GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Mellert, Kendra  (4)
  • Uberti, Joseph P.  (4)
  • 1
    In: American Journal of Hematology, Wiley, Vol. 91, No. 9 ( 2016-09)
    Abstract: Pleural effusion is a known entity in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, the incidence, risk factors, and morbidity−mortality outcomes associated with pleural effusions remain unknown. We retrospectively evaluated pleural effusions in 618 consecutive adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT from January 2008 to December 2013 at our institution. Seventy one patients developed pleural effusion at a median of 40 days (range, 1 − 869) post‐HSCT with the cumulative incidence of 9.9% (95% CI, 7.7 − 12.5%) at 1 year. Infectious etiology was commonly associated with pleural effusions followed by volume overload and serositis type chronic GVHD. In multivariate analysis, higher comorbidity index ( P  = 0.03) and active GVHD ( P  = 0.018) were found to be significant independent predictors for pleural effusion development. Higher comorbidity index, very high disease risk index, ≤7/8 HLA matching, and unrelated donor were associated with inferior overall survival (OS) ( P 〈 0.03). More importantly, patients with pleural effusion were noted to have poor OS in comparison to patients without pleural effusion ( P   〈  0.001). Overall, pleural effusion is a frequently occurring complication after allogeneic HSCT, adding to morbidity and mortality and hence, early identification is required. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E341–E347, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0361-8609 , 1096-8652
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1492749-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 5442-5442
    Abstract: Introduction: Pleural effusions are common clinical finding in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It can be a manifestation of underlying lung injury or a part of a systemic process. This study will investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes associated with pleural effusion in allogeneic HSCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 618 consecutive adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT for hematological disorders, between January 2008 and December 2013. Results: The baseline characteristics of the groups with and without pleural effusions are shown in table 1. The only significant difference was GVHD prophylaxis (p =0.002). A total 71 patients developed pleural effusions with the cumulative incidence of 12.6 % (95% CI, 10.0% to 15.6%) in five years. The median time of onset of pleural effusion from HSCT was 40 days (range, 1, 869). The onset of pleural effusion had a bimodal distribution with the first peak at 23 days (range 17, 29) and second peak at 362 days (range 277, 450). Based on chest CT criteria, the effusions were judged as large, moderate and small in size in 15%, 51% and 34% of patients respectively. Twenty five (35%) patients with pleural effusions underwent thoracentesis for respiratory difficulty and had a median of 800cc (range, 250 to 13500cc) of pleural fluid removed. Fourteen patients (56%) had exudative and 9 (36%) had transudative pleural effusions. Pleurx catheter was placed in 2 (3%), and chest tube in 3 (4%) patients. Causes of effusion listed in order of frequency are infection (38%), volume overload (23%), chronic GVHD (20%), heart failure (6%), engraftment syndrome (4%), veno-occlusive disease (4%), malignant pleural effusion (3%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (1%) and iatrogenic (1%). Time of onset is different among various etiologies (p=0.006). Although thoracentesis was performed in 25 patients, the specific etiology by pleural fluid analysis was identified in only 2 patients. Pleural effusion secondary to infections, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and engraftment syndrome occurred in the first 100 days after transplant, whereas pleural effusion due to chronic GVHD/polyserositis, bronchiolitis obliterans occurred 200 days after transplant.Fifty seven patients (80%) with pleural effusions had evidence of GVHD however; fourteen (20%) patients with pleural effusion had no evidence of acute or chronic GVHD. Twenty three (32%) patients had both pleural effusion and ascites, 27 (38%) had both pleural and pericardial effusion and 29 patients had pleural effusion alone. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed age, African American race, higher comorbidity index, unrelated donor, HLA-match 7/8, intermediate to high risk disease to be associated with worse survival among patients who developed pleural effusion after HSCT. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with or without pleural effusion (p=0.257). Conclusion: Majority of the patients who developed pleural effusions responded well with the treatment of the underlying disease. Although thoracentesis was often done for therapeutic reasons, it was a weak diagnostic tool. We did not identify any adverse impact of development of post HSCT pleural effusions on overall survival. Table 1. Characteristics Pleural Effusion (N=71) No Pleural Effusion (N=547) Signif Age - Median (range) year 55(25,73) 58(22,78) 0.514 Sex - no. (%) 0.522 Male/Female 43(61)/28(39) 305(56)/242(44) Diagnosis - no. (%) 0.490 AML 25(35) 213 (39) ALL 9(13) 53 (10) CLL 4(6) 27 (5) CML 2 (3) 16 (3) NHL 13 (18) 94 (17) Multiple Myeloma 3 (4) 16 (3) MDS 9 (13) 74 (14) Myelofibrosis 1 (1) 18 (3) Hodgkin's Lymphoma 1 (1) 8 (1) PLL 4 (6) 7 (1) Aplastic Anemia 0 (0) 17 (3) CMML 0 (0) 4 (1) Comorbidity-Median (range) 3 (0,8) 3 (0,9) 0.055 Disease risk status - no. (%) 0.389 Low 4 (6) 48 (9) Intermediate 32 (45) 284 (52) High 31 (44) 193 (35) Very High 4 (6) 22 (4) HLA - no. (%) 0.566 8/8 56 (79) 413 (76) 7/8 12 (17) 117 (21) 〈 7/8 3 (4) 17 (3) Donor - no. (%) 〉 0.99 Matched related 25 (35) 197 (36) Matched unrelated 46 (65) 350 (64) Conditioning regimen - no. (%) 0.761 Full intensity 45 (63) 361 (66) Reduced intensity 26 (37) 186 (34) GVHD prophylaxis - no. (%) 0.002 Mycophenolate-Tacrolimus 41 (58) 328 (60) Mycophenolate-Tacrolimus-Thymoglobulin 26 (37) 131 (24) Tacrolimus- Thymoglobulin 3 (4) 17 (3) Thymoglobulin-Tacrolimus-Sirolimus 0 (0) 64 (12) Others 0 (0) 5 (1) Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Deol: Bristol meyer squibb: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 25, No. 8 ( 2017-8), p. 2593-2601
