GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 56, No. 7 ( 2019-08), p. 877-889
    Abstract: The Craniofacial microsomia: Longitudinal Outcomes in Children pre-Kindergarten (CLOCK) study is a longitudinal cohort study of neurobehavioral outcomes in infants and toddlers with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). In this article, we review the data collection and methods used to characterize this complex condition and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort. Setting: Craniofacial and otolaryngology clinics at 5 study sites. Participants: Infants with CFM and unaffected infants (controls) ages 12 to 24 months were recruited from the same geographical regions and followed to age 36 to 48 months. Methods: Phenotypic, neurodevelopmental, and facial expression assessments were completed during the first and third waves of data collection (time 1 and time 3, respectively). Medical history data were taken at both of these time points and during an intermediate parent phone interview (time 2). Results: Our cohort includes 108 cases and 84 controls. Most cases and controls identified as white and 55% of cases and 37% of controls identified as Hispanic. Nearly all cases had microtia (95%) and 59% had mandibular hypoplasia. Cases received extensive clinical care in infancy, with 59% receiving care in a craniofacial clinic and 28% experiencing at least one surgery. Study visits were completed at a study site (92%) or at the participant’s home (8%). Conclusions: The CLOCK study represents an effort to overcome the challenges of characterizing the phenotypic and neurodevelopmental outcomes of CFM in a large, demographically and geographically diverse cohort.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-6656 , 1545-1569
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030056-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 58, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 42-53
    Abstract: The study aim was to assess behavioral adjustment in preschool children with and without craniofacial microsomia (CFM). Design: Multisite cohort study of preschoolers with CFM (“cases”) or without CFM (“controls”). Participants: Mothers (89%), fathers (9%), and other caregivers (2%) of 161 preschoolers. Outcome Measure: Child Behavior Check List (CBCL 1.5-5); linear regressions with standardized effect sizes (ES) adjusted for sociodemographic confounds. Results: Child Behavior Check Lists for 89 cases and 72 controls (average age 38.3 ± 1.9 months). Children were male (54%), white (69%), and of Latino ethnicity (47%). Cases had microtia with mandibular hypoplasia (52%), microtia only (30%), or other CFM-associated features (18%). Nearly 20% of cases had extracranial anomalies. Composite CBCL scores were in the average range compared to test norms and similar for cases and controls. On the subscales, cases’ parents reported higher Anxious/Depressed scores (ES = 0.35, P = .04), Stress Problems (ES = 0.40, P = .04), Anxiety Problems (ES = 0.34, P = .04), and Autism Spectrum Problems (ES = 0.41, P = .02); however, the autism subscale primarily reflected speech concerns. Among cases, more problems were reported for children with extracranial anomalies and certain phenotypic categories with small ES. Conclusions: Behavioral adjustment of preschoolers with CFM was comparable to peers. However, parental reports reflected greater concern for internalizing behaviors; thus, anxiety screening and interventions may benefit children with CFM. Among cases, more problems were reported for those with more complex presentations of CFM. Craniofacial microsomia–related speech problems should be distinguished from associated psychosocial symptoms during developmental evaluations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-6656 , 1545-1569
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030056-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: The Journal of Pediatrics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 160, No. 4 ( 2012-04), p. 673-678.e1
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3476
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005245-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Birth Defects Research, Wiley, Vol. 111, No. 11 ( 2019-07), p. 649-658
    Abstract: Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital condition that typically involves hypoplasia of the ear and jaw. It is often associated with adverse effects such as hearing loss and sleep‐disordered breathing. There is little research on its etiology. Methods We conducted a case–control study from maternal interview data collected from mothers of infants with and without CFM. The study included 108 children with and 84 children without CFM. Logistic regression with adjustment for demographic factors was used to evaluate associations between maternal exposures of interest and risk for CFM overall, as well as for different phenotypic sub‐groups of children on the CFM spectrum. Results We found a statistically significant association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and CFM (OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.6–10.5). The association was slightly attenuated after adjustment for BMI. Higher parity was also associated with increased risk for CFM (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–4.0). Vitamin A consumption and/or liver consumption was associated with a 70% lower risk compared with non‐users (OR 0.3, 95% 0.1–0.8). Maternal age at the time of pregnancy was not associated with CFM. Conclusions These analyses contribute evidence linking maternal DM with an elevated risk of having an infant with CFM, which is consistent with previous research and adds to the body of knowledge about the strength of this association. Further study is warranted to understand the potential mechanisms underlying the effect of DM in the developing embryo.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2472-1727 , 2472-1727
