Abstract: Introduction: Relapses after front-line therapy for Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia (BL) are unfrequent, and there is scarce information about the best rescue strategy for these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of relapse, salvage treatment and prognosis after relapse in patients with BL treated with two consecutive Spanish protocols. Patients and methods: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with BL in 40 Spanish hospitals betwen January 1997 and October 2014 treated with first line chemotherapy according to protocols PETHEMA LAL-3/97 (specific chemotherapy without rituximab) and BURKIMAB (rituximab plus specific chemotherapy). The demographic, clinical and biological characteristics were collected at the time of diagnosis and at relapse, as well as the salvage treatment and outcomes. Results: 233 patients were diagnosed with Burkitt lymphoma (n=150) or leukemia (n=83) and received first-line therapy according to PETHEMA LAL-3/97 (n=53) and BURKIMAB (n=180) protocols. Baseline characteristics at diagnosis are described in Table 1. A total of 26 patients relapsed, 11 (28%) treated with PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol and 15 (10%) with BURKIMAB protocol (p=0.009). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 10 years was 27% (95% CI, 12%-42%) in PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol vs.16% (95% CI, 4%-28%) in BURKIMAB protocol (p= 0.013) (Figure 1). Time to relapse was shorter in PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol (median of 3.7 months) vs. BURKIMAB protocol (6.3 months), but it was not significant (p=0.506). No differences were observed in relapse incidence between Burkitt leukemia and Burkitt lymphoma in PETHEMA LAL-3/97 protocol (6/31 vs. 5/22, p=1) and BURKIMAB protocol (7/41 vs. 8/107, p=0.124). Out of 15 patients in whom rescue treatment strategy was evaluable, 12 received chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate and/or cytarabine (4 of the them followed response, CR in 2, followed by SCT in the 2 patients achieving PR [autologous in one and allogeneic SCT in the other]), and the remaining 3 patients received DA-EPOCH-R (n=1, achieving CR), R-ICE (n=1, no response) and paliative care (n=1). At the time of the analysis, only 3 patients are alive. Median overall survival after relapse was 3 months (95% CI, 0.9-5.1) for PETHEMA LAL-3/97 relapsed group and 3.6 months (95% CI, 0.1-7.1) for BURKIMAB relapsed patients group. Conclusions: Patients with Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma treated with specific immunochemotherapy have lower probability of relapse compared with those treated with specific chemotherapy without rituximab. In our series, the most frequent regimens administered for the treatment of relapsed patients were based in high-dose methotrexate and/or cytarabine. The prognosis of relapsed Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma is poor, independently of the type of rescue therapy. Supported by grants RD12/0036/0029 (RTICC, FEDER), Instituto Carlos III, Spain. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Introduction: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are the two autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptors T cells commercially approved in Europe for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate patients characteristics, efficacy and safety for axi-cel and tisa-cel in a large cohort of patients within the GETH-TC (Spanish Group of Stem Transplantation and Cell Therapy)-GELTAMO (Spanish Group of Lymphoma and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation). Methods: Ten Spanish centers contributed data. Data were collected retrospectively from consecutive patients with DLBCL in whom apheresis was performed for axi-cel or tisa-cel treatment. CRS and ICANS were graded with the ASTCT consensus criteria. Response was assessed according to the Lugano criteria. Patients included had at least 30 days of follow-up. Results: A total of 268 patients with R/R DLBCL underwent apheresis for axi-cel (n=123) and tisacel (n=145) from Nov-2018 to May-2021, of which 232 (86%) received CART-cell infusion (n=110, 89% and n=122, 84%, respectively). Reasons for not undergoing infusion were progression in 10 cases, tumor lysis syndrome in 1, infection in 1, and CR after bridging therapy in 1 for the axi-cel cohort, and progression in 21 (4 after manufacture failure), psychiatric