Abstract: Intensive upfront therapy in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) including induction therapy (IT), high-dose melphalan (MEL200), and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by consolidation and/or maintenance is mostly restricted to patients up to 65 years of age. Prospective phase III trial data in the era of novel agents for patients up to 70 years of age are not available. The GMMG-MM5 trial included 601 patients between 18 and 70 years of age, divided in three groups for the present analysis: ≤60 years (S1, n  = 353), 61–65 years (S2, n  = 107) and 66–70 years (S3, n  = 141). Treatment consisted of a bortezomib-containing IT, MEL200/ASCT, consolidation, and maintenance with lenalidomide. Adherence to treatment was similar among patients of the three age groups. Overall toxicity during all treatment phases was increased in S2 and S3 compared to S1 (any adverse event/any serious adverse event: S1:81.7/41.8% vs. S2:90.7/56.5% vs. S3:87.2/68.1%, p  = 0.05/ 〈 0.001). With respect to progression-free survival (log-rank p  = 0.73), overall survival (log-rank p  = 0.54) as well as time-to-progression (Gray’s p  = 0.83) and non-relapse mortality (Gray’s p  = 0.25), no differences were found between the three age groups. Our results imply that an intensive upfront therapy with a bortezomib-containing IT, MEL200/ASCT, lenalidomide consolidation, and maintenance should be applied to transplant-eligible MM patients up to 70 years of age.

Abstract: Background: The well-described prognostic impact of tumor characteristics and biology in multiple myeloma (MM), such as the combination of cytogenetics, the International Staging System (ISS) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, Moreau et. al., JCO, 2014) as well as frailty (Palumbo et al., Blood, 2015) significantly influence patient outcomes. However, only limited data on the impact of infections during therapy exist (Rajkumar et al., Lancet Oncology, 2010). Therefore, we hypothesized that severe infections during induction therapy (IT) in transplant-eligible MM influence dosage of therapies, treatment responses after IT and survival. Patients and Methods: From 05/2005 until 05/2008, 399 patients were randomly assigned to receive IT with either three cycles of VAD (vincristine, VIN, i.v. 0.4mg, days 1-4; doxorubicine, DOXO, i.v. 9mg/m2, days 1-4; dexamethasone, DEX, p.o. 40mg, days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20; n=201, arm A) or PAD (bortezomib, BTZ, i.v. 1.3mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; DOXO i.v. 9mg/m2, days 1-4; DEX p.o. 40mg, days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20; n=194, arm B), followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and either thalidomide (arm A) or bortezomib (arm B) maintenance within the German part of the joint GMMG-HD4/HOVON65 trial (Sonneveld et al., JCO, 2012). After exclusion of ineligible patients, 395 patients (99.0%) were evaluable for analyses. Any severe infection (equal or greater grade 3, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0) during IT (at least once, defined from first until last date of application of IT medication) occurred in 105 patients (VAD n=53/198 and PAD n=52/192, 26.9% of all patients, missing data n=5). Results: Among patients with a severe infection during IT in the VAD and PAD arms, total DEX and DOXO doses (equal dosage in VAD/PAD group) were significantly lower (median DEX dose (mg/m2): 689.0 [77.7, 1014.1] vs. 742.3 [0.0, 1324.1] , p 〈 0.001 and median DOXO dose (mg/m2): 106.9 [33.0, 115.4] vs. 107.6 [27.6, 149.5] , p 〈 0.001). Accordingly, the BTZ dose during IT in the PAD group was significantly lower in patients with severe infections (median BTZ dose (mg/m2): 15.1 [5.1, 16.6] vs. 15.5 [1.3, 16.4] , p 〈 0.001). Combined PAD and VAD very good partial response rates or better (VGPR+) after IT were 27.6% vs. 19.9% (p=0.12) for patients with or without a severe infection during IT. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shortened in patients with at least one severe infection during IT (median OS: 81.8 months vs. not reached, p=0.04, Figure 1A). OS plots diverged in the early period of observation ( 〈 3 months), driven by infection-related deaths (n=8). A landmark analysis 3 months after registration demonstrated approximated survival curves without significant differences in OS (median OS: 78.8 months vs. not reached, p=0.30, Figure 1B). Similarly, progression-free survival (PFS) was shortened, though not significantly (median PFS: 30.2 vs. 35.0 months, p=0.08). However, since not just death accounts as PFS event, the impact of infection-related deaths on PFS remains smaller than on OS. Accordingly, landmark analyses after 3 months from registration showed again closer survival curves (median PFS: 28.5 vs. 32.4 months, p=0.36). Conclusions: Severe infections have a critical impact on the applied doses of IT and outcome in the early, vulnerable phases of MM therapy. OS for transplant-eligible MM patients with severe infections during IT was significantly shortened, mainly driven by early infection-related deaths ( 〈 3 