GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of the National Cancer Center, Elsevier BV, ( 2023-8)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2667-0054
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3101541-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 23, No. 6 ( 2022-06), p. 739-747
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 16, No. 2 ( 2021-02), p. 299-309
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1556-0864
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2223437-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 16_Supplement ( 2020-08-15), p. CT083-CT083
    Abstract: Background: Treatment options in 2nd-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) setting are very limited. PASSION (NCT03417895) was a phase 2 study of camrelizumab plus apatinib in ED-SCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: In the randomized, open-label, three-parallel-cohort Stage 1, patients (pts) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks plus oral apatinib 375 mg once daily (QD), 5 days on/2 days off, or 7 days on/7 days off (six pts each cohort). Based on the tolerability during the first 28-day cycle and efficacy data in Stage 1, one cohort was chosen to expand to 45 pts in Stage 2. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and safety. Results: From Apr 20, 2018 to Mar 12, 2019, 59 pts were enrolled, with 47 in the QD cohort. Findings as of Dec 12, 2019 are listed in the table. In the QD cohort, confirmed ORR reached 34.0% (95% CI 20.9-49.3), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI 1.9-4.6), and median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 months (95% CI 4.7-12.3). Chemo-sensitive and chemo-resistant pts (defined as pts with disease relapsed ≥90 and & lt;90 days after platinum based chemo, respectively) had comparable confirmed ORR (37.5% vs 32.3%), median PFS (3.6 vs 2.7 months), and median OS (9.6 vs 8.0 months). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 were reported in 43 (72.9%) of all 59 pts, with the most common being hypertension (25.4%), hand-foot syndrome (13.6%), and decreased platelet count (13.6%). These reported adverse events were manageable. Five (8.5%) pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. No treatment related death was reported. Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed potent antitumor activity in both chemo-sensitive and chemo-resistant ED-SCLC pts after platinum-based chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity profile. This phase 2 data warrant further clinical studies of camrelizumab plus apatinib in SCLC. Table.Summary of clinical efficacy.Camrelizumab plus apatinib (QD) (n = 47)Camrelizumab plus apatinib (5 days on/2 days off) (n = 6)Camrelizumab plus apatinib (7 days on/7 days off) (n = 6)All patients (n = 59)Objective response rate, n (%) 95% CI16 (34.0) 20.9−49.32 (33.3) 4.3−77.72 (33.3) 4.3−77.720 (33.9) 22.1−47.4Median duration of response, months (95% CI)6.2 (3.7−9.2)4.2 (3.6−4.7)NR (4.6−NR)5.7 (3.7−8.6)Disease control rate, n (%) 95% CI32 (68.1) 52.9−80.96 (100.0)3 (50.0) 11.8−88.241 (69.5) 56.1−80.8Median progression-free survival, months (95% CI)3.6 (1.9−4.6)3.6 (2.7−8.3)1.2 (0.9−NR)2.8 (1.9−4.6)Median overall survival, months (95% CI)8.4 (4.7−12.3)11.2 (4.9−NR)5.4 (1.5−NR)8.4 (5.4−11.2)NR, not reached Citation Format: Jie Wang, Yun Fan, Jun Zhao, Qiming Wang, Dingzhi Huang, Xingya Li, Jianhua Chen, Yong Fang, Zhijie Wang, Caicun Zhou, Yanping Hu, Haihua Yang, Yi Hu, Jianying Zhou, Xiaoyan Lin, Lifeng Wang, Yanjun Xu, Hanying Li. Camrelizumab plus apatinib in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (PASSION): A multicenter, two-stage, phase 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT083.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 18, No. 1 ( 2023-01), p. 93-105
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1556-0864