disorder in 1, and post-apheresis cerebral hemorrhage in 1 case for the tisa-cel cohort. Time between apheresis and infusion was 41 days (IQR 40-56) and 49 days (IQR 46-62) (p=0.006), respectively. Characteristics at baseline, apheresis and at lymphodepletion are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Median age was 60 (range 19-79), 61% of patients were male, most of them treated for DLBCL NOS (66%). There were no significant differences between patients intended to be treated with axi-cel and tisa-cel. 82% of the infused patients received bridging therapy. At apheresis and at lymphodepletion ECOG performance status score was 0-1 in 93% and 91%, and 7 and 32 patients were in response, respectively. The overall response rates (ORRs) at 1 month and 3 months were 65% and 56%, respectively, with 34% and 45% achieving a complete response (CR), respectively. In the intention-to-treat analysis, with a median follow-up of 9 months (IQR 5-15), EFS and OS at 9 months was 44% (95%CI 38-51)(Figure 1) and 59% (95%CI 53-66) with a median EFS and OS of 6 months and 11 months, respectively. At lymphodepletion, characteristics of infused patients and disease were not significantly different between axi-cel and tisa-cel cohorts. Rates of CRS, CRS grade 3-4, ICANS, ICANS grade 3-4 were 89% and 71% (p=0.001), 10% and 7% (p=0.34), 42% and 16% (p=0.001), 20% and 4% (p=0.001) for the axi-cel and tisa-cel cohorts, respectively. ICU admission was needed in 25% and 15% of patients (p=0.06), respectively. Non-relapse mortality at days 100 were 2.5% and 1.4%, and at day 180, 5.4% and 2.2% (p=0.08) for the axi-cel and tisa-cel groups, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months for patients who received infusion with axi-cel and 12 months for patients infused with tisa-cel, EFS and OS at 12 months were 48% and 33% (p=0.33), and 53% and 50% (p=0.27), respectively, with a median EFS of 11 and 6 months and a median OS of 13 and 12 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with poor PFS was having ECOG-PS ≥2 at lymphodepletion (HR13, p=0.03). No factors were identified as associated independently to OS. Factors associated to CRS grade 3-4 were IPI score 4-5 at lymphodepletion (OR 1.4, p=0.03) and ECOG-PS ≥2 at apheresis (OR 1.5, p=0.03). For ICANS grade 3-4, factors associated were the use of axi-cel (OR 8, p=0.04) and diagnosis of HG double/triple hit lymphoma (OR 9, p=0.022). Conclusions:This multicentric analysis describes one of the largest real-life cohorts of patients treated with axi-cel and tisa-cel for R/R aggressive B cell lymphoma in Europe. Results are comparable to those from the pivotal studies and other large real-life experiences. Up to now, patients included for one or other product in Spain do not differ significantly in terms of baseline characteristics, and within this setting, results are comparable between both products in terms of efficacy. The use of axi-cel was associated to higher rates of CRS and especially, severe forms of ICANS. However, mortality associated to toxicity were low and not significantly different between both cohorts. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Iacoboni: BMS/Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Janssen, Roche: Honoraria. Reguera: Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS-Celgene, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lopez Corral: Gilead, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Guerreiro: Novartis, Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Caballero: Novartis, Gilead: Honoraria. Ortiz-Maldonado: Kite, Novartis, BMS, Janssen: Honoraria. Sanchez: Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy. Sancho: Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Beigene: Speakers Bureau. Bastos-Oreiro: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; Kite: Speakers Bureau. Oarbeascoa: Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mussetti: Gilead: Other: Unspecified, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Unspecified; Takeda: Honoraria. Bailen: Gilead, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Martin Garcia-Sancho: Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Clinigen: Consultancy; Eusa Pharma: Consultancy; Kern Pharma: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Barba: Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche, Jazz Phar,aceuticals: Honoraria; Cqrlos III heqlth Institute, aSOCIACION espanola contra el cancer, PERIS: Research Funding.

