Abstract: Background: Evaluation of MRD is standard in patients with AML. However, the role of decentralized MRD assessment for risk stratification in AML remains largely unknown, and so it does which methodological aspects are critical to empower the evaluation of MRD with prognostic significance, particularly if using MFC. Aim: To evaluate the role of decentralized MRD assessment using MFC for risk stratification and putative treatment individualization of patients with AML. Methods: This study was performed on 1,076 AML patients in complete remission (CR) after 7+3 induction chemotherapy, in whom MRD was evaluated by MFC in local laboratories over a period of 20 years in the PETHEMA group. We conducted a survey of technical aspects of MFC based MRD testing in the laboratories of the 60 participating Hospitals, to determine the impact of methodological heterogeneity in the prognostic value of MFC. Results: We first investigated the most effective MRD cutoff to stratify patients' risk at first remission. Patients were segmented into progressively higher cutoffs, starting at 0.01% followed by 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%. Our results showed that 0.1% reached higher statistical significance to discriminate patients with different relapse-free survival (RFS, HR: 0.77; P = .001) and overall survival (OS, HR: 0.73; P = .001). In multivariate analyses together with patients' age, WBC, genetic risk and post-consolidation therapy, MRD status was selected as an independent prognostic factor for OS. To further define the utility of "real-world" MRD assessment using MFC in risk stratification of AML, recursive partitioning was performed using the prognostic and treatment related factors selected in the multivariate Cox model for OS. Of the four variables evaluated, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT, regardless of autologous or allogeneic source) vs no transplant emerged as the best single discriminator for OS, followed by genetic risk, age and MRD status. There were two branching points defined by MRD status; the first in patients ≤60 years with intermediate genetic risk who were not transplanted and the second in patients with adverse genetics who were not transplanted, in whom & lt;0.1% MRD faintly improved the dismal outcome of this subgroup. Overall, patients not referred to HSCT had dismal RFS regardless of MRD levels. Forty-nine of the 60 hospitals (82%) responded to the survey on questions regarding the measurement of MRD using MFC in the PETHEMA LMA 1999, 2007 and 2010 protocols, providing information corresponding to 966 of the 1,076 (90%) patients regarding the number of markers, preparation of samples, instruments, approach (ie, LAIP, DfN or LAIP+DfN), number of cells to define a cluster, etc. The survey revealed significant heterogeneity intra- and inter-protocols that reflected improvement in MFC assessment of MRD over time, in the absence of harmonization nor standardization at the national level. Accordingly, we investigated if the heterogeneity in methodological, interpretation and reporting aspects of MFC based MRD testing were hampering its ability to predict outcome independently of other patient and treatment related factors. Strikingly, our results showed that except for the denominator used to calculate MRD burden (ie, total nucleated cells vs leukocytes), lack of standardization in all other parameters had an impact on the ability of MFC to predict outcomes in AML (Figure). Namely, panels with ≤4 markers or ≤2 combinations failed to identify patients with significantly different RFS according to MRD status, and MFC-based MRD monitoring was prognostic only when & gt;500,000 cells were measured. Only MRD assessment using patient-specific panels was predictive of outcome. Conclusions: We report here one of the largest studies investigating the role of MRD monitoring using MFC. Our results confirmed that detection of MRD identifies patients in CR/CRi with inferior survival, but uncovered that decentralized MRD testing lacks significance when compared to other baseline risk factors and in the context of risk-adapted post-consolidation strategies. Thus, while this study demonstrated that "real-world" decentralized assessment of MRD using MFC does provide prognostic information in AML patients at first remission, our results question its readiness for risk stratification towards clinical decisions outside trials, at least until adequate standardization of this technique is achieved. Figure Disclosures Paiva: SkylineDx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Alonso Dominguez:Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Altum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Hosea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Vivia Biotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sossa:Astellas: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novo: Honoraria. San-Miguel:Roche, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, and Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Novartis, Takeda, Amgen, MSD, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Background Rearrangements of the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene at 11q23 (due to translocation, partial tandem duplication or gene amplification) are frequent in AML. Translocations give rise to fusion genes with AF9, AF6, MLLT10 and ENL, among others; partial tandem duplications or self-fusion fuses the 5' region of an MLL into the other MLL gene; and MLL amplification results in several copies of the wild-type gene. In this work we report the molecular analysis, gene expression profiling and clinical outcome for a cohort of MLL- rearrangedAML. Patients and Methods Herein