GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • Molina Collada, J.  (3)
  • Nieto, J. C.  (3)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    BMJ ; 2020
    In:  Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Vol. 79, No. Suppl 1 ( 2020-06), p. 1514.1-1515
    In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, BMJ, Vol. 79, No. Suppl 1 ( 2020-06), p. 1514.1-1515
    Kurzfassung: Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) is characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of the exocrine glands and marked B-lymphocytic cell hyperreactivity involving a variety of serum autoantibodies. 1 Salivary Gland Ultrasound (SGU) is a simple, fast, and well- tolerated examination, wich provides information about glandular structure and has proven to be very useful in the Sjögren Syndrome diagnosis 2 . A prognostic value has also been proposed due to its posible relationship with lymphomas and extra-glandular manifestations. Objectives: The objective of our study is to evaluate ultrasound results in patients who went through an SGU in clinical practice, its usefulness in the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome and the presence of complications (lymphomas, extra-glandular manifestations or factors related to increased lymphoma risk). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study with review of clinical records that included all those patients coded as SGU in the Ultrasound unit of Rheumatology Department from 2016 to December 2019. Information collected included final diagnosis, laboratory results, clinical manifestations and ultrasound results. We performed an analysis on the frequency of pathological SGU and on the relationship between this lesions in patients with final SS diagnosis and the presence of lymphoma, extra-glandular manifestations and the laboratory values related with increased lymphoma risk (low complement levels, cryoglobulinemia, positive autoimmunity). Results: SGU was performed in 171 patients in four years, 162 women (94.7%). The previous diagnoses, reason for the request and final diagnosis are shown in Table 1. The vast majority of the SGU were normal, only 28 (16,3%) were pathological, 13 with a grade II and 8 with a grade III. In the other 7 patients grading was not available. Of the 28 patients with pathological SGU, none had lymphoma, only 3 had recurrent parotitis and 15 had had extra-glandular manifestations, mainly arthralgia / arthritis (12). Only 1 patient, with rheumatoid arthritis, had had a lymphoma and the SGU was normal. Antibody positivity was frequent in pathological SGU, 16/23 antinuclear antibodies, 13/22 anti-Ro and 9/23 rheumatoid factor. Of the 86 patients without previous diagnosis, 18 were diagnosed with Sjogren syndrome, 9 with pathological SGU and the rest were normal. No patient diagnosed with a dry non-autoimmune syndrome presented pathological SGU. Table 1. Previous diagnoses, reason for request and final diagnoses. Previous diagnoses (n: 171) Reason for request (n: 171) Final diagnosis (n: 78) Without prior diagnosis (n: 86) Dry non- autoinmune syndrome (n: 127) Dry non-autoimmune syndrome (n: 60) Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (n: 11) Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (n: 12) Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (n: 18) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (n: 9) Lymphoma (n: 0) Secondary Sjögren’s syndrome (n: 0) Rheumatoid arthritis (n: 24) Control (n: 13) Other diagnoses (n: 7) Other diagnoses (n: 18) Other reasons (n: 11) Conclusion: The impact of the SGU is low and its use cannot, for now, displace other methods (e.g. salivary gland biopsy) in the diagnosis of SS. Also our low number of patients with pathological SGU together with the low prevalence of the complications studied (e.g. lymphomas = 1) prevents the expected comparisons. References: [1]Ramos-Casals M, Solans R, Rosas J, et al. Primary Sjogren syndrome in Spain: clinical and immunologic expression in 1010 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2008; 87: 210–219. [2]Damjanov N, Milic V, Nieto-Gonzalez JC, et al. Multiobserver Reliability of Ultrasound Assessment of Salivary Glands in Patients with Established Primary Sjogren Syndrome. J Rheumatology 2016; 43: 1858–1863. Disclosure of Interests: Fernando Montero: None declared, Karen Carpio: None declared, Iustina Janta: None declared, Juan Molina Collada: None declared, Belén Serrano Benavente: None declared, Julia Martínez-Barrio Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Alfonso Ariza: None declared, Javier Rivera: None declared, Carlos Gonzalez Consultant of: Gilead, Janssen, Novartis,, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Indalecio Monteagudo: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0003-4967 , 1468-2060