Abstract: Background. Recurrence of ALL in CNS in adults is considered a poor prognostic feature but few studies have analyzed this issue. The objective of this study was to analyze the frequency, prognosis and predictive factors of CNS involvement and recurrence in adult patients with ALL treated with 4 PETHEMA protocols not including cranial irradiation for CNS prophylaxis. Methods. From June 1989 to December 2003, 467 adult patients (≥ 15-years-old) diagnosed with ALL were treated with one of the four consecutive protocols of PETHEMA group: ALL-89 (standard and high risk, n=108), ALL-93 (high risk, n=222), ALL-96 (standard risk, n=84), and ALL-97 (Burkitt’s leukemia, n=53). CNS prophylaxis consisted of intrathecal (IT) injection of methotrexate (12 mg), cytarabine (30 mg) and hydrocortisone (20 mg), for 12–14 courses, together with high-dose systemic methotrexate and cytarabine during the early intensification phase. Cranial or craniospinal irradiation was not used in any case. Results. The median (SD) age was 33 (16) years and 272 (58%) were males. ALL type according to the FAB classification was: L1 28%, L2 61%, L3 11%. Immunological subtypes were: early-pre-B 15%, common 45%, pre-B 5%, mature B 11% and T 24%. CNS involvement at diagnosis was observed in 18 (3.9%) patients. Predictive factors for CNS involvement at diagnosis were: L3/mature B ALL (p 〈 0.0001) and testicular involvement (p=0.006). Overall, complete remission (CR) was achieved in 381 (81%) of the patients, of whom 159 (42%) relapsed: 137 (36%) in bone marrow (BM) and 22 (5.8%) in CNS (14 isolated and 8 combined CNS and BM). The median (range) CR duration prior to CNS recurrence was 1.06 yr (95%CI0.11–2.01) for isolated CNS relapse, 0.6 yr (95%CI o.30–0.89) for combined relapse and 0.93 (95%CI 0.78–1.07) for BM relapse (p=0.76). No correlation was found between initial CNS involvement and CNS relapse. An initial LDH value 〉 1,000 U/L was the only factor associated with higher risk of CNS relapse (p 〈 0.001). Treatment of CNS relapse consisted of systemic and IT therapy in the 22 cases (cranial irradiation was added to one) and CR was attained in 7 (32%) out of 22 of these patients. Stem cell transplantation was performed in 4 patients and 3 patients developed a second CNS recurrence. The median overall survival (OS) after recurrence was 0.7 yr for isolated CNS relapse, 0.13 yr for combined relapse and 0.41 yr for BM relapse (p=0.11). Conclusions. The frequency of CNS relapse in adult ALL patients receiving IT and systemic therapy for CNS prophylaxis is similar to that observed in protocols including cranial irradiation. An initial LDH value 〉 1,000 U/L was the only factor associated with higher risk of CNS relapse. Adult patients with CNS recurrence have a poor prognosis, although it is not different from that observed in BM relapses.

Abstract: Background and objective. Idelalisib is an oral inhibitor of the p110δ isoform of PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) approved in Europe and USA as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after 2 previous lines of therapy based on a phase 2 study (Gopal et al, N Eng J Med 2014). However, there are scarce data on the use of idelalisib in clinical practice (Eyre et al, Br J Haematol 2017). The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of idelalisib in relapsed/refractory FL patients in clinical practice in Spanish hospitals of GELTAMO group (GELT-IDE-2018-02 Study). Patients and Methods. Retrospective study of relapsed/refractory FL patients treated with idelalisib as salvage therapy in clinical practice. Demographic and clinical and biological variables were analyzed at FL diagnosis and at the time of idelalisib therapy, as well as its efficacy and toxicity. Results. A total of 43 patients from 20 hospitals were included. At time of idelalisib therapy, median age was 63 years (range 44-83), number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (2-7), 42% (n=18) were refractory to last previous treatment and 42% (n=18) had received an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT); 56% (n=24) had progressed in the first 24 months after FL diagnosis (POD24). Median duration of treatment with idelalisib at time of analysis was 8.1 months (1.1-37.4) and 28/43 patients (65%) discontinued therapy, 13 due to progression, 12 due to adverse events (AE) and 3 due to physician's decision. Overall response rate (ORR) was 73% (32% CR) and median PFS 14.6 months (95% CI 0-32.2), with a trend to be higher in non-POD24 group (median PFS of 9.4 months [95% CI 1.7-16.9] in POD24 vs. 27 months [95% CI NA] in non-PO24 patients, p=0.082); median duration of response to idelalisib was 25.1 months (95% CI 13.1-37.6). