GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Mori, Tsuyoshi  (4)
  • Shimizu, Tomoharu  (4)
  • Yamamoto, Hiroshi  (4)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 4_suppl ( 2012-02-01), p. 116-116
    Abstract: 116 Background: About half of patients with serosa-invasive gastric cancer develop peritoneal recurrence and die of this disease even if curative resections performed. This prospective phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with three anticancer drugs in patients with curative resection of clinically T3 or T4 serosa-invasive advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients age 75 years or younger with curative resection of clinically T3 or T4 advanced gastric cancer were eligible for this nonrandomized phase II trial. After the curative resection of gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection, HIPEC was carried out for 30 minutes with 50mg of CDDP, 10mg of MMC, and 1000mg of 5-FU in 5 L saline maintained at 42-43C°. Patients were given an adjuvant S-1 treatment after surgery. Primary endpoint of this study was overall survival. Second end points included safety and recurrence rate. Results: A total of 50 patients were eligible between January 2002 and December 2010. Pathologically, 12 patients had sub-serosal invasion (pT2(ss)), 35 patients had serosal invasion (pT3), and 3 patients had adjacent organ invasion (pT4). Median follow-up period was 52 months (12-104 months). Overall 5-year survival rate in all eligible patients was 89.9%. Overall 5-year survival rate in patients with stage IB (n=4), stage II (n=12), stage IIIA (n=18), or stage IIIB (n=16) was 100%, 100%, 90.9%, or 76.2%, respectively. Only one patient (2.0%) had peritoneal recurrences. Four patients (8.0%) with pN2 had lymphatic recurrences. A total of 13 patients had postoperative complications such as minor pancreatic fistula (Grade A) (10.0%), abdominal abscess (4.0%), leakage of the anastomosis (8.0%), and pneumonia (6.0%). All patients recovered without any surgical interventions. None of patients needed for the treatment in the Intensive Care Units after HIPEC. Conclusions: Intra-operative HIPEC with three anticancer drugs following curative resection of advanced gastric cancer improves overall survival with an inhibition of peritoneal recurrence and an acceptable morbidity.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e12014-e12014
    Abstract: e12014 Background: The objective of this study was to compare the potential advantages of the harmonic scalpel with those of electrocautery for axillary lymph node dissection in breast surgery. Methods: A prospective randomized study of axillary lymph node dissection procedures performed between March 2011 and September 2012 was conducted. Primary breast cancer patients with axillary node-positive status (n = 25) were randomly assigned to the harmonic scalpel (group A, n = 13) or electrocautery (group B, n = 12) groups.The patients underwent breast-conservation surgery or mastectomy with a level I and II axillary dissection, which was performed by one surgeon. The time required for resection and the blood loss during the lymphadenectomy were recorded. The HARMONIC FOCUS (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) was used as the ultrasonic scalpel. A low-pressure vacuum drain was placed in the axilla and removed when the drainage volume reduced to less than 50 ml over 24 hours. After the operations, the patients were assessed for the presence of seroma in an outpatient setting. Results: Resection timein group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (mean, 28.6 ± 5.1 vs. 40.3 ± 5.6 min; P = 0.0001). Similarly, blood loss in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (mean, 7.9 ± 5.3 vs. 22.9 ± 11.5 ml; P = 0.001). Duration of drain placement in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (mean, 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 0.9 days; P = 0.01), and the seroma rate in group A was lower than that in group B (23% vs. 66%; P = 0.04). Conclusions: For axillary lymph node dissection, the harmonic scalpel is more effective in terms of resection time, blood loss, duration of drain placement, and postoperative seroma formation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 4050-4050
    Abstract: 4050 Background: We recently showed that cancer cells, with proliferative and tumorigenic potential, can spill into the peritoneal cavity during curative (R0) gastric cancer (GC) surgery, which is associated with peritoneal recurrence (PM). To elucidate the pathophysiology of PM, the relationship between spilled cancer cells and cancer stem cells was evaluated. Furthermore, to identify a therapeutic strategy for PM, the prognostic impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following GC surgery with spillage of cancer cells was evaluated. Methods: Patients with advanced GC (≥pT2 [MP]) who underwent R0 gastrectomy between 2010 and 2015 were enrolled. Ninety-four consecutive patients with negative results in peritoneal cytology and cancer cell culture (CCC [-] ) following peritoneal washing (PW) before GC surgery were included. Spilled cancer cells in PW after GC surgery (PW-Post) were examined to identify any CD44-positive cancer stem-like cells associated with cancer metastasis. Based on the PW-Post CCC results, associations between HIPEC and recurrence-free survival (RFS), or overall survival (OS) were evaluated. HIPEC was performed following GC surgery using CDDP, MMC, and 5-FU in 5 L saline maintained at 42 ˚ C for 30 min. Results: Spilled cancer cells included CD44 + cancer stem-like cells. In 48 patients with PW-Post positive CCC (CCC [+]), the number of patients with pStage I, II, and III were 4, 7, and 15, respectively, in those who received HIPEC (n = 26), and 3, 9, and 10, respectively, in those who did not (n = 22). Among patients with CCC (+), the 5-year peritoneal RFS, hepatic RFS, and lymph node RFS rates were 93.3%, 100%, and 68.5%, respectively, in patients who received HIPEC, and 56.7%, 35.6%, and 66.7%, respectively, in those who did not ( P = 0.008, P = 0.008, and P= 0.24, respectively). Among patients with PW-Post CCC (-), none developed recurrence, regardless of whether they received HIPEC (n = 28) or not (n = 18). Conclusions: The results show that PW-Post CCC is a promising predictive biomarker for recurrence after R0 GC surgery. Adjuvant HIPEC performed with R0 GC surgery showed preventive effects on peritoneal and hepatic recurrence and survival benefits for patients with PW-Post CCC (+).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Breast Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 22, No. 2 ( 2015-3), p. 117-128
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1340-6868 , 1880-4233
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2394259-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...