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: BMJ
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 1481557-6
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, BMJ, Vol. 79, No. Suppl 1 ( 2020-06), p. 1402.2-1403
    Kurzfassung: Patients with inflammatory arthralgia (IA) are considered to be at increased risk for progression to RA. US has shown high sensitivity to detect synovitis compared with physical examination. Thus, US is recommended to identify subclinical synovitis in patients without clinical signs of inflammation. Objectives: The objective of our study is to determine the frequency and pattern of US detected inflammatory findings in patients with IA and investigate factors contributing to predict these findings. Methods: An US clinic is scheduled in an academic center running three days every week. A retrospective analysis of our US unit cohort during a period of 6 months was undertaken. Patients with IA and no previous diagnosis of inflammatory arthropathies were included for analysis. Inclusion criteria of IA definition included: severe symptoms presenting in the morning, duration of morning stiffness ≥60 min, symptoms predominantly located in MCP joints and abscense of clinically detected synovitis by the referral rheumatologist. The following routinely collected variables were included in the analysis: demographics, clinical features and laboratory tests. Patients underwent bilateral US examination in GS and PD mode of hands and/or feet according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines. The presence of synovitis, tenosynovitis and enthesitis was assessed on a semi quantitative scale (0–3) for Grey Scale(GS)/Power Doppler(PD) or using enthesitis OMERACT definition, respectively. Patients were stratified in two groups based on the presence of US inflammatory findings (synovitis, tenosynovitis or enthesitis with PD signal). First, differences between groups were tested using chi-squared and Student-t tests in the univariate analysis. Second, multivariate logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association between possible predictive factors of US detected inflammatory findings. Results: A total of 57 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 55.8±15.2 years, 41 (71.9%) were females, and mean symptoms duration was 11.4±10.4 months (Table 1). A total of 42 (73.7%) patients presented with a polyarticular arthralgia pattern. US inflammatory findings were present in 20 (35.1%) patients (26.3% PD synovitis, 21.1% PD tenosynovitis and 3.5% PD enthesitis). Hands were most commonly involved with PD synovitis at wrists in 19.3% and at MCP in 12.3% of patients (Table 2). For PD tenosynovitis, the flexor MCP 2-5 (5.3%) and compartment IV tenosynovitis (1.8 %) were the most frequent affected locations. Only two patients had PD enthesitis at feet and 6 (10.5%) had erosions in hands or feet at baseline examination. In the univariate analysis, the higher ESR values and the shorter time from symptoms onset were significantly associated with US detected inflammatory findings (p=0.044 and 0.049, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, only ESR values (OR=1,04; 95%CI 1,002-1,078), remained significantly associated with the presence of US inflammatory findings (Table 3). Table 3. Independent predictors of US detected inflammatory findings p Odds ratio 95% C.I. Lower Upper ESR (mm/h) 0.039 1.04 1.002 1.078 Time (months) from symptoms onset 0.1 0.924 0.841 1.015 Conclusion: PD US inflammatory findings are found in 1 over 3 patients with IA being PD synovitis the most common finding, specially at the wrists and MCP joints. Higher ESR values were significantly associated with the presence of US inflammatory findings. Our data highlights how the use of PD US may be useful to detect subclinical synovitis in patients with IA. Disclosure of Interests: Katerine López Gloria: None declared, Isabel Castrejon: None declared, Laura Trives Folguera Speakers bureau: ROCHE, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Belén Serrano Benavente: None declared, Julia Martínez-Barrio Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Javier Rivera: None declared, Carlos Gonzalez Consultant of: Gilead, Janssen, Novartis,, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Indalecio Monteagudo: None declared, Jose-Maria Alvaro-Gracia Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Elli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Janssen-Cilag, Elli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Tigenix, Roche, UCB, Paid instructor for: Elli-Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Janssen-Cilag, Elli-Lilly, Gedeon Richter, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Tigenix, Roche, UCB, Juan Molina Collada: None declared
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0003-4967 , 1468-2060
