Abstract: Background: Despite significant improvements in the treatment of MM, the outcome of patients with HR cytogenetics remains poor despite similar complete remission (CR) rates as compared to SR cases. Relapses among patients in CR are attributed to the persistence of MRD, but knowledge about the impact of MRD in patients with SR and HR cytogenetics, treated with modern therapies and monitored with next-generation techniques, is limited. Similarly, there is virtually no data about in vivo mechanisms of resistance in SR and HR MM; however, since MRD represents those very few cells that are resistant to treatment, it could be hypothesized that profiling MRD cells may shed light into the mechanisms of resistance in both SR and HR patients. Aim: To determine the clinical impact of MRD in MM patients with SR vs HR cytogenetics, and to identify transcriptional mechanisms determining MRD resistance by investigating the transcriptome of MRD cells in both patient subgroups. Methods: This study was conducted in a series of 390 patients enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2012 trial (6 induction cycles with VRD followed by ASCT and 2 courses of consolidation with VRD). FISH was analyzed on CD138 purified PCs at diagnosis. MRD was predefined to be prospectively assessed following induction, transplant and consolidation, using next-generation flow (NGF) according to EuroFlow. In 40 patients [28 with SR and 12 with HR cytogenetics: i.e., t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del(17p)], diagnostic and MRD tumor cells persisting after VRD-induction were isolated by FACS according to patient-specific aberrant phenotypes. Due to the small number of sorted MRD cells (median of 25,600) we used a 3' end RNAseq method optimized for generating libraries from low-input starting material (MARSeq). Differential expression analyses were performed with DESeq2 R package. Results: At the latest time-point in which MRD was assessed, MRD-positive rates progressively increased (p =.006) from SR patients (148/300, 49%) to cases with t(4;14) (24/42, 57%) and del(17p) (29/38, 76%). Furthermore, MRD levels were significantly superior in patients with del(17p) compared to SR FISH (0.02% vs 0.006%, p =.009), while MRD levels in patients with t(4;14) (0.004%) were similar to those in SR MM. Only 10 patients had a t(14;16) and 4 were MRD-positive. Among patients achieving MRD-negativity ( 〈 2x10-6), 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were similar for those with SR FISH, t(4;14) and del(17p) (90%, 100% and 89%; p 〉 .05). Conversely, 3-year PFS rates for MRD-positive patients decreased from those having SR FISH to those with t(4;14) and del(17p) (59%, 46% and 24%, respectively), with statistically significant differences between the first and the latest subgroups (p 〈 .001). Since clearance of MRD notably lowered the risk of relapse and persistence of MRD significantly shortened the PFS in each cytogenetic group (p ≤.001), we investigated the unique features of MRD cells persisting after VRD-induction by comparing their transcriptome to that of patient-matched tumor cells at diagnosis (n=40). Accordingly, MRD cells showed 763 genes significantly deregulated (Padj 〈 .05), including a cluster of proteasome subunits and proteasome related genes (i.e. PSMB5, PSMC3IP, BTRC, HUWE1, FBXL20 and TRIM69). Gene set enrichment analysis unveiled biologic determinants of MRD resistance such as the IL6-JAK-STAT signaling pathway in SR patients and the ROS pathway in HR patients (FDR 〈 0.1). Interestingly, the number of genes deregulated in MRD cells of SR patients was 9-fold higher than HR cases suggesting that, whereas in SR MM, a few tumor cells with specific gene regulatory networks may have higher probability to persist VRD induction, the presence of HR cytogenetic alterations is associated per se, with a transcriptional program that allows a few MRD cells to persist treatment. Conclusions: This is one of the largest studies integrating patients' cytogenetics and MRD status. Our results, based on intensive treatment and MRD monitoring using NGF, unveil that achieving MRD-negativity may overcome the poor prognosis of HR cytogenetics. By contrast, persistent MRD significantly reduces PFS rates, particularly in patients with del(17p). Interestingly, MRD cells from SR and HR patients may have different transcriptional mechanisms leading to VRD resistance, and further understanding of these could provide knowledge on how to eradicate MRD in both patient subgroups. Disclosures Puig: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Garcia-Sanz:Affimed: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Vivia: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. Mateos:GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lahuerta:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bladé:Janssen: Honoraria. San-Miguel:Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Abstract: MRD monitoring is one of the most relevant prognostic factors in elderly MM patients, irrespective of age or cytogenetic risk. Second-generation MFC immune profiling concomitant to MRD monitoring also helped to identify patients with different outcomes.

