Abstract: Background: Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), with a cumulative incidence of 50% (Arora et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016). Systemic corticosteroids are considered first-line therapy, and best approach to managing steroid-refractory cGVHD is lacking. Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of the extracellular domain of human cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) linked to the modified Fc portion of human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) to prevent complement fixation and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Abatacept is a selective costimulation modulator that binds specifically to CD80 and CD86 on antigen presenting cells, thus attenuating CD28-mediated T cell activation. We previously reported results from a Phase I clinical trial evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of abatacept in patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD (Nahas et al, Blood 2018 #NCT01954979). Here we report results of the phase II study evaluating the overall clinical response rate of abatacept in patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD. Methods: Allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation recipients were eligible if they developed cGVHD as defined by NIH consensus criteria and were treated with prednisone ≥ 0.25 mg/kg/day for at least 4 weeks without complete resolution of signs and symptoms. Peripheral blood was drawn prior to each dose of abatacept and following completion of therapy to assess the effect of treatment on circulating T cells. Abatacept was administered at 10mg/kg for a total of 6 doses. Doses 1-3 were administered at two-week intervals. One month after administration of Dose 3, abatacept was given at four-week intervals for Doses 4-6. Patients who completed 6 doses of abatacept and continued to demonstrate response were eligible to receive extended duration therapy with monthly abatacept at a dose of 10mg/kg for up to a total of 12 additional doses. Primary study endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) of using abatacept in treating cGVHD. Complete response (CR) was defined as resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site, and partial response (PR) was defined as improvement in at least one organ or site without progression in any other organ or site as per the 2014 NIH Chronic GVHD Consensus Response Criteria (Lee et al Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015). Results: 39 subjects with median age of 62 years (range 25-77 years) had undergone HCT a median of 43 months (range 6-173 months) prior to study entry. Patients were treated with abatacept and received a median of 8 doses (range 2-18). 17 patients had moderate cGVHD and 22 patients had severe cGVHD at baseline. Baseline cGVHD assessment of the 39 evaluable patients showed involvement of the skin in 85% (n=33), mouth in 44% (n=17), eyes in 69% (n=27), gastrointestinal tract (GI) in 18% (n=7), liver in 23% (n=9), lung in 54% (n=21), joints in 82% (n=32), and genital tract in 8% (n=3). The ORR was 49% (19/39 patients) with CR 0% and PR 49%. The organ sites with greatest improvement included lung (33%), eyes (23%), mouth (21%), and joints (21%). Progression of disease occurred in 26% of patients (n=10), with sites of involvement including skin (8%), mouth (10%), eyes (5%), lung (3%), and joints (5%). Baseline median daily dose of prednisone was 20mg with a 27.5% reduction at 1-month follow-up to 14.5mg (p & lt;0.01) and 50% reduction at 5-month follow-up to 10mg (p=0.02). The most common adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, headache, and upper respiratory infection (URI). No infusional reactions were observed. Nine events of neutropenia (5 Grade 2 , 2 Grade 3, 2 Grade 4) were reported in four patients. Infections were uncommon and included 1 Grade 2 eye infection, 2 Grade 2 lung infections, 1 Grade 3 lung infection, and 1 Grade 3 urinary tract infection. One patient died within 30 days from receiving the 6 th dose of abatacept due to concurrent HSV hepatitis. Conclusions: Abatacept is associated with a 49% ORR in steroid refractory cGVHD and leads to durable reduction in prednisone dosing over time. Severe infections are uncommon and the infusions are well tolerated. Abatacept represents a promising novel therapeutic agent for patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD. Disclosures Stroopinsky: The Blackstone Group: Consultancy. Arnason: Juno/BMS: Honoraria. Cutler: Cimeio: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Deciphera: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Nikiforow: Kite/Gilead: Other: ad HOC Advisory Boards; Novartis: Other: ad Hoc Advisory Boards; Iovance: Other: ad Hoc Advisory Boards; Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK): Other: ad Hoc Advisory Boards. Avigan: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aviv MedTech Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Legend Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexcel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Soiffer: Rheos Therapeutics, USA: Consultancy; Kiadis, Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics, USA: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Precision Biosciences, USA: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, USA: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Jasper: Consultancy; Gilead, USA: Other: Career Development Award Committee; NMPD - Be the Match, USA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenblatt: Attivare Therapeutics: Consultancy; Parexel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imaging Endpoints: Consultancy; Wolters Kluwer Health: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Abstract: Background Cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) is a life-threatening complication of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) occurring in the first few days after infusion of the stem cell graft prior to administration of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). In the last few years, blockade of IL-6 receptor signaling with tocilizumab has emerged as an effective therapy for Grade 3-4 CRS. As IL-6 mediated signaling is a known regulator of the balance between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and other T cell subsets and has effects on NK cell function, questions remain regarding the effect of the blockade of IL-6 signaling on post-transplant immune cell recovery, engraftment, infection, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and the graft-versus-tumor effect. We report on our experience with the use of tocilizumab to treat CRS, and we address the hypothesis that tocilizumab has no effect on the reconstitution of the post-haploSCT myeloid or lymphoid immune subsets. Methods A retrospective review of haploSCT patients with malignacies treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute during the period of 2010-2019 was undertaken. Data included treatment with tocilizumab, cumulative incidence of NRM and relapse, day+30 and day+100 post-transplant chimerism, laboratory markers of viral and fungal infection, and immune reconstitution data at 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, and 6 months post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS), including competing risk analysis of the cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) with the Fine-Gray model was preformed with EZR. Flow cytometry identification of relevant lymphoid populations was performed with a customized panel that included Treg (CD4+CD25+), Tcon (CD4+) and NK (CD3-CD56+) cells. Comparison of the lymphoid populations between the Tocilizumab-treated subgroup of haploSCT patients and the remaining patients was done with the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test. Results Out of 132 haploSCT patients, 19 received at least one dose of tocilizumab for the treatment of CRS out of whom one patient died from CRS. In tocilizumab-treated patients myeloid engraftment was 100% at day 30 post transplant. Tocilizumab use was not associated with any effect on lymphoid subset reconstitution at any time point post haploSCT (Figure 1A). Specifically, there was no difference in the reconstitution of NK cells (1-month NK: Mann-Whitney U = 120, p = 0.356; 3-month NK: Mann-Whitney U = 130, p = 0.528; 6-month NK: Mann-Whitney U = 110, p = 0.773), Treg (1-month Treg: Mann-Whitney U = 77, p = 0.412; 3-month Treg: Mann-Whitney U = 104, p = 0.203, 6-month Treg: Mann-Whitney U = 80, p = 0.186), or the Treg:Tcon ratio (1-month Treg:Tcon: Mann-Whitney U = 93, p = 0.835; 3-month Treg:Tcon: Mann-Whitney U = 97, p = 0.141; 6-month Treg:Tcon: Mann-Whitney U = 117, p = 0.959). The 1-year OS in the tocilizumab-treated patient subgroup was 62% (95% CI, 36%-80%) while in the rest it was 76% (95%CI, 67%-83%), with no significant difference between the two subgroups (p = 0.13). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse in the tocilizumab-treated subgroup was 19% (95% CI, 4%-42%) while in the rest it was 28% (95% CI, 20%-36%), with no difference between the subgroups (p=0.29). The 1-year NRM in the tocilizumab-treated subgroup was 33% (95% CI, 12%-55%) while in the rest it was 10% (95% CI, 5%-16%), and the difference between subgroups was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Fifty-five percent of patients treated with tocilizumab experienced reactivation of one or more of adenovirus, EBV, CMV or a fungal organism, with 50% of reactivations being CMV and 37% being fungal. Among the tocilizumab-treated patients, 42% experienced any aGVHD with only one patient experiencing Grade 3-4 aGVHD. Conclusions Tocilizumab use is not associated with any effect on post-transplant myeloid engraftment or reconstitution of the Treg, Tcon, and NK cell subsets. Although a significant proportion of tocilizumab-treated patients experienced reactivation of CMV or a fungal organism, the majority of these reactivations were not associated with any clinically significant symptoms. Treatment with tocilizumab was not associated with any significant effect on OS or disease relapse, but the tocilizumab-treated group had a higher NRM than the rest of the haploSCT patients. This association is consistent with prior studies correlating severe CRS with a high NRM, and merits further study. Disclosures Rambaldi: Equillium: Research Funding. Koreth:Amgen: Consultancy; Biolojic Design Inc: Consultancy; Regeneron: Other: Research Support; BMS: Other: Research Support; Cugene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Other: Research Support; Equillium: Consultancy; Moderna Therapeutics: Consultancy; Therakos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Clinigen: Other. Cutler:Medsenic: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nikiforow:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wu:BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Soiffer:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Be The Match/National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other; Juno: Other; Novartis: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Ritz:TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Rheos Medicines: Consultancy; Falcon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Equillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Abstract: Introduction: Veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Defibrotide (DF), a mixture of single and double stranded oligonucleotides with profibrinolytic, anti-thrombotic, anti-ischemic and anti-inflammatory activity was approved by the FDA for the treatment of VOD/SOS in 2016. Prior to its FDA approval, its use was mostly restricted to patients with moderate to severe VOD characterized by multiorgan dysfunction. However, following approval, it has been used more liberally. We herein report a "real world experience" for commercially available DF in patients who developed VOD/SOS at our transplant center. Methods: All patients who received DF for the treatment of VOD/SOS after allogeneic HCT from March 2016 until June 2019 were included in this study. Baseline demographic data were retrieved from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute BMT repository, and chart review was performed to obtain additional information for cases. All received DF 6.25 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours for 21-day cycle for the treatment of VOD/SOS. Patients were diagnosed with VOD/SOS if they met at least 2 of the EBMT criteria; total bilirubin ≥ 2mg/dL, painful hepatomegaly, ascites, weight gain & gt;5% or ultrasonographic evidence of VOD. VOD/SOS severity grading was defined per the EBMT VOD guidelines. Results: Twenty-eight patients received DF for the management of VOD/SOS. Of these, 12, 8, and 8 patients had mild-moderate, severe, and very severe VOD/SOS respectively. Median time to diagnosis of VOD/SOS was day +25 after HCT. Five cases were confirmed by liver biopsy and 16 patients had reversal of flow on ultrasound. Twelve and 16 patients received myeloablative and non-myeloablative regimens respectively. DF was started on the day of diagnosis in 71% of patients. Four patients had received inotuzumab ozogamicin prior to VOD/SOS diagnosis. Twenty-one (75%) patients had resolution of VOD/ SOS, defined by complete resolution of clinical symptoms and improvement of laboratory data ascertained via detailed chart review, at a median of 14 days from starting DF. Patients with very severe VOD/SOS took the longest to respond at a median of 21 days as compared to 10 and 11.5 days in the mild-moderate and severe group, respectively (P=0.04). Survival at 28 and 56 days from VOD/SOS diagnosis was 82% and 71% respectively. In univariable analysis, the presence of pulmonary dysfunction (PD) at VOD/SOS diagnosis and early in the course of VOD/SOS was significantly associated with lack of response. Only 1 out of 7 patients with PD responded (14%) as opposed to 20 out of 21 (95%) patients without PD who responded (p=0.0001). With the median follow up of 18 months from the VOD/SOS onset (range 11,33), 1-year overall survival (OS) was 46% for the entire cohort. Disease severity was not associated with OS (p=0.38) or progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.67) (Figure 1), but response to DF (treated as a time dependent variable in Cox model) was significantly associated with OS (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03, 