Abstract: The efficiency of upfront consolidation with high‐dose chemotherapy/autologous stem‐cell transplantation (HDCT/ASCT) for newly diagnosed high‐risk diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be influenced by induction chemotherapy. To select better induction chemotherapy regimens for HDCT/ASCT, a randomized phase II study was conducted in high‐risk DLBCL patients having an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score of 2 or 3. As induction chemotherapy, 6 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 (arm A) or 3 cycles of R‐CHOP‐14 followed by 3 cycles of CHASER (arm B) were planned, and patients who responded proceeded to HDCT with LEED and ASCT. The primary endpoint was 2‐y progression‐free survival (PFS), and the main secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs). In total, 71 patients were enrolled. With a median follow‐up of 40.3 mo, 2‐y PFS in arms A and B were 68.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.5%‐81.2%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 48.8%‐79.5%), respectively. Overall survival at 2 y in arms A and B was 74.3% (95% CI: 56.4%‐85.7%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 66.6%‐92.1%). Overall response rates were 82.9% in arm A and 69.4% in arm B. During induction chemotherapy, 45.7% and 75.0% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, had grade ≥ 3 non‐hematologic toxicities. One patient in arm A and 6 in arm B discontinued induction chemotherapy due to AEs. In conclusion, R‐CHOP‐14 showed higher 2‐y PFS and less toxicity compared with R‐CHOP‐14/CHASER in patients with high‐risk DLBCL, suggesting the former to be a more promising induction regimen for further investigations (UMIN‐CTR, UMIN000003823).

Abstract: Introduction: Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is a rare disease entity characterized by selective growth of lymphoma cells in the lumina of small vessels. IVLBCL has been listed in the WHO classification, which improves recognition of the disease. However, no standard therapy has been established based on the results of prospective studies. We previously reported promising efficacy of rituximab (R)-containing chemotherapy for IVLBCL (JCO 2008) and a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) recurrence (25% at 3 y) after R-chemotherapy (Lancet Oncol 2009, Cancer Sci 2010). To explore a more effective first-line treatment, we conducted a phase 2 trial of R-CHOP combined with CNS prophylaxis including R-high-dose methotrexate (R-HDMTX) and intrathecal chemotherapy with MTX, cytarabine (Ara-C), and prednisolone (PSL) (IT). Methods: Major inclusion criteria were untreated, histologically confirmed IVLBCL, age 20-79 y, ECOG PS 0-3, and no apparent CNS involvement at diagnosis. Patients received 3 cycles of R-CHOP followed by 2 cycles of R-HDMTX (3.5 g/m2; 2 g/m2 for ≥70 y) every 2 weeks, and 3 additional cycles of R-CHOP. IT (MTX 15 mg, Ara-C 40 mg, PSL 10 mg) was performed twice during the first 3 cycles of R-CHOP and twice during the final 3 cycles of R-CHOP (4 times in total). If patients achieved complete response (CR), they were observed without any therapy until relapse or disease progression. The primary endpoint was 2-y progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included 2-y overall survival (OS), CR rate, cumulative incidence of CNS recurrence at 2 y, patterns of progression, and adverse events. The threshold 2-y PFS was estimated to be 35%, with expected 2-y PFS estimated to be 60%. With a statistical power of 90% and a one-sided, type I error of 5%, a projected sample size of 37 was calculated in anticipation of 10% ineligible patients. The trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000005707). Results: 38 IVLBCL patients were enrolled between June 2011 and July 2016. One patient was found to be ineligible after completion of the protocol treatment due to a past history of lymphoma. The protocol treatment was completed in 34 (89%) of 38 patients. The diagnosis of IVLBCL was histologically confirmed by central pathological review in all enrolled patients. The baseline characteristics of the 37 eligible patients were: male sex, 16 (43%); median age, 66 (range 38-78) y; ECOG PS & gt;1, 15 (41%); stage IV, 37 (100%); serum LDH & gt;ULN, 36 (97%); WBC & lt;4,000/μL, 11 (30%); Hgb & lt;11g/dL, 30 (81%); PLT & lt;105/μL, 17 (46%); and IPI HI/H, 33 (89%) patients. The following clinical symptoms were observed before treatment initiation: B symptoms, 30 (81%); hypoxemia, 10 (27%); neurological symptoms, 3 (8%);exanthema, 4 (11%); hepatomegaly, 15 (40%); splenomegaly, 28 (76%); and hemophagocytosis, 8 (22%) patients. In the 37 eligible patients, the CR rate was 84% (95%CI: 68-94%). With a median follow-up of 3.9 (range, 2.0-6.6) y, 2-y PFS was 76% (95%CI: 59-87%), 2-y OS was 92% (95%CI: 77-97%), and the cumulative incidence of CNS recurrence at 2 y was 2.7% (95%CI: 0.2-12%) (Fig. 1). Only one patient had CNS relapse during follow-up. Of all 38 enrolled pts, there were no treatment-related deaths. G4 non-hematological adverse events were febrile neutropenia, hypokalemia, and low blood pressure in one patient each. Major G3 non-hematological toxicities were febrile neutropenia (32%) and hypokalemia (26%). G3 and G4 lymphocytopenia were observed in 95% and 50% and thrombocytopenia in 40% and 24% of patients, respectively. All toxicities were manageable. Conclusion: This phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint and showed favorable outcomes with a low cumulative incidence of CNS recurrence and acceptable toxicity profiles. These results indicate that R-CHOP combined with CNS prophylaxis including R-HDMTX and IT could be a reasonable treatment option for untreated IVLBCL without apparent CNS involvement at diagnosis. Disclosures Shimada: Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Yamaguchi:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Teijin Pharma: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Sorrento: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Meiji Seika Kaisha: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding. Atsuta:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd: Honoraria; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd: Honoraria; Janssen Paharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria. Matsue:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria. Kusumoto:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nagai:Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience