GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 164, No. 1 ( 2014-01), p. 101-112
    Abstract: With improvement in survival, it is important to evaluate the impact of treatment on secondary cancers in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia ( ALL ) survivors. A retrospective cohort study comprising 2918 children diagnosed with ALL and enrolled on T okyo C hildren's C ancer S tudy G roup ( TCCSG ) protocols between 1984 and 2005 was conducted to evaluate the incidence of secondary cancers and associated factors including treatment protocol, cranial irradiation and other characteristics of the primary ALL . Thirty‐seven patients developed secondary cancers, including acute myeloid leukaemia ( n  = 11), myelodysplastic syndrome ( n  = 5), non‐ H odgkin lymphoma ( n  = 2), brain tumours ( n  = 13) and other solid carcinomas ( n  = 6) within a median follow‐up duration of 9·5 years. The cumulative incidence of any secondary cancers was 1·0% (95% confidence interval ( CI ), 0·7–1·4%) at 10 years and 2·4% (95% CI , 1·5–3·7%) at 20 years, respectively. Standardized incidence rate ratio of secondary cancers was 9·3 (95% CI , 6·5–12·8). Multivariate analyses showed an increased risk of secondary cancers associated with the recent treatment protocol and cranial irradiation. There was no evidence of a reduction in secondary cancer incidence despite marked decreases in cranial irradiation use in the recent protocols.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Pediatrics International, Wiley, Vol. 56, No. 3 ( 2014-06), p. 354-359
    Abstract: The pain associated with bone marrow aspiration and biopsy ( BMAB ) has an enormous impact on pediatric cancer patients and their families, but no specific reference standards for sedation and analgesia have been developed in J apan. To determine the problems associated with pain management during BMAB , a cross‐sectional investigation was conducted. Methods A survey was sent in O ctober 2011 to data managers in institutions belonging to the T okyo C hildren's C ancer S tudy G roup, addressing the non‐pharmacological and pharmacological pain management for BMAB performed on pediatric cancer inpatients between J anuary 2010 and D ecember 2010. Results The eligible response rate was 41 of 57 institutions (71.9%). Non‐pharmacological pain intervention was provided in 68% of surveyed institutions. All institutions provided pharmacological pain management. In most institutions, sedation/analgesia was performed by pediatric oncologists in a treatment room in the ward. Standards for pain management were developed and utilized in only four institutions. Other means of pain management were provided in various settings. Twelve institutions reported insufficient sedation/analgesia. In total, 80% of institutions reported some adverse events. Two serious adverse events were reported in cases of underlying or complicated conditions. No serious long‐term consequences were reported. Conclusions Significant issues were identified regarding the efficacy and safety of pain management. Adverse events can occur in any institution. Children with underlying or complicated conditions are at high risk for serious adverse events. Therefore, adequate and systematic assessment, patient monitoring, preparation and treatment for adverse events, and cooperation with skilled specialists of pediatric oncology, anesthesiology, and intensive care are essential.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1328-8067 , 1442-200X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008621-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 913-913
    Abstract: Development of prophylactic cranial irradiation (CRT) has greatly contributed to the improvement of outcome of childhood ALL. However, late complications, including secondary malignant neoplasms, arising from CRT are becoming big problems. Furthermore, the prognosis of the patients with relapse in central nervous system (CNS) after CRT is extremely poor. To eliminate CRT in the treatment for majority of the patients with B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL, we had attempted to reduce the indication of CRT by conducting randomizations in 3 studies. We present here the long-term results of 4 consecutive clinical trials, to assess the effect of reducing the proportion of patients who received CRT on the treatment outcome. Of the 2,116 children with newly diagnosed ALL with 1–18 years of age who were enrolled to the 4 consecutive TCCSG ALL studies between 1989 and 2003, 1845 BCP ALL patients were evaluable: 354 Pts in L89-12 protocol (1989–1992), 291 Pts in L-92-13 (1992–1995), 536 Pts in L95-14 (1995–1999) and 664 Pts in L99-15 (1999–2003). The probability of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Events in the analysis of EFS included induction failure, death, relapse and secondary malignant neoplasm. The initial status of CNS disease was examined after 7 or 10 days of pre-phase treatment consisted of steroid and/or other drugs. The definition of the CNS status was as follows: CNS positive = CNS-1 with symptomatic CNS disease, CNS-2, CNS -3 and traumatic lumbar puncture (TLP) with leukemic blasts; CNS negative = CNS-1 and TLP without leukemic blasts. In L89-12 study, all but a half of the standard risk group (SR) patients had received CRT. After this study, no CRT was given for the patients in SR. Patients in the intermediate risk group (IR) were randomly assigned into either high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) arm or CRT arm in L92-13 study. In L95-14 study, patients with initial leukocyte count exceeding 50,000/ul received CRT, whereas the others were treated with HD-MTX in IR. A part of patients in the high risk group (HR) in L95-14 study proceeded to stem cell transplantation during the first remission. In L99-15 study, only patients with high WBC, more than 100,000/ul, at diagnosis received CRT. Overall, no increase in CNS relapse was observed. The EFS rate and the OS rate at 8 years in L99-15 study were significantly improved compared to those in L89-12 study. Details of the results are shown in the table. By intensifying systemic chemotherapy and intrathecal injections, the proportion of the patients who received CRT in L99-15, which was the last study, was reduced to as small as 4% without increase in CNS relapse. These remaining 4% of the patients who had received CRT included those with CNS-3 disease (= 0.3 %), and they are the ultimate target who needs innovative treatment. In conclusion, we have succeeded to reduce the proportion of the patients with BCP ALL receiving CRT from 79% to 4% in the past 20 years, without compromising the treatment outcome. Table. Treatment and outcome in each study L89-12 L92-13 L95-14 L99-15 LP: lumbar puncture, IT: intrathecal injection, *randomization, **Pts with WBC higher than 50,000/ul at diagnosis received CRT. ***Pts with WBC higher than 100,000/ul at diagnosis received CRT. Rate of CNS positive 2.0% 3.4% 1.3% 2.1% Date of 1st LP/IT Day8 Day8 Day11 Day8 Rate of Pts receiving CRT 79% 36% 23% 4% Dose of CRT 18Gy 1y:12Gy, 2-18y: 18Gy 1y:12Gy, 2–18y: 18Gy 1–6y:12Gy, 7–18y: 18Gy CNS directed therapy SR*: A; HD-MTX 9g B; CRT IR: CRT HR: CRT SR: HD-MTX 6g IR*: A; HDMTX 6g B; CRT HR: CRT SR: HD-MTX 9g IR**:A;MTX9g B;CRT HR: CRT SR: HD-MTX 9g IR***: HD-MTX 9g (*HD-or LD-Ara-C) HR***: HD-MTX 6g Rate of Pts receiving SCT 0% 0% 15% 8% 8y-EFS 65+/−3% 55+/−3% 76+/−2% 74+/−2% 8y-OS 76+/−2% 79+/−2% 84+/−2% 86+/−2% Rate of BM relapse 25.6% 31.1% 17.6% 18.7% Rate of Isolated CNS relapse 2.6% 0.72% 1.2% 1.5% Rate of all CNS relapse 3.2% 1.4% 1.7% 3.2%
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...