GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (3)
  • Mun, Yeung-Chul  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Hematology  (3)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 4035-4035
    Abstract: Introduction T-cell lymphoma is a group of heterogeneous diseases with various clinical behaviors and treatment outcomes, representing 10-15% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Owing to its rarity and heterogeneity, the standard treatment approach for T-cell lymphoma is still not established. Accordingly, conventional chemotherapy regimens adapted from B-cell lymphoma treatment has been used for T-cell lymphoma. However, their outcome is still not satisfactory, and there are limited data representing the real-world situation in terms of clinical features and treatment outcomes. Given the incidence of T-cell lymphoma is relatively higher in Asian than Western countries; a comprehensive registry study focusing on Asian patients with T-cell lymphoma could be helpful for better understanding of T-cell lymphoma as well as the development of more effective treatment strategy. Methods We performed a multi-national, multi-center, prospective registry study for patients with T-cell lymphoma and enrolled patients between 01-March-2016 and 31-January-2019. All patients received chemotherapy with curative intent after diagnosis, and were pathologically diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma according to the 2008 World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Patients belonged to any one of following clinical situations could be enrolled: (1) newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients; (2) patients who started treatment or completed treatment; (3) relapsed or refractory patients. After we enrolled the planned number of patients (n = 500), we analyzed clinical features and treatment outcomes. Results Out of 500 patients enrolled from nine Asian countries (Korea, China, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, Bangladeshi, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Philippines), 490 patients were analyzed because 10 patients with insufficient information were excluded. The median age was 59 years (range, 20-85), male patients (59%) were predominant compared to female patients (41%). Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) was the most common (28%) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) was the second common (24%). Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not-otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, 20%) and ALK+/- anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL, 16%) were also major subtypes of T-cell lymphoma. The proportion of stage IV was 40%, however, the distribution of stage was different between ENKTL and nodal T-cell lymphomas such as PTCL-NOS. The CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or CHOP-like regimens accounted for the mainstay of primary treatment for nodal T-cell lymphoma whereas non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens such as SMILE (steroid, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase, and etoposide) and GemOx-L (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and L-asparagainase) were mainly used for ENKTL. The overall survival of ENKTL was not significantly different from that of PTCL-NOS, AITL and ALK+/- ALCL. Conclusions Our study showed the distribution of T-cell lymphoma subtypes and tumor burdens at the time of diagnosis in Asian countries. Although clinical features of ENKTL are different from that of nodal T-cell lymphomas consisting of PTCL-NOS, AITL and ALK+/- ALCL, and the different types of treatment were used, survival outcome of patients were not significantly different. This finding might be associated with improved treatment outcomes of ENKTL compared to the past. However, considering a substantial number of patients experienced treatment failure in patients with PTCL-NOS as well as ENKTL, more effective treatment strategy should be warranted. Figure Disclosures Kim: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; J + J: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 4421-4421
    Abstract: Introduction Although several previous studies addressed the role of radiation in treating localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), chemotherapy alone has shown promising efficacy with the emergence of Rituximab. Thus, we evaluated the clinical efficacy outcomes and failure patterns of patients with localized DLBCL according to two different treatment strategies, either 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone or 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by involved field radiotherapy (IFRT). Methods A prospectively collected database from 21 tertiary centers participating the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL), built up for PROCESS study (NCT01202448) for secondary central nervous system involvement in DLBCL, was recruited for current study in addition to the Asan Medical Center (AMC) Lymphoma Registry. CISL database and AMC lymphoma registry consisted of data from patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between August 2010 and August 2012, and between February 2004 and February 2012, respectively. Inclusion criteria were localized (stage I or II), non-bulky ( 〈 10cm in longest diameter) DLBCL treated with R-CHOP as 1st line chemotherapy, and patients either who received 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy only (R-CHOP alone group) or received 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy followed by IFRT (R-CHOP plus RT group). Comparisons of clinicopathologic parameters, clinical outcomes and the patterns of relapse were performed between two groups. The types of relapse were classified as either locoregional or distant, according to whether it involves any separate region from primary sites. Efficacy outcomes included complete response (CR) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate. Results A total of 357 patients (CISL prospective cohort: 161 patients, AMC registry: 196 patients) were eligible for the analyses. Two hundred ninety nine patients (83.5%) received 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone, and 