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis, with a 2-year OS of 74% (95% CI 58%-90%) (Figure). In 4 patients, an allogeneic SCT was performed after idelalisib. A total of 86% (n=37) of patients showed any AE, being in 56% (n=24) of grade ≥3 AE. Toxicities of grade ≥3 more frequent were: neutropenia (23% of patients), diarrhea (23%), infections (23%: pneumonia in 4 patients, CMV infection in 2, febrile neutropenia in 1 and other infections in 3 [1 of them died due to Aspergillus infection]), and increased transaminases (9%). Conclusions. In this series of patients with relapsed/refractory FL, several previous lines of therapies and factors associated with poor prognosis, the treatment with idelalisib was associated with efficacy and toxicity similar to published studies. These results support the use of idelalisib as an option for FL patients with multiple or poor risk relapses. Financial support: Gilead Figure. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with follicular lymphoma treated with idelalisib. Figure Disclosures Sancho: SERVIER: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELLTRION: Consultancy; Kern-Pharma: Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy. Lopez Jimenez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Honoraria, Other: Education funding. Ramirez Payer:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Cordoba:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; FUNDACION JIMENEZ DIAZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martín:Kiowa Kirin: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; iQone: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses. Armando:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: CT-P10 is a biosimilar candidate to the reference rituximab product, EU-approved MabThera® and US-licensed Rituxan®. CT-P10 has an identical amino acid sequence and highly similar physicochemical and in vitro functional properties to its reference drug. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, CT-P10 has demonstrated compelling similarity in pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, safety and immunogenicity (Yoo DH, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(10):1736). Objective: The goal of this study was to demonstrate PK similarity of CT-P10 to rituximab, each administered in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) in patients with newly diagnosed Advanced Follicular Lymphoma (AFL) (NCT02162771) (Kim WS et al. Blood. 2015;126(23): 5111). The results of PK, PD, safety and immunogenicity up to Core Cycle 4 (12 weeks) are presented here from this ongoing study. Methods: Patients with AFL were randomized 1:1 to receive infusion (375mg/m2) of either CT-P10 or rituximab, at a 3-week interval, in combination with CVP. PK analysis was conducted in terms of AUCtau and Cmax at steady state, Core Cycle 4, as primary PK endpoints. PK parameter values considered as outliers determined by robust regression outlier testing were excluded from the pharmacokinetic primary analysis. Results: In total, 121 patients were randomly assigned to receive either CT-P10 (n=59) or rituximab (n=62) in combination with CVP. Result of CT-P10 PK at Core Cycle 4 was similar to that of rituximab. The ratios (90% CI) of geometric least square means (CT-P10 to rituximab treatment group) were 102.3% (94.1%-111.2%) for AUCtau and 100.7% (93.8%-108.0%) for CmaxSS at Core Cycle 4. The 90% CIs of ratio of geometric LS means for both AUCtau and CmaxSS were entirely contained within the equivalence margin of 80% to 125% (Table 1 and Figure 1). Mean serum concentrations of the study drug were highly similar for the 2 treatment groups at each time point (Core Cycle 1 to 4). The B-cell kinetics was similar up to Core Cycle 4 in the 2 treatment groups. Median number of B-cells decreased to below the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) (20 cells/μL) 1 hour after the end of infusion at Core Cycle 1 and remained below the LLoQ at each subsequent cycle, up to and including Core Cycle 4. The proportion of patients with a positive anti-drug antibody up to Core Cycle 4 at post-treatment visits was similar between the 2 treatment groups; 3/59 (5.1%) patients and 2/62 (3.2%) patients in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively. In addition, CT-P10 was well tolerated and the safety profile of CT-P10 up to Core Cycle 4 was similar to that of rituximab. The number of patients who experienced at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 43 (72.9%) patients and 41 (66.1%) patients in CT-P10 and rituximab treatment groups, respectively. The proportion of patients who experienced at least 1 treatment emergent serious adverse event considered by the investigator to be related to the study treatment was similar between the 2 treatment groups; 2/59 (3.4%) patients and 2/62 (3.2%) patients in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively. The frequencies of adverse events special interest (AESI) were similar between the 2 treatment groups (Table 2). Conclusion: This study demonstrated similarity