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2223437-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Lung Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 165 ( 2022-03), p. S32-S33
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0169-5002
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2025812-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 12_Supplement ( 2022-06-15), p. CT038-CT038
    Abstract: Introduction: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immunotherapy has recently showed robust clinical activity in ES-SCLC. In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we evaluated adebrelimab (SHR-1316), a novel anti-PD-L1 antibody, in combination with standard chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. Methods: Patients naïve to systemic treatment for ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive 4-6 cycles of adebrelimab (20 mg/kg, iv, d1, q3w) or placebo with carboplatin (AUC 5, d1, q3w) plus etoposide (100 mg/m2, d1, d2, d3, q3w), followed by maintenance therapy with adebrelimab or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: 462 patients were randomized and treated (adebrelimab+chemo, n=230; placebo+chemo, n=232). As of Oct 08, 2021, with an median follow-up of 13.5 mo (all patients; 22.5 mo for patients alive), OS was significantly prolonged with adebrelimab+chemo vs placebo+chemo (median, 15.3 mo [95% CI 13.2-17.5] vs 12.8 mo [95% CI 11.3-13.7] ; hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI 0.58-0.90] , 1-sided p=0.0017); OS rate was 62.9% vs 52.0% at 12 mo and 31.3% vs 17.2% at 24 mo. Progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee (IRC) was 5.8 mo (95% CI 5.6-6.9) with adebrelimab+chemo vs 5.6 mo (95% CI 5.5-5.7) with placebo+chemo (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.83); PFS rate was 49.4% vs 37.3% at 6 mo and 19.7% vs 5.9% at 12 mo. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) also favored the adebrelimab+chemo group (Table 1). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 85.7% vs 84.9% of patients with adebrelimab+chemo vs placebo+chemo, with the most common (frequency ≥5%) being hematological toxicities in both groups. Conclusions: The addition of adebrelimab to chemotherapy significantly improved OS with an acceptable safety profile, supporting this combination as a new first-line treatment option for ES-SCLC. Efficacy outcomes Adebrelimab+Chemo (n=230) Placebo+Chemo (n=232) Median OS (95% CI), mo 15.3 (13.2-17.5) 12.8 (11.3-13.7) HR (95% CI)*, 1-sided log-rank p 0.72 (0.58-0.90); p=0.0017 12-mo OS rate (95% CI), % 62.9 (56.3-68.8) 52.0 (45.4-58.2) 24-mo OS rate (95% CI), % 31.3 (24.9-37.9) 17.2 (12.1-23.0) Median PFS (95% CI), mo 5.8 (5.6-6.9) 5.6 (5.5-5.7) HR (95% CI)*, 1-sided log-rank p 0.67 (0.54-0.83); p & lt;0.0001 6-mo PFS rate (95% CI), % 49.4 (42.4-56.0) 37.3 (30.7-43.9) 12-mo PFS rate (95% CI), % 19.7 (14.5-25.5) 5.9 (3.1-10.1) IRC-assessed ORR (95% CI), % 70.4 (64.1-76.3) 65.9 (59.5-72.0) Median DoR (95% CI), mo 5.6 (4.6-6.7) 4.6 (4.3-5.5) *Stratified Cox proportional-hazards model Citation Format: Ying Cheng, Jie Wang, Caicun Zhou, Wenxiu Yao, Qiming Wang, Xuhong Min, Gongyan Chen, Xingxiang Xu, Xingya Li, Fei Xu, Yong Fang, Runxiang Yang, Guohua Yu, Youling Gong, Jun Zhao, Yun Fan, Quan Liu, Lejie Cao, Yu Yao, Yunpeng Liu, Xiaoling Li, Jingxun Wu, Zhiyong He, Kaihua Lu, Liyan Jiang, Huiqing Yu, Chengping Hu, Wenhua Zhao, Jian Zhao, Gang Wu, Dingzhi Huang, Chengshui Chen, Cuimin Ding, Baihong Zhang, Xiuwen Wang, Hui Luo, Baolan Li, Ben Zhang, Haowen Li, Ke Ma. Adebrelimab or placebo plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC: A phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT038.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 13_Supplement ( 2021-07-01), p. CT039-CT039
