GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Memedovic, Sonja  (4)
  • Mewton, Louise  (4)
Material
Publisher
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
FID
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research Vol. 37, No. s1 ( 2013-01)
    In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Wiley, Vol. 37, No. s1 ( 2013-01)
    Abstract: The use in hazardous situations criterion ( hazard ) is 1 of 4 criteria related to alcohol abuse in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV), and 1 of the 11 criteria related to the new alcohol use disorder ( AUD ) proposed for DSM ‐5. The current study aims to evaluate the hazard criterion in the context of both DSM ‐ IV alcohol abuse and DSM ‐5 AUD . Methods Data came from the 2007 A ustralian N ational S urvey of M ental H ealth and W ell‐ B eing ( n  = 8,841) as a stratified, multistage area probability sample of persons aged 16 to 85 years. Logistic regressions were used to: (i) compare the clinical characteristics of those with alcohol abuse including hazard and those with alcohol abuse because of other criteria; (ii) investigate the relationship between the hazard criterion and indices of socioeconomic status ( SES ); and (iii) investigate the effect of eliminating the hazard criterion on the epidemiology and correlates of the proposed DSM ‐5 AUD diagnosis. Results When compared with the other abuse subgroup, those with abuse including hazard (irrespective of other abuse criteria endorsed) were more likely to report another drug use disorder. The 2 abuse subgroups could not be differentiated by any other clinical characteristics. There were no systematic relationships between the hazard criterion and indices of SES . The elimination of the hazard criterion would lead to a considerable decrease in the prevalence of AUD , with those no longer receiving a diagnosis more likely to be young males with drug use disorders and suicidal behaviors. Conclusions The current study failed to replicate previous analyses that indicated problems with the hazard criterion when assessed in the U . S . population. Many of the problems identified in the hazard criterion appear to be due to operationalizations of this criterion that includes items specifically related to drink‐driving. The current results indicate that the elimination of the hazard criterion would lead to a considerable decline in the prevalence of DSM ‐5 AUD and risk excluding a potentially clinically significant subtype of AUD from future diagnosis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0145-6008 , 1530-0277
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2046886-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3167872-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2012
    In:  Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 46, No. 12 ( 2012-12), p. 1182-1192
    In: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, SAGE Publications, Vol. 46, No. 12 ( 2012-12), p. 1182-1192
    Abstract: To report nationally representative findings on the prevalence, correlates, psychiatric comorbidity and treatment of DSM-IV Cannabis Use and Cannabis Use Disorders in Australia. Method: The 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing was a nationally representative household survey of 8841 Australians (16–85 years) that assessed symptoms of the most prevalent DSM-IV mental disorders. Results: Prevalence of lifetime and 12-month cannabis use was 18% and 6%; prevalence of lifetime and 12-month cannabis use disorder was 6% and 1%. The conditional prevalence (proportion of ever users who met criteria for a disorder) of lifetime and 12-month cannabis use disorder was 32.2% and 14.3%. Current cannabis use disorders were more common in males (OR 2.0) and younger users (OR 4.6). Strong associations were observed between current cannabis use disorders and alcohol use disorders (OR 3.6) and current affective disorders (OR 3.0). Only 36.2% of those with current cannabis use disorders sought any treatment. Conclusions: The prevalence of cannabis use disorders in the Australian population is comparable with that in the USA. Current cannabis use disorders are highly concentrated in young Australians who have high levels of comorbidity. The low rates of treatment seeking warrant attention in treatment and prevention strategies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0004-8674 , 1440-1614
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003849-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research Vol. 37, No. 6 ( 2013-06), p. 1001-1007
    In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Wiley, Vol. 37, No. 6 ( 2013-06), p. 1001-1007
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0145-6008
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2046886-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3167872-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2014
    In:  International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Vol. 23, No. 3 ( 2014-09), p. 359-371
    In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Wiley, Vol. 23, No. 3 ( 2014-09), p. 359-371
    Abstract: This study aims to identify problems in the structure and wording of questions designed to operationalize four DSM‐IV diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorders (AUDs): (1) use of alcohol in hazardous situations ( hazard ); (2) tolerance ; (3) use of alcohol in larger amounts/longer periods than intended ( larger/longer ); (4) unsuccessful attempts to cut down or control alcohol use ( quit/cut down ). Ten experts appraised the questions related to these criteria in the WMH‐CIDI according to a standardized checklist. These experts identified three main problems: (1) the double‐barrelled nature of some of the questions; (2) definitional issues; and (3) unclear thresholds for criterion endorsement. Cognitive interviews of 100 young adult drinkers aged 18–24 were then conducted. The double‐barrelled nature of the DSM‐IV criteria led to their subsequent over‐ or under‐endorsement. Key terms in the questions under investigation were defined inconsistently. There was also a large amount of variability in the thresholds at which larger/longer and quit/cut down were endorsed. Many of these problems could be linked back to the DSM‐IV text. The findings raise questions as to the validity of AUD diagnoses when established via structured diagnostic interview. Further research should focus on testing alternative structure and wording of key AUD criteria to ensure accurate operationalizations of these criteria in structured diagnostic interviews. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1049-8931 , 1557-0657
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2135760-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...