months). A reduction of DEX doses during PAD/PAd IT in the subsequent GMMG study generation (GMMG-HD4/HOVON65: 480mg/cycle to GMMG-MM5: 240mg/cycle) and the recommendation of antibiotic/antiviral prophylaxis throughout the whole IT led to a reduced rate of severe infections of 12% (PAd) in the GMMG-MM5 trial. Further analyses are needed to elucidate how severe infections can be avoided, and whether there is an overlap between the subgroup of patients with severe infections during IT and patients with known adverse prognostic factors or reduced fitness/pre-existing conditions. (A) Overall survival and (B) landmark analysis on overall survival 3 months after start of induction therapy of patients with or without at least one severe infection (equal or greater grade 3) during induction therapy. Figure 1. Impact of severe infections on overall survival. Figure 1. Impact of severe infections on overall survival. Disclosures Mai: Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Grant; Onyx: Other: Travel Grant; Mundipharma: Other: Travel Grant; Celgene: Other: Travel Grant. Salwender:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol Meyer Sqibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Pfreundschuh:Roche: Honoraria; Amgen, Roche, Spectrum: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim, Celegene, Roche, Spectrum: Other: Advisory board. Duehrsen:Janssen: Honoraria. Hillengass:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Sanofi: Research Funding. Scheid:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weisel:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Noxxon: Consultancy. Blau:MSD: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria; JAZZ pharm: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract: Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n  = 138) or LEN ( n  = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m 2 i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1–21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10–15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended ( p  = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p  = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p  = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with 〈 nCR after first ASCT were assigned tandem ASCT in both trials. In patients with 〈 nCR and tandem ASCT (LEN: n  = 54 vs. BTZ: n  = 84), LEN MT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, p  = 0.04) but not OS (HR = 0.46, p  = 0.09). In conclusion, the significant PFS benefit after eliminating the impact of different tandem ASCT rates supports the current standard of LEN MT after ASCT.

Abstract: Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is an important, dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib (BTZ). Subanalysis of the phase 3 VISTA trial of intravenous (IV) BTZ in newly diagnosed MM patients identified baseline neuropathy as only clinical risk factor for Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BiPN). Since subcutaneous (SC) application reduces rates of BiPN, BTZ is mainly applied subcutaneously in current clinical trials and general practice. Data on clinical risk factors for BiPN in the era of SC BTZ are limited. We analyzed risk factors for PN in patients treated with SC or IV BTZ in the prospective randomized MM5 phase III trial of the German Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG). Methods: Primary end-points of the MM5 trial were response to VCD (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; Cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2 IV; day 1, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, orally, days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12) compared to PAd (BTZ 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; Doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 IV, days 1-4; Dexamethasone 20 mg/d, orally, days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20) induction therapy with respect to remission and progression-free survival (PFS). Induction therapy was followed by stem cell mobilization and harvest, high-dose therapy and Lenalidomide-based consolidation/maintenance therapy. From 07/2010 until 11/2013, 604 patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of PAd or VCD. Based on the results by Moreau et al, administration of BTZ was changed from IV to SC in 02/2012 after 314 patients were enrolled. We performed univariate and multivariate testing to analyze the association of different factors with the occurrence of PN ≥ grade 2 according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 after completion of induction therapy. Factors included: Treatment arm (PAd vs. VCD), route of administration (IV vs. SC), existing baseline PN as well as baseline ISS, creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dl , body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin and calcium levels. Fisher's exact test was used for univariate analyses. A multivariate logistic regression model was adapted to analyze the influence of all factors on the occurrence of PN. In this model the impact of a single factor on PN is