GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 15, No. 11 ( 2014-10), p. 1269-1278
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. PD2-4-PD2-4
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: The open-label randomized phase III TANIA trial demonstrated statistically significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) with the addition of BEV to 2nd-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with HER2-negative LR/mBC progressing after 1st-line BEV-containing therapy. We describe efficacy in clinically relevant subgroups to assess consistency of the BEV treatment effect. METHODS: Pts whose HER2-negative LR/mBC had progressed during/after 1st-line BEV–CT were randomized 1:1 to investigator’s chosen 2nd-line single-agent CT given either alone or with BEV (15 mg/kg q3w or 10 mg/kg q2w). 2nd-line therapy was continued until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. At PD, BEV was continued with 3rd-line CT (investigator’s choice) in pts initially randomized to BEV–CT but was not permitted in pts randomized to CT alone. The primary endpoint was PFS from randomization to 2nd-line PD/death. Sample size was calculated based on a log-rank test assuming median PFS of 7→9.3 mo with a corresponding hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75. PFS events were required in 384 of 488 pts for 80% power at 2-sided α=0.05. Subgroup analyses of the primary endpoint were prespecified and included subgroups defined by stratification factors. RESULTS: From Jan 2011 to Apr 2013, 494 pts were enrolled. The data cut-off for the primary analysis was Dec 20, 2013 (median follow-up: CT 15.9 mo; BEV–CT 16.1 mo). The PFS benefit seen in the overall population was observed consistently in most subgroups. SubgroupPts with PFS events/Total No. of pts (%)Median 2nd-line PFS, moUnstratified HR (95% CI)CTBEV–CTCTBEV–CTAll203/247 (82)204/247 (83)4.26.30.75 (0.61-0.93)aHormone receptor statusbTriple negative56/60 (93)45/56 (80)2.14.90.59 (0.40-0.88)Positive, HER2 negative147/187 (79)159/191 (83)4.76.70.84 (0.67-1.05)1st-line PFS, mob & lt;661/69 (88)54/68 (79)3.95.10.62 (0.43-0.90)≥6142/178 (80)150/179 (84)4.66.40.82 (0.65-1.03)LDHb≤1.5×ULN167/207 (81)168/210 (80)4.46.30.77 (0.62-0.96) & gt;1.5×ULN36/40 (90)36/37 (97)2.15.80.73 (0.46-1.16)CT choicebTaxane25/32 (78)26/32 (81)3.26.90.55 (0.31-0.98)Non-taxane non-vinorelbine156/191 (82)151/188 (80)4.46.00.84 (0.68-1.06)Vinorelbine22/24 (92)27/27 (100)2.46.50.41 (0.22-0.75)CT choice (not stratified)Capecitabine117/146 (80)125/151 (83)4.96.20.92 (0.72-1.19)Non-capecitabine86/101 (85)79/96 (82)3.26.50.55 (0.40-0.75)BEV-free interval, wk≤6138/165 (84)130/149 (87)4.25.80.82 (0.64-1.04) & gt;665/81 (80)74/98 (76)4.47.60.72 (0.51-1.00)aStratified.bStratification factor. CONCLUSIONS: PFS was statistically significantly improved with the addition of BEV to 2nd-line CT in BEV-pretreated pts, meeting the primary objective of TANIA. This effect was seen consistently within subgroups based on stratification factors. Within the limitations of exploratory subgroup analyses with small sample sizes, further subgroup analyses may suggest some potential inconsistencies in treatment effect. These hypothesis-generating observations require further exploration of potential differences in disease and pt characteristics in TANIA, which may have influenced physicians’ CT choice. Citation Format: Fabio Puglisi, Javier Cortes, Eduard Vrdoljak, Joseph Gligorov, Norbert Marschner, Christoph Zielinski, Michele de Laurentiis, Etienne Brain, Christelle Lévy, Anja Welt, Zsuzsanna Kahan, Moshe Inbar, Sabine de Ducla, Ulrich Freudensprung, Gunter von Minckwitz. Subgroup efficacy analyses of the randomized phase III TANIA trial evaluating continued or reintroduced bevacizumab (BEV) after 1st-line BEV for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-4.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. P3-06-08-P3-06-08
