GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • SAGE Publications  (2)
  • Robertson, Paul J.  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • SAGE Publications  (2)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2002
    In:  Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 36, No. 6 ( 2002-12), p. 792-799
    In: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, SAGE Publications, Vol. 36, No. 6 ( 2002-12), p. 792-799
    Abstract: Objective: This paper describes qualitative research that was carried out as part of a project aimed at drawing up a series of guidelines for the assessment and management for people with coexisting substance use and mental health disorders, or dual diagnosis [ 1 ]. Method: A core consultation team of 14 experts with experience in the areas of both substance use and mental health in New Zealand was established to advise on the development of eight clinical scenarios. The clinical scenarios were selected to highlight a range of real life issues in the treatment of people with coexisting substance use and mental health disorders and were presented at 12 focus groups around New Zealand. The 261 participants of the focus groups were asked to comment on what was optimal management for each of the scenarios and to identify barriers to optimal care in their region. Written notes were analysed for recurring and strongly stated themes and these comprise the results of the study. Results: While there was marked regional variation in treatment approaches and service structures, many of the barriers to optimal care that were identified were common to all regions. The results are considered under the headings of systems issues, clinical issues and attitudes. Conclusions: A wide variety of barriers that impede the delivery of optimal care have been identified. These range from the attitudes of individual clinicians to the structure of the systems within which they work. A system of key principles and processes for organizing treatment in a way which helps overcome these barriers is proposed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0004-8674 , 1440-1614
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003849-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2008
    In:  Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 42, No. 2 ( 2008-02), p. 134-140
    In: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, SAGE Publications, Vol. 42, No. 2 ( 2008-02), p. 134-140
    Abstract: Objective: To examine characteristics of patients with social phobia (SP) in alcohol and drug treatment settings and to identify features distinguishing this group from patients with and without other psychiatric conditions. Method: A random sample of 105 patients completing an initial assessment at two outpatient alcohol and drug treatment services were assessed and agreed to a 9 month follow-up interview, completed by n=102 (97%). At baseline the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was administered. Current diagnoses at baseline were used to separate the sample into those with SP (n=33), other current psychiatric disorders (OPD, n=40), and those with no current psychiatric diagnosis other than a substance use disorder (NPD, n=29). The novel methodology used in this study compared the SP group first to the NPD group to see if SP was associated with a different presentation, and then compared the SP group to the OPD group to see if any identified differences were associated with SP per se or psychopathology generally. The three groups were compared on demographic, current clinical, and past treatment utilization variables at baseline, while follow-up data were used to compare the groups on treatment outcome and treatment utilization. Results: The SP group did not differ from either group in a systematic way. What differences did emerge tended to show a difference between OPD and NPD, with SP intermediate between the two, or that SP and OPD together were different from NPD. Conclusions: Despite the relatively small sample size, these findings suggest that in substance use disorder treatment settings, patients with coexisting SP do not represent a distinctly high-needs or at-risk group in the broader context of patient populations, for which coexisting psychiatric diagnoses are the norm rather than the exception.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0004-8674 , 1440-1614
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003849-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...