GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 20, No. 6 ( 2021-06-01), p. 1009-1018
    Abstract: Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-7163 , 1538-8514
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 8 ( 2015-04-15), p. 1916-1924
    Abstract: Purpose: Wee1 regulates key DNA damage checkpoints, and in this study, the efficacy of the Wee1 inhibitor MK-1775 was evaluated in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenograft models alone and in combination with radiation and/or temozolomide. Experimental Design: In vitro MK-1775 efficacy alone and in combination with temozolomide, and the impact on DNA damage, was analyzed by Western blotting and γH2AX foci formation. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in orthotopic and heterotopic xenografts. Drug distribution was assessed by conventional mass spectrometry (MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS imaging. Results: GBM22 (IC50 = 68 nmol/L) was significantly more sensitive to MK-1775 compared with five other GBM xenograft lines, including GBM6 (IC50 & gt;300 nmol/L), and this was associated with a significant difference in pan-nuclear γH2AX staining between treated GBM22 (81% cells positive) and GBM6 (20% cells positive) cells. However, there was no sensitizing effect of MK-1775 when combined with temozolomide in vitro. In an orthotopic GBM22 model, MK-1775 was ineffective when combined with temozolomide, whereas in a flank model of GBM22, MK-1775 exhibited both single-agent and combinatorial activity with temozolomide. Consistent with limited drug delivery into orthotopic tumors, the normal brain to whole blood ratio following a single MK-1775 dose was 5%, and MALDI-MS imaging demonstrated heterogeneous and markedly lower MK-1775 distribution in orthotopic as compared with heterotopic GBM22 tumors. Conclusions: Limited distribution to brain tumors may limit the efficacy of MK-1775 in GBM. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1916–24. ©2015 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 16, No. 12 ( 2017-12-01), p. 2735-2746
    Abstract: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including talazoparib, potentiate temozolomide efficacy in multiple tumor types; however, talazoparib-mediated sensitization has not been evaluated in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) models. This study evaluates talazoparib ± temozolomide in clinically relevant GBM models. Talazoparib at 1–3 nmol/L sensitized T98G, U251, and GBM12 cells to temozolomide, and enhanced DNA damage signaling and G2–M arrest in vitro. In vivo cyclical therapy with talazoparib (0.15 mg/kg twice daily) combined with low-dose temozolomide (5 mg/kg daily) was well tolerated. This talazoparib/temozolomide regimen prolonged tumor stasis more than temozolomide alone in heterotopic GBM12 xenografts [median time to endpoint: 76 days versus 50 days temozolomide (P = 0.005), 11 days placebo (P & lt; 0.001)]. However, talazoparib/temozolomide did not accentuate survival beyond that of temozolomide alone in corresponding orthotopic xenografts [median survival 37 vs. 30 days with temozolomide (P = 0.93), 14 days with placebo, P & lt; 0.001]. Average brain and plasma talazoparib concentrations at 2 hours after a single dose (0.15 mg/kg) were 0.49 ± 0.07 ng/g and 25.5±4.1 ng/mL, respectively. The brain/plasma distribution of talazoparib in Bcrp−/− versus wild-type (WT) mice did not differ, whereas the brain/plasma ratio in Mdr1a/b−/− mice was higher than WT mice (0.23 vs. 0.02, P & lt; 0.001). Consistent with the in vivo brain distribution, overexpression of MDR1 decreased talazoparib accumulation in MDCKII cells. These results indicate that talazoparib has significant MDR1 efflux liability that may restrict delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and this may explain the loss of talazoparib-mediated temozolomide sensitization in orthotopic versus heterotopic GBM xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2735–46. ©2017 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-7163 , 1538-8514
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 20, No. 14 ( 2014-07-15), p. 3730-3741