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: A potential predictive and prognostic effect of pretreatment pVEGF-A concentrations was suggested in exploratory analyses of phase III trials in HER2-negative mBC (AVADO), gastric cancer (AVAGAST), and pancreatic cancer (AViTA). This led to initiation of the MERiDiAN trial evaluating pVEGF-A prospectively in patients (pts) receiving 1st-line paclitaxel ± BEV in HER2-negative mBC. Potential predictive value was also noted for pVEGFR-2 in AVADO, AViTA, and in early BC in BEATRICE. We report prespecified pVEGF-A and pVEGFR-2 analyses in TANIA. METHODS: TANIA is an open-label randomized phase III trial evaluating the addition of BEV (15 mg/kg q3w or 10 mg/kg q2w) to the investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (CT) in pts with HER2-negative mBC who experience disease progression (PD) on/after 1st-line BEV-containing therapy. Allocation to BEV or no BEV is continued with 3rd-line therapy after 2nd PD (ie no crossover permitted). The primary endpoint is PFS from randomization to 2nd-line PD/death. Pts consenting to the optional biomarker substudy provided 6 mL plasma samples in EDTA before drug administration at randomization, at wks 7 and 13, every 12 wks thereafter, and at 2nd PD. pVEGF-A and shedded pVEGFR-2 were measured using the IMPACT assay (v2.03). The median concentration for each marker before 2nd-line treatment was prespecified as the cut-off between low (≤ median) and high ( & gt; median) biomarker subgroups. 2nd-line PFS was analyzed in each subgroup. RESULTS: The PFS benefit from BEV seen in the ITT population (N=494; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.93) was observed consistently within subgroups of the biomarker population (N=312). However, there was no differential BEV effect according to pVEGF-A or shedded pVEGFR-2 concentrations. The stratified HR for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI 0.46–1.04) in pts with low pVEGF-A (≤1010.6 pg/mL [median] ) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.54–1.18) in pts with high pVEGF-A (interaction p=0.47). As all pts had received prior BEV, unlike earlier trials showing a potential predictive effect of pVEGF-A, we explored pVEGF-A concentrations according to BEV-free interval. The BEV-free interval was ≤12 wks in 117/150 pts (78%) in the CT arm and 136/162 pts (84%) in the BEV+CT arm. Median pVEGF-A was much lower in the subgroup of 59 pts with a BEV-free interval & gt;12 wks (45.1 pg/mL) than in pts with a BEV-free interval ≤12 wks (1135.3 pg/mL). Analyses of 2nd-line PFS according to shedded pVEGFR-2 concentration showed stratified PFS HRs of 0.68 (95% CI 0.45–1.02) for low pVEGFR-2 (≤9.6 ng/mL [median]) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.60–1.34) for high pVEGFR-2 (interaction p=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The potential predictive effect of pVEGF-A in AVADO was not observed in TANIA, although high pVEGF-A concentrations in pts recently treated with BEV complicate interpretation. pVEGF-A is being evaluated prospectively in BEV-naïve pts in the ongoing MERiDiAN trial. Shedded pVEGFR-2 showed no predictive effect in TANIA and the suggested trend was in the opposite direction to the effect seen in AVADO and BEATRICE. Further analyses are planned to evaluate the impact of gene expression, cell-free DNA, protein expression, and DNA mutations on treatment effect in TANIA. Citation Format: Javier Cortes, Eduard Vrdoljak, Fabio Puglisi, Norbert Marschner, Joseph Gligorov, Christoph Zielinski, Cristian Villanueva, Gilles Romieu, István Lang, Eva Ciruelos, Corinne Veyret, Andrea Fontana, Mikkel Oestergaard, Sabine de Ducla, Ulrich Freudensprung, Gunter von Minckwitz. Plasma (p) biomarker results from the TANIA trial evaluating continued or reintroduced bevacizumab (BEV) after 1st-line BEV for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...