GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
  • Makiyama, Akitaka  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 3540-3540
    Abstract: 3540 Background: It is unclear which drug of REG or TAS-102 should be used earlier for the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have access to both drugs. This study investigated the comparison of the efficacy between REG and TAS-102 in patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: The clinical data of patients who were treated with REG or TAS-102 among these drugs naive mCRC patients between Jun 2014 and Sep 2015 were retrospectively delivered from 24 institutions of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Propensity score (PS) was calculated with a logistic regression, in which using baseline parameters were included. Two methods, adjusted and matched analysis, to take propensity score were used. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models based on PS adjustment and matching. Results: Total of 589 patients were enrolled and 550 patients (223 patients in the REG group and 327 patients in the TAS-102 group) met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The results from PS adjusted analyses showed that OS was similar between the two groups (HR of TAS-102 to REG, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.18). There were also no statistically significant differences between two groups for progression-free survival (HR 0.94) and time to ECOG Performance status≥2 (HR 1.00), expect for time to treatment failure (HR 0.81; P = 0.025). In the subgroup analysis, REG showed favorable survival compared with TAS-102 in the age of 〈 65 years patients and unfavorable survival in ≥65 years patients (P for interaction = 0.012). In the PS matched sample (174 patients in each group), the clinical outcomes were similar to the results of the PS adjusted analysis. Conclusions: Although REG and TAS-102 showed a similar efficacy in mCRC patients with refractory to standard chemotherapies, the choice of the drug by age might affect the survival. Supported by JSCCR. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020416
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 3560-3560
    Abstract: 3560 Background: Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) have been recognized as standard treatments for patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because these drugs have limits on efficacy benefit for some pts, we are necessary to select pts who may be better not to receive REG or FTD/TPI. However, no reports are available on how to predict pts with early mortality after initiation of these drugs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated pts with mCRC who were registered in a multicenter observational study (the REGOTAS study). The main inclusion criteria were ECOG PS of 0–2, refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapy (if KRAS wild type), and no prior use of REG or FTD/TPI. Predictive factors for early mortality (≤ 12 weeks from initiation of REG or FTD/TPI) were evaluated by multivariate analysis for survival with all variables with P values of 〈 0.05 from the univariate analysis, using the Cox proportional hazards model. In this analysis, the pts who lived at first 15 weeks were defined as censored case. Results: A total of 523 pts (REG, 212; FTD/TPI, 311) were eligible. Predictive factors for early mortality were without primary tumor resection [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.56; p = 0.02], the low level of albumin (aHR, 2.31; p 〈 0.0001), the high level of CRP (aHR, 2.31; p 〈 0.0001), and short time from diagnosis of mCRC (aHR, 1.77; p = 0.002) by multivariate analysis. The pts harboring all these poor factors were classified into the high (H) risk of early mortality group. Two groups of pts with H and non-H were identified, with 12-week mortality rate of 39 and 14%, with 14-week mortality rate of 70 and 18%, and with median survival time (MST) of 2.9 and 7.8 months, respectively (HR of H/non-H, 4.02; p value 〈 0.0001). In pts treated with REG, H and non-H groups had 12-week mortality rate of 38 and 16%, 14-week mortality rate of 79 and 18%, and MST of 2.8 and 7.8 months, respectively. In pts treated with FTD/TPI, H and non-H groups had 12-week mortality rate of 41 and 13%, 14-week mortality rate of 63 and 18%, and MST of 3.2 and 7.7 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our predictive model for early mortality after initiation of REG or FTD/TPI might be useful for selecting pts who should not receive either these drugs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...