GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your search history is empty.

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)  (1)
  • Raynald  (1)
Material
Publisher
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)  (1)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), ( 2023-02-01), p. 1-8
    Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and predictors of first-pass effect (FPE) and to compare the clinical outcomes among FPE, multiple-pass effect, and incomplete reperfusion (ICR) in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. METHODS Patients from the ANGEL-ACT (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke) registry were included. FPE was defined as complete reperfusion after a single pass of the thrombectomy device without rescue treatment. MPE was defined as complete reperfusion after ≥ 2 passes of the thrombectomy device. ICR was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b independent of the number of passes. Multivariable analyses were used to determine predictors of FPE and to compare the following outcomes: functional independence, mortality within 90 days, intraprocedural complications, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among FPE, MPE, and ICR. RESULTS There were 1139 patients, of whom 307 (27.0%) achieved FPE. FPE was related to occlusion location (M1 vs internal carotid artery [ICA], adjusted OR [aOR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.15–2.15, p = 0.004; M2/anterior cerebral artery vs ICA, aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.32–3.22, p = 0.002) and negatively associated with underlying intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23–0.49, p 〈 0.001). Patients with FPE had a higher rate of functional independence (52.7% of FPE patients vs 45.6% of MPE patients and 37.1% of ICR patients, p = 0.002; MPE vs FPE, aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51–0.95, p = 0.023; ICR vs FPE, aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31–0.66, p 〈 0.001), lower rate of intraprocedural complications (4.2% vs 18.1% and 21.2%, p 〈 0.001; MPE vs FPE, aOR 6.23, 95% CI 3.36–11.54, p 〈 0.001; ICR vs FPE, aOR 7.70, 95% CI 3.97–14.94, p 〈 0.001), and lower rate of ICH within 24 hours (18.3% vs 27.9% and 26.9%, p = 0.009; MPE vs FPE, aOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.35–2.86, p 〈 0.001; ICR vs FPE, aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.30–3.16, p = 0.002) than those with MPE and ICR. CONCLUSIONS FPE was achieved at a rate of 27.0% and associated with functional independence, decreased intraprocedural complications, and ICH. Non-ICA occlusion and underlying ICAD were predictors of FPE.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3085 , 1933-0693
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026156-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...