    Abstract: Results From RATIONALE 303: A Global Phase 3 Study of Tislelizumab (TIS) vs Docetaxel (TAX) as Second- or Third-Line Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Background: Anti-PD-1/L1 therapies have improved OS by 2-4 mo vs TAX in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum regimens. TIS is an anti-PD-1 antibody engineered to minimize FcγR binding on macrophages, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential anti-PD-1 resistance. Methods: RATIONALE 303 (BGB-A317-303; NCT03358875) compared efficacy and safety of TIS vs TAX as 2 or 3L therapy for pts with advanced NSCLC. Patients without oncogenic driver mutation who failed at least 1 prior systemic therapy including a platinum regimen were randomized 2:1 to receive TIS 200 mg IV Q3W (Arm A) or TAX 75 mg/m2 IV Q3W (Arm B). Dual primary endpoints were OS in the ITT analysis set and OS in the PD-L1 high (≥25% TC) analysis set. A prespecified interim analysis (IA) was conducted after ≈426 deaths (76% of planned events); in the IA, formal OS superiority testing was conducted only in the ITT. The IA results are presented. Results: Overall, 805 pts were randomized (n=535, TIS; n=270, TAX); demographics were generally balanced between arms. With a 19-mo median follow-up (441 OS events), median OSITT was significantly longer in Arm A vs B (17.2 vs 11.9 mo; HR=0.64 [95% CI: 0.53, 0.78]; P & lt;.0001). OS benefit was also observed in the PD-L1 high analysis set (19.1 vs 11.9 mo; HR=0.52 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.71]) and across most subgroups including histology. In the ITT analysis set, PFS, ORR, and DoR were also improved in Arm A vs B (Table). Anemia (TIS) and alopecia (TAX) were the most commonly reported AEs (Table); pneumonia (TIS) and neutropenia (TAX) were the most common grade ≥3 AEs. AEs leading to death were 6.0% (TIS) and 4.3% (TAX); treatment-related AEs leading to death were 1.5% (TIS) and 1.6% (TAX). Conclusions: RATIONALE 303 demonstrated that, as 2 or 3L therapy in pts with advanced NSCLC, TIS was tolerable and prolonged OS by 5-7 mo with improved PFS and ORR vs TAX regardless of histology or PD-L1 expression. ITT Analysis Set (N=805)Arm A Tislelizumab (n=535)Arm B Docetaxel (n=270)EfficacyMedian OS, mo17.211.9OS difference, mo5.3HR (95% CI)a0.64 (0.53, 0.78)P-valuea,b & lt;0.0001Median PFS, mo4.12.6PFS difference, mo1.5HR (95% CI)a0.64 (0.53, 0.76)P-valuea,b & lt;0.0001cORR, n (%)117 (21.9)19 (7.0)ORR difference, %14.9OR (95% CI)3.71 (2.24, 6.14)P-valued & lt;0.0001cMedian DoR, mo (95% CI)13.5 (8.5, 21.8)6.2 (2.1, 7.2)Adverse event profileAEs occurring in ≥15% of patients in either arm, n (%)All gradeGrade ≥3All gradeGrade ≥3Anemia152 (28.5)18 (3.4)112 (43.4)16 (6.2)Alanine aminotransferase increased106 (19.9)4 (0.7)38 (14.7)0Cough104 (19.5)5 (0.9)40 (15.5)1 (0.4)Aspartate aminotransferase increased101 (18.9)5 (0.9)31 (12.0)1 (0.4)Appetite decreased82 (15.4)5 (0.9)59 (22.9)3 (1.2)Weight decreased81 (15.2)4 (0.7)26 (10.1)0Alopecia5 (0.9)0122 (47.3)2 (0.8)Neutrophil count decreased15 (2.8)3 (0.6)95 (36.8)71 (27.5)Neutropenia9 (1.7)3 (0.6)81 (31.4)72 (27.9)White blood cell count decreased20 (3.7)1 (0.2)74 (28.7)47 (18.2)Leukopenia15 (2.8)1 (0.2)69 (26.7)41 (15.9)Asthenia67 (12.5)6 (1.1)56 (21.7)14 (5.4)Constipation65 (12.2)042 (16.3)0Hypoalbuminemia70 (13.1)041 (15.9)1 (0.4)Nausea59 (11.0)041 (15.9)1 (0.4)Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; DoR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat; mo, months; NA, not available; OR, odds ratio; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival.aStratified.bOne-sided log-rank test.cDescriptive P-value.dCochran-Mantel-Haenszel. Citation Format: Caicun Zhou, Dingzhi Huang, Xinmin Yu, Yunpeng Liu, Yun Fan, Yongqian Shu, Zhiyong Ma, Ziping Wang, Ying Cheng, Jie Wang, Sheng Hu, Zhihua Liu, Mikhail Dvorkin, Elena Poddubskaya, Umut Disel, Andrey Akopov, Yiyuan Ma, Yan Wang, Zhenyu Pan, Cunjing Yu, Gareth Rivalland. Results from RATIONALE 303: A global phase 3 study of tislelizumab (TIS) vs docetaxel (TAX) as second- or third-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT039.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 12_Supplement ( 2022-06-15), p. CT554-CT554
