GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e19528-e19528
    Abstract: e19528 Background: Despite using cytogenetic and molecular-risk stratification and precision medicine, the current overall outcome of MDS patients remains relatively poor. Therapy selection is often based on information considering only cytogenetics and single molecular aberrations and ignoring other patient-specific omics data that could potentially enable more effective treatments. The Cellworks Singula™ report predicts response for physician prescribed therapies (PPT) using the novel Cellworks Omics Biology Model (CBM) to simulate downstream molecular effects of cell signaling, drugs, and radiation on patient-specific in silico diseased cells. We test the hypothesis that Singula is a more accurate predictor of patient-specific therapy response than PPT. Methods: Singula’s ability to predict response was evaluated in an independent, randomly selected, retrospective cohort of 146 MDS patients aged 28 to 89 years (median 69) treated with PPT. Patient omics data was available from PubMed and TCGA. The accuracy of Singula was compared to that of PPT using McNemar’s test to account for the correlation between Singula and PPT. Multivariate logistic regression modeled complete response (CR) as a function of patient age, PPT, and Singula against any non-response (NR). Likelihood ratio tests were performed to further validate if Singula provides predictive information beyond PPT or patient age. Similar analyses were performed for overall survival (OS) using proportional hazards regression. Results: Singula was a better predictor for CR than PPT (McNemar’s χ 2 = 42.0, p-value 〈 0.0001), with an overall accuracy of 73.3% (Exact 95% CI: 65.3%, 80.2%) compared to 37.7% (95% CI: 30.0%, 46.1%) for PPT. Singula exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI: 80.0%, 97.0%) and 62.6% (95% CI: 51.8%, 72.6%), respectively. In multivariate regression analysis, Singula (p 〈 0.0001) remained an independent predictor for CR after adjusting for patient age (p = 0.0759) and PPT (p = 0.0496). Singula provided alternative therapy selections for 17 of 53 true negative detected by Cellworks. Conclusions: Singula is a superior independent predictor for CR compared to PPT in MDS patients. The Singula report can also validate therapy selection, correctly identify non-responders to PPT and further provide alternative therapy selections.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 735-735
    Abstract: Background: Current hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) regimens for patients with relapsed refractory acute leukemia have 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) of 19% and 16% respectively. Previous studies demonstrated that intensification of total body irradiation (TBI) is not possible due to excessive regimen-related toxicity. Because image-guided targeted radiation therapy (e.g., total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI)) allows for the precise delivery of radiation through the sculpting of radiation to areas of high risk and disease burden, intensification of radiation dose to target structures as part of a HCT preparative may be possible without increased radiation-related toxicities or non-relapse mortality. Herein we report the results of a phase I trial that combines TMLI (1200-2000 cGy) with fixed doses of etoposide (VP16) and cyclophosphamide (CY); the primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose of TMLI. Methods: TMLI together with VP16 and CY before allogeneic HCT was assessed for patients with relapsed/refractory AML and ALL. TMLI was administered on days -10 to -6, VP16 60 mg/kg (adj bw) on day -5, and CY 100 mg/kg (ideal bw) on day -3. The initial radiation dose was 1200 cGy, delivered in 150 cGy fractions twice daily. The radiation dose was escalated in increments of 150 cGy, up to 1500 cGy, by use of a standard 3x3 design. At this point, the dose was raised in 100 cGy increments to a 2000 cGy maximum with a rolling 6 design. Bone marrow (n=3) or peripheral blood stem cells (n=48) were given on day 0. Tacrolimus and sirolimus were administered for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined according to the Bearman and CTCAE 3.0 scales, the latter for hematologic toxicity. The radiation dose delivered to the liver and brain was kept at 1200 cGy. Median normal organs received 16-60% of the dose (oral cavity 28%, lung 44%, esophagus 33%). Results: From 3/14/2008 to 1/30/2014, 51 patients underwent transplantation on this trial. (See table.) Our phase I trial/safety studies found the TMLI/CY/VP16 conditioning regimen to be well tolerated at TMLI doses up to 2000 cGy; 1-year estimates of non-relapse mortality and overall survival were 8.3% (95% CI: 2.6-18.4) and 54.4% (95% CI: 39.3-67.3) respectively (median follow-up: 23.5 months).Relapsed, progressed, or persistent disease after transplant occurred in 33 patients (bone marrow, 26; extramedullary disease, 6; concurrent bone marrow/extramedullary, 1). Of the 18 patients who were treated with a dose of 1700 cGy or higher, 17 achieved a complete remission at the day +30 evaluation. No radiological-based maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. We determined that the median organ dose at 2000 cGy would be lower than that seen for total body irradiation (TBI), but a higher dose may result in reaching or exceeding TBI organ dose levels. We therefore stopped at 2000 cGy, above which non-targeted organs may no longer be protected. Acute GVHD (aGVHD) developed in 28 (55%) of patients; of those 7 (14%) developed grades 3-4. The most common toxicities across the tested dose levels were grade 1 GI toxicity and grade 2 stomatitis. One patient (treated at 1500cGy) developed grade 3 stomatitis. No additional DLTs were experienced across all dose levels. Conclusion: A dose of 2000 cGy targeted to lymph nodes and marrow in combination with CY and VP16 can be safely administered in the context of related and unrelated HCT, using tacrolimus and sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. We did not see increased incidence of aGVHD, and the day +100 NRM rate was 〈 5%. A phase II trial is currently being conducted. Table. Patient characteristics Variable Median (range) or N Age at transplant (yrs) 34 (16-57) Disease diagnosis AML ALL Ph- ALL Ph+ biphenotypic undifferentiated 3313221 Disease status at HSCT 1 RL 2 RL IF 14334 Cytogenetic risk (SWOG criteria) favorable intermediate unfavorable unknown significance 122199 KPS at HSCT 80 (60-100) Donor source sibling HLA matched unrelated mismatched (1 allele) unrelated 25521 WBC at HSCT 1.4 (0.1-14.9) % Blasts in blood at transplant* 4 (0-93) % Blasts in marrow at transplant* 52 (8-98) Extramedullary disease at time of HSCT 11 *Excludes patients with solely extramedullary disease, n=4 Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Snyder:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forman:Mustang: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e19502-e19502
    Abstract: e19502 Background: Despite using cytogenetic and molecular-risk stratification and precision medicine, the current overall outcome of AML patients remains relatively poor. Therapy selection is often based on information considering only cytogenetics and single molecular aberrations and ignoring other patient-specific omics data that could potentially enable more effective treatments. The Cellworks Singula™ report predicts response for physician prescribed therapies (PPT) using the novel Cellworks Omics Biology Model (CBM) to simulate downstream molecular effects of cell signaling, drugs, and radiation on patient-specific in silico diseased cells. We test the hypothesis that Singula is a more accurate predictor of patient-specific therapy response than PPT. Methods: Singula’s ability to predict response was evaluated in an independent, randomly selected, retrospective cohort of 494 AML patients aged 2 to 85 years (median 54) treated with PPT. Patient omics data was available from PubMed. The accuracy of Singula was compared to that of PPT using McNemar’s test to account for the correlation between Singula and PPT. Multivariate logistic regression modeled complete response (CR) as a function of patient age, PPT, and Singula against any non-response (NR). Likelihood ratio tests were performed to further validate if Singula provides predictive information beyond PPT or patient age. Similar analyses were performed for overall survival (OS) using proportional hazards regression. Results: Singula was a better predictor for CR than PPT (McNemar’s χ 2 = 72.0, p-value 〈 0.0001), with an overall accuracy of 88.5% (95% CI: 85.3%, 91.1%) compared to 70.2% (95% CI: 66.0%, 74.2%) for PPT. Singula exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 97.1% and 68.0%, respectively. In multivariate regression analysis, Singula (p 〈 0.0001) remained an independent predictor for CR after adjusting for patient age (p = 0.0329) while PPT became not significant (p = 0.75). Singula was also an independent predictor for OS (p 〈 0.0001) after adjusting for patient age (p = 0.0018) and PPT (p = 0.0011). For all 100 true negatives, Singula generated alternative standard of care therapy selections with predicted clinical response. Conclusions: Singula is a superior independent predictor for CR and OS compared to PPT in AML patients. The Singula report can also validate therapy selection, correctly identify non-responders to PPT and further provide alternative therapy selections.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 7059-7059
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...