GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (5)
  • Rosenberg, Lynn  (5)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 25, No. 3_Supplement ( 2016-03-01), p. C49-C49
    Abstract: Introduction: Family history of breast cancer has been shown to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer in all populations studied. However, there are limited data related to risk of estrogen receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer in African American women, who have a disproportionately high incidence of ER- and triple negative (ER-, progesterone receptor negative, and HER2 receptor negative; TN) breast cancer. Even less information is available on whether a family history of other cancers also affects risk of ER- and TN breast cancer. Methods: Questionnaire data from the Black Women's Health Study, the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, the Multiethnic Cohort Study, and the Women's Circle of Health Study were pooled as part of the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium. Breast cancer cases were classified as ER+, ER-, and TN based on pathology data from medical records and/or state cancer registries. Participants were asked about first degree relatives with a breast cancer diagnosis and the age at which the relative was diagnosed. Participants were also asked about first degree relatives with prostate, lung, colorectal, ovarian, or cervical cancer or with lymphoma or leukemia. Polytomous logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various categories of positive family history relative to no first degree relative with breast cancer or no first degree relative with any of the cancers. Multivariable analyses controlled for age, study, time period, and other potential confounders. Results: The analysis included 3,023 African American women with ER+, 1,497 with ER-, and 696 with TN breast cancer and 17,420 controls. First degree family history of breast cancer, regardless of whether first degree relatives had cancers other than breast cancer, was associated with a 70% increased risk of ER+, ER- and TN breast cancer; the ORs were 1.7 (95% CI 1.6-2.0) for ER+, 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-1.9) for ER-, and 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-2.1) for TN breast cancer. The ORs were somewhat higher if the relative was diagnosed before age 50 (2.0 for ER+, 1.9 for ER-, and 1.8 for TN). Among the six other cancer sites examined, only family history of cervical cancer was significantly associated with risk; the ORs were 2.4 (1.4-4.2) for ER- and 2.9 (1.5-5.5) for TN breast cancer and there was no association with ER+ breast cancer. The OR for family history of ovarian cancer in relation to TN breast cancer was 1.6 (0.9-2.7), which is of interest because findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) indicate that serous ovarian cancers and basal-like breast cancers, which are mostly triple negative, have many molecular commonalities. The ORs for a family history of both breast and prostate cancer versus no family history of any of the cancers were 3.4 (2.4-4.7) for ER+ cancer, as compared with 1.6 for breast alone (p-interaction=0.01), and 2.1 (1.2-3.7) for ER- cancer, as compared with 1.5 for breast alone (p-interaction=0.08). The OR for a family history of both breast and lung cancer was 3.3 (1.9-5.9) for TN breast cancer, compared to 1.5 for breast alone (p-interaction=0.10). The ORs for family history of breast plus two other cancers were 2.4 (1.6-3.6) for ER+, 2.8 (1.6-4.7) for ER-, and 2.7 (1.3-5.7) for TN breast cancer. Conclusion: Our results confirm that having a first degree family history of breast cancer is a strong risk factor for ER+, ER-, and TN breast cancer. The findings also suggest that having relatives with other cancers in addition to a relative with breast cancer may further increase risk. Consideration of family history of other cancers may improve risk prediction models. The association observed for family history of cervical cancer and increased risk of ER- and TN breast cancer was unexpected and needs to be replicated by other studies. Citation Format: Traci N. Bethea, Lynn Rosenberg, Nelsy Castro-Webb, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Lara E. Sucheston, Edward A. Ruiz-Narvaez, Marjory Charlot, Song Y. Park, Elisa V. Bandera, Melissa A. Troester, Christine B. Ambrosone, Julie R. Palmer. Relation of family history of cancer to risk of ER+, ER-, and triple-negative breast cancer in African American women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr C49.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 74, No. 19_Supplement ( 2014-10-01), p. LB-285-LB-285
