GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (3)
  • Wang, Jianxiang  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Hematology  (3)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 47-48
    Abstract: Background: Current definition of multi-hit multiple myeloma (MM) is based upon the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CA). But we may overlook the influence of standard-risk CA and different concurrent patterns. In fact, standard-risk t(11;14) and del(13q) may bring extra danger when concurrent with other CA. And the concurrency of two secondary CA may do more harm to patients than that of one secondary CA with one primary CA. This study is to answer whether CA number or pattern exert an impact on outcomes of MM patients. Methods: This study was carried out based on the prospective, non-randomized clinical trial BDH 2008/02. 537 MM patients with complete cytogenetic data were enrolled, of whom 64% (341/537) patients were treated with bortezomib-based three-drug induction therapy, and the remaining patients with thalidomide-based therapy. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was recommended post induction therapy in transplant-eligible patients, and all patients received maintenance therapy for two years. CA were divided into primary CA [pCA: any type of IgH breakage], and secondary CA [sCA: del(17p), del(13q), gain(1q) (≥3 copies)] Results: In the era of novel agents, patients with pCA only did not have outcomes different from those patients without any FISH abnormality. Patients with s1 CA or s1+p CA had hazard ratio for PFS or OS of 1.5-2.0. Patients with s2 CA or s2+p CA had hazard ratio for PFS or OS of 2.0-3.0. Patients with concurrent del(13q), del(17p) and gain(1q) (s3 CA) had hazard ratio for PFS of 3.11 and for OS of 3.00. Patients with s3+p CA had hazard ratio for PFS of 4.65 and for OS of 6.16. Based on these results, we divided patients into four subgroups: no CA or only pCA, s1 CA in the presence or absence of pCA, s2 CA in the presence or absence of pCA, and s3 CA in the presence or absence of pCA. Both the PFS and OS decreased in a stepwise fashion with the accumulation of CA (Figure 1). Therefore, we defined double-hit MM as any one sCA in the presence or absence of pCA. Triple-hit MM referred to two sCA plus pCA or not, and quadra-hit MM referred to three sCA plus pCA or not. Furthermore, we confirmed the prognostic independence of CA pattern in the multivariant analysis with International Staging System (ISS) and LDH (Table 1). Conclusion: In this study, we found that the primary CA as a whole lost its adverse effect when treated by bortezomib-based regimens. CA subtype conferred a prognostic value. In details, secondary CA imposed an accumulative risk to patients. For the first time, we indicated that double-hit or triple-hit MM should be defined upon the number of secondary CA. This definition coincides with the "Two-Hit" theory of cancer causation and fits well with MM evolution model. The prognostic significance of CA pattern needs validation in further prospective trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 1-3
    Abstract: Purpose: Most data on the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities come from the setting of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, it remains unclear whether the dynamic changes of cytogenetic aberrations affect the prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. Methods: We analyzed the prognostic impact of dynamic changes of cytogenetic abnormalities with a cohort consisting of 80 paired patients with consecutive cytogenetic data both at diagnosis and recurrence among 568 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Results : Three patterns of recurrence were established from 80 paired patients: Pattern A (40%) consisted of 32 patients without new cytogenetic abnormalities at the time of progression. Pattern B (15%) consisted of 12 patients harboring new standard risk (SR) cytogenetic aberrations. Pattern C (45%) consisted of 36 patients with new high-risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities. The median overall survival (mOS; P & lt;0.001) and median progression-free survival (mPFS; P =0.013) differed significantly among three patterns. Four groups including 60 paired patients were further established according to genetic risk stratification changes. There were 15 patients who kept SR in group 1 (25%); 12 SR patients who evolved into HR group in group 2 (20%); 17 HR patients without new HR cytogenetic abnormalities in group 3 (28%); and 16 HR patients harboring new HR cytogenetic aberrations in group 4 (27%). The mOS (P=0.001) also differed significantly among these four groups. Conclusions: Dynamic cytogenetic changes significantly affected prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. Patients harboring new HR cytogenetic abnormalities and escalated genetic risk stratification at relapse had worse outcomes. Figure 1 Disclosures Anderson: Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.: Other: Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 136, No. Supplement 1 ( 2020-11-5), p. 23-24
    Abstract: Background: Large granular lymphocyte leukemia (LGLL) is one type of chronic lymphocytic proliferative disorders, which commonly manifests as infiltration of large granular lymphocytes in both peripheral blood and bone marrow. LGLL now includes two entities with similar clinical course, treatment strategy and outcomes: T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia and chronic lymphoproliferative disorder of NK cells. The standard therapy for LGLL is still elusive. Here, we presented the efficacy and safety of combinatorial oral immunoregulatory regimen thalidomide, prednisone, and methotrexate (TPM regimen) in a prospective phase 2 clinical trial. Methods: We designed this phase 2 investigator-initiated clinical trial (NCT04453345) to evaluate the clinical response and safety of the combination of thalidomide, prednisone, and methotrexate in symptomatic treatment naïve LGLL patients. The TPM regimen includes thalidomide 50-100mg per night, prednisone 0.5-1.0mg/kg qod and methotrexate 10mg/m2 per week. This regimen will be administrated for up to 12 months until disease progression or intolerable. Then, thalidomide maintenance will continue for another year or until intolerance. Meanwhile, we set Cyclosporin A (CsA) alone or plus steroids as control. Treatment dosage for CsA was 3-5mg/Kg/day with or without steroids (prednisone) 0.5-1 mg/Kg/day. The primary endpoint of this study was the complete response rate. Results: From Aug 2013, to Jan 2020, twenty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up time was 26 months (range: 7-96). Twenty-five patients (89%) achieved hematologic and symptomatic response. Among them, 21 patients (75%) achieved complete response (CR) and four patients achieved partial response. The median time to best clinical response was 6 months (2-18). The 3-years progression-free-survival (PFS) rate was 90%, and 3-years overall survival (OS) rate was 92%. The median PFS time was not reached in TPM group. The curative effect was better for TPM treatment group, both for overall response (OR) (TPM 89% (25/28) vs CsA 49% (49/99), P=0.000) and CR (TPM 75% (21/28) vs CsA 20% (20/99), P=0.000). Adverse events were uncommon, two patients had grade 1-2 nausea and one had grade 3 nausea. Two patients had grade 1-2 constipation and one patient experienced grade 1-2 peripheral neuritis. Conclusion: The efficacy of this TPM regimen is higher than the history reports with limited adverse events. The multiple-center clinical trial has been initiated to validate this conclusion. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...