In:
Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e18086-e18086
Abstract:
e18086 Background: The increasing adoption of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in molecular profiling of cancer presents a growing need for streamlined interpretation of NGS results in clinical labs. This can be achieved through bioinformatics tools equipped with a highly-curated database on clinically important variants. Methods: We performed an initial assessment of an NGS result interpretation tool called NAVIFY Mutation Profiler (NMP), which enabled us to process a Variant Call Format (VCF) file and generate a report with consensus recommendations of NCCN, ASCO, CAP and ACMG. This annotation tool identifies pathogenic variants and variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS), and groups variants by AMP Tiers. At the time of this assessment, NMP contained curation for ~4,000 variants. In this study, we used NGS results from 38 anonymized clinical cases with known treatment regimens to retrospectively assess NMP as the variant interpretation tool. Our cohort contained lung cancer subjects treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (5 cases), as well as subjects relapsed against EGFR TKI (1 case) or ALK TKI crizotinib (22 cases). We also included 10 control cases where standard of care chemo was used because initial diagnostic methods did not reveal any actionable targets. Results: NMP annotated NGS VCF data and generated a report within 10 minutes per case although some cases contained 〉 100 variants. NMP correctly associated EGFR TKI therapies options with the corresponding 5 cases. As expected, NMP did not recommend targeted therapies for the 10 chemo-treated control cases. For the subject relapsed against EGFR TKI, NMP correctly interpreted the complex EGFR mutation profile containing both activating (L858R) and drug-resistance (T790M) variants. In addition, out of 22 cases relapsed against ALK TKI crizotinib, NMP correctly marked 14 with crizotinib resistance when a known ALK variant conferring crizotinib resistance was detected. There was limited or no published clinical evidence to interpret the remaining 8 cases of ALK TKI resistance. Conclusions: NMP correctly interpreted cases containing EGFR and ALK variants in this study. With a highly-curated knowledge base, this tool simplifies NGS clinical reporting by identifying clinically actionable mutations and associating treatment options qualified by supporting clinical evidence.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0732-183X
,
1527-7755
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e18086
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2005181-5
Permalink