58 patients (16.2%) underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT. Median age was 54 years (range, 16-87). During the median follow-up of 24 months (range, 4-116 months), 35 patients (9.8%) experienced relapse, and 22 patients (6.1%) died. Two-year OS and EFS rate was 94.7% and 89.9%, respectively, and 345 out of 357 patients (96.6%) achieved CR. Comparing R-CHOP alone to R-CHOP plus RT group, there was no significant difference in clinicopathologic parameters. R-CHOP alone could achieve significantly higher CR rate of 97.7 % than 91.4% of R-CHOP plus RT group (p = 0.030). Two-year OS and EFS were significantly longer in R-CHOP alone group than R-CHOP plus RT group (96.1 vs 89.9 %, p = 0.029 and 91.7% vs 81.8%, p= 0.028) (Figure 1). Relapse rate was significantly lower in R-CHOP alone group compared with R-CHOP plus RT group than group (7.4% vs 22.4%, p=0.001), and distant relapses were also significantly lower (15.5% vs 2.7%, p 〈 0.001). In addition, even only in relapsed patients, R-CHOP alone group showed lower incidence of distant relapses with marginal statistical significance (36.4% vs 69.2 %, p=0.062) (Table 1). Conclusion In our cohort, R-CHOP alone for six to eight cycles without IFRT could achieve significantly higher 2-year OS and EFS rate as well as CR compared with R-CHOP plus RT group. In addition, the rate of relapse and systemic failure were significantly lower in R-CHOP alone group, which altogether warrant further validation in prospective trial. Table 1. Explorative comparison of overall clinical outcomes and patterns of relapse between two subgroups: patients who underwent six or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and who underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT Total (%) R-CHOP alone group (%) R-CHOP plus RT group (%) P -value Number of patients 357 (100) 299 (83.5) 58 (16.2) Treatment response Complete response 345 (96.6) 292 (97.7) 53 (91.4) 0.030 Overall response 351 (98.3) 294 (98.3) 57 (98.3) 1.000 Rate of relapse 35 (9.8%) 14 (7.4) 11 (22.4) 〈 0.001 Median time to relapse (95% CI) 11 (7-15) 11 (8-14) 10 (5-14) 0.346 Pattern of relapse 〈 0.001 (0.062) Locoregional 14 (4.7) (63.6) 4 (6.9) (30.8) Distant 8 (2.7) (36.4) 9 (15.5) (69.2) Figure 1. Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival in two subgroups: patients who underwent six or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and who underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT Figure 1. Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival in two subgroups: patients who underwent six or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and who underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 1786-1786
    Abstract: Abstract 1786 Background: Six to Eighth cycles of R-CHOP (Rituximab + cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisolone) has been widely used as standard regimen for the advanced stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the optimal dose and number of rituximab application have not been determined to date. According to the recent German DENSE-R-CHOP-14 trial, additional use of rituximab (12th dose of rituximab) showed increased complete remission (CR) rate in high risk DLBCL patients. Based upon the promising results of DENSE-R-CHOP-14 chemotherapy in DLBCL, we have been investigated the efficacy and safety of additional 1st cycle Rituximab + 8th cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy (R+8th R-CHOP, every 3 weeks) in patients with previously untreated stage III/IV or bulky DLBCL. Methods: 92 patients with advanced stage DLBCL (Bulky stage II or Stage III or IV) from 21 institutions received 8th cycles of R-CHOP-21 with additional rituximab on days 0 of 1st cycle between January 2009 and December 2009. The primary endpoint was complete response rate after 3rd cycles of treatment. Among 92 patents who were initially enrolled this study, 14 patients had no response data after 3rd cycles of chemotherapy (3 refuse consent, 2 early death, 7 no evaluation, 1 transfer to other institution, 1 serious toxicity). The DLBCL patients who were treated with 6–8th cycles of R-CHOP-21 will be analyzed for historical control data. The trial is registered on National Cancer Institute website, number NCT01054781. Results: Fifty two patients (56.5%) were older than 60 years (median age; 63); 16 (17.4%) had a poor performance status (ECOG 3 2); 64 (69.6%) had an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and 89 (93.5%) had stage III/IV disease. According to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), 5 (5.4%) patients had low risk, 28 (30.4%) had low–intermediate risk, 43 (46.7%) had high–intermediate risk, and 16 (17.4%) had high risk disease. According to the revised IPI, 33 (35.9%) patients had good prognostic group (IPI score 1–2), and 59 (64.1%) patients had poor prognostic group (IPI score 3–5). Among the 78 evaluable DLBCL patients, complete remission (CR) rate was 42.3% (33/78) after 3rd cycles of chemotherapy. Response rate after 3rd cycles of chemotherapy was 96.2% (42.3% CR + 53.8% partial remission). CR were observed in 80% (4/5) of low IPI patients, 65.2% (15/23) of low intermediate IPI, 32.4% (12/37) of high intermediate IPI and 15.3% (2/13) of high IPI (P = 0.087). And CR also observed in 67.9% (19/28) of the patients with good revised IPI and 28% (14/50) of the patients with poor revised IPI (P = 0.007). Infection was one of the most frequent 3 grade 3 adverse events (17/92; 18.5%). Two (2.2%) treatment related deaths (infection) were observed. Other grade 3 and 4 adverse events were occurred as follows; neutropenia (47.8%), anemia (13.1%), thrombocytopenia (5.4%), generalized weakness (6.5%), diarrhea (3.3%), anorexia (2.2%), abdominal pain (2.2%), neuropathy (1.1%) and muscle pain (1.1%). Conclusion: The addition of rituximab on days 0 of 1st cycle of R-CHOP to the standard 8th cycles of R-CHOP-21 for advanced DLBCL showed acceptable response rates after 3rd cycles of chemotherapy and acceptable toxicities. We will evaluate the long-term follow up results and the comparison analysis with historical controls receiving standard R-CHOP-21. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...