GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 47, No. 1 ( 2024-01), p. 41-50
    Abstract: This article reports a study aimed at developing and validating an evidence-based, shift-to-shift handover bundle for nurses and physicians to be used at shift changes in intensive care and emergency units. Deficient or absent clinical handovers, or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability can have unwanted consequences for hospitalized patients, particularly those at critical areas. Clinical handovers are practiced every day, in many ways, in all institutional health care settings. Despite increasing demand for structured processes to guide clinical handovers, standardized handover bundles for nurses and physicians are limited in the emergency and intensive care unit. As a result of this study, a shift-to-shift handover bundle was created, which was an evidence-based research design. This bundle is expected to be helpful for proper patient transfers between these critical areas, ensuring patient safety and efficient quality management.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0887-9303
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2053402-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2023
    In:  Nursing in Critical Care Vol. 28, No. 3 ( 2023-05), p. 404-410
    In: Nursing in Critical Care, Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 3 ( 2023-05), p. 404-410
    Abstract: Patients in intensive care units require comprehensive care. Hence, improving health care quality depends on accurate assessment and documentation. Aim To develop and validate the content of an assessment sheet for critically ill patients. Study Design and Methods A Delphi design study was conducted between January and March 2020. The content validity index (CVI) was used to calculate the degree of agreement among the experts to analyse the instrument and the entire set of items. Content validity was determined by seven experts (three critical care nursing professionals, two critical care doctors, and two anaesthesiologists) using a four‐point Likert scale. They evaluated the items in terms of the following: 1 = “irrelevant,” 2 = “somewhat relevant if the phrasing is profoundly adjusted,” 3 = “relevant with some adjustment as to phrasing,” and 4 = “very relevant.” The CVI was applied, and the accepted value was ≥0.50. Results Three rounds of evaluation were required to achieve the minimum index. The items were reviewed for content and face validity. The instrument was validated with 86 items with a total CVI of 0.90, a face validity of 1, and a scale‐level content validity index/universal agreement calculation method (S‐CVI/UA) value of 0.813. Conclusion This instrument can help nurses, doctors, academics, and students assess patients in intensive care units. Relevance to Clinical Practice The daily assessment tool may provide a systematic and consistent approach to critically ill patients' assessment to guide interventions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1362-1017 , 1478-5153
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106066-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 47, No. 1 ( 2024-01), p. 29-40
    Abstract: This article reports a prospective, comparative study using a semistructured interview technique, to compare the perceptions of nursing professionals and physicians about the bedside handover practice, in intensive care units (ICUs). Clinical handovers are practiced every day, in many ways, in all institutional health care settings. Despite increasing demand for structured processes to guide clinical handovers, the perception may differ between nurses and physicians, particularly in the ICU. The results of the current study showed that the quality of the information provided during handovers was perceived by both the nurses and physicians as satisfactory and relevant to the patient's care. The findings of this study could have impacts on the daily medical practices in the ICU. The results of this study could be utilized to design programs that will improve nurses' and physicians' understanding and practices of the handover process as well as the information needed to be communicated.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0887-9303
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2053402-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...