of PK in terms of AUCtau and CmaxSS between CT-P10 and rituximab in AFL patients. The B-cell kinetics and immunogenicity were comparable between the two treatment groups. CT-P10 was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of rituximab up to and including Core Cycle 4 (12 weeks). Table 1 Statistical Analysis of Rituximab Pharmacokinetic Primary Endpoints for Core Cycle 4 at Steady State: Pharmacokinetic Population Table 1. Statistical Analysis of Rituximab Pharmacokinetic Primary Endpoints for Core Cycle 4 at Steady State: Pharmacokinetic Population Figure 1 Mean (±SD) Serum Concentration of Rituximab Versus Time for Cycle 4 at Steady State (Linear Scale): Pharmacokinetic Population Figure 1. Mean (±SD) Serum Concentration of Rituximab Versus Time for Cycle 4 at Steady State (Linear Scale): Pharmacokinetic Population Table 2 The Incidence Rates of Adverse Events Special Interest: Safety Population Table 2. The Incidence Rates of Adverse Events Special Interest: Safety Population Disclosures Coiffier: Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sancho:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kim:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Nagarkar:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Zhavrid:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Hernandez Rivas:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Prokharau:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Zodelava:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Osmanov:Celltrion, Inc.: Research Funding. Ogura:SymBio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Buske:Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kwak:Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy. Kim:Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract: Different from acute myeloblastic leukemia, the prognostic significance of complex karyotype (CK) is not well known in adults with ALL. A recent study showed that CK (≥5 chromosomal abnormalities) confer an increased risk of treatment failure and poor survival (Moorman, 2007). The aim of study was to analyze the possible prognostic influence of CK in Ph- adult (≥15yr) ALL patients treated with risk-adapted protocols from the Spanish PETHEMA Group. The cytogenetic studies were reviewed following the ISCN criteria (2005). CK was defined as the finding of 3 or more structural chromosomal abnormalities. Patients were included in three different trials: ALL-96 for standard-risk (SR) ALL, and ALL-93 or ALL-AR03 for high-risk (HR) ALL. Patients with Burkitt’s ALL were not included in these trials. Patients included: 237. SR: n=44, 25 males, WBC count 12x109/L (SD: 14), 5 patients with CK (11.4%), 39 non-complex karyotype and normal karyotype (non- CK) (88.6%). HR: n= 193, 107 males, WBC count 58x109/L (SD: 77), 25 patients with CK (13%), 168 non- CK (87%). Complete remision (CR), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) according to karyotype group and trial are showed in Table: When CK was defined as the finding of ≥ 5 structural chromosomal abnormalities (n=11, SR=3, HR=8), DFS and OS were also significantly shortened in patients with SR ALL and CK (p=0.007 and p=0.001, respectively), but not in patients with HR ALL. Complex karyotype (defined as ≥ 3 or ≥5 structural chromosomal abnormalities) did not have any prognostic relevance in adults with high-risk Ph- ALL, whereas a significant short survival observed in standard-risk patients with complex karyotype.

Abstract: Background: survival of young patients with high IPI DLBCL treated with RCHOP chemotherapy needs to be improved. In this poor risk population the combination of RCHOP with new drugs is an attractive approach, along with performing an early evaluation with PET/CT after 2 to 4 cycles and change induction therapy if a complete response is not achieved. Bortezomib has been combined with RCHOP [1]. We present preliminary data of patients treated in a clinical trial comparing 6 cycles of RCHOP vs 6 cycles of BRCAP, a modified RCHOP regimen changing vincristine by bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 sc days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21 days cycle (NCT01848132). Methods: patients younger than 70 yrs diagnosed of DLBCL with aIPI 2-3 or aIPI 1 with elevated beta2microglobulin were eligible. The main objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients who survives free of event at 2 years. Central pathology review was performed in all cases, and samples were classified as GC vs non-GC subtypes by IHC (Hans algorithm). PET/CTs were performed at diagnosis, after 2, 4 and 6 cycles (PET2, PET4 , and PET6), and were reviewed by at least 3 experts of a central panel at real time. Response was analyzed following the visual method with the Deauville scale, and for PET2 and PET4 the semiquantitative method was used. Patients with persistent disease after 4 cycles were