GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e18067-e18067
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e18067-e18067
    Abstract: e18067 Background: Factors affecting cancer treatment may include evidence for effectiveness, cost, and preference. These influences can lead to treatment variation across institutions and populations. Decision-support systems have been proposed as tools to reduce variation. This study quantified concordance between treatment provided by oncologists in China and therapeutic options presented by a decision-support tool. Methods: We identified and analyzed concordance studies in nine unique institutions located in seven provinces in China, published in 2017-2018 using Watson for Oncology (WFO), a clinical decision-support tool. Published rates of concordance were compared by cancer type and institution. Results: Concordance of all combined cases was 59% (2012/3388). Concordance rates varied by cancer type and institution (Table). Concordance rates were highest for ovarian (96%), rectal (94%) and breast (89%) cancers but lowest in gastric (12%), ovarian (43%) and breast (55%) cancers. Conclusions: Concordance between treatments and therapeutic options from an oncology decision-support tool varied significantly across cancer types and institutions in China, suggesting significant practice variation. Without established guidelines for treatment, clinical decisions may be influenced by preferences and local factors. Future studies are needed to identify reasons for variation and improve adherence to regional evidence-based guidelines. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e16576-e16576
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e16576-e16576
    Abstract: e16576 Background: Shared decision-making is the process of deliberately interacting with patients who wish to make informed value-based choices, when there are no indicated best treatment options. Given the wide variation in prostate cancer treatment options, clinical decision-support systems (CDSS) may effectively support treatment decisions for patients with challenging risk-benefit profiles. However, limited data are available regarding CDSS in shared decision making. This study aimed to assess the alignment of CDSS therapeutic options with treatment received through a shared decision process. Methods: We identified patients with prostate cancer (Gleason Groups 1-5) who were engaged in shared treatment decision making, (from August–September 2018) at the Instituto do Câncer do Ceará, Brazil. IBM Watson for Oncology (WfO), a CDSS was used for the study. Treatment decisions were compared with WfO options (active surveillance, clinical trial, chemotherapy [CT], hormone therapy [HT] , radiation [RT], brachytherapy [brachy] , surgery and systemic therapy with GnRH suppression) and categorized as concordant (equivalent), partially concordant (a partial match), or discordant. Results: Concordance between WfO and shared treatment decisions was observed in 54% (26/48) of patients, partial concordance in 15% (7/48) and discordance in 31% (15/48). Most frequent treatments were RT+HT combination therapy (25%) and prostatectomy (21%). 8/15 (53%) discordant cases were due to patient preference for treatment over active surveillance. Patient preference for treatment over active surveillance was the most common reason (53%) for discordance. Conclusions: Variation in prostate cancer treatment exists. CDSS therapy options may be useful in quantifying and modifying unwarranted variations in prostate cancer treatment. Future studies are important for understanding reasons for variations. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e20006-e20006
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e20006-e20006
    Abstract: e20006 Background: Clinical decision-support systems (CDSS) provide up-to-date evidence to practitioners overwhelmed by the deluge of clinical findings. Few studies, however, have evaluated their impact on patient outcomes. This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted to: 1) measure concordance of real-world clinical decisions with therapeutic options from the IBM Watson for Oncology (WfO) CDSS and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines, 2) the effect of concordance on objective response rate (ORR). Methods: Health records from patients receiving 1 st line treatment at Peking University International Hospital Oncology Center in China between January 2016 and December 2018 (69 stage IV NSCLC, 30 with SCLC) with documented tumor progression after 2+ cycles of treatment, were reviewed to determine concordance of actual treatment with WfO therapeutic options and CSCO guidelines. Patients’ treatments were grouped as concordant with: WfO+CSCO, WFO only, CSCO only, or neither. ORR, defined as partial or complete response after 2+ treatment cycles (RECIST criteria)was determined for each group. Results: For NSCLC, ORR ranged from 21.4% for discordance with both WfO and CSCO to 100.0% for WfO only concordance. For SCLC, ORR ranged from 37.5% for CSCO only concordance to 73.3% for WfO+CSCO concordance (Table). The main reasons for discordance were: 1 st generation TKIs like Gefitinib and Erlotinib (vs. Osimertinib) are standard of care for EGFR mutant patients in China, (2) Local CSCO guideline drugs like Lobaplatin and Icotinib are not included in WfO. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that treatment concordance with WfO may be associated with improved ORR in some cases of NSCLC (WfO only) and SCLC (WfO + CSCO). ORR in NSCLC patients who were discordant with both WFO and CSCO guidelines was the lowest at 21.4%. Larger studies are needed to understand the effect of guideline and WfO concordance on ORR. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 13_Supplement ( 2021-07-01), p. 2617-2617
    Abstract: Background: In a commercially insured cohort of female patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer we examined geographic and clinical factors associated with variation in uptake of post-mastectomy adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET), cytotoxic chemotherapy (ACT) and biologic therapy (ABT). Methods: Retrospective observational study of the IBM® MarketScan® claims data from 01/01/2012-03/31/2018. Eligibility criteria included: 1) diagnosis of non-metastatic invasive breast cancer in female patients 18 years old or older, 2) mastectomy within 6 months of initial diagnosis. Patients with breast carcinoma in situ only and those who received neoadjuvant therapies were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy, including: 1) age, insurance plan type, and select chronic comorbid conditions, 2) sociodemographic, community-level (ZIP3) measures obtained from the 2019 Area Health Resource Files, and 3) time effects. Analyses were conducted at the patient level with standard errors clustered by ZIP3. Results: Of the 16,680 patients identified, 5,341 (32%) received AET only, 2,290 (14%) received ACT only and 729 (4%) received ABT. 7,911 (47%) did not have any claims for adjuvant therapy. 3% received adjuvant combinations, mostly post-radiation treatment (2%). We observed the following statistically significant associations (p & lt;.001 to p & lt;.05) between selected variables and adjuvant therapy use:- Increasing age and higher likelihood of AET (1.2-1.8) but decreased likelihood of ACT (.8-.03) and ABT (.98-.24).- Primary health policy holders were 13% more likely to receive ACT compared to a spouse or other dependent.- Patients residing in the Midwest and higher likelihood of receiving AET (OR=1.15), ACT (OR=1.14), and ABT (OR=1.44) compared to those in the Northeast whereas those in the West and South had higher likelihood of receiving ACT (OR=1.31; OR=1.21), and ABT (OR=1.66; OR=1.36).- Patients residing in areas with increased Black resident density (ZIP3 level) and lower likelihood of receiving AET (OR=.58), ACT (OR=.61), and ABT (OR=.45).- Percentage population with a 4-year college degree and decreased likelihood of ACT (OR=.33).- Genetic testing and increased likelihood of AET (OR=1.92), ACT (OR=2.72), and ABT (OR=1.91).- Breast carcinoma in situ diagnosis preceding invasive disease diagnosis and decreased likelihood of receiving AET (OR=.56), ACT (OR=.2) and ABT (OR=.65). Conclusions: In a large cohort of commercially insured patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer, uptake of post-mastectomy adjuvant therapies varied and was influenced by several non-clinical factors. Results of real-world evidence cancer studies may support treatment-decision making, guide adoption of value-based care models and reduce treatment disparities. Citation Format: Yull Arriaga, Joseph Tkacz, M Christopher Roebuck, Judy George, Van Willis, Irene Dankwa-mullan. Factors associated with utilization of post-mastectomy adjuvant therapies in privately insured female patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2617.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...