0.69, P=0.016) and PFS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04, 0.84, P=0.029) (Figure 2). All 7 non-responders died within 3 months of onset. Immediate causes of death in non-responders were VOD/SOS (n=2), grade III/IV gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n=1), relapsed disease (n=1) and sepsis (n=3). Attributed causes of death in responders were grade III/IV gut/liver graft versus host disease (n=2), relapsed disease (n=2), sepsis (n=2) and respiratory failure (n=1). Possible therapy-related adverse events were uncommon but included grade III/IV gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n=1), grade III/IV pulmonary hemorrhage (n=1), gross hematuria (n=6) and grade 3 hypotension (n=2), and proved generally manageable. Importantly, 1 out of 4 patients who received inotuzumab ozogamicin did not respond to DF and subsequently died from sepsis, considered unrelated to DF therapy. Conclusion: We report a real world experience of DF post-FDA approval in the USA from 2016 -2019. The majority of our patients received DF as soon as VOD/SOS was diagnosed. We found that use of DF was associated with complete resolution of VOD/SOS in 75% of all patients meeting the EBMT criteria treated with DF. Our overall survival outcomes are encouraging; particularly among responders without severe adverse events. Our results favor early identification and initiation of DF in VOD/SOS after HCT. Disclosures Richardson: Celgene/BMS, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Soiffer:Gilead: Consultancy; Juno: Other; Celgene: Other; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Be The Match/National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cutler:Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medsenic: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nikiforow:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Koreth:Biolojic Design Inc: Consultancy; Regeneron: Other: Research Support; Cugene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Other: Research Support; BMS: Other: Research Support; Amgen: Consultancy; Equillium: Consultancy; Moderna Therapeutics: Consultancy; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Clinigen: Other.

Abstract: Introduction: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS) is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that is triggered, at least in part, by conditioning regimen-induced sinusoidal endothelial cell injury. VOD is thus commonly, but not exclusively, associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The incidence of VOD in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT was ≈2% in a single center series (Carreras et al. BBMT 2011), and risk factors for VOD in RIC HSCT remain poorly defined. Methods: We performed a retrospective review to confirm all cases of VOD among patients undergoing RIC HSCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center between January 2007 and June 2017. Diagnosis of VOD was based on modified Seattle or Baltimore criteria and/or liver biopsy or RUQ ultrasound in conjunction with fluid retention/ascites and hepatomegaly/RUQ pain. Diagnosis dates for all VOD cases were confirmed and clinico-laboratory values collected in the 10 days preceding the diagnosis. The same data were collected for a randomly selected control non-VOD RIC cohort, calculated from the median day of VOD onset derived from the cases. Acute kidney injury was defined as an absolute increase in creatine by 0.3 mg/dL or a relative increase of 〉 50% within a 48-hour period. Increased platelet transfusion requirement was defined as requiring a platelet transfusion on 2 consecutive days in the 7 days prior to VOD diagnosis, excluding transfusions for procedures. Incidence of VOD at D50 was calculated using a competing risk framework. Cox regression was used to identify significant features for predicting VOD. Survival was compared to a concurrent cohort of 76 patients with VOD after MAC HSCT recently published from our center (Roeker et al. BBMT 2018). Results: A total of 1492 patients underwent RIC HSCT, of whom 1070 (67.8%) received sirolimus (Sir) with tacrolimus (Tac) as part of the GVHD prophylaxis, and 1217 (82%) received intravenous busulfan(Bu) 3.2 or 6.4mg/kg with fludarabine(Flu) as conditioning. Twenty-six developed VOD (median day of diagnosis = d+26, range 5-48 days), for a cumulative incidence of 1.6% (95%CI 1.1%-2.4%). The median bilirubin at diagnosis was 1.1 mg/dL(range 0.6-5.2). Only 5 (19.2%) patients had a bilirubin of ≥2.0 mg/dL on the date of VOD diagnosis, although total bilirubin peaked at ≥ 2 mg/dL in 17 of 26 (65.4%). VOD was mild/moderate in 16 and severe in 10 patients. Sixteen had received ursodiol as VOD prophylaxis. Defibrotide was used as treatment in 17 cases. