GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (2)
  • Park, Sook Ryun  (2)
  • Park, Young Soo  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)  (2)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 12, No. 11_Supplement ( 2013-11-01), p. B211-B211
    Abstract: Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) amplification is associated with tumorigenesis of gastric cancer and can be a promising molecular target for the treatment of FGFR2-amplified gastric cancer. So far, the most optimal single method to screen patients with FGFR2 amplification has not been determined. To screen patients with gastric cancer harboring FGFR2 amplification, we aim to investigate whether qPCR can replace the FISH method which is the golden standard but less sensitive and much more expensive than qPCR. Methods: FISH (Abnova, #FG0018) and qPCR (Applied Biosystems, HS05182482_cn) method for FGFR2 amplification were performed with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed from 2007 to 2012 in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, and whose FFPE tissues contained at least 70% of tumor cells. qPCR was conducted initially in 26 patients who had both endoscopic biopsy and surgical tissues in the diagnosis to figure out which samples are better between biopsy and surgical tissues. According to the results, 182 patients with endoscopic biopsy tissues were further included. FISH was defined as positive in case of FGFR2 to CEP10 ratio & gt; 2.0. Results: In 26 patients who had paired endoscopic biopsy and surgical samples, the qPCR-based copy number assay for FGFR2 amplification was more sensitive in biopsy samples; i.e., FGFR2 copy number by qPCR was higher in biopsy samples in 13 (50%) patients, while it was higher in surgical samples only in 3 (11.5%) patients. In a total of 208 endoscopic biopsy FFPE samples including 182 patients with biopsy tissues, copy number of FGFR2 ranged from 0.8 to 399.0 (median 15.9) by qPCR and from 0.7 to 166.9 (median 6.1) by FISH. 16 biopsy samples showing FGFR2 copy number & gt; 10 by qPCR were all FISH-positive, while 192 biopsy samples showing FGFR2 copy number & lt; 10 by qPCR were all FISH-negative. In cases of FGFR2 copy number & gt; 10 in biopsy tissues by qPCR, the copy numbers were very well correlated between qPCR and FISH in all patients, and were also over 10 in surgical tissues regardless of methods in 26 patients. The positive rate of FGFR2 amplification was 7.7% with a cut-off value of 10 by qPCR. Conclusion: This study suggests that it is better to use biopsy samples than surgical tissues to detect FGFR2 amplification by qPCR; and for patient screening in gastric cancer, the optimal cut-off value for definite FGFR2 amplification by qPCR is 10 in comparison with the results of FISH. Clinical relevance of intermediate FGFR2 copy number elevation & lt; 10 by qPCR needs to be addressed in future clinical trials using FGFR2 inhibitors. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B211. Citation Format: Young-Soon Na, Young Soo Park, Min-Hee Ryu, Chae-Won Lee, Hye Jin Park, Ju-Kyung Lee, Sook Ryun Park, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Yoon-Koo Kang. Comparison of detection of FGFR2 amplification by quantitative real-time-PCR (qPCR) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in gastric cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B211.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1535-7163 , 1538-8514
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2062135-8
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 74, No. 19_Supplement ( 2014-10-01), p. 2874-2874
    Abstract: Background: The intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 expression in gastric cancer (GC) is a major challenge when identifying patients who will benefit from HER2-targeting therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the significance of re-evaluation of the HER2 status by repeat endoscopic biopsy in GC patients with an initial, HER2-negative endoscopic biopsy. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and who will receive first-line chemotherapy, were eligible if the HER2 was negative on the initial endoscopic biopsy. HER2 positivity was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) + using the GC scoring system. A repeat endoscopic biopsy was performed in ≥6 different primary tumor sites immediately after obtaining initial HER2-negative results. Results: From May 2011 to April 2013, a total of 183 eligible patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics at the time of the initial biopsy were as follows: tumor location, GEJ∼fundus/body/antrum/diffuse stomach=22(12.0%)/47(25.7%)/68(37.2%)/46(25.1%); Lauren classification, intestinal/diffuse/mixed=53(29.0%)/111(60.7%)/19(10.4%); and HER2 IHC score, 0/1/2=149(81.4%)/26(14.2%)/8(4.4%). The median number of biopsy pieces per patient was 5 (range, 1-15) and 10 (range, 1-15) on the initial and repeat biopsy, respectively (P & lt;0.0001). There was no difference in the median ratio of the number of cancer-containing pieces/total pieces; 0.86 (range, 0.13-1) vs. 0.89 (range, 0.10-1) (P=0.679). As the repeat biopsy identified 16 patients with HER2-positive tumor, the rate of rescued HER2 positivity was 8.7% (95% CI 4.6-12.8%). Rescued HER2 positivity was associated with tumor location (diffuse stomach vs. others=0% vs. 11.7%, P=0.013), Bormann type (IV vs. others=0% vs. 11.7%, P=0.013), and the HER2 IHC score on the initial biopsy (0 vs. 1 vs. 2 = 6.7% vs. 15.4% vs. 25.0%, P=0.028). In multivariate analysis, the HER2 IHC score (1/2 vs. 0, odds ratio=3.78; P=0.016) was an independent predictive factor for rescued HER2 positivity. Conclusions: Repeat endoscopic biopsy is recommended in order to check the HER2 status again even if the initial endoscopic biopsy is HER2 negative in metastatic or unresectable GC. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Sook Ryun Park, Young Soo Park, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Chang Gok Woo, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jeong Hoon Lee, Gin Hyug Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Yoon-Koo Kang. A prospective study of a repeat endoscopic biopsy to identify HER2-positive tumors following an initial HER2-negative endoscopic biopsy in unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer patients: GASTHER1 study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2874. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2874
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...