International: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; SymBio Pharmaceuticals Limited: Honoraria, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; IQVIA: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Mundi Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Fukuhara:Mundi: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Mochida: Honoraria; Nippon Shinkyaku: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Research Funding. Miyazaki:Eisai: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; SymBio Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Nippon Shinyaku: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Okamoto:Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Other: Scholarship donation; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Other: Scholarship donation; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Other: Scholarship donation; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Other: Scholarship donation. Uchida:Eisai: Honoraria. Tsukasaki:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Huya: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Byer: Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Eisai: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Masaki:Tanabe Mitsubishi: Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Taisho Toyama: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Teijin: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Kiyoi:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; FUJIFILM Corporation: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Honoraria; Perseus Proteomics Inc.: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd: Research Funding. Suzuki:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria; Meiji Seika: Honoraria; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria; ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Abstract: Background: CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) is the standard of care for previously untreated DLBCL. R-CHOP comprises CHOP and one-dose rituximab in each 21-day cycle; however, the schedule of rituximab administration has not been fully optimized. Dose-dense rituximab was expected to increase its peak concentration to enhance the synergistic effect with chemotherapy at early phase of treatment. To compare weekly administration of rituximab combined with CHOP (RW-CHOP) with standard R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL, we conducted a multicenter, randomized phase II/III study (JCOG0601, UMIN000000929). Methods: Previously untreated patients with CD20+ DLBCL were eligible. Other major inclusion criteria were as follows: aged 20-79 years; ECOG performance status 0-2, at least 1 measurable lesion and preserved organ functions. At the beginning of the study, patients with advanced stage disease and the low or low-intermediate risk group by the International Prognostic Index (IPI) were eligible. These criteria were amended in September 2010 to allow enrollment of the patients with any IPI risk and any clinical stage because of slow accrual. Patients were randomly assigned to standard R-CHOP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [max 2 mg], all IV on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/day PO [40mg/m2 for aged 〉 65] on days 1-5, every 3 weeks) or RW-CHOP (standard CHOP with eight doses of weekly rituximab [375mg/m2 IV on days1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 and 50] ). Six cycles of CHOP were given in stage I non-bulky patients, 8 cycles were given in stage I bulky and II-IV patients, and rituximab was given 8 times regardless of cycles of CHOP. Randomization was stratified by institution, presence or absence of bulky mass and patient age. The primary endpoint of phase III part was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE). Assuming 3-year PFS in the R-CHOP arm to be 77% and expecting a 7% increase in 3-year PFS of the RW-CHOP arm, required sample size was 211 per arm with a one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 80%, an accrual period of 7 years, and a follow-up period of 3 years. Results: Between December 2007 and December 2014, a total of 422 patients were randomized to study treatments but primary analysis was performed in 421 patients: 213 to the R-CHOP arm and 208 to the RW-CHOP arm, because of one consent withdrawal. Baseline characteristics of 421 eligible patients were as follows (R-CHOP vs. RW-CHOP): median age, 61 vs. 62 years; male sex, 54.5% vs. 55.8%; Ann Arbor stage I/II/III/IV, 14.6/32.9/26.8/25.8% vs. 16.3/42.8/20.2/20.7%; and IPI score ≤2, 77.0% vs. 87.5%. With a median follow-up of 63.4 months (range: 3.2-119.2) among all patients, there was no significant difference in PFS between the arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 90.6% confidence interval [CI] , 0.68 to 1.31; one-sided log-rank P = 0.39). The 3-year PFS and OS were 79.2% and 88.7% with the R-CHOP arm and 80.3% and 90.4% with the RW-CHOP arm, respectively. The complete response rate and overall response rate were 77.0% and 93.0% in the R-CHOP arm and 82.2% and 91.8% in the RW-CHOP arm, respectively. Major AEs were hematological toxicities and infections. Grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia and G 3/4 thrombocytopenia were observed in 97.7% and 8.0% in the R-CHOP arm and 97.1% and 5.3% in the RW-CHOP arm, respectively. G3 febrile neutropenia was occurred in 33.8% in the R-CHOP arm and in 22.1% in the RW-CHOP arm. The frequency of severe AE was 2.3% in the R-CHOP arm and 3.8% in the RW-CHOP arm. Safety profile was comparable. No unexpected AEs were experienced. Conclusion: In combination of standard CHOP and rituximab, dose-dense weekly rituximab at early phase of treatment did not improve the PFS in patients with untreated DLBCL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Ohmachi: Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd,: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Meiji Pharma: Honoraria. Kinoshita:Takeda: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Ono: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Solasia: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Ono: Honoraria; Zenyaku: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Tobinai:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA Bioscience International: Consultancy, Honoraria; SERVIER: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Fukuhara:Sumitomo Dainippon: Research Funding; Solasia: Research Funding; Symbio: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Ono: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis pharma: Research Funding; Nippon-shinyaku: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mitsubishi Tanabe: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Japan Blood Products Organization: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer Yakuhin: Research Funding; Alexionpharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Nihon Ultmarc: Research Funding; Taiho: Research Funding; Teijin Pharma: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Uchida:Takeda Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Meiji Seika Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Nippon Shinyaku: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Teijin: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen Pharma: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria. Yamamoto:Solasia Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Meiji Seika Pharma: Consultancy; MSD: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zenyaku: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; HUYA: Honoraria; SymBio: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Miyazaki:Kyowa Hakko Kirin,: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma,: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sumitomo Group: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Shionogi Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Teijin Pharma: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical Co: Research Funding; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Tsukamoto:Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding. Iida:Teijin Pharma: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy. Yoshida:Taiho Pharma: Honoraria; Takeda Pharma: Honoraria; Celegene: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding. Masaki:Ono: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Phizer: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding. Yakushijin:Mundipharma Co.,: Research Funding; Chugai Co.,: Research Funding; Kyowa-kirin Co.,: Research Funding; Merch Sharp & Dohme Corp.,,: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo Inc.,: Research Funding; Eisai Co.: Research Funding. Suehiro:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Nosaka:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical Co.LTD.: Honoraria; Eisai Co. Ltd.,: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.,: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.LTD.,: Honoraria; Celgene Co. LTD.,: Honoraria. Dobashi:Celgene Co.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Sysmex Co.: Research Funding. Kuroda:Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Takamatsu:Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; TAIHO Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Maruyama:Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fujifilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Asahi Kasei Pharma: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Solasia Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Dai-Nippon-Sumitomo: Honoraria; Dai-ichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biomedis International: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Amgen Astellas BioPharma: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Mundipharma International: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ando:Eisai: Research Funding; Meiji Seika Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Japan Blood Products Organization: Research Funding. Ishizawa:Eisai: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Phizer: Research Funding. Ogura:Celltrion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy; SymBio: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria; MeijiSeika Pharma: Consultancy. Hotta:SymBio: Consultancy; CellSeed Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tsukasaki:Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; HUYA: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ono Pharma: Consultancy; Daiich-Sankyo: Consultancy; Mundy Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa-hakko/Kirin: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Nagai:HUYA Bioscience International: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer Yakuhin Ltd.: Research Funding; Sanofi K. K.: Honoraria; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Solasia Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Roche Ltd.: Honoraria; Esai Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; SymBio Pharmaceuticals Limited: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma K.K.: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca plc.: Research Funding; Abbvie G. K.: Research Funding.

Abstract: Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard of care for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the schedule for rituximab administration has not been optimized. To compare standard R-CHOP with CHOP plus dose-dense weekly rituximab (RW-CHOP) in patients with untreated DLBCL, we conducted a phase 2/3 study (JCOG0601, jRCTs031180139). Patients were randomly assigned to R-CHOP (CHOP-21 with 8 doses of rituximab once every 3 weeks [375 mg/m2]) or RW-CHOP (CHOP-21 with 8 doses of weekly rituximab [375 mg/m2] ) groups. The primary end point of the phase 2 component was percent complete response (%CR) of the RW-CHOP arm, whereas that of the phase 3 component was progression-free survival (PFS). Between December 2007 and December 2014, 421 untreated patients were randomly assigned to R-CHOP (213 patients) or RW-CHOP (208 patients). The %CR in the RW-CHOP arm was 85.3% and therefore met the prespecified decision criteria for the phase 2 component. With a median follow-up of 63.4 months, the 3-year PFS and overall survival were 79.2% and 88.7% in the R-CHOP arm and 80.3% and 90.4% in the RW-CHOP arm, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.95; 90.6% confidence interval, 0.68-1.31). Although the safety profile and efficacy of RW-CHOP was comparable with R-CHOP and its tolerability was acceptable, weekly rituximab in combination with CHOP during the early treatment period did not improve PFS in untreated patients with DLBCL. This trial was registered at jrct.niph.go.jp as #jRCTs031180139.