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 54% from VOD onset. VOD was associated with increased risk for NRM (HR 4.02, 95% CI 2.1-7.7, p 〈 0.0001), but not OS (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.9-2.6, p= 0.11), PFS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.9-2.4, p= 0.17) or relapse (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.3-1.5, p= 0.35). Compared to patients who developed VOD after MAC, OS at 2 years after VOD was better in RIC patients (54% vs. 28%, p=0.04). Use of ursodiol was not associated with any reduction in VOD incidence. In the multivariable model, the only significant risk factor for VOD was use of Sir with Tac for GVHD prophylaxis (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.26-12.17). Among RIC Bu/Flu patients who received Tac/Sir based GVHD prophylaxis, 18/877 (2.1%) developed VOD, compared to 1/351 (0.28%) in RIC Bu/Flu patients without Sir, p 〈 0.01. To assess clinico-laboratory predictors of VOD patients in the 10 days prior to VOD diagnosis, we compared the 26 VOD cases to 65 randomly selected control RIC patients. The groups were well matched with regards to baseline characteristics. In the 10 days prior to VOD diagnosis (or D+26 for controls), VOD patients were significantly more likely to develop acute kidney injury, peak creatinine 〉 1, increasing platelet transfusion requirements, and increasing Tac and Sir trough levels (Table 1, Fig 1). Conclusions: The incidence of VOD in this large modern cohort of 1492 RIC HSCT patients was 1.6%, and was associated with the use of Sir with Tac. Onset of VOD in RIC patients was delayed (median D+26 vs. D+14) and 2 yr-OS is superior compared to MAC patients. Only 19% of the RIC VOD cases met the bilirubin threshold for Baltimore and Seattle criteria at diagnosis, suggesting that the rise in bilirubin is a later event in these RIC VOD cases, whereas increasing platelet transfusion requirements, sudden rise in Tac and Sir levels, elevated serum creatinine and acute renal injury appear to be early clinical predictors. Disclosures Nikiforow: Kite Pharma: Consultancy. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Abstract: Background Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic stem cell transplant has a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Cytokine-induced memory like natural killer (CIML NK) cells are a novel therapy with enhanced cytotoxicity independent of KIR ligand interactions able to induce remission of relapsed/refractory AML (Romee et al, Science TM 2016). We are evaluating the safety and potential efficacy of donor-derived CIML NK cells in patients with relapsed myeloid malignancies after haploidentical donor transplant (haploSCT) in a phase 1/1b study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT040247761). Here we report on manufacturing, safety, and in vivo correlative biology of the adoptively transferred CIML NK cells in the first 3 enrolled patients. Methods The primary endpoint is to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of CIML NK cells in patients with MDS, MPN, or AML who relapsed after haplo-SCT. NK cells were enriched from donor-derived non-mobilized leukapheresis product via two-step CD3 depletion followed by selection of CD56+ cells using the CliniMACS reagent system (Miltenyi Biotec). The enriched NK cell product was cultured for 12-16 hours in X-VIVO 15 media containing rhIL-12, rhIL-15, and rhIL-18 to generate CIML NK cells (Figure 1A). Patients in the current cohort were lymphodepleted with fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily for 3-5 days and cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg daily for 2 days followed by CIML NK cells at a dose of 5-10 x 106 cells/kg and IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. Dose-limiting toxicities were evaluated for 6 weeks following NK cell infusion. Response to therapy was assessed at day+28 following CIML NK cell infusion. Results Patient #001 has FLT3-ITD AML that relapsed 5 months after a reduced intensity (RIC) haploSCT. She received 7.4x106 NK cells/kg followed by IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. Her day+28 bone marrow had no leukemia blasts although FLT3-ITD mutation remained detectable. Two months post-CIML NK the leukocyte and granulocyte chimerism were 88% and 89%, respectively. Patient #002 has AML with multiple pathogenic variants, including a potentially pathogenic variant in TP53. His disease relapsed 15 months post haplo-SCT with repeat marrow showing all the original mutations, including the TP53 variant (VAF 50.5%). He received 9.5x106 NK cells/kg followed by IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. His day+28 marrow had trilineage hematopoiesis without any mutations, including no TP53 mutation (Figure 1B). Two months post-CIML NK the leukocyte and granulocyte chimerism were both 