITP. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: It includes information or discussion of off-label drug use of tacrilimus.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 1197-1197
    Abstract: Abstract 1197 Poster Board I-219 Abstract Purpose: To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from partially matched related donors (PMRDs) or unrelated donors (URDs) for hematologic malignancies without the use of in vitro T cell depletion (TCD). Experimental Design: 297 consecutive patients were performed HSCT from URDs (n = 78) or PMRDs (n = 219) during the same time period. Incidences of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) are compared between the PMRD and URD groups. Results: All patients achieved full engraftment. The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV acute GVHD in the PMRD and URD cohorts were 47% (95% CI, 33%-62%) versus 31% (CI, 20%-42%, P = .033), with a relative risk (RR) = 1.72 (1.01-2.94), P = .046. The incidence of chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (P = .17). Two-year incidences of NRM and relapse were 20% (CI, 15%-26%) versus 18% (CI, 10%-27%), with P = 0.98, and 12% (CI, 8%-16%) versus 18% (CI, 10%-27%), with P = .12, for the PMRD versus URD cohort respectively. Four-year OS and LFS were 74% (CI, 67%-80%) versus 74% (CI, 62%-85%), with P = .98, and 67% (CI, 59%-75%) versus 61% (CI, 47%-74%), with P = .74, respectively. Conclusions: Our comparisons demonstrate that every major end point, including relapse, NRM, OS and LFS, was comparable between the PMRD and URD groups. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 3301-3301
    Abstract: Exposure to non-inherited maternal antigen (NIMA) in fetal and neonatal life has a lifelong immunological consequence. In haploidentical transplantation, the mismatched haplotype of the donor can originate from either the mother or the father. The aim of this prospective study is to investigate the effects of NIMA and non-inherited paternal antigen (NIPA) on transplant outcomes in patients who underwent unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation (HBMT). Methods Two hundred and eleven patients with hematological disease, including AML, ALL, CML, MDS, SAA, and others, who received haploidentical blood and marrow allgrafts were enrolled in this study. The stem cell source was G-CSF mobilized BM combined with PB. The conditioning regimen was modified BUCY plus ATG with 10mg/kg in total dosage. MTX, CSA, and MMF were used for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease. Results The median patient follow-up was 343 days (range, 7-573 days). The median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days (range 7-25 days) and 16 days (range 6-410 days), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 actue GVHD at day 100 after HBMT was 41.7%±3.8% The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 53.4%±4.1%. The 1-year probability of relapse, TRM, LFS, and OS at 1 year was 11.3%±2.3%, 8.3%±1.9%, 79.6%±3.0%, and 85.0%±2.8%, respectively. Among the 211 patients, multivariate analysis showed that high risk patients had a high relapse rate (HR: 3.699, 95%CI, 1.598-8.565, P=0.002) and low LFS (HR: 2.452, 95%CI, 1.322-4.546, P=0.004). Duration from diagnosis to transplantation (more than 6 months vs. less than or equal to 6 moths) was associated with a high incidence of TRM (HR: 3.175, 95%CI, 1.251-8.059, P=0.015). Young recipient age (HR: 0.969, 95%CI, 0.946-0.993, P=0.012) were associated with a low incidence of grade 2-4 actue GVHD. Multiple analysis also showed that patients who received allografts from NIMA mismatched donor and father donor had lower incidences of grade 2-4 actue GVHD compared to those of patients receiving allografts from mother (HR: 0.576, 95%CI, 0.334-0.996, P=0.048, and HR: 0.378, 95%CI, 0.126-1.137, 0.087, respectively). For subgroup patients who received allografts from sibling donors, multivariate analysis showed that sibling transplantations mismatched for NIMA had a significantly lower incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD than those with NIPA mismatched donors (HR: 0.257, 95%CI, 0.083-0.796, P=0.018). No effects of NIMA mismatch on relapse, TRM, LFS, and OS were found in the current study. Conclusions Our results suggest that HBMT from a NIMA mismatched donor can offer low indicence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD. In unmanipulated haploidentical settings, mother donor transplantation may be associated with high incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD. These data suggest a NIMA mismatched donor not a mother donor should be preffered as donor for unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 6 ( 2014-08-07), p. 843-850
    Abstract: There is a need to identify the best HLA haplotype-mismatched related donor. Use of young, male, NIMA-mismatched donors results in the best survival after HLA haplotype-mismatched related donor transplants.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Bone Marrow Transplantation, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 54, No. 8 ( 2019-8), p. 1198-1207