we include 20 MLL-rearrangement harboring patients, diagnosed in our institution of AML. MLL gene fusion was detected by cytogenetics; FISH with LSI MLL dual color, Break Apart probe, and chromosome painting probes; 10 cases could be verified by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and sequencing. Gene expression was analyzed in ten cases by real-time PCR in a reaction with specific primers and SybrGreen. Relative quantification was performed by 2-DDCt method. Survival analysis was carried-out by Kaplan-Meyer method. Overall survival was considered as the time from diagnostics to exitus. Results In a time course from March 2004 to June 2015, the systematic screening for genetic rearrangements in AML patients at diagnosis, revealed 20 patients harboring a rearranged MLL. Fourteen of these were translocations, and in nine of them we could demonstrate the genetic fusion at the mRNA sequence level. There were three amplifications of the MLL gene in double minute (dmin), homogeneously stained region (hsr) and in several marker chromosomes. MLL rearrangement harboring patients had a median overall survival of 284±119 (N=18) days and only 25% of them survive at 1.7 years. Gene expression profiling of AML relevant genes (HOXA5, FLT3, EVI1, MEIS1 and RUNX1) showed a general upregulation of HOXA5, and a heterogenic regulation of FLT3. EVI1 and MEIS1 expression, undetectable in health control's peripheral blood, were upregulated only in some cases, interestingly the only two survivors in the series had undetectable EVI1 expression (Fig 1A). RUNX1 had a downregulation in MLL amplification cases, especially patient with 15-20 MLL copies in HSR in hyperdiploid cells that showed 7.4*107±2.5*107 fold downregulation (p 〈 0.01), almost undetectable by real-time PCR (Fig 1B). Also was significatively (p 〈 0.05) downregulated in two of the four MLL-ENL harboring patients and the only included MLL-AF6 harboring patient. Conclusions In this work we show that MLL-rearranged AML have a poor outcome, and most of them should not be included in intermediate-risk karyotype. Accordingly, the classification of MLL cases by the genetic partner or gene expression profile may provide a more precise prognostics. In this sense, overexpression of EVI1 has been previously associated to a worst outcome, but there are other genes that could be useful in prognostics such as MEIS1. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Endocannabinoid system is a set of ligands, receptors and endogenous enzymes which modulate a variety of physiological effects. There are two well-characterized cannabinoid receptors, CB1 (mainly expressed in Central Nervous System) and CB2 (mainly in hematopoietic cells). Here, we tested the effect of the cannabinoid WIN-55 212-2 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo and studied the molecular signaling pathways involved in this effect. Moreover, we synthesized a new family of twelve cannabinoids that are specific to CB2 receptor. For their design and synthesis, computational techniques of docking, analytical and spectroscopic techniques such as mass spectrometry (MS) were used. To assess the anti-leukemia effect of the different cannabinoids, we analyzed cell viability by MTT and flow cytometry using six human AML cell lines, primary cells from healthy donors (hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) and lymphocytes) and blasts from AML patients. Cannabinoids induced a potent proapoptotic effect on AML cell lines and on primary leukemic cells, which was not observed in normal HPC and lymphocytes from healthy donors. Fragmentation of PARP and activation of caspases 2, 3, 8 and 9 were confirmed by western-blot. Other proteins involved in the effect of cannabinoids were p-AKT, p-ERK 1/2, p-38 and p- JNK. Also studies on p-PERK, p-IRE1 and CHOP confirmed an increased endoplasmic reticulum stress upon exposure to cannabinoids. Mitochondrial damage was analyzed by flow cytometry using TMRE and by MitoSOXTMRed. These assays confirmed a very early mitochondrial damage in leukemic cells which was not observed in normal hematopoietic progenitor cells. Moreover, we analyzed the ceramide levels, a membrane lipid associated with death/survival cell processes by HPLC and immunohistochemistry. Remarkably, we observed significant differences in the amounts of certain subtypes of ceramides in untreated versus treated leukemic cells. The proapoptotic effect of cannabinoids on AML cells was abolished upon co-culture with either CB2 receptor antagonists or with pancaspase inhibitors. Finally, NOD/scid/IL-2R gammae null (NSG) mice were xenotransplanted with HL60 cell line. We confirmed disease infiltration in bone marrow (BM) by BM aspirates and flow cytometry assays. Once the presence of leukemic cells was confirmed, treatment with vehicle, WIN-55 cannabinoid at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day or citarabine (ARA-C) at 50 mg/kg during 5 days was administered. We observed a significantly increased survival among mice treated with WIN-55 cannabinoid as compared to both the control group and the group treated with ARA-C. In addition, we tested in vivo the effect of these compounds on normal hematopoiesis by treating healthy BALB-C mice. We confirmed that cannabinoids did not affect the viability of the different populations of hematopoietic progenitors (LK, GMP, CMP) and, moreover, an increased platelet count was observed in treated mice. Our findings indicate that cannabinoids display a highly selective proapoptotic effect against leukemic cells. Several pathways are involved in this effect, the modification in the ceramide pattern playing a main role. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.