GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (2)
  • Saito, Bungo  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Hematology  (2)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 1648-1648
    Abstract: Background: Relapse/progression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the major cause of treatment failure. In this study, the subsequent clinical outcome in a modern transplant setting was overviewed to improve decision-making. Patients and immediate therapy: Between 2000 and 2006, 294 patients with leukemia/MDS received allogeneic HCT after myeloablative (n=145) or reduced-intensity (n=149) conditioning. Among them, 93 patients (32%) either relapsed or showed disease progression; the relapse rate was 40% for AML (57/144 patients), 18% for MDS (13/72), 14% for CML (5/35), and 42% for ALL (18/43). The median overall survival (OS) after relapse or progression was 167 days (range; 5 to 1456 days). Twenty-eight patients (30%) were elected to receive no interventions with curative intent other than withdrawal of immunosuppressant, less-intensive chemotherapy or DLI, mostly due to comorbidities or refractoriness of the disease, and all but 3 patients died with disease progression at a median of 61 days. Two other patients underwent immediate HCT without intervention due to graft failure. Among the remaining 63 patients (68%) who received therapeutic interventions including re-induction chemotherapy with or without DLI, 26 (41%) achieved subsequent complete remission (CR). Salvage transplantation: Forty-five patients (15 in CR and 30 in non-CR) did not undergo a second HCT due to various reasons including progressive disease (n=28), infection (n=6), GVHD (n=3), refusal (n=3), and rather stable disease (n=5). Overall, 20 patients underwent salvage HCT using myeloablative (n=8) or reduced-intensity (n=12) conditioning: 11 in CR and 9 in non-CR. The incidence of TRM after the second HCT was not remarkable (5%). The probability of achieving CR after the second HCT was 75%, compared to 35% after other interventions (p=0.001), and the 1-year OS after relapse was significantly better in patients with the second HCT than that in others (58% vs 14%, p & lt;0.0001), but these favorable outcomes may simply reflect the patient-selection bias. The 2-year OS did not differ between the two groups, which suggests that it is difficult to maintain CR after a second HCT. Currently, 15 of the 93 patients (16%) are alive with a median follow-up of 346 days (range; 33 to 1456 days), and 10 of these patients are still in CR. Notably, 5 patients are alive in CR without a second HCT: 3 suffered from central nervous system relapse without systemic relapse and received localized therapy alone (follow-up; 494 to 1456 days), and the remaining 2 have had a rather short follow-up after DLI. Multivariate analysis showed that re-induction chemotherapy, CR after intervention, a second HCT, and a longer time to post-transplantation relapse (≥100 days) were associated with improved OS after relapse. Conclusion: For patients with chemosensitive systemic relapse, a second allogeneic HCT may improve survival and could be considered as an effective therapeutic option. Figure Figure
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 2009-2009
    Abstract: Background: Within the concept of reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST), there is a wide range of differences in regimens utilized, in terms of toxicities and antileukemia effects, and only a little information is available on the clinical impact of chimerism status in patients conditioned with a busulfan-containing regimen. To examine this point, we reviewed the pattern of lineage-specific chimerism to correlate with subsequent clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 117 patients (median age, 52 years: range, 29–68) who had various hematological malignancies and underwent busulfan-containing RIST with related blood stem cells (n=81), related marrow (n=4) or unrelated marrow (n=32), between January 2000 and December 2006. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulfan (8 mg/kg) and fludarabine (180 mg/m2, n=64) or cladribine (0.66 mg/kg, n=53), with or without 2–4 Gy TBI (n=26) or anti-thymocyte globulin (5–10 mg/kg: n=31). Prophylaxis for GVHD consisted of cyclosporin or tacrolimus, with or without methotrexate. Chimerism was evaluated with peripheral blood samples taken on days 30, 60 and 90 after transplantation by PCR-based amplification of polymorphic short tandem repeat regions. Results: The median follow-up of surviving patients was 857 days (50–2535). Percent donor-chimerism was significantly higher in granulocytes than T-cell fraction throughout the entire course, and the mean values were, respectively, 96% vs 83%, 98% vs 89% and 98% vs 91% at days 30, 60 and 90 after RIST. At day 30, the numbers of patients with T-cell chimerism & gt;90%, 60–90% and & lt;60% were 67 (58%), 32 (27%) and 18 (15%), respectively. The mean percentage of donor T-cell chimerism on day 30 was 18% (0–63%) in 5 patients who experienced graft failure (GF), which was significantly lower than that (86%; 15–100%) in the rest of the patients (p & lt;0.01). No correlation was found between the kinetics of T-cell chimerism and the occurrence of acute or chronic GVHD. A multivariate analysis showed that low donor T-cell chimerism of & lt;60% at day 30 was significantly associated with an increased risk of treatment failure (TF) at day 100, which included GF, progressive disease, relapse and non-relapse mortality (HR: 3.3 [95% CI, 1.4–7.8] p & lt;0.01), but not with 1-year TF. The stem cell source and the addition of TBI or ATG were not associated with the degree of T-cell chimerism, overall survival (OS) or TF. In a Cox proportional hazard model, low donor T-cell chimerism of & lt;60% at day 30 was associated with poor OS (HR: 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1–4.4] p=0.02) (Figure) and TF (HR: 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1–3.8] p=0.02). Conclusion: We found that 42% of the patients retained mixed donor T-cell chimerism (≤90% donor), whereas 92% achieved complete chimerism in granulocyte fraction. Low donor T-cell chimerism of & lt;60% at day 30 may predict a poor outcome, and a prospective study to examine the value of early intervention based on chimerism data is warranted. Figure Figure
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...