GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Georg Thieme Verlag KG  (3)
  • Ohira, Hiromasa  (3)
  • Suzuki, Rei  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • Georg Thieme Verlag KG  (3)
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: Endoscopy International Open, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 06, No. 01 ( 2018-01), p. E51-E57
    Abstract: Background and study aims Proper sedation is necessary for the safe and satisfactory completion of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. This study was conducted as a comparative trial of efficacy and safety, comparing propofol-based sedation and midazolam-based sedation during ESD of early gastric cancer patients. Patients and methods This study examined 64 lesions in 58 patients treated using ESD with midazolam plus pentazocine between July 2013 and January 2014 (group M) and 237 lesions in 216 patients treated by ESD using propofol plus pentazocine between February 2014 and December 2015 (group P). The two groups were compared in terms of the frequency of body movement during ESD as the primary outcome and in terms of the procedure time, en bloc resection rate, intraoperative change in cardiorespiratory dynamics, and postoperative awareness as the secondary outcomes. Body movement was defined as movement by a patient that required interruption of the procedure or restraint of the patient’s body trunk, and addition of a sedative agent. Results The median frequency of body movement during ESD was significantly lower in group P (0 times) than in group M (3 times) (P  〈  0.001). No significant difference was found for the mean procedure time (117 min in group P; 127 min in group M). Although no significant difference was found in the incidence of hypoxemia, bradycardia, or bradypnea, the incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in group P (31.5 %) than in group M (6.9 %) (P = 0.004). Patients in group P had significantly higher postoperative awareness immediately after ESD and at 1 hour after ESD (P = 0.002 and 0.022, respectively). Conclusion These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of propofol-based sedation for gastric ESD.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2364-3722 , 2196-9736
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2761052-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Endoscopy International Open, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 05, No. 11 ( 2017-11), p. E1044-E1049
    Abstract: Background and study aims Fixation of an esophageal self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) with an over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) system for a benign stricture to prevent migration has been reported. However, the efficacy of SEMS fixation with an OTSC for malignant esophageal stricture remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of SEMS fixation with an OTSC for a malignant esophageal stricture. Patients and methods Twelve patients who underwent esophageal SEMS placement and fixation with an OTSC for a malignant esophageal stricture were included in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint was technical success. The secondary endpoint was clinical success, which was defined as an improvement of at least 1 grade in the dysphagia score 1 week after SEMS placement or changes in the dysphagia score from before SEMS placement to 1 week after SEMS placement. Results The technical success rate was 100 %. The clinical success rate was 92.3 %. In 6 mild stricture cases in which a standard peroral endoscope could be used, no migration of the SEMS was observed. The median dysphagia score before and at 1 week after SEMS placement was 3 (range 2 – 4) and 0 (0 – 4), respectively, which indicated improvement at 1 week after SEMS placement compared with before SEMS placement (P = 0.002). There were no adverse events associated with placement of SEMS and deployment of an OTSC. Conclusions SEMS fixation with an OTSC is feasible for prevention of migration due to a malignant esophageal stricture.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2364-3722 , 2196-9736
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2761052-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Endoscopy International Open, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 05, No. 01 ( 2017-01), p. E17-E24
    Abstract: Background and study aims The safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in very elderly patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for EGC in patients age 85 years and older. Patients and methods Patients who underwent ESD for EGC between September 2003 and April 2015 were divided into 3 groups: the very elderly (≥ 85 years; 43 patients), the elderly (65 – 84 years; 511 patients), and the non-elderly ( ≤ 64 years; 161 patients). Adverse events (AEs) were used as the primary endpoint to assess the safety of ESD, and the ESD treatment outcomes (i. e., en bloc resection rate, complete en bloc resection rate, and curative resection rate) and the overall survival rate after ESD were the secondary endpoints. These parameters were retrospectively evaluated in the 3 groups. Results There were no significant differences in AEs (non-elderly, elderly, and very elderly: 7.3, 9.5, and 12.5 %, respectively, P = 0.491) or in the en bloc resection and complete en bloc resection rates among the three groups. However, there was a significant difference in the curative resection rates (non-elderly, elderly, and very elderly: 91.5, 84.1, and 77.1 %, respectively, P = 0.014). Regarding overall survival, there was a significant difference among the three groups (1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates: non-elderly: 98.6, 90.2, and 74.7 %; elderly: 97.2, 86.2, and 61.9 %; and very elderly: 92.7, 66.8, and 34.4 %, respectively, P = 0.001). Moreover, the overall survival rate in the very elderly patients with cardiovascular disease was significantly lower than that in the very elderly patients without cardiovascular disease (P  〈  0.001). Conclusions ESD is an acceptable treatment for EGC in patients 85 years of age or older in terms of safety. However, the overall survival after ESD in the very elderly patients with cardiovascular disease was short.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2364-3722 , 2196-9736
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2761052-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...