99%. Patient #003 has MDS whose disease relapsed 8 months post RIC haploSCT with persistence of all her diagnostic pathogenic mutations. She received approximately 9.2x106 NK cells/kg and has only just completed IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. Among the 3 patients, the main toxicity was prolonged cytopenia requiring stem cell boost in one case. Donor NK cells demonstrated a dramatic shift from a predominantly CD56dimCD16hi (88% of NK cells) to a CD56dimCD16lo phenotype (49% of NK cells) as CIML NK cells. Infused CIML NK cells expanded massively, with approximately 50-fold, 10-fold, and 15-fold maximum in vivo expansion in the first three patients, respectively (Figure 1C). CIML NK cells were the major population in the day+28 marrows in both patients #001 and #002, with CD56+CD7+ cells constituting 89% of the cellularity in the former and 48% in the latter (Figure 1C). CIML NK cells persisted for 3 and 6 months post-infusion in the first two patients. The NK cells were predominantly mature, with most expressing CD16 and low levels of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A. PD-1 expression was much lower on the expanded NK cells vs the pre-infusion donor-derived NK cells. There was minimal concurrent expansion of CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells (Figure 1D). Conclusion We show with the first 3 patients in this trial that CIML NK cells can be generated and infused safely, can expand massively in the peripheral blood and bone marrow within the first 30 days post-infusion, and can persist for several months. In addition, CIML NK cell infusion can reduce the burden of pathogenic variant alleles to below the limit of detection, including the burden of high-risk mutations such as in TP53. Though our results are preliminary, the massive in vivo expansion and long-term persistence of adoptively transferred CIML NK cells underscores the unique biology of these cells that makes them an attractive option for cellular therapy protocols. Disclosures Nikiforow: Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rambaldi:Equillium: Research Funding. Cutler:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medsenic: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Koreth:Cugene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Other: Research Support; Clinigen: Other; Miltenyi: Other: Research Support; BMS: Other: Research Support; Therakos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equillium: Consultancy; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Biolojic Design Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Moderna Therapeutics: Consultancy. Wu:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Soiffer:Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Consultancy; Be the Match/ National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ritz:TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Rheos Medicines: Consultancy; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Equillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Falcon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Abstract: CD6 is a co-stimulatory receptor expressed on T cells that binds activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM), a ligand expressed on antigen presenting cells and various epithelial and endothelial tissues. The CD6-ALCAM pathway plays an integral role in modulating T cell activation, proliferation and trafficking and is central to inflammation. Early studies by Soiffer et al. demonstrated that ex vivo depletion of CD6+ donor cells prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) decreased the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), highlighting the importance of CD6+ cells in GVHD pathogenesis. Itolizumab, a humanized anti-CD6 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to modulate T cell activation and proliferation. The aim of this study was to characterize: (1) expression of CD6 and ALCAM, and (2) activity of itolizumab on T cell responses in peripheral blood from HCT patients pre- and post-aGvHD. We analyzed immune reconstitution in 31 adult patients who underwent HLA matched donor HCT for hematological malignancies. Patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts and GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate. Twelve of 31 patients developed aGVHD at a median of 58 days, range 27-208, after HCT and systemic treatment was started in 83% of these cases. aGVHD grade severity was 25%, 58.3% and 16.7% of grade I, II and IV, respectively. Patient samples were collected at 1, 2 and 3 months after HCT and analyzed using multi-color flow cytometry. Nine healthy donors (HD) were analyzed as controls. Suppressive activity of itolizumab was tested using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from HD and patients