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0268-3369 , 1476-5365
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004030-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 40-40
    Abstract: The major complication of allogeneic HSCT-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-remains lethal and limits use of this important procedure, especially after unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT. Several studies have provided evidence that universal addition of corticosteroids for prophylaxis of GVHD can reduce the risk for acute GvHD grade II-IV in HLA-matched transplantation. However, corticosteroid, a non-specific immunosuppressive agent, may also contribute to high rates of infections. Our previous data suggest that the ratio of CD4/CD8 in allografts from haploidentical donors can stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk ones who will develop GVHD after transplantation. Recently, we indicated that low-dose of methylprednisolone (MP, 0.5 mg/kg/day) might be a well-tolerated, effective and inexpensive regimen in combination of MTX for therapy of GVHD, suggesting that low-dose corticosteroid may be used for the prophylaxis of GVHD without increasing infection. To investigate whether risk-stratification directed prophylaxis strategy can reduce the incidence of GVHD and improve survival in a hemogenous patient population who underwent unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT, we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. A total of 228 patients were enrolled in this trial. All of the patients completed the study and were stratified as high-risk (n=145) and low-risk arms (n=83) according to the ratio of CD4/CD8 in allografts. Patients of the high-risk arms were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to additional low-dose glucocorticoid prophylaxis group (Group A, n=72) and control group (GroupB, n=73). The groups were balanced with respect to patient and donor characteristics. Our results showed that the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD on day 100 was 20.9%±4.8% in Group A, which was comparable to Group C (25.5%±4.8%, P=0.430) and both of which were significantly lower than that of Group B (48.1%±5.9%, P<0.001). In addition, the onset time of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 25 (16-50) days, 15 (9-57) days, and 21 (10-58) days, respectively in Group A, Group B, and Group C (P<0.05, Group A vs. Group B or Group C). There were no significant difference in grade Ⅲ-IV acute GVHD among these three groups. The ratio of patients who developed glucocorticoid refactory acute GVHD and treated with basiliximab (anti-CD25 antibody) were 13.9% (10/72), 17.8% (13/73), and 22.9% (19/83), respectively, in Group A, Group B, and Group C, there is a trend that the incidence of basiliximab treated patients in Group C is higher than that of Group A (P=0.109). The median time for myeloid engraftment in Group A was 11 days (range: 10-21 days), which was significantly faster that those of Group B (13 days, range from 10 to 33 days, P<0.05) and Group C (13 days, range from 10 to 33 days, P<0.05). The median time for platelet engraftment in Group A was 12 days (range: 10-22 days), which was significantly faster that those of Group B (17 days, range from 6 to 255 days, P<0.01) and Group C (19 days, range from 8 to 260 days, P<0.01). In addition, risk-stratification directed prophylaxis with additional low-dose of MP did not increase the incidence of CMV, EBV reactivation, PTLD, relapse and TRM, as well as delay immune recovery after unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT. The 100 day cumulative incidence relapse and transplant-related mortality was not significantly different among patients in Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively. The 100 day probabilities of LFS and OS were comparable among these three patient groups. In conclusion, we for the first time demonstrated that risk-stratification directed prophylaxis for GVHD with additional low-dose of MP could significantly decrease the incidence and delay the onset of grade II-IV acute GVHD without increasing infections and delaying immune recovery. Our data indicated that addition of glucocorticoid early after unmanipulated haploidentical transplantation could also accelerate hematopietic recovery [This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ NCT01607580] . Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 119, No. 23 ( 2012-06-07), p. 5584-5590