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2884154-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ; 2013
    In:  Pediatrics Vol. 131, No. 1 ( 2013-01-01), p. e109-e115
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 131, No. 1 ( 2013-01-01), p. e109-e115
    Abstract: Infants and toddlers with deformational plagiocephaly (DP) have been shown to score lower on developmental measures than unaffected children. To determine whether these differences persist, we examined development in 36-month-old children with and without a history of DP. METHODS: Participants included 224 children with DP and 231 children without diagnosed DP, all of who had been followed in a longitudinal study since infancy. To confirm the presence or absence of DP, pediatricians blinded to children’s case status rated 3-dimensional cranial images taken when children were 7 months old on average. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) was administered as a measure of child development. RESULTS: Children with DP scored lower on all scales of the BSID-III than children without DP. Differences were largest in cognition, language, and parent-reported adaptive behavior (adjusted differences = –2.9 to –4.4 standard score points) and smallest in motor development (adjusted difference = –2.7). Children in the control group who did not have previously diagnosed DP but who were later rated by pediatricians to have at least mild cranial deformation also scored lower on the BSID-III than unaffected controls. CONCLUSIONS: Preschool-aged children with a history of DP continue to receive lower developmental scores than unaffected controls. These findings do not imply that DP causes developmental problems, but DP may nonetheless serve as a marker of developmental risk. We encourage clinicians to screen children with DP for developmental concerns to facilitate early identification and intervention.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1477004-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: The Journal of Pediatrics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 198 ( 2018-07), p. 226-233.e3
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3476
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005245-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 58, No. 9 ( 2021-09), p. 1169-1177
    Abstract: To examine neurodevelopment in preschool-aged children with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) relative to unaffected peers. Design: Multisite, longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care centers in the United States. Participants: We included 92 children with CFM (“cases”) through craniofacial centers and clinics. Seventy-six children without CFM (controls) were included from pediatric practices and community advertisements. This study reports on outcomes assessed when participants were an average age of 38.4 months (SD = 1.9). Main outcome measures: We assessed cognitive and motor skills using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III), and language function using subtests from the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Preschool, second edition (CELF-P2). Results: Case–control differences were negligible for Bayley-III cognitive (effect sizes [ES] = −0.06, P = .72) and motor outcomes (ES = −0.19, P = .25). Cases scored lower than controls on most scales of the CELF-P2 (ES = −0.58 to −0.20, P = .01 to .26). Frequency counts for “developmental delay” (ie, one or more scores 〉 1 SD below the normative mean) were higher for cases (39%) than controls (15%); however, the adjusted odds ratio = 1.73 ( P = 0.21) was not significant. Case–control differences were most evident in children with microtia or other combinations of CFM-related facial features. Conclusions: Cognitive and motor scores were similar for preschool-aged children with and without CFM. However, children with CFM scored lower than controls on language measures. We recommend early monitoring of language to identify preschoolers with CFM who could benefit from intervention.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-6656 , 1545-1569
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030056-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Speech Language Hearing Association ; 2019
    In:  American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol. 28, No. 4 ( 2019-11-19), p. 1571-1581
    In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, American Speech Language Hearing Association, Vol. 28, No. 4 ( 2019-11-19), p. 1571-1581