Abstract: Introduction: Several cooperative MM groups have shown that MRD monitoring may be relevant as biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies, to support treatment decisions, and to act as surrogate for overall survival (OS) in MM. Because of its wider applicability, a significant fraction of available MRD data has been obtained using MFC that originally, was limited to 4- or 6-colors and measured a limited number of cells. It is assumed that the sensitivity of MFC can increase by usage of ≥8 markers and acquisition of greater cell numbers, but the degree of improved specificity and sensitivity remains unknown. Methods: We aimed at determining the increment in specificity and sensitivity upon transition from first-generation 4-color into a second-generation 8-color MFC assay, by applying new computational tools developed by the EuroFlow consortium in elderly MM patients, enrolled in the GEM2010MAS65 study, for which MRD monitoring was performed with an 8-color monoclonal antibody combination - CD45-PacB/CD138-OC515/CD38-FITC/CD56-PE/CD27-PerCPCy5.5/CD19-PECy7/CD117-APC/CD81-APCH7 - and acquisition of ≥2x106 leukocytes (detection limit: 10-5). Time-to-progression (TTP) and OS were measured from diagnosis. Results: First, we created a reference data file of normal (n=17) and clonal (n=71) plasma cells (PCs) derived from bone marrow samples of healthy individuals and MM patients (Figure 1A) in order to determine the individual contribution of each marker to the discrimination between normal vs. clonal PCs. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that CD19 ranked as the most significant marker followed by CD56, CD81, CD27, CD117, CD45, forward scatter (FSC), CD38, CD138 and sideward scatter (SSC). Accordingly, the 8-color combination resulted in improved discrimination between normal vs. clonal PCs as compared to the former 4-color approach based only on CD38/CD56/CD19/CD45 (Figure 1B); in fact, CD81, CD27 and CD117 had higher independent value than CD45 in the PCA. Afterwards, we focused on 50 randomly selected MRD-positive patients enrolled in the GEM2010MAS65 study, to compare the performance of an 8- vs. 4-color software-guided classification of MRD cells. PCA based on 8-colors showed that all but two patients were accurately located in the clonal PC reference and outside 1 or 2 standard deviation (SD) curves of the normal PC reference (96% accuracy; Figure 1C); by contrast, using 4-color software-guided classification up to 9 patients became located in the overlapping area between 1 and 2 SD of the normal and clonal PCs references (82% accuracy; Figure 1D). Afterward, we investigated the increment in sensitivity due to the evaluation of 2x106 leukocytes with the second-generation 8-color flow assay instead of the standard 2x105 cells with the first-generation 4-color approach, by determining how many of the 50 MRD-positive patients would turn into MRD-negative if only 2x105 leukocytes had been analyzed (detection limit: 10-4). Interestingly, by reducing the number of visible events to 2x105, our results showed that up to 15 out of the 50 cases (30%) would become wrongly classified as MRD-negative. Then, we investigated the impact in TTP and OS of having MRD levels of 10-5 within a series of 163 patients enrolled in the GEM2010MAS65 and with MRD assessment. Accordingly, 88 cases had detectable MRD levels ≥10-4, 21 patients had persistent MRD at 10-5, and the remaining 54 cases were MRD-negative. Importantly, MRD-positive patients at 10-5 had similar outcome as compared to cases with MRD levels ≥10-4 (both had median TTP of 31 months; 3-year OS rates were 80% and 74%, respectively) and significantly inferior to that of MRD-negative patients [median TTP not reached (P 〈 .001); 3-year OS rate of 93% (P =.05)]. Conclusions: We showed that the transition from a first-generation 4-color into a second-generation 8-color MFC assay that measured ten-times more cells resulted in increased specificity and sensitivity. MRD detection at the 10-5 level is clinically relevant, since it identifies a subset of patients with inferior survival than MRD-negative cases, similar to that of the overall MRD-positive patient population. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Paiva: Millenium: Consultancy; BD Bioscience: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; EngMab AG: Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Puig:Janssen: Consultancy; The Binding Site: Consultancy. Gironella:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. van Dongen:BD Biosciences (cont'd): Other: Laboratory Services in the field of technical validation of EuroFlow-OneFlow antibody tubes in dried format. The Laboratory Services are provided by the Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; Cytognos: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP on Infinicyt software, Patents on EuroFlow-based flowcytometric Diagnosis and Classification of hematological malignancies, Patents on MRD diagnostics, and Patents on PID diagnostics.; Cytognos (continued): Patents & Royalties: Royalty income for EuroFlow Consortium. The Infinicyt software is provided to all EuroFlow members free-of-charge.Licensing of Patent on detection of IgE+ B-cells in allergic diseases. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; DAKO: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on Split-Signal FISH. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; InVivoScribe: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on BIOMED-2-based methods for PCR-based Clonality Diagnostics.. Royalty income for EuroClonality-BIOMED-2 Consortium ; Immunostep: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patents on immunobead-based dection of fusion proteins in acute leukemias and other tumors. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC and for EuroFlow Consortium ; BD Biosciences: Other: Educational Services: Educational Lectures and Educational Workshops (+ related travelling costs). The lectures and workshops fully focus on the scientific achievements of the EuroFlow Consortium (No advertisement of products of BD Biosciences). , Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on EuroFlow-based flowcytometric Diagnosis and Classification of hematological malignancies; Royalty income for EuroFlow Consortium.; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Laboratory Services in the field of MRD diagnostics, provided by the Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL.. Mateos:Takeda: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Background: MRD is an established biomarker to evaluate treatment efficacy, define patients at risk based on persistent MRD, and eventually, act as surrogate for prolonged survival based on sensitive MRD-negative definitions. Accordingly, the IMWG has developed criteria for MRD-negativity defined by next-generation sequencing, NGF or PET/CT, and has recommended their inclusion in clinical trials. Notwithstanding, most flow cytometry results have been obtained using less sensitive methods and in fact, there is no data about the impact of NGF-based MRD assessment in clinical trials. Aim: To define the feasibility, sensitivity and clinical impact of NGF-based MRD assessment in the phase III PETHEMA/GEM2012 trial. Methods: A total of 458 patients were enrolled into the PETHEMA/GEM2012 trial. MRD was predefined to be prospectively assessed at three time-points: after six induction cycles with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD), after HDT/ASCT, and after two courses of consolidation with VRD. MRD monitoring was performed blinded for clinical outcomes in four PETHEMA/GEM laboratory cores, and data was centralized for MRD analyses. MRD assessment was performed following EuroFlow SOPs in a total of 1,134 bone marrow (BM) samples from 419 patients. The 39 cases without MRD assessment had suboptimal response to induction and were thus considered as MRD+ for intention-to-treat analyses. Noteworthy, in 14 BM samples with undetectable MRD, B-cell precursors, erythroblasts and mast cells represented & lt;0.01% of BM cells, and these samples were thus considered as hemodiluted and inadequate for MRD assessment. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined for each of the 1,117 BM samples representative for MRD assessment, according to the formula: (20/nucleated viable cells) x 100; the median LOD achieved by NGF in the PETHEMA/GEM2012 trial was of 3x10-6. Results: Overall, 225/458 (49%) patients had undetectable MRD at the latest time-point in which MRD was assessed and were thus classified as MRD-. Conversely, 233/458 (51%) cases remained MRD+: 28% with ≥10-4 MRD, 12% with 10-5 MRD, and 11% with 10-6 MRD. Detailed analyses of MRD kinetics in 320 patients with available MRD results at all three time-points, showed that the percentage of MRD- patients increased from 35% into 54% and 58% after induction, HDT/ASCT and consolidation, respectively. Furthermore, a restricted analysis among MRD+ patients showed that whereas after induction only 8% of them had MRD levels as low as 10-6, subsequent intensification with HDT/ASCT and consolidation could reduce MRD levels down to 10-6 in 32% of MRD+ cases. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 3-years were of 92%, 70%, 54% and 44% for patients being MRD-negative, MRD+ 10-6, 10-5 and ≥10-4, respectively (P & lt;.001; Figure). Thus far, only 6/225 (3%) MRD- patients have relapsed; strikingly, all 6 cases had extramedullary plasmacytomas at diagnosis, all relapsed with extramedullary plasmacytomas, and only 2 had concomitant serological relapse. The favorable outcome of MRD- patients encouraged us to investigate the impact of MRD negativity in both standard- and high-risk patients defined by FISH [i.e.: t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del(17p)]. Even though MRD- rates were significantly inferior in patients with high- vs standard-risk FISH (37% vs 50%, respectively; P=.03), 3-year PFS rates were similar between patients with high- and standard-risk FISH reaching MRD-negativity (94% and 91%, respectively; P=.56); by contrast, MRD+ cases with high- and standard- risk FISH had median PFS of 27 and 35 months, respectively (P=.025). Conclusions: This is the largest study of MRD monitoring in MM based on the total number of samples analyzed (n=1,134). Our results show that NGF-based MRD assessment is feasible in large multicenter clinical trials, is highly-sensitive, and allows the identification of hemodiluted BM samples inadequate for MRD assessment. Risk of relapse among MRD-negative patients was remarkably reduced (3%), and was particularly related to the reappearance of extramedullary plasmacytomas, which urges the need for combined cellular and imaging MRD monitoring in these patients; by contrast, even MRD levels as low as 10-5 and 10-6 conferred significantly inferior PFS. Overall, this study defines MRD-negativity as the most relevant clinical endpoint for both standard- and high-risk transplant-eligible MM patients. Figure Figure. Disclosures Paiva: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; EngMab: Research Funding. Oriol: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored symposia, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored symposia, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored symposia; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. de la Rubia: Janssen: Other: Honoraria; Amgen: Other: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Honoraria. Rosinol: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Mateos: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lahuerta: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. San Miguel: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.