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0941-4355 , 1433-7339
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1463166-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 3501-3501
    Abstract: Introduction: Patients with AML and MDS who are age 60 or above represent a discrete group of patients with a different disease biology compared to younger patients. These patients are often not offered allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) as a curative intent because of concern of increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and poor overall survival (OS). Hence, the information on transplant outcomes among this population is very limited. Recently with the use of better supportive care measures and reduced intensity preparative regimens, patients greater than 60 are often recommended to proceed to transplant. This study evaluates our single center experience of allogeneic transplantation in patients with MDS and AML aged 60 and older. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 60 years or older consecutive patients with AML and MDS who underwent allogeneic HSCT between January 2005 and December 2014. The primary objectives of our study were to determine NRM, relapse, relapse free survival (RFS) and OS at 1 year following transplant. The secondary objectives were to estimate cumulative incidence of acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 1 year, length of stay and readmission rate in the first 100 days following transplant. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2014, 159 patients underwent allogeneic HSCT with the median age of 64 (range, 60-75) years and median follow-up duration for OS of 3.34 (95% CI, 2.51-3.87) years. Increasing number of patients were transplanted in recent years, i.e., 67% patients between 2010-2014 compared to 33% between 2005-2009. One hundred three patients (65%) had AML and 56 patients (35%) had MDS. Forty-nine patients (31%) received full intensity regimen and 110 patients (69%) received reduced intensity regimen. Fifty-two patients (33%) underwent allogeneic related transplant and 107 patients (67%) had allogeneic unrelated transplant. Thymoglobulin based GVHD prophylaxis was given in 77 patients (48%) whereas non-thymoglobulin based GVHD prophylaxis was given in 82 patients (52%). The median day to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 (range, 7-22) days and 16 (range, 0-675) days, respectively. Graft failure occurred in 3 patients. At 1-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 39.7% (95% CI, 32.0-47.2%), grade III-IV aGVHD was 20.8% (95% CI, 14.9-27.5%) and cGVHD was 54.1% (95% CI, 46.0-61.5%). The cumulative incidence of chronic extensive GVHD was 39.8% (95% CI, 32.1-47.4%). Blood stream infection, cytomegalovirus reactivation, Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, C. difficile diarrhea occurred in 44%, 35%, 22% and 26% of patients, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, NRM was 25.3% (95% CI, 18.8-32.3%), RFS was 53.3% (95% CI, 46.1-61.7%), relapse rate was 21.4% (95% CI, 15.4-28.1%) and OS was 56.4% (95% CI, 49.2-54.7%). The median day of hospitalization following transplant was 26 (range, 19-112) days and almost half (52%) of patients were readmitted in the first 100 days following transplant. Leukemia recurrence was the most common cause of death. Multivariable analysis demonstrated high disease risk index to be the independent predictor of poor RFS, OS and higher relapse rate (p 〈 0.03), whereas non-thymoglobulin based GVHD prophylaxis, higher comorbidity index (≥3) and MDS were found to be associated with higher NRM (p 〈 0.03). Most importantly, age did not shown to have any effect on relapse rate, OS, RFS, or NRM. Conclusion: Our results indicate that allogeneic HSCT is well tolerated and had acceptable NRM, and OS among this group. Hence, older age alone should not be considered a contraindication to HSCT. Figure 1 Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) estimates. The median OS is 1.60 years (95% CI, 0.94 to 5.00 years) and the median RFS is 1.15 years (95% CI, 0.63 to 3.07 years). The median follow-up time of OS and RFS are 3.34 years (95% CI, 2.51 to 3.87 years) and 3.25 years (95% CI, 2.51 to 3.87 years), respectively. Figure 1. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) estimates. The median OS is 1.60 years (95% CI, 0.94 to 5.00 years) and the median RFS is 1.15 years (95% CI, 0.63 to 3.07 years). The median follow-up time of OS and RFS are 3.34 years (95% CI, 2.51 to 3.87 years) and 3.25 years (95% CI, 2.51 to 3.87 years), respectively. Figure 2 Cumulative incidences of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse and non-relapse mortality after transplantation. Figure 2. Cumulative incidences of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse and non-relapse mortality after transplantation. Disclosures Deol: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...