before (preGVHD) and after (postGVHD) aGvHD onset (within 30 days). PBMC were stimulated with antiCD3/CD2/CD28 coated beads in the presence of itolizumab or isotype control (cetuximab) for 72 hours. T cell proliferation was measured by CFSE dilution, while T cell activation and maturation was measured by expression of CD25 and CD45RO, respectively. For statistical analysis, non-parametric unpaired (Mann-Whitney) or paired (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank) test were used. CD6+ T cells reconstituted early after transplant, accounting for 95% of positive CD3 T cells, range 57-100 at 1 month. Similar to HD PBMC, in the first 3 months after HCT, CD4 Tcon had the highest CD6 expression, while CD4 Treg had a lower CD6 expression compared to both CD4 Tcon and CD8 T cells (Fig 1A and 1B). To characterize the expression of CD6 on different T cell subsets, we used a t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm and visualized the data using a viSNE map (Fig 1C). Within the Tcon compartment, there were no differences in expression of CD6 between HD and patients at all 3 time points. Within CD4 Treg and CD8 T cells, CD6 expression was reduced in naïve CD8 T cells and CM Treg after transplant compared to HD. In HD, ALCAM expression was detected in 35% of CD14+ monocytes, 23% of CD19+ B cells, 20% of myeloid (CD11c+ CD123-) DCs and 97% of plasmacytoid (CD11c-CD123+) DCs. After HCT, expression of ALCAM in DC compartments was similar to HD. In functional studies, itolizumab inhibited CD4 and CD8 T cell proliferation in preGVHD samples, similar to HD controls. This effect was less prominent in samples collected from patients who had developed GVHD and were already receiving immunosuppressive medications, potentially confounding the ability to assess the effect of itolizumab in this assay (Fig 2A). Similar results were observed for CD25 (Fig 2B) and CD45RO (Fig 2C) expression pre- and post-aGVHD. Finally, itolizumab did not increase rates of cell death in samples from HCT patients as assessed by Annexin V expression, suggesting that itolizumab-mediated T cell inhibition was not due to increased T cell apoptosis. There was a slight increase in Annexin V expression in HD vs isotype control (21%, range 10-43 vs 15%, range 11-31, p= 0.0273). In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time that CD6+ T cells reconstitute rapidly in peripheral blood after HCT and that CD6 expression is highest in Tcon while lowest in Treg (Tcon 〉 CD8 〉 Treg). Itolizumab efficiently inhibits T cell proliferation and activation after in vitro TCR stimulation of PBMC from aGvHD patients, thus representing a potential therapeutic for treating aGvHD. A phase I/II study using itolizumab as first line treatment in combination with steroids for patients with aGVHD is currently ongoing (NCT03763318). Disclosures Rambaldi: Equillium: Research Funding. Koreth:Amgen: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Equillium: Consultancy. Cutler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; BiolineRx: Other: DSMB; Cellect: Other: DSMB; Kalytera: Other: DSMB; ElsaLys: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy. Nikiforow:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; NKarta: Honoraria. Ho:Omeros Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Soiffer:Jazz: Consultancy; Gilead, Mana therapeutic, Cugene, Jazz: Consultancy; Juno, kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB; Cugene: Consultancy; Mana therapeutic: Consultancy; Kiadis: Other: supervisory board. Ampudia:Equillium: Employment. Ng:Equillium: Employment, Equity Ownership. Connelly:Equillium: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ritz:Equillium: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Aleta Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Draper Labs: Consultancy.

Abstract: Steroid-refractory chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic transplantation. Abatacept is a selective co-stimulation modulator, used for the treatment of rheumatologic disease, and was recently the first drug to be approved by the FDA for the prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease. We conducted a Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of Abatacept in steroid-refractory cGVHD (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01954979). The overall response rate was 58%, with all responders achieving a partial response. Abatacept was well-tolerated with few serious infectious complications. Immune correlative studies showed a decrease in IL-1-alpha, IL-21, and TNF-alpha as well as decreased PD-1 expression by CD4+ T cells in all patients after treatment with Abatacept, demonstrating the effect of this drug on the immune microenvironment. The results demonstrate that Abatacept is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cGVHD.