considered a failure of therapy and were dropped out from the trial. Results: data from the first 76 patients were analyzed. Diagnosis of DLBCL was confirmed in all except 3 pts, 36 pts were treated in the experimental arm and 37 in the control arm. Median age was 58.2 yo (range 23-70), 37 (50.7%) were males. Characteristics at diagnosis were: non-GC subtype 18/46 (39.1%), C-myc expression 35/43 (81.4%), bcl2 expression 43/49 (87.7%), double expression cmyc/bcl2 30/42 (71%), stage III-IV 64 (87.6%), ≥2 extranodal locations 27 (42.2%), ECOG 2-3 24 (33%), elevated LDH 43 (62.3%), elevated beta 2 microglobulin 47 (75.8%), aIPI 2: 42 (57.5%), aIPI 3: 21 (28.8%). Among 160 cycles of BRCAP chemotherapy, 5 (3.1%) on day 8, and 22 (13.7%) on day 15, were given without bortezomib due to a neutrophil count below 0.5 /L. The most common toxicities are shown in table 1 without significant differences between both arms. Twenty-one (32.8%) out of 64 patients had a positive PET2. Fifteen (26.8%) out of 56 patients who have finished the 4 cycles had a positive PET4 according to central review and were withdrawn of the trial. Table 1. Episodes of treatment-related adverse events Control arm: RCHOP n=166 Experimental arm: BRCAP n=160 Any grade Grade 3-4 Any grade Grade 3-4 Anemia 6 0 22 9 ( 5.6%) Neutropenia 31 26 (15.6%) 47 37 (23.1%) Thrombocytopenia 9 4 ( 2.4%) 16 5 ( 3.1%) Febrile neutropenia - 6 ( 3.6%) - 10 ( 6.2%) Fever 8 1 ( 0.6%) 8 0 Infection 4 1 ( 0.6%) 7 1 ( 0.6%) Nausea/vomiting 12 0 19 0 Peripheral neuropathy 7 1 ( 0.6%) 7 1 ( 0.6%) Diarrhea 4 0 8 0 Constipation 7 0 4 0 Hepatotoxicity 6 0 6 0 Conclusions: BRCAP regimen with bortezomib sc d1, 8, and 15 is feasible. Its main toxicity is hematological, and some patients cannot receive some doses of bortezomib due to neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity is rare, including peripheral neuropathy, and do not differ from RCHOP toxicity. 1.Ruan J et al, JCO 2011;29:690-7 Disclosures Sancho: CELLTRION, Inc.: Research Funding. Lopez-Guillermo:Roche, Celgene, Mundipharma, Gilead, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract: Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in elderly patients, potentially curable when optimum treatment is administered. The combination of rituximab with CHOP chemotherapy (R-CHOP) is considered standard for these patients, but randomized studies published to date are limited to the range of age from 60 to 80 years, so that in patients over this age treatment election is not so clear, usually opting for palliative treatment or a "full" treatment at a reduced dose. This retrospective study is primarily aimed to analyze the influence of the type of treatment and comorbidity scales in overall survival (OS) of a large series of patients 〉 80 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥ 80 years, diagnosed of DLBCL, follicular lymphoma grade 3B or transformed lymphoma. The main patient characteristics were obtained retrospectively from the medical records, including a complete geriatric assessment (CGA, "comprehensive geriatric assessment") and the Charlson comorbidity index. The Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Salamanca approved the study. Results: 288 patients from 19 GELTAMO hospitals were registered in the study, of which 234 (60% women) were evaluable and have been included in this preliminary analysis. The median age was 84 years (80-94) and the vast majority (94%) were DLBCL. According to the Charlson index, 65% of patients were low-intermediate risk, and according to CGA, 63% of patients were considered "fit". A higher proportion (60% v 44%, p = 0.03) of patients with low or intermediate comorbidity index were treated with a curative intent (CHOP +/- rituximab), as compared with patients with high or very high index. With a median follow up of 41 (range 9-142) months, the median OS was 11.5 months (33% estimated at 3 years). The median OS for patients treated with R-CHOP-like (N=96) was 35.3 months, significantly better (p 〈 0.001) than those achieved with CHOP-like (n=23, 7.9 months), R-CVP (n=20, 6.9 months) or cyclophosphamide- prednisone +/- vincristine (n=69, 6.2 months). Charlson comorbidity index and CGA scale also had a significant influence on OS (median of 14.6 vs. 6.1 months for patients with low or intermediate versus high or very high risk, p = 0.006; and 18 vs 6.6 months for patients "fit" versus "non-fit", p = 0.006). In the multivariate analysis, treatment with R-CHOP-like (RR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.6) and IPI 〈 3 (RR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.6) had an independent positive influence on OS. Conclusions: In patients over 80 years with DLBCL, treatment with R-CHOP-like was associated with the best results in terms of OS. Therefore, its administration must be considered whenever possible. Disclosures Sancho: CELLTRION, Inc.: Research Funding.