    Abstract: Background: At a predefined interim analysis (IA), RATIONALE-303 (NCT03358875) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) for TIS vs D in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with a manageable safety profile. Given disease characteristics, standard of care treatment/prognosis differ between histologic types of NSCLC. Here we report the data on the sq population. Methods: 805 patients (pts) with histologically confirmed, advanced NSCLC with progressive disease during or after ≥ 1 platinum (Pt)-containing chemotherapy regimen were randomized (2:1) to TIS 200 mg IV or D 75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. Histology (sq vs non-sq), was a stratification factor for randomization. Dual primary endpoints were OS in the ITT and PD-L1 ≥ 25% populations. The IA was conducted after ~426 deaths (76% of planned events). Efficacy and safety were assessed in 370 randomized pts with sq histology. Results: Baseline characteristics of sq pts were balanced between treatment arms and similar to the ITT population. As of August 10, 2020, at median follow-up of 19.0 and 19.3 months (mo), respectively, median (95% CI) OS was longer with TIS (16.0 mo [13.8, 18.9]) vs D (11.3 mo [8.7, 12.7] ) in the sq ITT population, and progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) were also improved for TIS vs D (Table). 95.1% (TIS) and 99.1% (D) of pts had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 38.1% (TIS) and 79.5% (D) of pts had ≥ Grade 3 TEAEs. The most common TEAEs were anemia, cough and alanine amino transferase increased (TIS arm), and anemia, alopecia, and neutrophil count decreased (D arm). Conclusions: TIS prolonged OS with a favorable safety profile in pts with advanced sq NSCLC who progressed after a Pt-containing regimen. The data are consistent with the overall ITT population. Efficacy* TIS (n=248) D (n=122) Median OS, mo (95% CI) 16.0 (13.80, 18.86) 11.3 (8.67, 12.68) OS HR (95% CI)† 0.58 (0.436, 0.761) P & lt; 0.0001‡§ Median PFS, mo (95% CI) 6.2 (4.21, 6.37) 2.3 (2.10, 3.38) PFS HR (95% CI)† 0.45 (0.343, 0.577) P & lt; 0.0001‡§ ORR, n (%) 57 (23.0) 5 (4.1) Median DoR, mo (95% CI) 16.7 (8.31, NE) 6.2 (2.10, 8.31) Safety** TIS (n=247) D (n=117) TEAEs ≥ 20% of patients in either arm, n (%) All grades ≥ Grade 3 All grades ≥ Grade 3 Anemia 76 (30.8) 7 (2.8) 56 (47.9) 10 (8.5) Decreased appetite 41 (16.6) 2 (0.8) 33 (28.2) 3 (2.6) Asthenia 38 (15.4) 5 (2.0) 27 (23.1) 6 (5.1) White blood cell count decreased 12 (4.9) 1 (0.4) 32 (27.4) 21 (17.9) Leukopenia 9 (3.6) 1 (0.4) 31 (26.5) 19 (16.2) Neutrophil count decreased 7 (2.8) 2 (0.8) 42 (35.9) 35 (29.9) Alopecia 5 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 52 (44.4) 0 (0.0) Neutropenia 2 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 37 (31.6) 34 (29.1) *Efficacy analysis set - Sq patients; †Stratified; ‡One-sided stratified log-rank test; §Descriptive P-value; **Safety analysis set - Sq patients CI; confidence interval; D, docetaxel; DoR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; mo, months; NE, not evaluable; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; sq, squamous; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TIS, tislelizumab Data cut-off: August 10, 2020 Citation Format: Jie Wang, Zhiyong Ma, Dingzhi Huang, Yun Fan, Xinmin Yu, Sheng Hu, Ziping Wang, Zhihua Liu, Devrim Cabuk, Mahmut Gumus, Yiyuan Ma, Yan Wang, Yan Ma, Caicun Zhou. Tislelizumab (TIS) versus docetaxel (D) in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (sq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Sub-analysis from phase 3 RATIONALE-303 randomized clinical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT554.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 12_Supplement ( 2022-06-15), p. CT553-CT553