    Abstract: Purpose: Effective sensitizing strategies potentially can extend the benefit of temozolomide (TMZ) therapy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We previously demonstrated that robust TMZ-sensitizing effects of the [poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase] (PARP) inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888) are restricted to TMZ-sensitive GBM xenografts. The focus of this study is to provide an understanding for the differential sensitization in paired TMZ-sensitive and -resistant GBM models. Experimental Design: The impact of veliparib on TMZ-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in models of acquired TMZ resistance (GBM12TMZ-mgmtHigh, GBM12TMZ-mgmtLow, and U251TMZ), inherent TMZ resistance (T98G), and TMZ-sensitive (U251 and GBM12). In vivo drug efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were analyzed using clinically relevant dosing regimens. Results: Veliparib enhanced TMZ cytotoxicity and DNA-damage signaling in all GBM models in vitro with more pronounced effects in TMZ-resistant lines at 3 to 10 μmol/L veliparib. In vivo, combined TMZ/veliparib, compared with TMZ alone, significantly delayed tumor growth and enhanced DNA-damage signaling and γH2AX levels in the sensitive GBM12 xenograft line but not in the resistant GBM12TMZ lines. The pharmacokinetic profile of veliparib was similar for GBM12 and GBM12TMZ tumors with Cmax (∼1.5 μmol/L) in tissue significantly lower than concentrations associated with optimal in vitro sensitizing effects for resistant tumors. In contrast, robust suppression of PARP-1 expression by shRNA significantly increased TMZ sensitivity of U251TMZ in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: In vitro cytotoxicity assays do not adequately model the therapeutic index of PARP inhibitors, as concentrations of veliparib and TMZ required to sensitize TMZ-resistant cancer cells in vivo cannot be achieved using a tolerable dosing regimen. Clin Cancer Res; 20(14); 3730–41. ©2014 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 108, No. 5 ( 2015-05), p. djv369-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-8874 , 1460-2105
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2992-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1465951-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. 340-340
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Talazoparib (TAL) is a potent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that robustly enhances in vitro sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) in several tumor models. We assessed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of TAL combined with TMZ in glioblastoma (GBM) models. METHODS: Established glioma cell lines (T98G, U251) and the GBM12 patient derived xenograft (PDX) line were treated in vitro with TAL (1-10 nM) ± TMZ (2-300 μM). Antitumor efficacy was assessed with CyQUANT, clonogenic and primary neurosphere assays; cell cycle analysis with flow cytometry; DNA damage signaling with phospho-specific western blots for pKap1, pChk1, pChk2 and fluorescent immunocytochemistry for γH2AX and replication protein A foci. Brain and plasma concentrations of TAL in wild-type (WT), Mdr1a/b(-/-), Bcrp(-/-) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) knockout (KO) mice were assessed with LC-MS/MS. The tolerability of TAL (0.05 - 0.30 mg/kg/day orally, divided twice daily (div. bid)) and TMZ (5-50 mg/kg/day orally) was tested in athymic nude mice. Subsequently, in vivo combination TAL/TMZ efficacy was assessed with survival analyses in intracranial and flank GBM12 PDX models. RESULTS: TAL 1-3 nM sensitizes the TMZ resistant T98G glioma cell line to TMZ at high TMZ concentrations (30-300 μM) and is associated with G2 cell cycle arrest and enhanced DNA damage signaling. TAL 1-3 nM also enhances the cytotoxic efficacy of lower concentrations of TMZ (10-30 μM) in the TMZ sensitive U251 cell line. At least 3 nM TAL is required to enhance the in vitro efficacy of low TMZ concentrations (2-10 μM) in the TMZ sensitive GBM12 PDX line. PK studies in non-tumor bearing WT FVB mice treated with a single dose of TAL 0.15 mg/kg revealed mean brain and plasma concentrations of 0.49 ng/g (1.3 nM) and 25.5 ng/ml (67.1 nM) respectively at 2 hours. The mean brain/plasma ratio at 2 hours was unchanged in Bcrp(-/-) KO mice compared to WT mice (1.2% vs. 2.0%), but was significantly increased in Mdr1a/b(-/-) KO mice (22.8%) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) KO