Abstract: Background and objective. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is a major issue in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The use of non pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®)has been associated with less cardiotoxicity as compared to conventional doxorubicin in breast cancer, but its benefit in DLBCL has been investigated mostly in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefit, in terms of cardiac toxicity, of the substitution of conventional doxorubicin as part of R-CHOP therapy by the non pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®, R-COMP arm) in older patients (≥60 years) with de novo DLBCL or grade 3b follicular lymphoma (FL). Methods. This is a prospective randomized phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02012088) of newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL or grade 3b FL ≥60 years old with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 〉 55%. Patients were randomized to R-COMP or R-CHOP (in both cases every 21 days for a total of 6 cycles, with a dose of conventional doxorubicin or Myocet® of 50 mg/m2/cycle). The primary end-point was to evaluate the differences in subclinical cardiotoxicity between the two arms of treatment, defined by a decrease in LVEF to ≤ 55% at the end of treatment (measured by echocardiography at 1 and 4 months after the last cycle of chemotherapy). Secondary objectives were efficacy, safety and differences in the variations of cardiac biomarkers (troponin and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) through therapy in both arms of treatment. Results. Patient characteristics. A total of 91 patients from 15 Spanish hospitals were included, with a median age of 75 years (range 60-86), 49 (54%) were females. ECOG performance status was 2 in 15 (16%), stage III-IV in 68 (76%) and IPI 3-5 in 56 (63%). A total of 46 patients received R-COMP while 45 were treated with R-CHOP, without significant differences between arms regarding baseline characteristics. Subclinical cardio-toxicity: No differences between arms were observed in the number of patients with LVEF ≤55% determined at the end of treatment or at 4 months (6 [15%] in those treated with R-COMP and 5 [14%] in the R-CHOP arm, p=0.966). However, a higher number of patients in R-CHOP arm increased troponin levels at cycle 6 of treatment (17 out of 24 evaluable patients [71%] in R-COMP group vs. 25 out of 25 evaluable patients [100%] in R-CHOP group, p=0.004) or at the end-of-treatment visit (13 out of 21 evaluable patients [62%] in R-COMP group vs. 20 out of 23 evaluable patients [87%] in R-CHOP group, p=0.05). No differences between both groups were observed in variations of NT-proBNP levels through treatment period and follow-up. Serious adverse events (SAEs): With a median follow-up of 16 months (range 0.7-34), a total of 59 SAEs were reported in 37 patients (39 in 21 patients from R-COMP group and 20 in 16 patients from R-CHOP group), including 18 infections (12 in R-COMP and 6 in R-CHOP), and 14 episodes of febrile neutropenia (9 in R-COMP and 5 in R-CHOP). Four patients showed cardiovascular events: atrial fibrillation (n=1, R-COMP group), supraventricular tachycardia (n=2, R-CHOP group), and myocardial infarction (n=1, R-CHOP group). Efficacy: Overall response (OR) and complete remission (CR) were observed in 72 (96%) and 54 (72%) patients, respectively, without differences between R-COMP group (OR and CR rates of 97% and 72%) and R-CHOP group (OR and CR rates of 94% and 72%) (p=0.775). Conclusions. R-COMP is a feasible immunochemotherapy schedule for patients with de novo DLBCL older than 60 years. However, in our series, the use of non-pegylated doxorubicin instead of conventional doxorubicin was not associated with less decrease in LVEF measured by echocardiography, although the differences in troponin levels merits the need for further evaluation with a higher number of evaluable patients and longer follow-up. Disclosures Sancho: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. González-Barca:Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martín:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sevier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.