    Abstract: Background: At a predefined interim analysis (IA), RATIONALE-303 (NCT03358875) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) for TIS vs D in the intent-to-treat (ITT), with a manageable safety profile. Disease characteristics, standard of care and treatment/prognosis differ between histologic types of NSCLC. Here, we report on the non-sq population. Methods: 805 patients with histologically confirmed, advanced NSCLC with progressive disease during or after ≥ 1 platinum (Pt)-containing chemotherapy regimen were randomized (2:1) to TIS 200 mg or D 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. Histology (sq vs non-sq) was a randomization stratification factor. Dual primary endpoints were OS in the ITT and PD-L1 ≥ 25% populations. A prespecified IA was conducted after ~426 deaths (76% of planned events). Efficacy and safety were assessed in 435 randomized patients with non-sq histology. Results: Baseline characteristics of non-sq patients were balanced between treatment arms and similar to the ITT population. As of August 10, 2020, at median follow-up of 20 and 17 months (mo), respectively, median (95% CI) OS was longer with TIS (18.6 mo [15.41, 23.16]) vs D (13.8 mo [9.43, 17.94] ) in the non-sq ITT population, and objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) were also improved for TIS vs D (Table). 95.5% (TIS) and 97.9% (D) of patients had ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 39.0% (TIS) and 70.9% (D) of patients had ≥ Grade 3 TEAEs. The most common TEAEs were anemia, aspartate aminotransferase increased and alanine aminotransferase increased (TIS arm), and alopecia, anemia and neutrophil count decreased (D arm). Conclusions: TIS prolonged OS, consistent with the overall ITT population, with a favorable safety profile in patients with advanced non-sq NSCLC who progressed after a Pt-containing regimen. Table Efficacy* TIS (n=287) D (n=148) Median OS, mo (95% CI) 18.6 (15.41, 23.16) 13.8 (9.43, 17.94) OS HR (95% CI)† 0.71 (0.538, 0.929) P=0.0064‡,§ Median PFS, mo (95% CI) 2.5 (2.14, 4.01) 3.6 (2.17, 4.14) PFS HR (95% CI)† 0.84 (0.660, 1.062) P=0.0686‡,§ ORR, n (%) 60 (20.9) 14 (9.5) Median DoR, mo (95% CI) 11.7 (6.80, 14.65) 6.2 (2.10, 7.16) Safety** TIS (n=287) D (n=141) TEAEs ≥ 15% of patients in either arm, n (%) All grades ≥ Grade 3 All grades ≥ Grade 3 Anemia 76 (26.5) 11 (3.8) 56 (39.7) 6 (4.3) AST increased 64 (22.3) 5 (1.7) 18 (12.8) 0 (0.0) ALT increased 63 (22.0) 4 (1.4) 24 (17.0) 0 (0.0) Cough 59 (20.6) 4 (1.4) 25 (17.7) 0 (0.0) Weight decreased 44 (15.3) 2 (0.7) 13 (9.2) 0 (0.0) Decreased appetite 41 (14.3) 3 (1.0) 26 (18.4) 0 (0.0) Hypoalbuminemia 37 (12.9) 0 (0.0) 23 (16.3) 0 (0.0) Nausea 37 (12.9) 0 (0.0) 22 (15.6) 0 (0.0) Constipation 31 (10.8) 0 (0.0) 22 (15.6) 0 (0.0) Asthenia 29 (10.1) 1 (0.3) 29 (20.6) 8 (5.7) Neutrophil count decreased 8 (2.8) 1 (0.3) 53 (37.6) 36 (25.5) White blood cell count decreased 8 (2.8) 0 (0.0) 42 (29.8) 26 (18.4) Neutropenia 7 (2.4) 3 (1.0) 44 (31.2) 38 (27.0) Leukopenia 6 (2.1) 0 (0.0) 38 (27.0) 22 (15.6) Alopecia 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 70 (49.6) 2 (1.4) *Efficacy analysis set - non-sq patients; †Stratified; ‡One-sided stratified log-rank test; §Descriptive P-value; **Safety analysis set - non-squamous patients ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CI; confidence interval; DoR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; mo, months; NE, not evaluable; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event Data cut-off: August 10, 2020 Citation Format: Ying Cheng, Dingzhi Huang, Zhiyong Ma, Yun Fan, Jie Wang, Xinmin Yu, Mikhail Dvorkin, Gareth Rivalland, Yiyuan Ma, Yan Wang, Yan Ma, Caicun Zhou. Tislelizumab (TIS) versus docetaxel (D) in patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous (non-sq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Subanalysis from the RATIONALE-303 phase 3 randomized clinical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT553.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...