measured by an odds ratio (OR) based on a characteristic effect (change of one unit for categorical factors and change of interquartile range for continuous factors). Results: Of the analyzed patients, who received at least one dose of trial medication (PAd: n=150 IV/140 SC; VCD: n=154 IV/140 SC), 61 patients (10.2%) developed PN ≥ grade 2. Rates of PN were higher in patients treated with PAd (n=40; 13.5%) compared to VCD (n=21; 7.0%). Neither the presence of higher ISS stage at baseline, nor the route of administration had an impact on development of PN after 3 cycles of induction therapy in univariate analyses. However, PN was more frequent in IV-treated patients during the third cycle of induction therapy (IV: 7.6%; SC: 1.8%, p = 0.001). Median baseline BMI was significantly higher in patients who developed PN (26.9 kg/m2; 19.5-43.7 kg/m2) compared to patients without PN (25.7 kg/m2; 16.7-44-6 kg/m2, p=0.04). Also baseline hemoglobin levels were higher in patients with PN (12.0 g/dl; 6.8-15.9 g/dl) compared to patients without PN (10.8 g/dl; 5.8-16.3 g/dl, p=0.004). While baseline calcium levels were significantly lower in patients with PN (2.3 mmol/l; 1.6-3.5 mmol/l) compared to patients without PN (2.4 mmol/l; 1.6-5.4 mmol/l, p=0.04), baseline creatinine were not different in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for the above mentioned factors confirmed the effect of VCD treatment compared to PAd on the development of PN (OR 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.28, 0.89], p=0.02) and the importance of pre-existing PN (OR 3.12, 95% CI [1.26, 7.76] , p=0.01). Also baseline calcium (OR 0.71, 95% CI [0.51, 0.99], p=0.04) and hemoglobin levels (OR 1.53, 95% CI [1.01, 2.33] , p=0.05) proved to have an impact on the development of PN in the multivariate model. Conclusion: We confirm the importance of pre-existing neuropathic symptoms and the combination partners for BTZ on the development of PN in patients with newly diagnosed MM. We provide first evidence that clinical baseline characteristics, like calcium and hemoglobin levels, might predict the development of PN. This is in line with preclinical studies showing that dysregulation of calcium homeostasis and oxidative stress in the dorsal root ganglion plays a role in the pathogenesis of BiPN. Disclosures Merz: Janssen: Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Other: Travel grants. Salwender:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol Meyer Sqibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Blau:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria; JAZZ pharm: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria. Scheid:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mai:Mundipharma: Other: Travel Grant; Celgene: Other: Travel Grant; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Grant; Onyx: Other: Travel Grant. Hose:Takeda: Other: Travel grant; EngMab AG: Research Funding. Weisel:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Noxxon: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Duerig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: The GMMG-CONCEPT trial investigated isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in transplant-eligible (TE) and transplant-noneligible (TNE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with exclusively high-risk disease for whom prospective trials are limited, aiming to induce minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. METHODS This academic, investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase II trial enrolled patients with high-risk NDMM (HRNDMM) defined by mandatory International Staging System stage II/III combined with del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), or more than three 1q21 copies as high-risk cytogenetic aberrations (HRCAs). Patients received Isa-KRd induction/consolidation and Isa-KR maintenance. TE patients received high-dose melphalan. TNE patients received two additional Isa-KRd cycles postinduction. This prespecified interim analysis (IA) reports the primary end point, MRD negativity ( 〈 10 −5 , next-generation flow), at the end of consolidation. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Among 125 patients with HRNDMM (TE–intention-to-treat [ITT]-IA, 99; TNE-ITT, 26) of the IA population for the primary end point, the median age was 58 (TE-ITT-IA) and 74 (TNE-ITT) years. Del17p was the most common HRCA (TE, 44.4%; TNE, 42.3%); about one third of evaluable TE/TNE patients presented two or more HRCAs, respectively. The trial met its primary end point with MRD negativity rates after consolidation of 67.7% (TE) and 54.2% (TNE) of patients. Eighty-one of 99 TE-ITT-IA patients reached MRD negativity at any time point (81.8%). MRD negativity was sustained for ≥1 year in 62.6% of patients. With a median follow-up of 44 (TE) and 33 (TNE) months, median PFS was not reached in either arm. CONCLUSION Isa-KRd effectively induces high rates of sustainable MRD negativity in the difficult-to-treat HRNDMM population, regardless of transplant status, translating into a median PFS that was not yet reached after 44/33 months.