    Abstract: Youth with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) have anomalies and comorbidities that increase their risk for speech, language, and communication deficits. We examined these outcomes in youth with and without CFM and explored differences as a function of CFM phenotype and hearing status. Method Participants included youth ages 11–17 years with CFM ( n = 107) and demographically similar controls ( n = 306). We assessed speech intelligibility, articulation, receptive and expressive language, and parent and teacher report measures of communication. Hearing status was also screened at the study visit. Group differences were estimated using linear regression analyses with standardized effect sizes (ES) adjusted for demographic characteristics (adjusted ES) or negative binomial regression. Results Youth with CFM scored lower than unaffected peers on most measures of intelligibility, articulation, expressive language, and parent- and-teacher-rated communication. Differences were most pronounced among participants with CFM who had mandibular hypoplasia plus microtia (adjusted ES = −1.15 to −0.18). Group differences were larger in youth with CFM who failed the hearing screen (adjusted ES = −0.73 to 0.07) than in those who passed the hearing screen (adjusted ES = −0.34 to 0.27). Conclusions Youth with CFM, particularly those with mandibular hypoplasia plus microtia and/or hearing loss, should be closely monitored for speech and language concerns. Further research is needed to identify the specific needs of youth with CFM as well as to document the course of speech and language development in children with CFM.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-0360 , 1558-9110
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Speech Language Hearing Association
    Publication Date: 2019
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2019
    In:  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open Vol. 7, No. 1 ( 2019-01), p. e2081-
    In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 7, No. 1 ( 2019-01), p. e2081-
    Abstract: Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital condition associated with malformations of the bone and soft tissue of the face and the facial nerves, all of which have the potential to impair facial expressiveness. We investigated whether CFM-related variation in expressiveness is evident as early as infancy. Methods: Participants were 113 ethnically diverse 13-month-old infants (n = 63 cases with CFM and n = 50 unaffected matched controls). They were observed in 2 emotion induction tasks designed to elicit positive and negative effects. Facial and head movement was automatically measured using a computer vision–based approach. Expressiveness was quantified as the displacement, velocity, and acceleration of 49 facial landmarks (eg, lip corners) and head pitch and yaw. Results: For both cases and controls, all measures of expressiveness strongly differed between tasks. Case–control differences were limited to infants with microtia plus mandibular hypoplasia and other associated CFM features, which were the most common phenotypes and were characterized by decreased expressiveness relative to control infants. Conclusions: Infants with microtia plus mandibular hypoplasia and those with other associated CFM phenotypes were less facially expressive than same-aged peers. Both phenotypes were associated with more severe involvement than microtia alone, suggesting that infants with more severe CFM begin to diverge in expressiveness from controls by age 13 months. Further research is needed to both replicate the current findings and elucidate their developmental implications.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2169-7574
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2723993-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2017
    In:  Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Vol. 140, No. 3 ( 2017-09), p. 571-580
    In: Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 140, No. 3 ( 2017-09), p. 571-580
    Abstract: The authors compared the IQ and academic achievement of adolescents with craniofacial microsomia (cases) and unaffected children (controls). Among cases, the authors analyzed cognitive functioning by facial phenotype. Methods: The authors administered standardized tests of intelligence, reading, spelling, writing, and mathematics to 142 cases and 316 controls recruited from 26 cities across the United States and Canada. Phenotypic classification was based on integrated data from photographic images, health history, and medical chart reviews. Hearing screens were conducted for all participants. Results: After adjustment for demographics, cases’ average scores were lower than those of controls on all measures, but the magnitude of differences was small (standardized effect sizes, −0.01 to −0.3). There was little evidence that hearing status modified case-control group differences (Wald p 〉 0.05 for all measures). Twenty-five percent of controls and 38 percent of cases were classified as having learning problems (adjusted OR, 1.5; 95 percent CI, 0.9 to 2.4). Comparison of cases with and without learning problems indicated that those with learning problems were more likely to be male, Hispanic, and to come from lower income, bilingual families. Analyses by facial phenotype showed that case-control group differences were largest for cases with both microtia and mandibular hypoplasia (effect sizes, −0.02 to −0.6). Conclusions: The highest risk of cognitive-academic problems was observed in patients with combined microtia and mandibular hypoplasia. Developmental surveillance of this subgroup is recommended, especially in the context of high socioeconomic risk and bilingual families. Given the early stage of research on craniofacial microsomia and neurodevelopment, replication of these findings is needed. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0032-1052
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2037030-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...