mice (23.9%). Standard doses of TMZ (50 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) combined with low doses of TAL (0.05 mg/kg/day, div. bid) were toxic in nude mice. Higher doses of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) required substantial TMZ dose reductions (5 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) for tolerability. The addition of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) to low-dose TMZ (5 mg/kg/day) prolonged tumor stasis in flank GBM12 xenografts (median time to endpoint 76 vs. 50 days, p = 0.005). However this regimen was ineffective in intracranial GBM12 xenografts (median survival 37 vs. 30 days, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: TAL is a potent PARP inhibitor that enhances the efficacy of TMZ in both in vitro GBM models and flank GBM12 PDX models, but not in the corresponding GBM12 intracranial xenografts. This lack of intracranial efficacy is associated with limited brain distribution due to active efflux mediated by Mdr1 at the blood-brain barrier. Citation Format: Sani H. Kizilbash, Kenneth Chang, Shiv K. Gupta, Ryo Kawashima, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Mark A. Schroeder, Gaspar J. Kitange, Paul A. Decker, Yuqiao Shen, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Talazoparib enhances low-dose temozolomide efficacy in flank glioblastoma models, but intracranial efficacy is constrained by limited brain distribution. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 340.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2015
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 75, No. 15_Supplement ( 2015-08-01), p. 3505-3505
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 15_Supplement ( 2015-08-01), p. 3505-3505
    Abstract: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive and fatal disease commonly treated with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), but emergence of therapy resistance invariably limits treatment efficacy. Inhibition of Poly-ADP ribose polymerases 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) sensitizes GBM cells, and inhibitors of PARP are emerging as combination partners with TMZ. However, limited brain penetration precludes use of several promising PARP inhibitors in GBM. BGB-290 is a relatively new and potent PARP inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier with a brain to plasma ratio of ∼0.2. The focus of the present study was to evaluate antitumor effects of BGB-290, as single agent or in combination with TMZ, in patient derived GBM xenografts and glioma cell lines. In a biochemical assay, low doses (30-100 nM) of BGB-290 suppressed PARP activity, while single agent anti-tumor activity of BGB-290 was modest and restricted to concentrations above 3 μM. Combinations of 0.1 μM BGB-290 with 10 μM TMZ significantly diminished primary neurosphere formation in a patient-derived xenograft line, GBM12, decreasing relative neurosphere count to 3.1 ± 1.3% as compared to 9.2 ± 3.1% with TMZ alone, p = 0.03. Consistent with a mechanism involving disruption of DNA repair, treatment of GBM12 cells with TMZ and BGB-290 combination resulted in robust γH2AX foci formation and a synergistic increase in DNA damage signaling as compared to TMZ or BGB-290 alone. TMZ-sensitizing effects of BGB-290 were heterogeneous in TMZ-resistant (GBM12TMZ) sublines that were developed previously by in vivo selection of parental GBM12 with cyclical TMZ therapy. The average neurosphere formation across 4 resistant sublines lacking MGMT expression after 100 μM TMZ only was 75.3 ± 9.0% versus 14.9 ± 7.4% with TMZ and 0.1 μM BGB-290, p & lt;0.01. In contrast, 2 MGMT overexpressing sublines were much less sensitive to the combination with relative neurospheres 91.9 ± 5.2% versus 73.2 ± 9.2% respectively, p & lt; 0.01. Next Gen Sequencing revealed discrete non-synonymous somatic mutations in the mismatch repair pathway of GBM12TMZ sublines lacking MGMT, which led us to examine the relationship between mismatch repair and sensitizing effects of PARP inhibition. Silencing Msh2 resulted in marked TMZ resistance in U251 cells (94.7± 5.4% relative growth with 100 μM TMZ), while co-treatment with 0.1 μM BGB-290 and 100 μM TMZ decreased growth to 23.5 ± 9.6% (p & lt;0.01), which is similar sensitivity to TMZ alone