GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Critical Care, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 25, No. 1 ( 2021-12)
    Abstract: Fever and hypothermia have been observed in septic patients. Their influence on prognosis is subject to ongoing debates. Methods We did a secondary analysis of a large clinical dataset from a quality improvement trial. A binary logistic regression model was calculated to assess the association of the thermal response with outcome and a multinomial regression model to assess factors associated with fever or hypothermia. Results With 6542 analyzable cases we observed a bimodal temperature response characterized by fever or hypothermia, normothermia was rare. Hypothermia and high fever were both associated with higher lactate values. Hypothermia was associated with higher mortality, but this association was reduced after adjustment for other risk factors. Age, community-acquired sepsis, lower BMI and lower outside temperatures were associated with hypothermia while bacteremia and higher procalcitonin values were associated with high fever. Conclusions Septic patients show either a hypothermic or a fever response. Whether hypothermia is a maladaptive response, as indicated by the higher mortality in hypothermic patients, or an adaptive response in patients with limited metabolic reserves under colder environmental conditions, remains an open question. Trial registration The original trial whose dataset was analyzed was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01187134) on August 23, 2010, the first patient was included on July 1, 2011.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1364-8535
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2051256-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Scientific Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2022-03-10)
    Abstract: Sepsis is a major reason for preventable hospital deaths. A cluster-randomized controlled trial on an educational intervention did not show improvements of sepsis management or outcome. We now aimed to test an improved implementation strategy in a second intervention phase in which new intervention hospitals (former controls) received a multifaceted educational intervention, while controls (former intervention hospitals) only received feedback of quality indicators. Changes in outcomes from the first to the second intervention phase were compared between groups using hierarchical generalized linear models controlling for possible confounders. During the two phases, 19 control hospitals included 4050 patients with sepsis and 21 intervention hospitals included 2526 patients. 28-day mortality did not show significant changes between study phases in both groups. The proportion of patients receiving antimicrobial therapy within one hour increased in intervention hospitals, but not in control hospitals. Taking at least two sets of blood cultures increased significantly in both groups. During phase 2, intervention hospitals showed higher proportion of adequate initial antimicrobial therapy and de-escalation within 5 days. A survey among involved clinicians indicated lacking resources for quality improvement. Therefore, quality improvement programs should include all elements of sepsis guidelines and provide hospitals with sufficient resources for quality improvement. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01187134. Registered 23 August 2010, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01187134 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-2322
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2615211-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Critical Care, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 26, No. 1 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: Timely antimicrobial treatment and source control are strongly recommended by sepsis guidelines, however, their impact on clinical outcomes is uncertain. Methods We performed a planned secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial conducted from July 2011 to May 2015 including forty German hospitals. All adult patients with sepsis treated in the participating ICUs were included. Primary exposures were timing of antimicrobial therapy and delay of surgical source control during the first 48 h after sepsis onset. Primary endpoint was 28-day mortality. Mixed models were used to investigate the effects of timing while adjusting for confounders. The linearity of the effect was investigated by fractional polynomials and by categorizing of timing. Results Analyses were based on 4792 patients receiving antimicrobial treatment and 1595 patients undergoing surgical source control. Fractional polynomial analysis identified a linear effect of timing of antimicrobials on 28-day mortality, which increased by 0.42% per hour delay (OR with 95% CI 1.019 [1.01, 1.028], p  ≤ 0.001). This effect was significant in patients with and without shock (OR = 1.018 [1.008, 1.029] and 1.026 [1.01, 1.043] , respectively). Using a categorized timing variable, there were no significant differences comparing treatment within 1 h versus 1–3 h, or 1 h versus 3–6 h. Delays of more than 6 h significantly increased mortality (OR = 1.41 [1.17, 1.69]). Delay in antimicrobials also increased risk of progression from severe sepsis to septic shock (OR per hour: 1.051 [1.022, 1.081] , p  ≤ 0.001). Time to surgical source control was significantly associated with decreased odds of successful source control (OR = 0.982 [0.971, 0.994], p  = 0.003) and increased odds of death (OR = 1.011 [1.001, 1.021]; p  = 0.03) in unadjusted analysis, but not when adjusted for confounders (OR = 0.991 [0.978, 1.005] and OR = 1.008 [0.997, 1.02] , respectively). Only, among patients with septic shock delay of source control was significantly related to risk-of death (adjusted OR = 1.013 [1.001, 1.026], p  = 0.04). Conclusions Our findings suggest that management of sepsis is time critical both for antimicrobial therapy and source control. Also patients, who are not yet in septic shock, profit from early anti-infective treatment since it can prevent further deterioration. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01187134 ). Registered 23 August 2010, NCT01187134
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1364-8535
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2051256-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Abstract: Es wird immer wieder diskutiert, ob der Tod bei Sepsis überwiegend durch die Sepsis oder häufiger durch eine Grunderkrankung verursacht wird. Es gibt keine Daten über den Einfluss des Hintergrunds eines Forschers auf eine solche Beurteilung. Ziel dieser Analyse war es daher, die Todesursache bei Sepsis und den Einfluss des beruflichen Hintergrunds des Beurteilers auf seine diesbezügliche Einschätzung zu bewerten. Methodik Wir führten eine retrospektive Kohortenstudie an Sepsispatienten durch, die auf der medizinischen Intensivstation eines tertiären Versorgungszentrums behandelt wurden. Bei verstorbenen Patienten wurden Komorbiditäten und der Schweregrad der Erkrankung dokumentiert. Die Todesursache (Sepsis oder Komorbiditäten oder beides zusammen) wurde unabhängig voneinander von 4 Beurteilern mit unterschiedlichem beruflichem Hintergrund (Medizinstudent, Oberarzt der medizinischen Intensivstation, anästhesiologischer Intensivmediziner und auf die vorherrschende Komorbidität spezialisierter Arzt) evaluiert. Ergebnisse Insgesamt starben 78 von 235 Patienten im Krankenhaus. Die Übereinstimmung zwischen den Beurteilern bezüglich der Todesursache war gering (κ 0,37; 95 %-Konfidenzintervall 0,29–0,44). Je nach Beurteiler wurde in 6–12 % der Fälle die Sepsis als alleinige Todesursache festgestellt, in 54–76 % die Sepsis gemeinsam mit den Komorbiditäten und in 18–40 % nur die Komorbiditäten. Diskussion Bei einem relevanten Anteil der auf der medizinischen Intensivstation behandelten Sepsispatienten tragen Komorbiditäten wesentlich zur Mortalität bei und der Tod durch Sepsis ohne relevante Komorbiditäten ist ein seltenes Ereignis. Die Beantwortung der Frage nach der Todesursache bei Sepsispatienten ist in hohem Maß subjektiv und kann durch den beruflichen Hintergrund des Beurteilers beeinflusst werden.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2193-6218 , 2193-6226
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2636049-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...