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: BMJ
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 1481557-6
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, BMJ, Vol. 79, No. Suppl 1 ( 2020-06), p. 1465.2-1465
    Kurzfassung: Metotrexate (MTX) is usually the first line therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) because of its favorable efficacy-toxicity ratio. However the exact mechanism and treatment response time in both a clinical and ultrasonographic setting are still uncertain. Objectives: To describe the clinical and ultrasound response to MTX during the first 6 months of treatment in early RA patients who started subcutaneous methotrexate as the first disease-modifying drug (DMARD). Methods: Ongoing prospective cohort of patients with early RA (ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria), over 18 years and starting MTX-SC. Patients had a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. We collected demographic data, C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] , rheumatoid factor [FR], anti-citrullinated protein antibody [ACPA] ), inflammatory activity indexes (DAS28esr and DAS28crp) and EULAR’s response to treatment (delta value of -1.2 in DAS28 scores). Joints explored with ultrasound were elbows and wrists (radio-carpal and inter-carpal joint) counted as a single joint, 1st-5th metacarpophalangeal (MCF), proximal interphalangeal (IFP), knees, tibio-talar and subtalar joints and 2nd-5th metatarsophalangeal (MTF) joints. Bone erosions were evaluated in 2nd and 5th MCF, styloid, distal ulna and 5th MTF. Synovitis was graduated semi-quantitatively from 0 to 3 (OMERACT) and calculated on B mode and Doppler. Results: 35 patients were included (mean age 61.2 years, 65.7% women) with a median of 0.8 (+/-8) months delay to diagnosis. 34 patients (97.1%) started 15mg MTX-SC/weekly. A higher DAS28esr was found in baseline data for the group that had a response by month 1 (DAS28esr baseline 5.5 vs 4.2 p=0.01), no other significant differences were found. During the first month, a significant response was achieved in 13 (41%) patients and remission in 11 (35%) (Table 1). 17 patients have 6 th month data. 11 (64.7%) have achieved EULAR response compared to baseline(P=0.0005) out of which 7 (54.5%) had already reached it by month 1. A difference in MTX dose (month1 14.8 vs month6 17.1 p=0.003) was found between month 1 and 6, with no differences in disease activity. In the ultrasonographic baseline data; 8 patients (22.9%) had erosions, with a mean of 2,75 erosions/patient (22 of the 280 locations). During the follow up the global rating lowered, with no differences in B mode but significant differences in Doppler at the 6 month mark (Table 2). As of this report, 10 patients (28.5%) had stopped MTX treatment due to lack on response or adverse effects and 8 (22.9%) are waiting 6 th month evaluation. Table 2. Ultrasound synovitis global rating. Baseline Month 1 P Value EULAR response 0 13 (41) 0.00005 MTX Dose mg (SD) 14.8 (+/-0.8) 14.8 (+/-1.6) 1 Prednisone Dose mg(SD) 5.9 (+/-6.5) 2.9 (+/-3) 0.02 DAS28crp (SD) 4.3 (+/-1.5) 3,4 (+/-1.4) 0.02 DAS28esr (SD) (4.8 (+/-1.5) 3.7 (+/-1.4) 0.006 Remission (DAS28 〈 1.2) 3(9.6) 11(35.5) 0.04 Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients with RA (n=102). Baseline N=35 1 month N=31 3 months N=25 6 months N=17 B Mode: Median (interquartile range) 8 (3.5-12) 8 (3-12.5) 6 (4-11) 5 (2-11) p 0,16 Doppler Mode : Median (interquartile range) 2 (0.5-6) 2 (0-6) 2 (0-6) 0 (0-2) p 0,005 Conclusion: In this cohort half of the patients that responded to treatment had achieved this by month 1. A higher baseline inflammatory profile was related to the response. Little difference is found between month 1 and 6 on clinical data, however ultrasonographic results suggest that at least 6 months are needed for Doppler improvement. Perhaps MTX has a faster effect over joint pain and lowers DAS28 scores requiring longer to completely suppress inflammatory activity. References: [1]Braun, J. et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008 Disclosure of Interests: Liz R. Caballero Motta: None declared, Ana Melissa Anzola Alfaro: None declared, Luis A Torrens Cid: None declared, Christian Y Soleto: None declared, Belén Serrano Benavente: None declared, Iustina Janta: None declared, Juan Molina Collada: None declared, Carlos Gonzalez Consultant of: Gilead, Janssen, Novartis,, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Indalecio Monteagudo: None declared, Jose Maria Alvaro Gracia: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0003-4967 , 1468-2060
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: BMJ
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 1481557-6
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...