in U251 parental cells. In an initial in vivo study with orthotopic GBM12 xenografts, administration of BGB-290 at 3 mg/kg twice per day combined with 25 mg/kg TMZ extended survival of animals beyond 300 days (80% survival at day 320), while in the group treated with TMZ alone 80% animals were moribund before day 150. In conclusion, BGB-290 is a promising PARP inhibitor with high potency, cytotoxicity and favorable in vivo efficacy in TMZ sensitive and possibly a subset of recurrent TMZ resistant GBM. Citation Format: Shiv K. Gupta, Brett L. Carlson, Mark A. Schroeder, Katrina K. Bakken, Ann C. Tuma, Jann N. Sarkaria. Inhibition of PARP activity by BGB-290 potentiates efficacy of temozolomide in patient derived xenografts of glioblastoma multiforme. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3505. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3505
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. 4781-4781
    Abstract: Microtubule-targeting agents (MTA) have been employed in the treatment of many cancers for decades. BAL101553 is a highly soluble prodrug of BAL27862, a novel, small molecule, microtubule-depolymerizing agent that induces tumor cell death by activating the ‘spindle assembly checkpoint’. Given intravenously or orally, the drug penetrates the brain and has anti-cancer activity in diverse tumor models refractory to standard MTA or radiotherapy (RT). In this study, BAL101553 was evaluated in orthotopic xenografts from 16 GBM PDX models; 7 of 16 lines demonstrated significant (p & lt;0.01) increases in median survival with BAL101553 versus placebo (range in median survival extension 24-87%). The combination of BAL101553 with conventional therapies for GBM (RT and temozolomide (TMZ) was then evaluated in select lines. In the MGMT methylated GBM12 line, combination of RT with TMZ increased survival compared to placebo (median survival 80 days vs. 23 days, respectively; p & lt;0.001). Extended BAL101553 monotherapy provided a short but significant extension in survival (median survival 31 days, p & lt;0.001), while extended BAL101553 dosing during and after RT/TMZ (median survival 85 days) did not extend survival relative to RT/TMZ alone (p = 0.56). In contrast, in the MGMT unmethylated GBM6 line, combination of RT and extended BAL101553 increased survival (median 90 days, p & lt;0.001) relative to either treatment alone (median survival BAL101553 63 days; RT 69 days) or placebo (46 days). Additionally, the combination of BAL101553 with TMZ (median survival 70 days) was more effective than TMZ alone (median survival 60 days; p = 0.009). Consistent with the unmethylated MGMT status, the TMZ/RT combination (median survival 66 days) was similar to RT alone (p = 0.62), but the combination of extended BAL101553 with RT/TMZ (median survival 101 days; p & lt;0.001 compared to other combination groups) was significantly more effective. To further evaluate whether BAL101553 is a true radiosensitizer, a second GBM6 study was performed. Also here, combination of RT (20Gy, 2wks) with extended BAL101553 dosing (median survival 66 days) significantly extended survival compared to RT alone (median survival 54 days; p = 002). Interestingly, when BAL101553 dosing was limited to 2 weeks with RT, there was no increase in median survival (58 days; p = 0.16). To evaluate effects on tumor repopulation during RT, the efficacy of an extended RT schedule (36 Gy, 6 wks) with or without 6 weeks of BAL101553 was evaluated. In this case, BAL101553 given during the RT schedule (median survival 78 days) extended median survival as compared to RT alone (61 days; p & lt;0.001). Collectively, these data demonstrate that BAL101553 has broad single agent activity across a panel of GBM PDX models and suggests that combination with RT/TMZ therapy may provide additional benefits for survival extension. Citation Format: Ann C. Mladek, Jenny L. Pokorny, Heidi Lane, Felix Bachmann, Mark A. Schroeder, Katrina K. Bakken, Brett L. Carlson, Paul A. Decker, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Jann N. Sarkaria. The novel tubulin-binding ‘tumor checkpoint controller’ BAL101553 has anti-cancer activity alone and in combination treatments across a panel of GBM patient-derived xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4781.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...