    Abstract: We report the results of a prospective, patient self-selected study evaluating whether haploidentical related donor stem cell transplantation (HRD-HSCT) is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Among totally 419 newly diagnosed AML patients, 132 patients with intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetics achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone (n = 74) or HSCT (n = 58) as postremission treatment. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was 37.5% ± 4.5%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 4 years were 64.5% ± 5.1% and 55.6% ± 5.0%, respectively. The cumulative incident of relapse for the HRD-HSCT group was significantly lower than that for the chemotherapy-alone group (12.0% ± 4.6% vs 57.8% ± 6.2%, respectively; P 〈 .0001). HRD-HSCT resulted in superior survival compared with chemotherapy alone (4-year DFS, 73.1% ± 7.1% vs 44.2% ± 6.2%, respectively; P 〈 .0001; 4-year OS, 77.5% ± 7.1% vs 54.7% ± 6.3%, respectively; P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed postremission treatment (HRD-HSCT vs chemotherapy) and high WBC counts at diagnosis as independent risk factors affecting relapse, DFS, and OS. Our results suggest that HRD-HSCT is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for AML.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 162-162
    Abstract: Abstract 162 Background and Aims. The relative merits of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in the first chronic phase (CP) in the imatinib era have not previously been evaluated. This prospective cohort study was designed to compare the medical outcomes and quality of life (QOL), with imatinib versus allo-HSCT from an HLA-matched sibling donor for CML in the first CP including the early CP (ECP; a CML duration 〈 12 months) and the late CP (LCP; a CML duration ' 12 months). Patients and methods. From April 2001 to April 2010, patients treated consecutively at the Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology were nonrandomly assigned to treatment with imatinib or allo-HSCT according to whether the patient had an HLA-matched sibling donor; those with an HLA-identical sibling donor were assigned to the allo-HSCT group, and the others were assigned to the imatinib group. QOL of surviving patients still in the imatinib and allo-HSCT groups was measured by the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36 (MOS SF-36) at the end of the study evaluation period in April 2011. Results. In total, 463 patients were recruited, 209 patients were assigned to the allo-HSCT group and 254 patients were assigned to the imatinib group, respectively.Based on a ten-year follow-up period, a multivariate analysis revealed that allo-HSCT was an independent adverse prognostic factor for event-free survival (EFS; estimated HR=2.4, P=0.002 and estimated HR=0.31, P 〈 0.001) and overall survival (OS; estimated HR=6.9, P 〈 0.001 and estimated HR=26.2, P=0.001) for the total population (n=463) and the patients in the ECP (n=348), and an independent favorable predictor of progression-free survival (PFS; estimated HR=3.2, P=0.020) for the total population. Imatinib was superior to allo-HSCT, with six-year EFS and OS rates of 83.6% vs. 76.6% (P=0.041) and 96.4% vs. 82.0% (P 〈 0.001), respectively, for the entire cohort and 90.3% vs. 74.3% (P=0.001) and 99.4% vs. 80.2% (P 〈 0.001), respectively, for the patients in the ECP, despite six-year PFS rates of 90.7% vs. 96.6% (P=0.014), respectively, for the entire cohort and 95.9% vs. 97.3% (P=0.303) respectively, for the patients in the ECP. Both treatments resulted in similar EFS and OS rates in those in the LCP (n=115), with a probability of six-year EFS rate of approximately 80% and six-year OS rate of more than 90%. More LCP patients in the imatinib group experienced relapse compared with those in the allo-HSCT group, with six-year PFS rates of 86.0% vs. 100% (P=0.035), respectively. There was no correlation between the EBMT risk score and EFS, OS or PFS in the patients receiving allo-HSCT. Among the 392 surviving patients who were invited to participate in the QOL survey, 295 (75.3%) patients including 180 of 218 (82.6%) in the imatinib group and 115 of 174 (66.1%) in the allo-HSCT group, respectively, completed the questionnaires. A multivariate analysis revealed that there was no correlation between the treatment mode and the physical health for the total, ECP and LCP population, however, allo-HSCT was one of the independent factors associated with good mental health (estimated HR=0.5, P 〈 0.001) in the ECP patients. The Physical Component Summary were comparable between the imatinib group and the allo-HSCT group, however, the Mental Component Summary of the patients experienced allo-HSCT were better than those receiving imatinib for the total (P=0.001), ECP (P=0.015) and LCP (P=0.010) population. Conclusions. We concluded that imatinib confers significant survival advantages and a desirable QOL and is superior to allo-HSCT as the first-line therapy for patients with CML in the ECP. All trials were registered with www.chictr.org as CHiCHTR-TNC-10000955. Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...