    Abstract: Introduction. Obesity has been shown to be associated with reduced risk in premenopausal women and increased risk in postmenopausal women, with evidence coming largely from studies in white women. African American (AA) women are more likely than white women to be obese and to have central obesity (measured as a high waist to hip ratio (WHR) or waist circumference). They are also more likely to be diagnosed with ER- and triple negative (TN) breast cancers, which tend to have poorer prognosis than ER+ tumors. There is growing evidence that risk profiles for these subtypes may differ. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of general and central obesity on breast cancer subtypes in AA women. Methods. We pooled data from three studies in AA women, the Black Women Health Study, the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, and the Women's Circle of Health Study, to evaluate the association of recent body mass index (BMI), young adult BMI (at age 18-21 y), and waist to hip ratio (WHR) with breast cancer subtypes. Cases were categorized according to hormone receptor subtype as ER+, ER-, and triple negative (TN: ER-, PR-, and HER2-) based on pathology reports or cancer registry data. A total of 1,809 ER+ cases, 1,024 ER- cases (which included 478 TN cases), and 9,593 controls were included in the analyses. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using unconditional polytomous or regular logistic regression, as appropriate, taking into account all major risk factors for breast cancer. Results. Recent BMI was inversely associated with postmenopausal ER- breast cancer (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.53-1.02), and more strongly with tumors that were also PR- and HER2- (TN), (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.97 for BMI≥35 vs. & lt;25). For ER+, ORs were below one for pre-menopausal and above one for post-menopausal breast cancer, but confidence intervals included 1.0. However, among women who were thin as young adults (BMI & lt;19.4, lowest tertile), recent high BMI (≥35) was associated with more than a twofold increase in risk of postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer (OR: 2.24; 95% CI 1.46-3.43, p for interaction: 0.02). Associations between recent BMI and ER- breast cancer did not differ by young-adult BMI. There was a suggestion of increased risk for high WHR (highest vs. lowest quartile) independent of BMI, which only approached statistical significance for premenopausal ER+ tumors (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.98-1.75; p for trend: 0.05). In analyses of the joint effects of recent BMI and WHR, the association of WHR with ER+ tumors in postmenopausal women was strongest for women with normal BMI (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.02-2.56), p for interaction: 0.05. Conclusion. Our results indicate the need to consider subtypes when evaluating the impact of general and central obesity on breast cancer and warrant the study of mechanisms underlying these complex associations. Citation Format: Elisa V. Bandera, Urmila Chandran, Chi-Chen Hong, Christine B. Ambrosone, Melissa Troester, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Andrew Olshan, Julie R. Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg. Obesity and breast cancer subtypes in African American women participating in the AMBER Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-285. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-LB-285
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. 814-814
    Abstract: Dysregulation of the IGF (insulin-like growth factor) signaling pathway plays a key role in cancer development. It is still unclear whether germline variation in genes in the IGF pathway may affect risk of breast cancer. We conducted a gene-based analysis of 184 genes in the IGF signaling pathway to identify genes carrying genetic variation affecting risk of breast cancer and the specific estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes. Tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for each gene were selected and genotyped on a customized Illumina Exome Array. Imputation was carried out using 1000 Genomes haplotypes. The analysis included 91,627 SNPs in 3,663 breast cancer cases (including 1,983 ER positive,1,098 ER-negative) and 4,687 controls from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) consortium, a collaborative project of four large studies of breast cancer in African American women (Carolina Breast Cancer Study, Black Women's Health Study, Women's Circle of Health Study, and Multiethnic Cohort). We used a multi-locus adaptive joint (AdaJoint) test to determine the association of each gene in the IGF signaling pathway with overall breast cancer and ER subtypes. None of the 184 tested genes, including IGF, IGF binding protein (IGFBP), and IGF receptor (IGFR) genes were associated with disease after adjustment for multiple testing. At the nominal level of P≤0.01, BAIAP2 (P = 0.003), and CALM2 (P = 0.009) genes were associated with overall breast cancer; BAIAP2 (P = 0.001), and CSNK2A1 (P = 0.01) with ER+ breast cancer; and BRAF (P = 0.003), BAD (P = 0.005), and MAPK3 (P = 0.009) with ER- breast cancer. The intronic rs9913477 SNP in the BAIPA2 gene was significantly associated with overall (P = 3.2×10−7) and ER+ (P = 4.4×10−7) breast cancer at the pathway-wide level after adjusting for the total number of tested SNPs. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the risk G-allele were 1.44 (1.25, 1.66), and 1.53 (1.30, 1.81) for overall and ER+ breast cancer, respectively. BAIAP2 codes an adaptor protein, IRSp53, which functions as a substrate of the insulin receptor and IGF-1 receptor tyrosine kinases and links Rho-family small GTPases such as Rac. In vitro studies have shown that activation of Rac promotes metastatic behavior of breast cancer cells. In conclusion, we identified a SNP in BAIAP2 associated with overall and ER+ breast cancer. These results highlight the importance of the IGF signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Citation Format: Edward A. Ruiz-Narvaez, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Chi-Chen Hong, Stephen A. Haddad, Song Yao, Ting-Yuan D. Cheng, Jeannette T. Bensen, Elisa V. Bandera, Christopher A. Haiman, Andrew F. Olshan, Christine B. Ambrosone, Lynn Rosenberg, Julie R. Palmer. Gene-based analysis of the IGF signaling pathway and risk of breast cancer in African American women: The AMBER consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 814.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 5 ( 2017-05-01), p. 787-794
    Abstract: Background: Alcohol is a recognized risk factor for invasive breast cancer, but few studies involve African American women. Methods: The current analysis included 22,338 women (5,108 cases of invasive breast cancer) from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium. The association between number of alcoholic drinks per week (dpw) and breast cancer was estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders, and stratifying by breast cancer subtype. Results: Approximately 35% of controls were current drinkers at interview. Women who reported current drinking of ≥14 dpw had an elevated risk of breast cancer compared with light drinkers ( & gt;0– & lt;4 dpw) [adjusted OR (ORadj), 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07–1.64]. We observed elevated risk among women drinking ≥7 dpw for ER− [ORadj, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00–1.72] , PR− [ORadj, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00–1.63], HER2− [ORadj, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.09–1.70] , and triple-negative [ORadj, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.98–2.00] molecular subtype. Among receptor-positive cases, ORs remained elevated but attenuated relative to receptor-negative cases. Sensitivity analysis of age-defined windows of exposure ( & lt;30 years, 30–49, 50+ years of age) did not reveal variation in patterns of association. Risk associated with alcohol intake did not vary significantly by oral contraceptive use, smoking status, or menopausal status. Conclusions: Among African American women, similar to women of European descent, drinking ≥7 alcoholic dpw was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer regardless of subtype. Impact: Alcohol intake is a modifiable risk factor for breast cancer, and reduced intake among African American women should be encouraged. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(5); 787–94. ©2017 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 25, No. 2 ( 2016-02-01), p. 366-373
    Abstract: Background: The evidence on the relation of family history of cancers other than breast cancer to breast cancer risk is conflicting, and most studies have not assessed specific breast cancer subtypes. Methods: We assessed the relation of first-degree family history of breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, ovarian, and cervical cancer and lymphoma or leukemia, to the risk of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+), ER−, and triple-negative breast cancer in data from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: There were 3,023 ER+ and 1,497 ER− breast cancer cases (including 696 triple-negative cases) and 17,420 controls. First-degree family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risk of each subtype: OR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.57–1.97) for ER+, 1.67 (1.42–1.95) for ER−, and 1.72 (1.38–2.13) for triple-negative breast cancer. Family history of cervical cancer was associated with increased risk of ER− (OR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.36–4.20), but not ER+ cancer. Family history of both breast and prostate cancer was associated with increased risk of ER+ (3.40; 2.42–4.79) and ER− (2.09; 1.21–3.63) cancer, but family history of both breast and lung cancer was associated only with ER− cancer (2.11; 1.29–3.46). Conclusions: A family history of cancers other than breast may influence the risk of breast cancer, and associations may differ by subtype. Impact: Greater surveillance and counseling for additional screening may be warranted for women with a family history of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(2); 366–73. ©2015 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...